Do you happen to still have some open slot to a member like me?
7 slots are opened for members. Read the first page before subscribing.
Topic: ★ LuckyBit Bitcoin Talk Affiliate Program ★ [CLOSED] - page 62. (Read 221315 times)
7 slots are opened for members. Read the first page before subscribing.
Do you happen to still have some open slot to a member like me?
Post: 339
Addy: 1Efr4xUrNYN2gNAKw6Lc1Yck8N2kggXzq2
Bet: http://luckyb.it/check?txin=e44f38346a660cfe1c9abeb123b827311f3638e2917f0bc1c6b949b9b4c150d6:0
Addy: 1Efr4xUrNYN2gNAKw6Lc1Yck8N2kggXzq2
Bet: http://luckyb.it/check?txin=e44f38346a660cfe1c9abeb123b827311f3638e2917f0bc1c6b949b9b4c150d6:0
Your post history is also very inconsistent, and reveals evidence of signature campaign farming. I'll ignore the latter for now, but decline this application based on the former. You may re-apply after your activity level has increased.
Today's qualified enrollment has been background checked and found to be a duplicate enrollment. Both usernames are barred from the campaign. I don't know which part of "cheaters not welcome" you think doesn't apply to you, but it does.
wang_yan - Disqualified and barred for abuse
fanbeila - Disqualified and barred for abuse
wang_yan - Disqualified and barred for abuse
fanbeila - Disqualified and barred for abuse
This is unfair. I worked a month for 0.1 BTC, and you simply say that I was disqualified and refuse to pay. I didn't abuse this. Can you specify how did I abuse it?
The question you asked was answered in the post you replied to.
If you think I am not the right one, I can quit. But I must state that I didn't abuse. You may think I have many accounts in order to get more pay. But why didn't I join the compaign after my Activity updates to Sr. Member so that I could get a pay of 0.1 BTC?You know I am currently paid 0.05 BTC. I just want to tell you I didn't cheat you. I don't have multiple accounts.
Your "no motive" argument is as hollow as a tennis ball. Nice try, but it didn't even come close.
I used to think LB is a fair game, but now I think it can be a potential scam. Is OP a teenager?
I haven't even had to answer, and the personal attack begins. Hilarious; my relationship with Lucky Bit as a third-party manager is well-documented and yet you accuse them as well. The reason for my decision was stated up front. I found evidence on bitcoin talk, and on the blockchain, that these two users are directly linked. Specifically, I found a spend-link between addresses used by both accounts. I gave warning two weeks ago that this was happening, and quite a kerfuffle has gone on here concerning the situation, so feigning ignorance now isn't going to help you either.
I'd be willing to entertain "explanations" or "requests for leniency". If you're honest with me, I'm willing to forgive; but I'm not willing to entertain accusations of being underage while managing a gambling site's advertisement campaign. Even if you try to be nice about it now, it's too late; I don't reciprocate hostility with acquiescence.
Post-script: I'm 37.
It doesn't matter even if you're 73, if you still behave like a teenager.
What I can say is this is my ONLY account. If you have any proof that there're some spend linking, prove it other than being childish. Or just pay what you should pay.
Is there ne way i can request a 7 day extension due to low activity over the hollidays my post count is a little low and dont want to spam uselessness all of the forum to try and catch up that fast???
Today's qualified enrollment has been background checked and found to be a duplicate enrollment. Both usernames are barred from the campaign. I don't know which part of "cheaters not welcome" you think doesn't apply to you, but it does.
wang_yan - Disqualified and barred for abuse
fanbeila - Disqualified and barred for abuse
wang_yan - Disqualified and barred for abuse
fanbeila - Disqualified and barred for abuse
This is unfair. I worked a month for 0.1 BTC, and you simply say that I was disqualified and refuse to pay. I didn't abuse this. Can you specify how did I abuse it?
The question you asked was answered in the post you replied to.
If you think I am not the right one, I can quit. But I must state that I didn't abuse. You may think I have many accounts in order to get more pay. But why didn't I join the compaign after my Activity updates to Sr. Member so that I could get a pay of 0.1 BTC?You know I am currently paid 0.05 BTC. I just want to tell you I didn't cheat you. I don't have multiple accounts.
Your "no motive" argument is as hollow as a tennis ball. Nice try, but it didn't even come close.
I used to think LB is a fair game, but now I think it can be a potential scam. Is OP a teenager?
