Topic: LoyceV's Avatar for Rent [first 🦊🦊🦊3 YEARS🦊🦊🦊 (165 weeks) rented out] - page 38. (Read 32693 times)

fillippone, amico mio, here you are! Let me serve you with my father in law's finest wine!



Yes, still in plastic bottle, but I evolved to 5l bottles, as you see   I just started it so please feel free to join me  

Of course, all gang members and wannabees are welcome as well icopress Juliya, are you here too?

Actually, nobody did.

I was hoping that noboy will notice that I answered instead of you 

Thanks again for your flawless timing! I'll do as GazetaBitcoin said and blame the kids for being late: they're not even in bed yet

Thanks again for your perfect timing! I'm late again, as I had to put the kids in bed.

One hundred and fifty-first week paid.

I had to bump up the flux capacitor for this one, and I'm sorry for the grave-digging, but I just wanted to say that even after recently encountering (and reading) through Blockchair documentation regarding this "meter"[1], I'm still unsure how is this percentage calculated and why it doesn't apply more weight to this characteristic that you pointed out at the time. If we take Foxpup most recent timely transaction[2] the only thing that appears to be stopping from getting 100 % as a score is because they supposedly identified matched addresses (We identified which of the recipient addresses possibly belong to one or more senders.[3]).

If we compare a transaction details which had a privacy-o-meter of 0 %[4] vs. the most recent one from Foxpup[5], the only heuristics that it's being applied to the transaction from Foxpup is "rare_fingerprint" - which is just described in their documentations as "This transaction has quite unique technical characteristics" - while the other transaction has at least 4 heuristics identified (amongst other properties) that are deemed to be more easy to track for blockchair.

What I can conclude regarding this exercise is that, like you initially said, they are missing some sort of heuristic to determine if a particular recipient address has been receiving a fixed amount of BTC from time to time no matter what sender is being responsible for the transfer - such behavior could be easily linked/spotted by someone who ended up investigating the receiver address... I reckon that these kind of tools, while may look good for outsiders, may give a false feeling of security in some cases (like this one). I wonder if this heuristic would be easy to implement?

PS: Sorry for using the flux capacitor in such ways. I promise I'll refrain from similar uses in the future ...

---

[1]https://blockchair.com/api/docs#link_M6
[2]https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/aff2ba4ade305580c0fe8638319424e2768fa0d0f595f48fe79338e2bfbbf4b3
[3]https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/privacy-o-meter/aff2ba4ade305580c0fe8638319424e2768fa0d0f595f48fe79338e2bfbbf4b3
[4]https://api.blockchair.com/bitcoin/dashboards/transaction/116bd19a3ec5f210ce72043115a4d5d3ef08f7556829c4feac8d89de3195ea4e?privacy-o-meter=true
[5]https://api.blockchair.com/bitcoin/dashboards/transaction/aff2ba4ade305580c0fe8638319424e2768fa0d0f595f48fe79338e2bfbbf4b3?privacy-o-meter=true

Thanks again for your flawless timing! I can once again blame the kids for being a tad late.

One hundred and fiftieth week paid.

Although the name would imply that, since it's Gazeta and not Gazetul, I think that I've seen once mentioned about having a wife.
At that point it made me certain it's a he, but now, on a second thought I no longer know... and maybe I've rushed back then to conclusions.

However, I don't think that a Girls Club has to be necessarily ran by a woman, hence nothing is ruled out.
Although if Gazeta is indeed the CEO there, I would feel a bit hurt that I was never sent an invite for.. ehm.. visiting...

She is a girl. Gazeta is CEO of that club.

There's a club like this? Now we're talking. An invitation link please, I have bitcoins!

Awww, well, I can not expose an odalisque, as I am a gentleman, but I hope that I proved, at least, that I am not a peeper 

Hold on a second now! How did you find out about Crypto Club Girls?

Young padawan, with all the modesty I have, I will say that you are living in denial


I took icopress with me last time I visited that harem, to initiate him. Now he says I'm just a peeper

Hold on a second now! How did you find out about Crypto Club Girls?

How insatiable you are 

However, I'm sure that even after 52 weeks you are still a beginner ... because peeping through the keyhole, I've never seen you try on a foxtail.

Btw, did everyone answer question 23 correctly?

Thank you as well, Supreme Leader! It's been also 1 year since I am inside the gang and - daaaamn! - feels soooo good! 

Note: "my" year had only 52 weeks though 

One hundred and forty-ninth week paid.

Thanks ahead for your perfect timing! I'll be early, got to put the kids in bed.