Topic: [LTCD] LitecoinDark.com ★ Scrypt ★ Difficulty Shield ★ Multipool ★ Fast - page 223. (Read 368579 times)

SO basically same sh*t different day! Hihi

Thanks for the update...

But good thing 2500 block till next halving!

Ha, I meant that the BTCTalk site is a really bad forum application. It's buggy, slow and confusing. The new forum is modern, fast and much nicer to work with. Both places have the same community

If it is that crappy here why almost no one's there :-)

Don't forget the new forum at http://www.litecoindark.net/!! So much better than crappy BTCTalk

I suggest everybody get over there and write something on the "Introduce Yourself" thread I've started

well lets see no word on the gypsies and price is down due to bots and a little  bit of confusion on the logo contest that's about it lol and the bot on bittrex keeping price down lol

Hah. Not much new. There is stil a logo contest going on and Developers work hard on adding new features :-)

Just limit yourself to reading the posts by developers here. There hasn't been that many. Others are not that important. They mentioned few interesting things.
I don't want to go through all these pages to recite their posts :-)

come on  someone give me the updates.... Looking through 19 pages is hard.

each ground squirrel in a field agronomist (c) 

Hi Guys.

Whats new??


I have not been online and have missed 19 pages of chitta chatta!!!


Can anyone briefly fill me in.


By the way its good to be back and I missed you.

Kind regards

I would allow 5% of the reward to go to the Blue Logo owner if that one is the winner.

5% consists of about how much change there is in the logo from the original.

Words of reason. To the two logo designers: come to an amicable agreement and we will support the winning logo wholeheartedly

I agree on all but one point:  No permission was ever given to use the original author's work, therefore I submit that unless some sort of agreement can be reached between the two of them I don't feel that the recolor should even be allowed entry as it is (even if it is modified) clearly a derivative.

This isn't for us to decide.  Let them decide whether or not to allow it entry and how to divide reward, and if either logo wins the vote, we will abide by their decision on how to divide the bounty.

This is like, one man creating a game. And another man changing the color of the cover and being rewarded for someone else imagination. The design is what counts, if the color need to be change, should of ask the original creator to change it. A Good Community would not let one get cheated, and let another be the one to collect the rewards for another man creation. To be fair to one is to be fair to all, To be unfair to one is to be unfair to all. Someone should not have touch another man design or imagination, but should have asked for the changes to be made. I vote that the original creator get the reward, and if he decide to share it, it should be up to him. That is the right thing to do. Should not reward others for another man good works.

Do you have any connections to the network?

Debug console, getblockhash 20000

If it doesn't report c4203f4bd41907ed62f4153eed6473a995a02fccdd198ee188eff60080bfca4e something weird happened.  Delete blocks & chainstate.

Debug console again: addnode 24.199.222.230 add

Try this.  Also verify that you are on version 1.1.0-pre1-dev.  

As for the logo, I really like both versions of this logo, and do in fact prefer the blue one, however it is rather cut and dry that it is a derivative work, and the logo was never offered under an open license.  It was offered in a competition for a bounty, community-oriented, yes, but a competition nonetheless.  If the work is accepted, we would still need some form of license agreement with the original author to be able to use it at all, be it creative commons or whatever.

The recolor was done without license and cannot be accepted without permission of the original author, which was not given.  I'd say that this particular discussion is not up to the community at large, nor even the developers.  Whether or not the logo should be allowed to be submitted is between the original author and the designer who recolored it and/or redesigned it.

When comparing this to the many altcoin forks the difference is in the license agreement.  We are modifying sources that are licensed to us under an open source license.  The agreement expressly allows us to do so.  There is no accompanying license agreement with this logo submission, and unless the original is selected as a winner and we are subsequently issued an open license (at which the point would be moot), or unless the original creator agrees to supply some sort of license agreement (perhaps via compensation in either LTCD, BTC, USD, or whatever else they decide upon) I cannot in good faith condone allowing the recolor entry.

Apologies if this offends anyone, but we've reached a discussion that ties directly into the heart of copyright law.

i just want a wallet that syncs   

I think she/he should receive 95%. I wouldn't expect to give someone 35% just because they changed the colour...
But that's up to originator to decide how much he is willing to share...

And if he doesn't want any reward then you can for example let the community vote/decide on where to allocate this reward instead. On LTCD development, some charity or whatever else...

lol

lol.. that was kinda what i was typing.. only u expressed it much nicer sir   -edit- im not designer but do play around with design progs sometimes. and those changes arent alot of work.
IF THAT TOOK YOU 2 HOURS ur doing it wrong 

Mate, now you're being slightly unattractive. The original designer created the logo. You copied it an changed some colours and a font. I've done graphic design for years and I know how much effort goes into creating a symmetrical and simple logo. YOur efforts involved a lot less design work than his. Your colour may have won he vote, but his design was what we are looking at. Take the 10% of what is being offered and stop trying to act like a child who didn't get a reward for washing dad's car really badly with a hose, while the older brother used wax by hand.

+1