Topic: London's mayor is a muslim! - page 2. (Read 3919 times)

I think you have a problem regarding reading comprehension.
First i started my post with what protokol pointed out:
Khan wanted to get more WOMAN on board of the TFL - something that YOU totaly ignored because you probaly though he wanted to get some muslims in there right?

Second then i provied you a article from the same website and author that you provided and asked you about the truth of the content because i though you were from london.
Then i asserted that if the story is true then khan is a good PERSON and YOU might be prejudiced about muslims.

Third then YOU started instantly WITHOUT even commenting on what i wrote that im a pathetic muslim terrorist lover.


dude are you fucking kidding me or insane? YOU are doing this shit not me.
READ my post again.
Instead of most of you I AM calling every asshole out doesnt matter if muslim christian jew or buddhist. It is only important that the person in question is a fucking tard.


Look at my post history. Im calling out shit every single time i see it.
You are getting delusional dear.


Again - you might got this delusional perception of reality from your christian fanatics.
I have no problem with people calling shit out in whatever religion ( im atheist ) - the important thing is that it is correct.

And exactly that is what makes me thing the lethn account was sold. Where is the logical thinking and researching of facts? I dont see that from you like in the past.

1. Ignored 95% of my post
2. Picked 5% of my post to answer with something that wasnt really important to my question.
3. Answered with a narrative that all muslims are bad or whoever thinks otherwise is bad.

By the way, since Criptix is insistent on trying to be a dick, there are genuine secular Muslims out there who repeatedly warn about Islamists trying to spread their religion and take over communities, you're going to call them prejudiced too Criptix?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13tAAft2tJA

Grow the fuck up and realise that people aren't going to pay any attention to your lies anymore.

I don't care as long as he remain secular. Too early to judge him. Let's give him sometime, before criticizing him.

And now you're just resorting to claiming I'm prejudiced and trying to attack me because of the evidence I've provided, if he is a genuine secular Muslim, then great, I applaud it entirely, however the links he has, the things that he has said are not things that normally come out of a genuine secularist.

How about, instead of just trying to throw accusations at me which simply don't do a damn thing anymore, you actually try to form some decent arguments and gee, I can't imagine how anyone wouldn't get angry at a group of people who openly hate gays, Jews and have no problem with the idea of jailing people or attacking them for insulting their religion or criticising it.

You don't want to address that though do you? You just want to shut me up, which is why you're getting more and more ridiculous, I'm fucking fed up of people like you who try to immediately shut down of any discussion about Islam with your stupid smear attempts, it's people like you I hate far more than any religious fanatic because you enable their behaviour.

Also, I only have on account on this forum you fucking halfwit, it says a lot though when even people I would have no problem calling Christian fanatics understand the importants of free speech and expression more than cunts like you.

Hello lethn you little pathetic sucker it wasnt the first thing i wrote you seem just to be brainwashed and/or blind

Wanna try to answer this shit?

Besides what protokol pointed out i read another article on that website:

http://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2016/05/10/yes-we-khan-inside-story-sadiq-khan-defeated-dog-whistle

Can you or any other londoners tell me if what the article says is true?

If it is true then i doubt that khan is either racist or extremist in any way.

I'm not sure but lately you seem to have build some serious prejudice against muslims.

Edit

You just discredited yourself as a not reading sigspammer with a racial mentality of saddampuh mixed with bryant.coleman - congrats.

Or the original owner just sold his account.

Damn right +1

Why worry about media propoganda. The media likes to stir shit up people are people not matter what color or religion your from theres always a percentage that will be bad and after all this is just a fight amongst the filthy rich and doesnt concern us peasants.

He might have voted in favor of gay marriage. But he has not done anything to prevent homophobic attacks in the Muslim-dominated areas of London. Also, this guy refused to condemn the ISIS, when they were beheading the homosexuals in Syria and Iraq. As far as this Pakistani is concerned, his words don't match the actions.

It really is pathetic that's the first thing that you deliberately decided to type when somebody dares to criticise a guy who happens to be a Muslim, fuck off.

Oh, here's a great little quote from 2009 and it's from a recorded interview.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPqHMcNUuP0

Stop claiming that criticising Islam and being against religious fanaticism is being prejudiced towards all Muslims.

lol He is open minded far from the radical one in Middle east and some parts of Asia.He goes beyond the principles /teaching of his religion. Just to get votes? or...

Now you are saying that it is the fault of the society that these thugs refused to get themselves educated? The government has provided free education, and have given affirmative action quotas to help them find employment. But rather than studying, most of these apes resort to violent crimes such as robbery and rape. Who is to blame here? 

Besides what protokol pointed out i read another article on that website:

http://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2016/05/10/yes-we-khan-inside-story-sadiq-khan-defeated-dog-whistle

Can you or any other londoners tell me if what the article says is true?

If it is true then i doubt that khan is either racist or extremist in any way.

I'm not sure but lately you seem to have build some serious prejudice against muslims.

You are doing a lot of "imagining". Which says more about you than it does about the new London mayor.

It was actually a simple election - London is a liberal city. They were given a choice of a moderate muslim who voted in Parliament to make gay marriage legal, and a rich man married to a Rothschild who voted in Parliament against gay marriage. They chose the more liberal guy. They defeated man also looked like a dainty idiot holding a pint, it was clear that he'd never visited a pub before. The muslim guy had been in pubs and knew how to hold his glass even though it was a pint of Coke!

This is funny, because if you read the article, you find that he specifically talks about increasing the small number of women on the TfL board, an idea which radical muslims would actually have a problem with. He does mention ethnic minorities, but the overwhelming accent is on gender equality.

Now don't get me wrong, I think that's a poor argument because I believe the best person for the job should be chosen, regardless of gender. However I can certainly appreciate the irony that here we have a muslim that is actually standing up for women's rights - in direct opposition to the ideology of extreme muslims, which is to repress women in society.

Something to think about...

You may be right that Muslim neighborhoods in France and Belgium are not so safe and that many young people there don't have future etc.
The problem is that Europe is in a great economic crisis and that there are fewer jobs, especially for uneducated people, and most of such people are unfortunately Muslims.
If this young people can't find job or finish good university or high school, they don't have chance for good future and often become criminals or even worse, become radicalized.
It's not only their fault but government is also responsible, and indirectly all society.
It's very complicate social problem.
On the other hand, Muslims who were given the opportunity to study and take a responsible positions in the society, showing how the Muslims can contribute to society.
It's not black and white picture, so we can't generalize.

London was not the first Western European city to appoint a Muslim as the Mayor. There are a number of other examples. In 2008, Rotterdam (Netherlands) elected the Moroccan Ahmed Aboutaleb as the mayor (he is still holding that position). Similar to London, Rotterdam is also having a large Muslim population (48% are non-white).

Well, I'd love to but I've traveled. I've been everywhere in Europe and in a few muslim countries, too. Sorry, but they don't compare. Europe is a much, much nicer place to live, with more freedom, and more opportunities. I've also been to muslim neighborhoods in France and Belgium, and they're assuredly the worst parts of these countries.

politics is an art of telling perfect lies so i dont care whether a mayor muslim or not.. he or she pretend like a muslim but they are not muslims at all. they serve evil forces i guess.

  This year, mayor of  London is a Muslim, a year or two and mayors of other European capitals will be Muslim.
No one can predict the long-term consequences.

Blacks have a term for that and it's very accurate to that sort of situation, they call it white guilt, get the fuck over yourself and stop trying to drag me and everyone else down with your bullshit.

Well Said, religion is not a important factor. Human achievement and skills need to be given preference, in such a manner government had given this opportunity. Now it would also help in uniting religious people.