Can I stake LUXcoin at the moment? How long needed before the wallet activated for staking?
Need 36hrs for coins mature https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/388703503973089301/388712139390713877/LUX_Staking_-_How_to_guide_-_V1.0.pdf
Topic: LUXCoin—New PHI2 PoW/PoS Hybrid—SC—SegWit—PrivateSend—PoS Web Wallet—LuxGate - page 132. (Read 130231 times)
January 31, 2018, 10:49:38 AM
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/388703503973089301/388712139390713877/LUX_Staking_-_How_to_guide_-_V1.0.pdf
January 31, 2018, 10:36:26 AM
Can I stake LUXcoin at the moment? How long needed before the wallet activated for staking?
January 31, 2018, 10:15:26 AM
I'll give zergpool a shot after I figure out why it displays my wallet in BTC...
Unimining seem to have corrected values, now it's lower then bsod...
Unimining seem to have corrected values, now it's lower then bsod...
Unimining is several factors lower overall LUX hashrate, so could be an outlier (lucky 24 hours timespan), will monitor a bit while testing another pool and if Unimining stays outperforming others - give it a shot.
Seems like https://www.unimining.net/ is most profitable pool @ 0.0018 mBTC/Mh/day. But that's weird, how come http://yiimp.eu/ has 0.0016 then? I don't get this... Both are big pools, so where hashrate goes?
Had same issue. Sent ~600Mh their way, got about 3.65 average only. Retesting with a different pool. Sometimes whattomine is off in their calculations, even if you factor in harder difficulty than in reality (I always add 10% difficulty for good measure).
Tried to mine LUX on bsod.pw but seem to get really low amount. For my 400MH I should get currently about 3 coins, but was able to get only 2.2 after 24h. On bsod estimated earning is about 0.0019 mBTC/day/Mh but pool stats tell different: only 0.0013 (I earned that), how come there's such a difference?
Is this related to orphaned blocks?
Is this related to orphaned blocks?
Seems like https://www.unimining.net/ is most profitable pool @ 0.0018 mBTC/Mh/day. But that's weird, how come http://yiimp.eu/ has 0.0016 then? I don't get this... Both are big pools, so where hashrate goes?
January 31, 2018, 08:47:56 AM
altminer has 0.016, so low too.
Why so many orphaned blocks, what are they?
Most of this orphans is a POS blocks, and the rest POW orphans amount is withing normal limits.Why so many orphaned blocks, what are they?
So how to calculate profit then? How much should I lower profit vs standard formula?
January 31, 2018, 08:25:01 AM
altminer has 0.016, so low too.
Why so many orphaned blocks, what are they?
Most of this orphans is a POS blocks, and the rest POW orphans amount is withing normal limits.Why so many orphaned blocks, what are they?
So how to calculate profit then? How much should I lower profit vs standard formula?
January 31, 2018, 07:44:10 AM
Commercial Whitepaper now available on the website
https://www.luxcore.io/pdf/luxcore_commercial_wp_v2.0.pdf
https://www.luxcore.io/pdf/luxcore_commercial_wp_v2.0.pdf
Link for retweeting https://twitter.com/LUX_COIN/status/958622338135838721
Great job! It looks really good in my eyes, though im not an expert in whitepapers.
Now just waiting for the new wallet
Unable to activate staking at the moment hehe.Read it thoroughly and although it is a very solid piece of work, the document still requires some polishing in my opinion.
Main issues:
- Style and linguistic inconsistencies. Sentences starting with "but"; usage of Capitallizaiton where not required (i.e. for terms that are not established definitions or proprietary nouns). I would definitely do a cleanup before any major corporate presentations.
- Visual layout issues (graphics offset, for example the portraits in in the team section are off)
- Team. Either full disclosure or partial disclosure, but no aliases or nicknames. By the very least, these should be listed as secondary, with proper personal details first. Use LinkedIN style templating.
Maybe other issues as well, but these are the ones I could identify during the first read through.
Link for retweeting https://twitter.com/LUX_COIN/status/958622338135838721
Great job! It looks really good in my eyes, though im not an expert in whitepapers.
Now just waiting for the new wallet Unable to activate staking at the moment hehe.
Team making "cleanup" in CWP currently. Thanks for feedback, noted Main issues:
- Style and linguistic inconsistencies. Sentences starting with "but"; usage of Capitallizaiton where not required (i.e. for terms that are not established definitions or proprietary nouns). I would definitely do a cleanup before any major corporate presentations.
- Visual layout issues (graphics offset, for example the portraits in in the team section are off)
- Team. Either full disclosure or partial disclosure, but no aliases or nicknames. By the very least, these should be listed as secondary, with proper personal details first. Use LinkedIN style templating.
Maybe other issues as well, but these are the ones I could identify during the first read through.
Commercial Whitepaper now available on the website
https://www.luxcore.io/pdf/luxcore_commercial_wp_v2.0.pdf
https://www.luxcore.io/pdf/luxcore_commercial_wp_v2.0.pdf
Link for retweeting https://twitter.com/LUX_COIN/status/958622338135838721
Great job! It looks really good in my eyes, though im not an expert in whitepapers.
Now just waiting for the new wallet
Unable to activate staking at the moment hehe. January 31, 2018, 07:30:19 AM
Read it thoroughly and although it is a very solid piece of work, the document still requires some polishing in my opinion.
Main issues:
- Style and linguistic inconsistencies. Sentences starting with "but"; usage of Capitallizaiton where not required (i.e. for terms that are not established definitions or proprietary nouns). I would definitely do a cleanup before any major corporate presentations.
- Visual layout issues (graphics offset, for example the portraits in in the team section are off)
- Team. Either full disclosure or partial disclosure, but no aliases or nicknames. By the very least, these should be listed as secondary, with proper personal details first. Use LinkedIN style templating.
Maybe other issues as well, but these are the ones I could identify during the first read through.
Link for retweeting https://twitter.com/LUX_COIN/status/958622338135838721
Great job! It looks really good in my eyes, though im not an expert in whitepapers.
Now just waiting for the new wallet Unable to activate staking at the moment hehe.
Main issues:
- Style and linguistic inconsistencies. Sentences starting with "but"; usage of Capitallizaiton where not required (i.e. for terms that are not established definitions or proprietary nouns). I would definitely do a cleanup before any major corporate presentations.
- Visual layout issues (graphics offset, for example the portraits in in the team section are off)
- Team. Either full disclosure or partial disclosure, but no aliases or nicknames. By the very least, these should be listed as secondary, with proper personal details first. Use LinkedIN style templating.
Maybe other issues as well, but these are the ones I could identify during the first read through.
Commercial Whitepaper now available on the website
https://www.luxcore.io/pdf/luxcore_commercial_wp_v2.0.pdf
https://www.luxcore.io/pdf/luxcore_commercial_wp_v2.0.pdf
Link for retweeting https://twitter.com/LUX_COIN/status/958622338135838721
Great job! It looks really good in my eyes, though im not an expert in whitepapers.
Now just waiting for the new wallet
Unable to activate staking at the moment hehe. January 31, 2018, 06:57:42 AM
Where is a working wallet?
WHITE PAPER V2.0
Wallet Major Upgrade Q1 2018
January 31, 2018, 06:17:06 AM
Commercial Whitepaper now available on the website
https://www.luxcore.io/pdf/luxcore_commercial_wp_v2.0.pdf
https://www.luxcore.io/pdf/luxcore_commercial_wp_v2.0.pdf
Link for retweeting https://twitter.com/LUX_COIN/status/958622338135838721
Great job! It looks really good in my eyes, though im not an expert in whitepapers.
Now just waiting for the new wallet
Unable to activate staking at the moment hehe. January 31, 2018, 06:16:53 AM
Where is a working wallet?