I haven't even had to answer, and the personal attack begins. Hilarious; my relationship with Lucky Bit as a third-party manager is well-documented and yet you accuse them as well. The reason for my decision was stated up front. I found evidence on bitcoin talk, and on the blockchain, that these two users are directly linked. Specifically, I found a spend-link between addresses used by both accounts. I gave warning two weeks ago that this was happening, and quite a kerfuffle has gone on here concerning the situation, so feigning ignorance now isn't going to help you either.
I'd be willing to entertain "explanations" or "requests for leniency". If you're honest with me, I'm willing to forgive; but I'm not willing to entertain accusations of being underage while managing a gambling site's advertisement campaign. Even if you try to be nice about it now, it's too late; I don't reciprocate hostility with acquiescence.
Post-script: I'm 37.
And im sure he was more older than you .
I don't really think age has too much to do with it, however calling him a teenager @wang_yan is a bit... 
Enrolling:
Posts: 476
Position: Sr. Member
address: 14eXr36TiJmSUdbSdXzQNC9CAVfPVFbu5K
Posts: 476
Position: Sr. Member
address: 14eXr36TiJmSUdbSdXzQNC9CAVfPVFbu5K
You forgot to add a recent bet to your page. You can find the address to your bet using the 'Bet Browser' on www.luckyb.it
I used to think LB is a fair game, but now I think it can be a potential scam. Is OP a teenager?
I know OP and I can say he is a fair an thrust worthy guy. I am sure he has valid reasons to assume both of you abused this campaign and he'll explain them to you.
LB isn't a potential scam, just because you were disqualified from their signature campaign. They have given away a lot of bitcoins in this campaign and during their many promotions. Why would they throw away their good name just for 0.1 BTC (which they don't even owe you)?
Am I accusing them a potential scam with no reasons? No.
They're refusing to pay the commission without giving a reason. If I abused it, there's should be some evidence. Simply accusing people abusing it and refusing to pay is not cool.
I used to think LB is a fair game, but now I think it can be a potential scam. Is OP a teenager?
Woooaaa easy dude , remember about time zone .Maybe he was sleep or busy.
But im sure he will answer your questions soon.
And im sure he was more older than you .
I used to think LB is a fair game, but now I think it can be a potential scam. Is OP a teenager?
Today's qualified enrollment has been background checked and found to be a duplicate enrollment. Both usernames are barred from the campaign. I don't know which part of "cheaters not welcome" you think doesn't apply to you, but it does.
wang_yan - Disqualified and barred for abuse
fanbeila - Disqualified and barred for abuse
I like giving people money. I don't like having to do this. Don't make me do this; be honest.
The bet condition is hardly an expense. You said it yourself - "with bitcoin price very low", requiring our advertisers to play the game is not unreasonable. The reason the campaign has such spotty enrollment is that I just kicked out a bunch of cheaters that were double-enrolled in signature campaigns with 2 accounts (or more). Shaking the tree seems to have removed most of the bad fruit but I'm on a detailed inspection.
Perhaps pay rates will go up in the future, after all this shakes out. I'm not adverse to increasing the higher pay levels and removing the less popular enrollment slots but I want to settle one change at a time.
If you think I am not the right one, I can quit. But I must state that I didn't abuse. You may think I have many accounts in order to get more pay. But why didn't I join the compaign after my Activity updates to Sr. Member so that I could get a pay of 0.1 BTC?You know I am currently paid 0.05 BTC. I just want to tell you I didn't cheat you. I don't have multiple accounts. wang_yan - Disqualified and barred for abuse
fanbeila - Disqualified and barred for abuse
I like giving people money. I don't like having to do this. Don't make me do this; be honest.
This campaign has difficulties to be full recently. With bitcoin price very low, I think the solution to solve this is either to raise payments or to remove recent bet condition.
The bet condition is hardly an expense. You said it yourself - "with bitcoin price very low", requiring our advertisers to play the game is not unreasonable. The reason the campaign has such spotty enrollment is that I just kicked out a bunch of cheaters that were double-enrolled in signature campaigns with 2 accounts (or more). Shaking the tree seems to have removed most of the bad fruit but I'm on a detailed inspection.
Perhaps pay rates will go up in the future, after all this shakes out. I'm not adverse to increasing the higher pay levels and removing the less popular enrollment slots but I want to settle one change at a time.
Today's qualified enrollment has been background checked and found to be a duplicate enrollment. Both usernames are barred from the campaign. I don't know which part of "cheaters not welcome" you think doesn't apply to you, but it does.
wang_yan - Disqualified and barred for abuse
fanbeila - Disqualified and barred for abuse
I like giving people money. I don't like having to do this. Don't make me do this; be honest.
The bet condition is hardly an expense. You said it yourself - "with bitcoin price very low", requiring our advertisers to play the game is not unreasonable. The reason the campaign has such spotty enrollment is that I just kicked out a bunch of cheaters that were double-enrolled in signature campaigns with 2 accounts (or more). Shaking the tree seems to have removed most of the bad fruit but I'm on a detailed inspection.
Perhaps pay rates will go up in the future, after all this shakes out. I'm not adverse to increasing the higher pay levels and removing the less popular enrollment slots but I want to settle one change at a time.
wang_yan - Disqualified and barred for abuse
fanbeila - Disqualified and barred for abuse
I like giving people money. I don't like having to do this. Don't make me do this; be honest.
This campaign has difficulties to be full recently. With bitcoin price very low, I think the solution to solve this is either to raise payments or to remove recent bet condition.
The bet condition is hardly an expense. You said it yourself - "with bitcoin price very low", requiring our advertisers to play the game is not unreasonable. The reason the campaign has such spotty enrollment is that I just kicked out a bunch of cheaters that were double-enrolled in signature campaigns with 2 accounts (or more). Shaking the tree seems to have removed most of the bad fruit but I'm on a detailed inspection.
Perhaps pay rates will go up in the future, after all this shakes out. I'm not adverse to increasing the higher pay levels and removing the less popular enrollment slots but I want to settle one change at a time.
This is unfair. I worked a month for 0.1 BTC, and you simply say that I was disqualified and refuse to pay. I didn't abuse this. Can you specify how did I abuse it?
Name: Gyfts
Posts: 538
Address: 1ED2gnZAdC8jpd3QHSMfK2XAgTq3D33AbL
Bet: http://luckyb.it/browse?search=5aacf6302d55d01bdddc6ff8d22ca2d1a39e9ac107b0bb721bbd645e14b99045&day=
Posts: 538
Address: 1ED2gnZAdC8jpd3QHSMfK2XAgTq3D33AbL
Bet: http://luckyb.it/browse?search=5aacf6302d55d01bdddc6ff8d22ca2d1a39e9ac107b0bb721bbd645e14b99045&day=
Registered.
Would like to register again.
Name: Gyfts
Posts: 538
Address: 1ED2gnZAdC8jpd3QHSMfK2XAgTq3D33AbL
Bet: http://luckyb.it/browse?search=5aacf6302d55d01bdddc6ff8d22ca2d1a39e9ac107b0bb721bbd645e14b99045&day=
Name: Gyfts
Posts: 538
Address: 1ED2gnZAdC8jpd3QHSMfK2XAgTq3D33AbL
Bet: http://luckyb.it/browse?search=5aacf6302d55d01bdddc6ff8d22ca2d1a39e9ac107b0bb721bbd645e14b99045&day=
Name: TheNewAnon135246
Posts: 3414
Address: 12bBzycRmqgvsYf2C36QTuBFmcrWi1NJdn
Bet: http://luckyb.it/check?txin=201b728feff817f55d44c9c61bb9f09ed7e01c849aa86c9f5c6e66df7538f60f:0
Posts: 3414
Address: 12bBzycRmqgvsYf2C36QTuBFmcrWi1NJdn
Bet: http://luckyb.it/check?txin=201b728feff817f55d44c9c61bb9f09ed7e01c849aa86c9f5c6e66df7538f60f:0
Name: Southpaw0
Posts: 571
BTC Address: 1LBb3ePCTs9wn2TUNHyC5XWmWh7GEs7BfK
Bet: luckyb.it/check?txin=845b501eee2b5104b74116e71799c18f12dd8d14973a00f691dd65f18d166e3b:0
Posts: 571
BTC Address: 1LBb3ePCTs9wn2TUNHyC5XWmWh7GEs7BfK
Bet: luckyb.it/check?txin=845b501eee2b5104b74116e71799c18f12dd8d14973a00f691dd65f18d166e3b:0
Registered.
re-enrolling
Name: Southpaw0
Posts: 571
BTC Address: 1LBb3ePCTs9wn2TUNHyC5XWmWh7GEs7BfK
Bet: luckyb.it/check?txin=845b501eee2b5104b74116e71799c18f12dd8d14973a00f691dd65f18d166e3b:0
Name: Southpaw0
Posts: 571
BTC Address: 1LBb3ePCTs9wn2TUNHyC5XWmWh7GEs7BfK
Bet: luckyb.it/check?txin=845b501eee2b5104b74116e71799c18f12dd8d14973a00f691dd65f18d166e3b:0
Today's qualified enrollments have been background checked and paid.
Gyfts - 0.1BTC - 1ed38aa14b546477273ca71b13f5e60bad9ca27a3df83d6df39b0f202bedac5c
Southpaw0 - 0.1BTC - 7c81dbe41b08b39bb974a2f7e19248f2d4e35285618c6337a8292bc9def404fe
Sorry, I missed this yesterday in my fury over having discovered a senior level cheater:
TheNewAnon135246 - 0.1BTC - c647b518d1e0ea15dd6fa7de4ba99b116295003f46bd4f31548d76fe646e3d99
Gyfts - 0.1BTC - 1ed38aa14b546477273ca71b13f5e60bad9ca27a3df83d6df39b0f202bedac5c
Southpaw0 - 0.1BTC - 7c81dbe41b08b39bb974a2f7e19248f2d4e35285618c6337a8292bc9def404fe
Sorry, I missed this yesterday in my fury over having discovered a senior level cheater:
TheNewAnon135246 - 0.1BTC - c647b518d1e0ea15dd6fa7de4ba99b116295003f46bd4f31548d76fe646e3d99
received
thank you very much Luckyb.it and stingleword
Today's qualified enrollments have been background checked and paid.
Gyfts - 0.1BTC - 1ed38aa14b546477273ca71b13f5e60bad9ca27a3df83d6df39b0f202bedac5c
Southpaw0 - 0.1BTC - 7c81dbe41b08b39bb974a2f7e19248f2d4e35285618c6337a8292bc9def404fe
Sorry, I missed this yesterday in my fury over having discovered a senior level cheater:
TheNewAnon135246 - 0.1BTC - c647b518d1e0ea15dd6fa7de4ba99b116295003f46bd4f31548d76fe646e3d99
Gyfts - 0.1BTC - 1ed38aa14b546477273ca71b13f5e60bad9ca27a3df83d6df39b0f202bedac5c
Southpaw0 - 0.1BTC - 7c81dbe41b08b39bb974a2f7e19248f2d4e35285618c6337a8292bc9def404fe
Sorry, I missed this yesterday in my fury over having discovered a senior level cheater:
TheNewAnon135246 - 0.1BTC - c647b518d1e0ea15dd6fa7de4ba99b116295003f46bd4f31548d76fe646e3d99
Today's qualified enrollment has been background checked and found to be a duplicate enrollment. Both usernames are barred from the campaign. I don't know which part of "cheaters not welcome" you think doesn't apply to you, but it does.
wang_yan - Disqualified and barred for abuse
fanbeila - Disqualified and barred for abuse
I like giving people money. I don't like having to do this. Don't make me do this; be honest.
The bet condition is hardly an expense. You said it yourself - "with bitcoin price very low", requiring our advertisers to play the game is not unreasonable. The reason the campaign has such spotty enrollment is that I just kicked out a bunch of cheaters that were double-enrolled in signature campaigns with 2 accounts (or more). Shaking the tree seems to have removed most of the bad fruit but I'm on a detailed inspection.
Perhaps pay rates will go up in the future, after all this shakes out. I'm not adverse to increasing the higher pay levels and removing the less popular enrollment slots but I want to settle one change at a time.
wang_yan - Disqualified and barred for abuse
fanbeila - Disqualified and barred for abuse
I like giving people money. I don't like having to do this. Don't make me do this; be honest.
This campaign has difficulties to be full recently. With bitcoin price very low, I think the solution to solve this is either to raise payments or to remove recent bet condition.
The bet condition is hardly an expense. You said it yourself - "with bitcoin price very low", requiring our advertisers to play the game is not unreasonable. The reason the campaign has such spotty enrollment is that I just kicked out a bunch of cheaters that were double-enrolled in signature campaigns with 2 accounts (or more). Shaking the tree seems to have removed most of the bad fruit but I'm on a detailed inspection.
Perhaps pay rates will go up in the future, after all this shakes out. I'm not adverse to increasing the higher pay levels and removing the less popular enrollment slots but I want to settle one change at a time.
Jump to: