Author

Topic: Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘 - page 217. (Read 85526 times)

sr. member
Activity: 2520
Merit: 280
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
exactly, I agree that an artists is not their art...
on the other hand, I also believe a better person will create better art in most of situations, but this is a point for a different topic.

Are roobet art contests still happening or they stopped with these?
Currently the art contest wasn't live at the moment, generally we may see them only at the festival season like new year but why we need to discuss about the winners reputation? If there is no such rules that negative tagged account can't participate in the art contest then they can't able to win or else there is no problem at all.

YES, A ROOBET Art Contest with the theme " Winter & Valentine's Day" is still running until February 28th. Negatively tagged accounts, whether participant or non-participant, are meaningless. Despite such a rule, anyone can create a new account and participate on it. Thus, A negative tagged account is fine with me.

Roobet.com | Art Contest "Winter & Valentine's Day" | $4950 up for grabs! Ends Feb 28.

Did see that contest and actually forgot this is valentine's month, am I getting old. Sad

Yeah, we shouldn't see the reputation for the contest winner when they can bypass it hy simply create a new account and post their art in the thread.
sr. member
Activity: 2156
Merit: 323
exactly, I agree that an artists is not their art...
on the other hand, I also believe a better person will create better art in most of situations, but this is a point for a different topic.

Are roobet art contests still happening or they stopped with these?
Currently the art contest wasn't live at the moment, generally we may see them only at the festival season like new year but why we need to discuss about the winners reputation? If there is no such rules that negative tagged account can't participate in the art contest then they can't able to win or else there is no problem at all.

YES, A ROOBET Art Contest with the theme " Winter & Valentine's Day" is still running until February 28th. Negatively tagged accounts, whether participant or non-participant, are meaningless. Despite such a rule, anyone can create a new account and participate on it. Thus, A negative tagged account is fine with me.

Roobet.com | Art Contest "Winter & Valentine's Day" | $4950 up for grabs! Ends Feb 28.
legendary
Activity: 1820
Merit: 2700
Crypto Swap Exchange
Are roobet art contests still happening or they stopped with these?

It is my understanding that Roobet's Art competitions have not stopped and are still being held. Currently, one is still running, the "Valentines & Winter" art contest, which will close next week (February 28).
sr. member
Activity: 2520
Merit: 280
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
I sort of understand the disconnection between an art contest and an account with negative trust. Art is art and if you have a good art that you published then what type of person you are shouldn't dictate on how good your art is. I mean after all Art is connected to the artist a bit but not the exact thing.

Assume you saw the most beautiful painting you have ever seen but it is by some person who committed crime all their life, would that make the art bad? It just makes the artist bad. I am not saying that one or the other version of this is better, but I could totally understand the logic of a negative account getting art win because those two things seem a bit unrelated.

exactly, I agree that an artists is not their art...
on the other hand, I also believe a better person will create better art in most of situations, but this is a point for a different topic.

Are roobet art contests still happening or they stopped with these?
Currently the art contest wasn't live at the moment, generally we may see them only at the festival season like new year but why we need to discuss about the winners reputation? If there is no such rules that negative tagged account can't participate in the art contest then they can't able to win or else there is no problem at all.
legendary
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1113
There's no need to be upset
I sort of understand the disconnection between an art contest and an account with negative trust. Art is art and if you have a good art that you published then what type of person you are shouldn't dictate on how good your art is. I mean after all Art is connected to the artist a bit but not the exact thing.

Assume you saw the most beautiful painting you have ever seen but it is by some person who committed crime all their life, would that make the art bad? It just makes the artist bad. I am not saying that one or the other version of this is better, but I could totally understand the logic of a negative account getting art win because those two things seem a bit unrelated.

exactly, I agree that an artists is not their art...
on the other hand, I also believe a better person will create better art in most of situations, but this is a point for a different topic.

Are roobet art contests still happening or they stopped with these?
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 2124
It is not the jpg that makes it worth that much, it is the tech behind it that makes it worth that much. I mean there is nothing that we should be really claiming that we know in the NFT world because some things just happen without any reason at all and makes everyone shocked. I consider them like that banana taped to the wall that the guy ate which was worth 150k.

We all know that it was not really "art", it was banana taped to the wall, and even the owner said that banana could be changed it was the "idea" that was the art and not THAT banana that makes it art. Do you really believe that a banana taped to wall worths a ton of money? We all know it shouldn't however it became viral and probably worths even more right now, art is a bit weird like that.

that!

people should remember that value is different than price and some of these high prices of NFTs are already justifiable just for the fact that there's people willing to pay for it, so, they value it

people don't always buy on reason, sometimes the buy on emotion too

worth remembering that the image it's just a tiny part of the NFT, what is on the surface, there are many other details on the next layers like inside the contract, properties, etc..
Yeah that's our personal opinion how we rate art and this is nothing and have seen people paying huge amounts for some paint colour only on big frame and similar artworks but they find it worth paying so it's their choice only but for me there should be something worth noticing in art and it must have something to pay for.
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1129
VPN Friendly & Exclusive Bonuses!
I sort of understand the disconnection between an art contest and an account with negative trust. Art is art and if you have a good art that you published then what type of person you are shouldn't dictate on how good your art is. I mean after all Art is connected to the artist a bit but not the exact thing.

Assume you saw the most beautiful painting you have ever seen but it is by some person who committed crime all their life, would that make the art bad? It just makes the artist bad. I am not saying that one or the other version of this is better, but I could totally understand the logic of a negative account getting art win because those two things seem a bit unrelated.
legendary
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1113
There's no need to be upset
It is not the jpg that makes it worth that much, it is the tech behind it that makes it worth that much. I mean there is nothing that we should be really claiming that we know in the NFT world because some things just happen without any reason at all and makes everyone shocked. I consider them like that banana taped to the wall that the guy ate which was worth 150k.

We all know that it was not really "art", it was banana taped to the wall, and even the owner said that banana could be changed it was the "idea" that was the art and not THAT banana that makes it art. Do you really believe that a banana taped to wall worths a ton of money? We all know it shouldn't however it became viral and probably worths even more right now, art is a bit weird like that.

that!

people should remember that value is different than price and some of these high prices of NFTs are already justifiable just for the fact that there's people willing to pay for it, so, they value it

people don't always buy on reason, sometimes the buy on emotion too

worth remembering that the image it's just a tiny part of the NFT, what is on the surface, there are many other details on the next layers like inside the contract, properties, etc..
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 2124
Many artists had join the train of NFT creators making it competitive and difficult to sell due to the high numbers of participants joining the market. It looks to me that there is more NFT creators than the buyers themselves.
NFT is a great asset which will be quite interesting to have in one's portfolio but sometimes it's difficult to sell especially for holders.
See particularly i am not fan of jpeg images but some projects which have some utility in them will surely survive the the next blow otherwise all will be out from the market and their holders would loose all the funds.At this time many are jumping to make profits but don't have prerequisite knowledge so they lag behind.If you look clearly there are buyers and sellers as well for this NFT trend.

some say most NFTs will go to zero over time, and this is possible (the long tail)
but some blue-chip ones will probably stay and melt faces

some projects are already changing what we've seen before in terms of collective media creation and IP.

For sure the projects that are having no stake and serve no purpose will not survive in the market as selling images as NFT is now becoming tough.Only a handful of projects that have some P2E or PVP game setup and some purpose will survive the next few years.Or others will be lying like dead tokens in your wallets who nobody wants.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1563
I would like to participate on it but do they allow negative trust users to join in their art contest? It would be nice if I could showcase my art even though I am not really that good.
Yeah! There are other participant who submitted an artwork with a negative trust on their account and are still able to win a prize. Other than that, it is also not indicated on the Announcement thread that having a negative trust is prohibited.

One example is this user -> https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/5ksanahandmade-2555471 who is announced to be the winner of the said contest -> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.54928901
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 3054
Wheel of Whales 🐳
I already picture out on whose members would really be able to include on that top 10 selection.  Grin
-snip-
I'm not sure what you mean exactly, but I assume that you think that people from the forum who have won previous contests are also participating?

