Topic: Loss Aversion: A Critical Factor for Responsible Gambling. - page 6. (Read 1412 times)

Loss aversion is a cognitive bias in humans that shows that we tend to avoid losses more than we desire profits (twice as much). We avoid the confrontation of feeling that comes with loss, therefore taking more risk to chase losses.

Chasing losses is one of the common dilemmas of gamblers. As they want to recover their losses, they tend to continue their games thinking that they can get back what they had lost.
Lucky if you can still contain your gambling habits as you won't have financial troubles. However, if you feel you are going deep, better pause and assess your situation.

Loss aversion is a cognitive bias in humans that shows that we tend to avoid losses more than we desire profits (twice as much). We avoid the confrontation of feeling that comes with loss, therefore taking more risk to chase losses.

Casinos use this to trap you in a vicious circle of addiction. They will give you loss-back/rake-back in the quantity, which might not have enough appeal for you to withdraw, especially after a big loss (which enabled that loss back). They will do this either by giving you your loss back or rake back in small installments (daily, weekly, or monthly) instead of giving you a lump sum amount one time. It is not that they cannot give you more, but they will deliberately do this because they want you to play with that amount and take bigger risks. After you lose that rake-back/loss-back, you will have an urge (twice as strong) to deposit and win back the lost amount (this is especially true if you are new to gambling), taking a higher risk to avoid the intra-confrontation with the fact that you have just lost x amount. The majority will lose again and again; some will even develop a defense mechanism to not even think about their big losses and continue focusing on depositing more money to cover losses.

This cognitive bias has some deep-rooted genesis in human psychology because of how we evolved. A shortage of food is more lethal than the happiness that comes with excessive food.

I am posting this because understanding this concept helps me become more responsible with my decision-making, and it might be helpful to you as well. I am eager to know opinions of other wise members.

Sometimes the mindset and attitude taken by each gambler can also be influenced by how much money they use in one betting session, when there is still a remainder that allows someone to continue it, it is possible for them to continue to pursue their defeat.
Implementing responsible attitude is not easy and it is indeed natural when someone has to try to win because this is in gambling, there is no goal that will really be prioritized by most gamblers except for the ambition to get as much victory and profit as possible.

Well people's opinion and perspective differs from one another and in the aspect of responsible gambling I think chasing over losses have been one issues that can't be opted out while gambling but it's not like it could be seen as biased, yes we can't dispute the fact that we make losses and so we can't shy away from them as well since the main aim for gambling is to win and make profits then since we can't avoid winning, losses too should not be avoided cause they are all criterias in a game.

Loss aversion is a cognitive bias in humans that shows that we tend to avoid losses more than we desire profits (twice as much). We avoid the confrontation of feeling that comes with loss, therefore taking more risk to chase losses.

Casinos use this to trap you in a vicious circle of addiction. They will give you loss-back/rake-back in the quantity, which might not have enough appeal for you to withdraw, especially after a big loss (which enabled that loss back). They will do this either by giving you your loss back or rake back in small installments (daily, weekly, or monthly) instead of giving you a lump sum amount one time. It is not that they cannot give you more, but they will deliberately do this because they want you to play with that amount and take bigger risks. After you lose that rake-back/loss-back, you will have an urge (twice as strong) to deposit and win back the lost amount (this is especially true if you are new to gambling), taking a higher risk to avoid the intra-confrontation with the fact that you have just lost x amount. The majority will lose again and again; some will even develop a defense mechanism to not even think about their big losses and continue focusing on depositing more money to cover losses.

This cognitive bias has some deep-rooted genesis in human psychology because of how we evolved. A shortage of food is more lethal than the happiness that comes with excessive food.

I am posting this because understanding this concept helps me become more responsible with my decision-making, and it might be helpful to you as well. I am eager to know opinions of other wise members.

I was saying that since cognitive bias of Loss aversion can be applied to various fields of human endeavor, and I contextualized this in terms of gambling. This contextualization has been done by many people before me; I just gave a subcontext of how it might relate to the loss-back/rake-back practices casinos employ now a days.
Therefore, I do not see it as my 'brilliancy.' I read something from various sources and just made a point.
I am not being sarcastic in any manner, nor did 'contextualization bias' have to do anything with you (praising me).  

I don't get you, biased contexts, how? Don't tell me you are being sarcastic now because what I read was on point and it's trying to balance the thoughts of the urge to gamble and the consequence of doing so for us to make an informed decision and even curb our excess if need be. That's my view and interpretation of it and personally, I appreciate it, so I see no reason why this is not a brilliant write-up. You might need more than just a piece of a line reply to convince me of that.

Well people's opinion and perspective differs from one another and in the aspect of responsible gambling I think chasing over losses have been one issues that can't be opted out while gambling but it's not like it could be seen as biased, yes we can't dispute the fact that we make losses and so we can't shy away from them as well since the main aim for gambling is to win and make profits then since we can't avoid winning, losses too should not be avoided cause they are all criterias in a game.

Thanks but it has nothing to do with me. The information is already out there, even the contextualization of this bias.

Thank you for that.

It's all true and it actually happened to me. Right now, I have a big loss in one local online gambling application and I can say I am trying to move on from that loss although we cannot take the fact that the memory will still be there at the back of our heads.
I think that's the only way to avoid this. Forget all those losses and be a brand new gambler, a better one. We already know to ourselves that it is how gambling is made, for us to lose, so what else are we gaining from playing over and over again? Not much. Entertainment mostly. Emotional fluctuations. I don't even think that's a gain. It's not a good thing when you are all stressed with the losses and all you feel is rage, I'd rather avoid that.
Sports betting is also a good cure. Stick with your team, bet an amount that will just ignite your passion as a fan, and cheer louder. You won't be wasting too much money and you might win if your team will perform well per season.

I think I agree to what "Betwrong" said, because judging by the popular saying we usually use in the gambling community (i.e Gamble what you can always afford to lose), it simply means if an individual was able to gamble $100, it automatically means he or she was willing and able to afford to lose that exact amount of money, of which I see no difference on which will be more painful or happier, inasmuch as it's the same amount of money that is either lost or won while gambling. Hence, inasmuch as everybody wants to win more while gambling, for me, I think when an equal amount is involved, the level of dopamine or adrenaline is literally at equilibrium.

Loss aversion is a cognitive bias in humans that shows that we tend to avoid losses more than we desire profits (twice as much). We avoid the confrontation of feeling that comes with loss, therefore taking more risk to chase losses.

Casinos use this to trap you in a vicious circle of addiction. They will give you loss-back/rake-back in the quantity, which might not have enough appeal for you to withdraw, especially after a big loss (which enabled that loss back). They will do this either by giving you your loss back or rake back in small installments (daily, weekly, or monthly) instead of giving you a lump sum amount one time. It is not that they cannot give you more, but they will deliberately do this because they want you to play with that amount and take bigger risks. After you lose that rake-back/loss-back, you will have an urge (twice as strong) to deposit and win back the lost amount (this is especially true if you are new to gambling), taking a higher risk to avoid the intra-confrontation with the fact that you have just lost x amount. The majority will lose again and again; some will even develop a defense mechanism to not even think about their big losses and continue focusing on depositing more money to cover losses.

This cognitive bias has some deep-rooted genesis in human psychology because of how we evolved. A shortage of food is more lethal than the happiness that comes with excessive food.

I am posting this because understanding this concept helps me become more responsible with my decision-making, and it might be helpful to you as well. I am eager to know opinions of other wise members.

Loss aversion is a cognitive bias in humans that shows that we tend to avoid losses more than we desire profits (twice as much). We avoid the confrontation of feeling that comes with loss, therefore taking more risk to chase losses.

Casinos use this to trap you in a vicious circle of addiction. They will give you loss-back/rake-back in the quantity, which might not have enough appeal for you to withdraw, especially after a big loss (which enabled that loss back). They will do this either by giving you your loss back or rake back in small installments (daily, weekly, or monthly) instead of giving you a lump sum amount one time. It is not that they cannot give you more, but they will deliberately do this because they want you to play with that amount and take bigger risks. After you lose that rake-back/loss-back, you will have an urge (twice as strong) to deposit and win back the lost amount (this is especially true if you are new to gambling), taking a higher risk to avoid the intra-confrontation with the fact that you have just lost x amount. The majority will lose again and again; some will even develop a defense mechanism to not even think about their big losses and continue focusing on depositing more money to cover losses.

This cognitive bias has some deep-rooted genesis in human psychology because of how we evolved. A shortage of food is more lethal than the happiness that comes with excessive food.

I am posting this because understanding this concept helps me become more responsible with my decision-making, and it might be helpful to you as well. I am eager to know opinions of other wise members.

Losing money is painful to almost everyone whether it happens within or outside your pre ascribed bank roll. The question that why people gamble has various answers in psychology (dopamine, adrenaline etc.). Here we are discussing one of the major factors which can lead a fun and entertaining [even money making {poker, sports etc.}]  activity towards an addiction.

Loss aversion is a cognitive bias in humans that shows that we tend to avoid losses more than we desire profits (twice as much). We avoid the confrontation of feeling that comes with loss, therefore taking more risk to chase losses.

Loss aversion is a cognitive bias in humans that shows that we tend to avoid losses more than we desire profits (twice as much). We avoid the confrontation of feeling that comes with loss, therefore taking more risk to chase losses.

This cognitive bias has some deep-rooted genesis in human psychology because of how we evolved. A shortage of food is more lethal than the happiness that comes with excessive food.

I am posting this because understanding this concept helps me become more responsible with my decision-making, and it might be helpful to you as well. I am eager to know opinions of other wise members.

The truth is that while individuals response to loss varies, the majority of people react more to looses that to the instances they win. A win makes it look like winning is a routine that you're used to while looses comes with a burning desire to iether gamble more as a way of recovering the loss.