It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency,
since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site;
Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in -
your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency
so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
A notorious member of BCT has said DVC can be bought for .5sats so based on this information I will buy all your DVC @ .5 sat minimum 1 btc worth upwards.No small amounts under 1 btc worth plz.We can use an escrow such as OGnasty.Thank you.
At this point you will have a hard time finding much DVC to buy at .5sats
But get them if you can!
Thanks to merged mining capabilities and some helpful Bitcoin mining farms adding DVC mining in the background of their normal operations, Devcoin mining difficulty jumped much,much higher at the start of May.
DVC today has a higher difficulty than Bitcoin Cash. Lower transaction fees. Fast block times.
The wallet is improving and the Devcoin engine is humming.
The community is hodling.
The value is returning.
You are in luck...
You can earn Devcoins by contributing to the progress!
A notorious member of BCT has said DVC can be bought for .5sats so based on this information I will buy all your DVC @ .5 sat minimum 1 btc worth upwards.No small amounts under 1 btc worth plz.We can use an escrow such as OGnasty.Thank you.
I just upgraded faucet.d.evco.in and block.d.evco.in to https, and remade some ui code, anyone please test if they work properly.
and I've moved the site to another machine, so the faucet.devcoin.org and blockchain.devcoin.org has wrong redirection, please could the admin of devcoin.org help to do CNAME records instead of A records?
I just upgraded faucet.d.evco.in and block.d.evco.in to https, and remade some ui code, anyone please test if they work properly.
and I've moved the site to another machine, so the faucet.devcoin.org and blockchain.devcoin.org has wrong redirection, please could the admin of devcoin.org help to do CNAME records instead of A records?
I just upgraded faucet.d.evco.in and block.d.evco.in to https, and remade some ui code, anyone please test if they work properly.
and I've moved the site to another machine, so the faucet.devcoin.org and blockchain.devcoin.org has wrong redirection, please could the admin of devcoin.org help to do CNAME records instead of A records?
Our codebase repository is getting warmer! Mainly thanks to @Ctya's pull requests. Now we need everyone to compile devcoin to help us build a solid new release!
My understanding is that all of jasinlee's duties have now been assigned to other Admins (primarily ctya), as jasinlee had requested some time ago. Kudos to jasinlee for hanging in there, for so long, after that request!
The 2/5-Node Maintenance (seed node) duties mentioned above are still in question. Perhaps ctya would know if that was part of the server software/data moved off jasinlee's server? All the rest can be removed, though. Please let me know when your updates are complete so as to update the Devcoin HR Resources page accordingly.
Thanks,
Nova
I still hope to have some clear info about seed nodes because people could claim they do things but they aren't. How can we confirm that a seed node is running if we don't even know the IP address?
My take on it is to become a little strict. Apart from my node (http://dvcexplorer.wy.si/) I don't know of any other.
NOW listen carefully
I'll drop node maintenance rewards from people not replying to this message. Deadline is 2 weeks!
Emfox, Hunterbunter, Jasinlee, Markm, Shattienator PLEASE CONFIRM that you are still run your seed nodes. (sent you a private message as well)
EVERYONE If you are not mentioned but you are in contact with such people, please reply here.
Thanks!
P.S: If you have other duties, please confirm those as well
OK, now what?
Only Markm, emfox replied to me. Also, Ctya just added his node to Devcoin's mainnet nodes: https://github.com/devcoin/core/pull/43 so along my node, we only have 4 known active node maintainers.
Given this situation, I feel pushed to remove Shattienator, Jasinlee and Hunterbunter from Node Maintenance ongoing shares, starting from round 86.
@Novacadian, since you hold the HR Admin role, what is your recommendation?
Hi develCuy.
Pretty sure Hunterbunter had resigned from all his duties. Just was not sure about the nodes.
Jasinlee had asked to be replaced in all his duties some time ago, so he could be removed (and is already from the HR Resources Page).
Allow me to try a PM to Shattienator. He may still be running a node on his server(s). Will PM you with my results.
My understanding is that all of jasinlee's duties have now been assigned to other Admins (primarily ctya), as jasinlee had requested some time ago. Kudos to jasinlee for hanging in there, for so long, after that request!
The 2/5-Node Maintenance (seed node) duties mentioned above are still in question. Perhaps ctya would know if that was part of the server software/data moved off jasinlee's server? All the rest can be removed, though. Please let me know when your updates are complete so as to update the Devcoin HR Resources page accordingly.
Thanks,
Nova
I still hope to have some clear info about seed nodes because people could claim they do things but they aren't. How can we confirm that a seed node is running if we don't even know the IP address?
My take on it is to become a little strict. Apart from my node (http://dvcexplorer.wy.si/) I don't know of any other.
NOW listen carefully
I'll drop node maintenance rewards from people not replying to this message. Deadline is 2 weeks!
Emfox, Hunterbunter, Jasinlee, Markm, Shattienator PLEASE CONFIRM that you are still run your seed nodes. (sent you a private message as well)
EVERYONE If you are not mentioned but you are in contact with such people, please reply here.
Thanks!
P.S: If you have other duties, please confirm those as well
OK, now what?
Only Markm, emfox replied to me. Also, Ctya just added his node to Devcoin's mainnet nodes: https://github.com/devcoin/core/pull/43 so along my node, we only have 4 known active node maintainers.
Given this situation, I feel pushed to remove Shattienator, Jasinlee and Hunterbunter from Node Maintenance ongoing shares, starting from round 86.
@Novacadian, since you hold the HR Admin role, what is your recommendation?
Our codebase repository is getting warmer! Mainly thanks to @Ctya's pull requests. Now we need everyone to compile devcoin to help us build a solid new release!
This is the key file needed to have the Devcoin data inserted instead of the Dogecoin data
Code:
using NBitcoin; using NBitcoin.DataEncoders; using NBitcoin.Protocol; using NBitcoin.RPC; using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.IO; using System.Linq; using System.Net; using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace NBitcoin.Altcoins { // Reference: https://github.com/dogecoin/dogecoin/blob/10a5e93a055ab5f239c5447a5fe05283af09e293/src/chainparams.cpp public class Dogecoin { public class DogeConsensusFactory : ConsensusFactory { public DogeConsensusFactory() { }
public override BlockHeader CreateBlockHeader() { return new DogecoinBlockHeader(); } }
#pragma warning disable CS0618 // Type or member is obsolete public class DogecoinBlockHeader : BlockHeader { public override uint256 GetPoWHash() { var headerBytes = this.ToBytes(); var h = NBitcoin.Crypto.SCrypt.ComputeDerivedKey(headerBytes, headerBytes, 1024, 1, 1, null, 32); return new uint256(h); } } #pragma warning restore CS0618 // Type or member is obsolete
//Format visual studio //{({.*?}), (.*?)} //Tuple.Create(new byte[]$1, $2) //static Tuple[] pnSeed6_main = null; //static Tuple[] pnSeed6_test = null; // Not used in DOGE: https://github.com/dogecoin/dogecoin/blob/10a5e93a055ab5f239c5447a5fe05283af09e293/src/chainparams.cpp#L135
[Obsolete("Use EnsureRegistered instead")] public static void Register() { EnsureRegistered(); } public static void EnsureRegistered() { if(_LazyRegistered.IsValueCreated) return; // This will cause RegisterLazy to evaluate new Lazy