I think so too, we have some very talented artists among us here in the forum. I like to follow such contests and I am always amazed by the good works that are submitted. I think that the contest will be worthwhile for Roobet, which in turn will pay off for all of us if Roobet continues to strengthen their promotional activities here in the forum (longer running campaigns, more contests, ...).
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1075
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Many artists had join the train of NFT creators making it competitive and difficult to sell due to the high numbers of participants joining the market. It looks to me that there is more NFT creators than the buyers themselves.
NFT is a great asset which will be quite interesting to have in one's portfolio but sometimes it's difficult to sell especially for holders.
See particularly i am not fan of jpeg images but some projects which have some utility in them will surely survive the the next blow otherwise all will be out from the market and their holders would loose all the funds.At this time many are jumping to make profits but don't have prerequisite knowledge so they lag behind.If you look clearly there are buyers and sellers as well for this NFT trend.
It is not the jpg that makes it worth that much, it is the tech behind it that makes it worth that much. I mean there is nothing that we should be really claiming that we know in the NFT world because some things just happen without any reason at all and makes everyone shocked. I consider them like that banana taped to the wall that the guy ate which was worth 150k.

We all know that it was not really "art", it was banana taped to the wall, and even the owner said that banana could be changed it was the "idea" that was the art and not THAT banana that makes it art. Do you really believe that a banana taped to wall worths a ton of money? We all know it shouldn't however it became viral and probably worths even more right now, art is a bit weird like that.
hero member
Activity: 2702
Merit: 540
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
-snip-
but do they allow negative trust users to join in their art contest? It would be nice if I could showcase my art even though I am not really that good.
I would not have read anything in the conditions of participation that users with a negative trust are not allowed to participate. Why should that be anyways, this rule makes sense for signature campaigns, but not for such contests. You don't advertise the company in any way with your account.

To be sure you can of course send Hhampuz a PM, he usually responds very quickly!

There is nothing mentioned about the trust on that thread, which means that he can participate in the art contest.
Although there are 10 prizes to be won there but you need to be a very good artist in order to win as i have seen some amazing artworks in previous artworks competitions on the forum.
I already picture out on whose members would really be able to include on that top 10 selection.  Grin

When it comes to drawing competition then its always been that generous or prize is really decent on where Roobet do set on which what makes it interesting.
They are the ones who are really that active when it comes to events like this and no other.
legendary
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1113
There's no need to be upset
Many artists had join the train of NFT creators making it competitive and difficult to sell due to the high numbers of participants joining the market. It looks to me that there is more NFT creators than the buyers themselves.
NFT is a great asset which will be quite interesting to have in one's portfolio but sometimes it's difficult to sell especially for holders.
See particularly i am not fan of jpeg images but some projects which have some utility in them will surely survive the the next blow otherwise all will be out from the market and their holders would loose all the funds.At this time many are jumping to make profits but don't have prerequisite knowledge so they lag behind.If you look clearly there are buyers and sellers as well for this NFT trend.

some say most NFTs will go to zero over time, and this is possible (the long tail)
but some blue-chip ones will probably stay and melt faces

some projects are already changing what we've seen before in terms of collective media creation and IP.
hero member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 618
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
-snip-
but do they allow negative trust users to join in their art contest? It would be nice if I could showcase my art even though I am not really that good.
I would not have read anything in the conditions of participation that users with a negative trust are not allowed to participate. Why should that be anyways, this rule makes sense for signature campaigns, but not for such contests. You don't advertise the company in any way with your account.

To be sure you can of course send Hhampuz a PM, he usually responds very quickly!

There is nothing mentioned about the trust on that thread, which means that he can participate in the art contest.
Although there are 10 prizes to be won there but you need to be a very good artist in order to win as i have seen some amazing artworks in previous artworks competitions on the forum.
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 3054
Wheel of Whales 🐳
-snip-
but do they allow negative trust users to join in their art contest? It would be nice if I could showcase my art even though I am not really that good.
I would not have read anything in the conditions of participation that users with a negative trust are not allowed to participate. Why should that be anyways, this rule makes sense for signature campaigns, but not for such contests. You don't advertise the company in any way with your account.

To be sure you can of course send Hhampuz a PM, he usually responds very quickly!
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1024

I see this in services and it looks like they are giving a good prizes to the top 10 and the participants are really good at arts and crafts I would like to participate on it but do they allow negative trust users to join in their art contest? It would be nice if I could showcase my art even though I am not really that good.

ya.ya.yo!
legendary
Activity: 3514
Merit: 2246
🌀 Cosmic Casino

Alright, here's another amazing promo by Roobet. Not $20k+ worth NFT, but the chances of winning are much higher. 10 Winners/ $500 EACH!




Don't miss it, guys! Just click on the image above, and you are there!
Indeed, "there's always next time " as @lienfaye said, because Roobet's giveaways ... we have an endless stream of them. Smiley Good luck, guys!
That's the thing i like about roobet giveaways which is the rewards are high as well the number of winners is also set to 5 or more like in this which is 10 players winning $500 by simple giveaway.Those who got this $500 from simple rt and other instructions are really lucky as never hit this jackpot but trying is easy so we should do it.Maybe some of us get lucky this time and we have more winners from us what do you say @Betwrong Wink

What can I say? Smiley I myself won a lot in various promo contests and challenges run by Roobet. "Guess Total Wagers" and "Guess The Slot" come to mind first, but there were others, many of them here on bitcointalk, and I'm sure forum members can confirm that they won hundreds of USD each in those contests. So, yeah, it's not a guess, it's a certainty that people will keep winning hundreds of USD in Roobet's amazing contests, like this one
   
Roobet.com | Art Contest "Valentines & Winter" | $4950 up for grabs! Ends Feb 28


for example. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 2124
Many artists had join the train of NFT creators making it competitive and difficult to sell due to the high numbers of participants joining the market. It looks to me that there is more NFT creators than the buyers themselves.
NFT is a great asset which will be quite interesting to have in one's portfolio but sometimes it's difficult to sell especially for holders.
See particularly i am not fan of jpeg images but some projects which have some utility in them will surely survive the the next blow otherwise all will be out from the market and their holders would loose all the funds.At this time many are jumping to make profits but don't have prerequisite knowledge so they lag behind.If you look clearly there are buyers and sellers as well for this NFT trend.
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 1228
If reputed Casino's are being questioned for the privacy of KYC's then dam, its gonna be difficulty in the future. I mean Roobet is definitely making more money than anyone of us could imagine. Why the heck they would go and risk the business for KYC in-secure non sense.
Exactly. Besides, on Roobet, users who make small deposits/withdrawals (whom I believe are the majority) are requested to only complete the step one verification by providing some basic information such as the name, country, phone number without having to upload any document.
I am sure most of those complaining about kyc are publicly sharing more personal information than that on social media platforms.



I think that would definitely be a suicide move if Roobet decides to implement a KYC function as this would decrease their total number of players daily. KYC and other identity documents are what make/break the success of an online gambling company. While the latter must comply with the regulations prescribed in their country, there must be at least some sort of compromise if they really want to earn and maximize their profits.

Not only does KYC affect the success of an online gambling company but it also puts people at risk for identity theft or any other related problems.
They implement first level KYC already for about a year now, and guess what? They are still consider as one of the best site to gamble so I don’t think the whole KYC thing can ruin Roobet, they are just too good for this. Though I don’t like how they implement it since there’s no announcement ahead of time but gamblers of this site have no more choice but to comply with it, the transitions are not that smooth but it works well I believe.

They consider as one of the best site because even by know they never failed to give their gamblers good satisfaction in terms of their gambling experiences. That's why we can say that for now and KYC is just temporarily confusion to the people and later on people ignores that because many understand that its really a part of something regulation or legalization of their casino.
Jump to: