Topic: Loozik is a scammer refusing to pay on a contract - page 4. (Read 6256 times)
You know, if Viceroy can demonstrate a state is something more than just a thought in his or your head (is an object / exists), he will get BTC 100 right away.
Lies all lies just like the one about air not existing because you cannot see it in a picture.
All right Mr Loozik, I am sorry for the "clown" and the "looser". However you must be aware that you put yourself in a position to be mocked. I gave an advice and you just ignored...
You know, if Viceroy can demonstrate a state is something more than just a thought in his or your head (is an object / exists), he will get BTC 100 right away.
Yeap! Concepts do not exist! No energy and no mass!
Exactly. Just like unicorns have no mass and no energy (they do not exists, they are not objects). Unicorns are just thought in your head (abstraction).
I hope you have no problem with the division: objects (exist) vs abstractions like concepts and anty-concepts (do not exist).
There is no need for you to call me by names. It didn't do it with regard to you.
Trust me, if Viceroy ever demonstrates the evidence of existence of states then very soon three digits ''100'' will appear on his wallet interface (by my performing specific actions on my computer).
Trust me, if Viceroy ever demonstrates the evidence of existence of states then very soon three digits ''100'' will appear on his wallet interface (by my performing specific actions on my computer).
All right Mr Loozik, I am sorry for the "clown" and the "looser". However you must be aware that you put yourself in a position to be mocked. I gave an advice and you just ignored...
I do not want you post links to what rules evidence are. I will not pay BTC 100 for this stupid task.
I want you to present the evidence to support your claim that states and citizens exist!
If you present the evidence, I will be more than happy to pay you BTC 100.
Bitcoins to my little understanding are just a valid abstraction (concepts). Concepts do not exists (no energy and no mass). I could not prove Bitcoins exist.
I hope you are okay with my answer.
I hope you are okay with my answer.
Yes, I am quite OK with your "little" answer. Thank you to prove that you cannot even prove that you understand what is matter of proof.
Yeap! Concepts do not exist! No energy and no mass!
Bravo!
Bravo!
This is far better than opera!
I must be dreaming.
What come next?
Quantum physics?
100 BTC are just a reaction of our will. Forgot electricity and complex hard wiring! Let's mine Bitcoins with crystals and yoga meditation!
Ah ah ah.
Lies, more lies. I demonstrated using facts that would be acceptable in any court of law. You never had any intention of paying on the contract you made.
What I presented is evidence based on centuries of courts deciding what evidence is. You, on the other hand, just want to play word games while shirking your duty to hold to your contract.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_of_evidence
You are a liar and a cheat.
What I presented is evidence based on centuries of courts deciding what evidence is. You, on the other hand, just want to play word games while shirking your duty to hold to your contract.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_of_evidence
You are a liar and a cheat.
I am starting to understand the circular logic of the looser...
Next step he is going to say that 100 BTC do not exist because there is not really tangible evidence demonstrating it mere existence.
Brilliant!
So there will be no way to he pay Viceroy. The Bitcoins are just a mere fictional idea in everyone's mind!
This clown is a genius!
Ah ah ah.
Next step he is going to say that 100 BTC do not exist because there is not really tangible evidence demonstrating it mere existence.
Brilliant!
So there will be no way to he pay Viceroy. The Bitcoins are just a mere fictional idea in everyone's mind!
This clown is a genius!
Ah ah ah.
Augusto,
There is no need for you to call me by names. It didn't do it with regard to you.
Trust me, if Viceroy ever demonstrates the evidence of existence of states then very soon three digits ''100'' will appear on his wallet interface (by my performing specific actions on my computer).
Maybe he'll just stop using that air he cannot get a picture of and do us all a favor and just expire.
The Bitcoins are just a mere fictional idea in everyone's mind!
There is some truth to this 
I am starting to understand the circular logic of the looser...
Next step he is going to say that 100 BTC do not exist because there is not really tangible evidence demonstrating it mere existence.
Brilliant!
So there will be no way to he pay Viceroy. The Bitcoins are just a mere fictional idea in everyone's mind!
This clown is a genius!
Ah ah ah.
Next step he is going to say that 100 BTC do not exist because there is not really tangible evidence demonstrating it mere existence.
Brilliant!
So there will be no way to he pay Viceroy. The Bitcoins are just a mere fictional idea in everyone's mind!
This clown is a genius!
Ah ah ah.
Your demand is completely illogical and is start to show that you never had any intention to honour your promise.
Why illogical? I just want an unedited photograph of the object called a ''state''.
I wonder if you can prove that Bitcoins exist with your demands.
"Damn it, I know that Bitcoin never existed! I cannot have empirical experiences with that concept!"
"Damn it, I know that Bitcoin never existed! I cannot have empirical experiences with that concept!"
Bitcoins to my little understanding are just a valid abstraction (concepts). Concepts do not exists (no energy and no mass). I could not prove Bitcoins exist.
I hope you are okay with my answer.
Perhaps you shold argue with the authors who CLEARLY state in that article that:
Quote
A state of the United States of America is one of the fifty constituent political entities that shares its sovereignty with the United States federal government. Because of the shared sovereignty between each U.S. state and the U.S. federal government, an American is a citizen of both the federal republic and of his or her state of domicile. State citizenship and residency are flexible and no government approval is required to move between states, except for persons covered by certain types of court orders (e.g., paroled convicts and children of divorced spouses who are sharing custody). States are divided into counties or county-equivalents, which may be assigned some local governmental authority but are not sovereign. County or county-equivalent structure varies widely by state. Kentucky, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and Virginia use the official title of Commonwealth rather than State.
I should neither argue nor not argue. This article doesn't prove states exists.
This is a very good question. I will accept both rational (using logic, reasoning) evidence and or empirical (something tangible, e.g. unedited photograph of a state (the state can be in any pose or performing any action: lying on bed, flying in the air, preferably without clothes). Another empirical proof would be you or viceroy will visit me in Poland and the state will come with you. We'll have a chat if the state can speak. Something like this.
Ah ah ah.
Putz... Get a grip of what you are talking about! Your demand is completely illogical and is start to show that you never had any intention to honour your promise.
Sorry, this was so funny...
I wonder if you can prove that Bitcoins exist with your demands.
"Damn it, I know that Bitcoin never existed! I cannot have empirical experiences with that concept!"
Done a hundred times over. But unlike a 5 year old you refuse to accept the obvious proof by Common Knowledge.
Scummy scammer refuses to pay on his contract.
Obvious? Proof by common knowledge (sounds like a oxymoron)? Are you delusional?
Show the evidence, earn BTC 100 from me or STFU
Sure you will. You keep avoiding doing that by attempting in vain to argue a point that has no merit. Here's some more evidence that states and citizens exist and this is all common knowledge:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/States_of_the_United_States
Perhaps you shold argue with the authors who CLEARLY state in that article that:
Quote
A state of the United States of America is one of the fifty constituent political entities that shares its sovereignty with the United States federal government. Because of the shared sovereignty between each U.S. state and the U.S. federal government, an American is a citizen of both the federal republic and of his or her state of domicile. State citizenship and residency are flexible and no government approval is required to move between states, except for persons covered by certain types of court orders (e.g., paroled convicts and children of divorced spouses who are sharing custody). States are divided into counties or county-equivalents, which may be assigned some local governmental authority but are not sovereign. County or county-equivalent structure varies widely by state. Kentucky, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and Virginia use the official title of Commonwealth rather than State.
Or perhaps this one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Rules_of_Evidence
Or this one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_of_evidence
You can proclaim that I've not given evidence but the reality remains you are not a man of your word. Borrowing from your vernacular I am sure that you are nothing more than a pussy who has no intention of living up to his word. You are a lying piece of shit scammer and you should be forced to wear a tag for the same.
Done a hundred times over. But unlike a 5 year old you refuse to accept the obvious proof by Common Knowledge.
Scummy scammer refuses to pay on his contract.
Obvious? Proof by common knowledge (sounds like a oxymoron)? Are you delusional?
Show the evidence, earn BTC 100 from me or STFU
As soon as you prove your claim with evidence, BTC 100 is yours.
Done a hundred times over. But unlike a 5 year old you refuse to accept the obvious proof by Common Knowledge.
Scummy scammer refuses to pay on his contract.
You keep changing the contract, or trying in an effort to avoid paying.
Is there anyone reading this post (other than loozik) who can demonstrate with any degree of evidence that:
1) The state of Delaware does not exist.
2) A person born in the state of Delaware are not citizens of Delaware.
Is there anyone reading this post (other than loozik) who can demonstrate with any degree of evidence that:
1) The state of Delaware does not exist.
2) A person born in the state of Delaware are not citizens of Delaware.
Good try. The burden of proof that the states and citizens exists is on you. Proving that the so called state of delaware does not exist might fall under ''proving the negative''. Do yourself a favour and do not follow the path of goat.
As soon as you prove your claim with evidence, BTC 100 is yours.
If Viceroy can prove to me that he holds a legitimate USA passport, the burden of proof will fall over you to prove he is a not an USA citizen.
For him to prove (to me, not you, I am the guy who promised to pay) he is a USA citizen, he must also prove USA exists.
You keep changing the contract, or trying in an effort to avoid paying.
Is there anyone reading this post (other than loozik) who can demonstrate with any degree of evidence that:
The state of Delaware does not exist? Or that a person born in the state of Delaware is not a citizen of Delaware?
When the answer is no perhaps you can all agree that Loozik is refusing to pay on his contract and he deserves a scammer tag for the same. I contend this is all common knowledge. Clearly "Augusto Croppo" who is intellectually superior to the entire lot of you is in agreement that states and citizens exist and that this is all common knowledge. There is simply nothing more that needs to be said as common knowledge is an acceptable proof for things such as the existence of states and citizens.
Pay up scammer.
Jump to: