Hello people! 
I do not know what you are arguing here, but I do not mind in the joint award of the logo.
As for my work - I do not just repaint it. Font has been changed, as I lined it and made 2 options buttons.
And go to the forum - http://litecoindark.net
I do not know what you are arguing here, but I do not mind in the joint award of the logo. As for my work - I do not just repaint it. Font has been changed, as I lined it and made 2 options buttons.
And go to the forum - http://litecoindark.net
but you have to admit that with the right program thats done pretty easy.. good job on the forum tho!!!
I did not understand you. What do you want me to answer you? Was it easy?
It took 1.5-2 hours time. I do not think that the creator of the red variant spent more, although the idea deserves a lot of respect.
But what these complaints? Once wrote that do not apply to the entire award, and the 1st creator wrote that he was not at all interested in money. Now he complains.
What kind of nonsense? : D
I personally feel that the original author should receive the entire originally offered bounty for the logo, but have no qualms about allowing an additional bounty (valued between 5% to 10% of the original bounty) for the recolor. Anyone else have input on this?
Agreed
I would think this to be a suitable way to go considering it was the edited version that received an overwhelming response in votes, but would not have even been up for consideration without the work of the original designer.
I'm sorry, but how many creators altcoins asked permission from the original owners to change the code or creating a fork?
We seem to be engaged in the development of the collective, and each brings something different to the development. This also applies to code. Why find out who is on how much % was important.
We Will Solve this. I Will pm the orginal dev, mainwhile focus yourself at the forum.
