It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
► | ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄
▄█▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▀█▄ ▄█▀ ▄█▀▀ ▀ █▀█▄ ▀█▄ ▄▀ ▄████ █ ████▄ ▀▄ ▄█ ███████ █ ███████ █▄ █ ▄█████▀ ▄ ▄ ▀█████▄ █ █ █████ ▀█▀▀▄ █████ █ █ ▀███▌ █▀▀▀█ ▐███▀ █ ▀█ ███ ▄█▄▄▄▀ ███ █▀ ▀▄ ▀█▄ ▀ ▀ ▄█▀ ▄▀ ▀█▄ ▀███████████▀ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ▄█▀ ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀
I see a dozen chaps applying for the campaign with a few who are ofcourse just trying to be sarcastic.
Don't you think DT members should tag the other culprits for joining the campaign very well knowing that Livecoin were proven scammers? Warnings are all there but they just decided to ignore and join the campaign Sometimes your reputation is more important than getting a few satoshis. match point dude i think always reputation > money That "sometimes" was just a figure of speech. Of course it is always more important than a few satoshis. Sometimes your reputation is more important than getting a few satoshis. match point dude i think always reputation > money LiveCoin started a new signature campaign https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/open-livecoinnet-signature-campaign-herolegendary-weekly-up-to-01btc-5166711 I believe they will choose most of spammers. Since here is open scam accusation, I think any reputed user will apply there. Perhaps their signature will end up like Yobit. They should resolve that accusation and hire a well reputed managers. However, I am little bit late on this thread, so I will take a look all of reply here before make any judgment. The reward is very huge and very tempting and you can really earn a lot if you completed that 50 posts, they did not specify the number of people they are going to accept, so there is a possibility that they can accept as many people that they want and would like to apply. It is not worth getting all the hate from the well established members. (you may even get tagged for this) Yobit had great rewards too, look what happened to them. Many yobit signature carriers got a sig ban for months. It is very clear, respected members of the forum aren't applying for this campaign any more. Sometimes your reputation is more important than getting a few satoshis. I really wish Livecoin had sorted this out, as I sent my applications to their campaign several times before. LiveCoin started a new signature campaign https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/open-livecoinnet-signature-campaign-herolegendary-weekly-up-to-01btc-5166711 I believe they will choose most of spammers. Since here is open scam accusation, I think any reputed user will apply there. Perhaps their signature will end up like Yobit. They should resolve that accusation and hire a well reputed managers. However, I am little bit late on this thread, so I will take a look all of reply here before make any judgment. The reward is very huge and very tempting and you can really earn a lot if you completed that 50 posts, they did not specify the number of people they are going to accept, so there is a possibility that they can accept as many people that they want and would like to apply. A month passed after they blocked my account for publicly criticizing their work. They continue to blackmail me so that I delete everything that I have said here, otherwise they will not return anything to me! The only thing they did was Mona coins delisting, which I now cannot sell even for the pennies they offer in return, because my account is blocked. Why did you withdraw your flag? WOW! What is that?! I don't know how it happened, maybe some kind of mistake! Thanks! A month passed after they blocked my account for publicly criticizing their work. They continue to blackmail me so that I delete everything that I have said here, otherwise they will not return anything to me! The only thing they did was Mona coins delisting, which I now cannot sell even for the pennies they offer in return, because my account is blocked. Why did you withdraw your flag? A month passed after they blocked my account for publicly criticizing their work. They continue to blackmail me so that I delete everything that I have said here, otherwise they will not return anything to me! Would you mind sharing that blackmails to us so we can see, that the LIVECOIN shouldn't be here and atleast be banned. With those mails that you were saying, many will be saved and on the later part, this site will fall. If they continue their habbit on making such behaviour then who knows what can they do to others, and as for the OP, there might be no chances on retrieving your finances, so I think you should consider this now, as for the fact LIVECOIN doesn't want to answer the allegations.
A month passed after they blocked my account for publicly criticizing their work. They continue to blackmail me so that I delete everything that I have said here, otherwise they will not return anything to me! The only thing they did was Mona coins delisting, which I now cannot sell even for the pennies they offer in return, because my account is blocked.
LiveCoin started a new signature campaign https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/open-livecoinnet-signature-campaign-herolegendary-weekly-up-to-01btc-5166711 I believe they will choose most of spammers. Since here is open scam accusation, I think any reputed user will apply there. Perhaps their signature will end up like Yobit. They should resolve that accusation and hire a well reputed managers. However, I am little bit late on this thread, so I will take a look all of reply here before make any judgment. LiveCoin started a new signature campaign https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/open-livecoinnet-signature-campaign-herolegendary-weekly-up-to-01btc-5166711 Surely it doesn't look good. After hhampuz decided to end the campaign instead of solving the issue between the OP and the exchange they started a new campaign. They don't understand how things work here at all. It is really sad despite all the warnings and all the chances they had to solve the issue, they went this way and ignoring what people say. >>>Yobit v2.0 loading LiveCoin started a new signature campaign https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/open-livecoinnet-signature-campaign-herolegendary-weekly-up-to-01btc-5166711 recruting new scammers
LiveCoin started a new signature campaign https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/open-livecoinnet-signature-campaign-herolegendary-weekly-up-to-01btc-5166711
These scammers have deprived me of the opportunity to sell this mona. They also continue to illegally withhold my BTC. And all this happens only because I publicly spoke about the problem with MONA!
Well, that's not me, actually Losses are losses and if they are to be socialized, everyone thus "socialized" will get financially punished. What you suggest is more about paying back but if they didn't do that before why they are going to do that now? Anyway, if the Mona withdrawals as well as deposits have been disabled, it is quite possible they don't have the coins unless they bought them elsewhere. In this manner, delisting the coin is a form of loss socialization in its own right Where did the coins disappear then? The 51% attack pretty much by definition couldn't "destroy" existing main chain coins that Livecoin supposedly had in their wallets. So if the balance is now 0 then either Livecoin had lost them before the attack, or they sold them off after the attack while customers were unable to withdraw. I really don't understand the rest of your argument. Sounds like an attempt to justify the scam with word games. Unless you're saying that Livecoin has 0 MONA coins, which is certainly possible and would make the whole scam even more egregious Well, that's not me, actually Losses are losses and if they are to be socialized, everyone thus "socialized" will get financially punished. What you suggest is more about paying back but if they didn't do that before why they are going to do that now? Anyway, if the Mona withdrawals as well as deposits have been disabled, it is quite possible they don't have the coins unless they bought them elsewhere. In this manner, delisting the coin is a form of loss socialization in its own right I'm not sure I understand what you mean by this. As far as I'm able to grasp the concept, it is about spreading losses among everyone, even those not affected by the situation (like Bitfinex altcoin holders). In other words, socializing the losses only among the current holders of the Mona coin (which is to be delisted) is not much different from just delisting it (what the exchange is going to do anyway) What am I missing? Delisting means bagholders get nothing (they can't withdraw) and Livecoin gets to keep whatever actual MONA it still has. Livecoin should at least distribute existing real on-chain MONA covering at least a fraction of users' balances. Unless you're saying that Livecoin has 0 MONA coins, which is certainly possible and would make the whole scam even more egregious. The Mona holders would be better off if Livecoin socialized the losses among current Mona holders, get on the new chain, and let the Mona holders withdraw the coin I'm not sure I understand what you mean by this. As far as I'm able to grasp the concept, it is about spreading losses among everyone, even those not affected by the situation (like Bitfinex altcoin holders). In other words, socializing the losses only among the current holders of the Mona coin (which is to be delisted) is not much different from just delisting it (what the exchange is going to do anyway) What am I missing? Jump to:
|