January 31, 2018, 01:17:27 AM
Commercial Whitepaper now available on the website
https://www.luxcore.io/pdf/luxcore_commercial_wp_v2.0.pdf
https://www.luxcore.io/pdf/luxcore_commercial_wp_v2.0.pdf
Link for retweeting https://twitter.com/LUX_COIN/status/958622338135838721
January 31, 2018, 12:21:06 AM
I use SPmod1, evga sc2, %85 tdp, +80 core, -500 mem, backplate cooler, 55-60C, 1700rpm fans.
@%100, +120 core, -500 mem I reach 40MH/s but I don't want to run my cards higher than 70C.
@%100, +120 core, -500 mem I reach 40MH/s but I don't want to run my cards higher than 70C.
Which OC and power settings are you running your 1080Ti's to get 37Mhash? And which Miner? SP MOD1?
I can add to the list that Titan Xp is getting ~40Mhash @ 105pwr +135 core
GTX 1080 Ti 37 MH/s - 200W
GTX 750 3,2 MH/s - 30W
I can add to the list that Titan Xp is getting ~40Mhash @ 105pwr +135 core
Could someone let us know hashrates for the following cards with reasonable power consumption?
1) R9 Fury/Nano (volts usually clearly under 1.1V in any mining)
2) GTX 1070 (22MH/s when optimized for 130W?)
3) GTX 1070ti (-------- | | --------)
4) GTX 1080 (-------- | | --------)
5) GTX 1080ti (-------- | | --------)
1) R9 Fury/Nano (volts usually clearly under 1.1V in any mining)
2) GTX 1070 (22MH/s when optimized for 130W?)
3) GTX 1070ti (-------- | | --------)
4) GTX 1080 (-------- | | --------)
5) GTX 1080ti (-------- | | --------)
GTX 1080 Ti 37 MH/s - 200W
GTX 750 3,2 MH/s - 30W
January 30, 2018, 10:33:56 PM
Lux Wallet Update: only remaining issue is with the stratum compatibility. We are working around the clock to get this issue resolved. We appreciate your patience and are striving to deliver top notch products.
Check out our LUXcoin review from our team here (Vietnamese).
Check out our LUXcoin review from our team here (Vietnamese).
January 30, 2018, 09:46:24 PM
altminer has 0.016, so low too.
Why so many orphaned blocks, what are they?
Most of this orphans is a POS blocks, and the rest POW orphans amount is withing normal limits. Why so many orphaned blocks, what are they?
January 30, 2018, 06:47:09 PM
Unimining is several factors lower overall LUX hashrate, so could be an outlier (lucky 24 hours timespan), will monitor a bit while testing another pool and if Unimining stays outperforming others - give it a shot.
Seems like https://www.unimining.net/ is most profitable pool @ 0.0018 mBTC/Mh/day. But that's weird, how come http://yiimp.eu/ has 0.0016 then? I don't get this... Both are big pools, so where hashrate goes?
I`m using altminer and getting around 0.4 LUX/day per 60 MHHad same issue. Sent ~600Mh their way, got about 3.65 average only. Retesting with a different pool. Sometimes whattomine is off in their calculations, even if you factor in harder difficulty than in reality (I always add 10% difficulty for good measure).
Tried to mine LUX on bsod.pw but seem to get really low amount. For my 400MH I should get currently about 3 coins, but was able to get only 2.2 after 24h. On bsod estimated earning is about 0.0019 mBTC/day/Mh but pool stats tell different: only 0.0013 (I earned that), how come there's such a difference?
Is this related to orphaned blocks?
Is this related to orphaned blocks?
Seems like https://www.unimining.net/ is most profitable pool @ 0.0018 mBTC/Mh/day. But that's weird, how come http://yiimp.eu/ has 0.0016 then? I don't get this... Both are big pools, so where hashrate goes?
altminer has 0.016, so low too.
Why so many orphaned blocks, what are they?
January 30, 2018, 06:23:25 PM
Unimining is several factors lower overall LUX hashrate, so could be an outlier (lucky 24 hours timespan), will monitor a bit while testing another pool and if Unimining stays outperforming others - give it a shot.
Seems like https://www.unimining.net/ is most profitable pool @ 0.0018 mBTC/Mh/day. But that's weird, how come http://yiimp.eu/ has 0.0016 then? I don't get this... Both are big pools, so where hashrate goes?
I`m using altminer and getting around 0.4 LUX/day per 60 MH Had same issue. Sent ~600Mh their way, got about 3.65 average only. Retesting with a different pool. Sometimes whattomine is off in their calculations, even if you factor in harder difficulty than in reality (I always add 10% difficulty for good measure).
Tried to mine LUX on bsod.pw but seem to get really low amount. For my 400MH I should get currently about 3 coins, but was able to get only 2.2 after 24h. On bsod estimated earning is about 0.0019 mBTC/day/Mh but pool stats tell different: only 0.0013 (I earned that), how come there's such a difference?
Is this related to orphaned blocks?
Is this related to orphaned blocks?
Seems like https://www.unimining.net/ is most profitable pool @ 0.0018 mBTC/Mh/day. But that's weird, how come http://yiimp.eu/ has 0.0016 then? I don't get this... Both are big pools, so where hashrate goes?
January 30, 2018, 06:15:34 PM
560 4gb Hashrate?
January 30, 2018, 05:20:09 PM
Unimining is several factors lower overall LUX hashrate, so could be an outlier (lucky 24 hours timespan), will monitor a bit while testing another pool and if Unimining stays outperforming others - give it a shot.
Seems like https://www.unimining.net/ is most profitable pool @ 0.0018 mBTC/Mh/day. But that's weird, how come http://yiimp.eu/ has 0.0016 then? I don't get this... Both are big pools, so where hashrate goes?
Had same issue. Sent ~600Mh their way, got about 3.65 average only. Retesting with a different pool. Sometimes whattomine is off in their calculations, even if you factor in harder difficulty than in reality (I always add 10% difficulty for good measure).
Tried to mine LUX on bsod.pw but seem to get really low amount. For my 400MH I should get currently about 3 coins, but was able to get only 2.2 after 24h. On bsod estimated earning is about 0.0019 mBTC/day/Mh but pool stats tell different: only 0.0013 (I earned that), how come there's such a difference?
Is this related to orphaned blocks?
Is this related to orphaned blocks?
Seems like https://www.unimining.net/ is most profitable pool @ 0.0018 mBTC/Mh/day. But that's weird, how come http://yiimp.eu/ has 0.0016 then? I don't get this... Both are big pools, so where hashrate goes?
January 30, 2018, 05:14:09 PM
Had same issue. Sent ~600Mh their way, got about 3.65 average only. Retesting with a different pool. Sometimes whattomine is off in their calculations, even if you factor in harder difficulty than in reality (I always add 10% difficulty for good measure).
Tried to mine LUX on bsod.pw but seem to get really low amount. For my 400MH I should get currently about 3 coins, but was able to get only 2.2 after 24h. On bsod estimated earning is about 0.0019 mBTC/day/Mh but pool stats tell different: only 0.0013 (I earned that), how come there's such a difference?
Is this related to orphaned blocks?
Is this related to orphaned blocks?
Seems like https://www.unimining.net/ is most profitable pool @ 0.0018 mBTC/Mh/day. But that's weird, how come http://yiimp.eu/ has 0.0016 then? I don't get this... Both are big pools, so where hashrate goes?
January 30, 2018, 05:06:07 PM
Had same issue. Sent ~600Mh their way, got about 3.65 average only. Retesting with a different pool. Sometimes whattomine is off in their calculations, even if you factor in harder difficulty than in reality (I always add 10% difficulty for good measure).
Tried to mine LUX on bsod.pw but seem to get really low amount. For my 400MH I should get currently about 3 coins, but was able to get only 2.2 after 24h. On bsod estimated earning is about 0.0019 mBTC/day/Mh but pool stats tell different: only 0.0013 (I earned that), how come there's such a difference?
Is this related to orphaned blocks?
Is this related to orphaned blocks?
Jump to: