First sentence in this thread says:
We are happy to answer your questions.
So someone please answer my question here, because when asked on your discord channel I was first ignored and after that I was ridiculed.
My question was about discrepancy between data on block chain explorer and data on one of the pool's website list of found blocks.
When you go here
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/lux/ you see "Latest Blocks" for Lux. When you compare "Block Height" and "Extracted by" with block height displayed on the pools you can find out which pool have found certain block. I'm correct about that?
For example when you click on "AltMiner.net" under "Extracted by", next page that opens shows all blocks extracted by this pool. Am I correct?
Its little difficult when under "Extracted by" isn't name of the pool. But comparing number under "Block Height" with corresponding numbers on the pools you can attach name to the address under "Extracted by".
I have done that for unimining pool and everything corresponds, there is nothing less and nothing more when I click on that address under "Extracted by" and new page opens compared to blocks displayed on the pool.
LQH6iofaGnyHSEbBC4HGrd29v8W7BcPwzV - Extraction Statistics
Every block that is found here is also found on the web site for the pool
https://www.unimining.net/site/mining.
Also tried for some other pools, my logic seems to be correct.
Until I do that for bsod pool...
When I choose
LKDxGDJq5fF4FohAB8zJH24mDDNHDNtqsE - Extraction Statistics
It shows all the blocks displayed on
http://bsod.pw/site/mining for the lux, and some extra blocks which are listed only here but not on the website.
http://i63.tinypic.com/2wf1t3k.jpgWill someone explain this, please?
Guys, I was writing month ago about pools stealling blocks (not reporting them on the pool, although block explorer was showing that certain blocks were found by the same address as all other blocks reported on the pool. And yet I was ignored at first and after that ridiculed on the discord. When asked lupanar in this thread he was playing dumb.
Now when altminer (by the way back then altminer and unimining were named by me examples that any blocks shown in explorer under "extracted by" for they address is shown in the pool, I literally counted blocks) is gone and made his statement - you should ask yourself: do you want to be involved with this kind of people that runs this scheme. People that ignore this serious information I was provided back then.
That's all folks. Enjoy.