[MAINNET]"MimbleWimble", we cast this spell so mote it be. GRIMM was born. - page 12.

Tongpu

jr. member

Activity: 70

Merit: 3

Quote from: Tongpu on August 09, 2019, 04:40:58 AM

Withdraw from pool work now. If someone have failed transactions from tonight, they will see the resend button later today after interface update. New withdraw work fine. bug fixed. Cool

Any questions please at telegram @grimmw , there are pool operator work

Upd: All payouts on mining pool working. If you have failed transaction, go to payouts and click resend opposite transaction.

ivanTzvetanov

newbie

Activity: 7

Merit: 0

ok we waiting

Tongpu

jr. member

Activity: 70

Merit: 3

Quote from: ivanTzvetanov on August 09, 2019, 06:22:50 AM

Gminer and Lolminer when will they work? Huh

Lol miner is silent while, Gminer will add us soon

ivanTzvetanov

newbie

Activity: 7

Merit: 0

Gminer and Lolminer when will they work? Huh

witalikf

jr. member

Activity: 75

Merit: 1

Quote from: L0ky on August 09, 2019, 02:13:17 AM

Quote from: witalikf on August 08, 2019, 04:30:16 PM

These guys threw me out of telegrams. They do not want to answer questions that are inconvenient for them. Does such a coin have a future? It is impossible to buy or sell it! Well, the last developers are Russian-speaking! Tell me the projects that had a future with such developers Sorry for Google translation, but it's too late for me and it's time to sleep...moreover ... 50 coins simply disappeared from the pool when withdrawing to the wallet!

You are just an idiot. People need technical support, solve issues with a pool of wallets, you have come and flood. Do not like it - go to hell do not stop people from working - deer.

When there is nothing to say, a person uses curses and names like YOU !!!

Tongpu

jr. member

Activity: 70

Merit: 3

Withdraw from mining pool work now. If someone have failed transactions from tonight, they will see the resend button later today after interface update. New withdraw work fine. bug fixed. Cool

Any questions please at telegram @grimmw , there are pool operator work

Tongpu

jr. member

Activity: 70

Merit: 3

Quote from: gold969 on August 09, 2019, 03:41:06 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: gold969 on August 09, 2019, 03:03:47 AM

when will the withdrawal of coins in the pool work? I'm not one of the times still could not remove the coins...
https://grimm.ravepool.com/#dashboard

There was a bug when more transactions payout. It fixed. Now we test payout. At Telegram group @grimmw - you can send your address. Now testing

do I have to send my address via telegram to withdraw coins from the pool?or I should wait for you to fix it.. I'm in no hurry

Wait. Withdraw will be avaible from pool soon. At telegram last info

gold969

sr. member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 251

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: gold969 on August 09, 2019, 03:03:47 AM

when will the withdrawal of coins in the pool work? I'm not one of the times still could not remove the coins...
https://grimm.ravepool.com/#dashboard

There was a bug when more transactions payout. It fixed. Now we test payout. At Telegram group @grimmw - you can send your address. Now testing

do I have to send my address via telegram to withdraw coins from the pool?or I should wait for you to fix it.. I'm in no hurry

gold969

sr. member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 251

when will the withdrawal of coins in the pool work? I'm not one of the times still could not remove the coins...
https://grimm.ravepool.com/#dashboard

Tongpu

jr. member

Activity: 70

Merit: 3

Quote from: stas on August 09, 2019, 12:35:53 AM

Quote from: witalikf on August 08, 2019, 04:56:16 PM

This team initially positions itself as a fork from BEAM, but this is fundamentally wrong ... and they themselves talk about it! + BEAM developers did not talk about fork ... do not be fooled!Let's get it shit back, where it got out!

In this case fork - means they just took source code from beam gitHub repository and used it for their project.
Not the fork in context of block chain splitting.

I do agree that the launch was not a clean one:) only big rigs could get blocks until pool was added.
And now when pool is available the difficulty is too high

You are right about the fork. He just does not understand what this means.
About launch:
We started as transparently as possible. We start blockchain. Mine on CPU first block. Then we publish topic here and in other socials. After +- 20 mins diff began to grow miners began to connect. Big rigs - yes, miners starts connect rigs. Build-in miner at wallet works well on rigs. Instructions about how to mine in two clicks was published on website from start. I understand that we always suspect everyone of impurity. But we do not want commerce in our project as wait like witalikf and people like him have no place in our community. For them there are many projects with ICO's. We have no premine. No ICO. Do you know how many coins we personally mined? about 1500 coins on balance only. Less than many. We work on testnet and testing futures for next release. Fixing bugs. We are building a community and developing mimblewimble technology. It's is the main goal of Grimm. Before you take something you need to give something Wink

.

L0ky

jr. member

Activity: 37

Merit: 1

Not All Who Wander Are Lost

Quote from: witalikf on August 08, 2019, 04:30:16 PM

These guys threw me out of telegrams. They do not want to answer questions that are inconvenient for them. Does such a coin have a future? It is impossible to buy or sell it! Well, the last developers are Russian-speaking! Tell me the projects that had a future with such developers Sorry for Google translation, but it's too late for me and it's time to sleep...moreover ... 50 coins simply disappeared from the pool when withdrawing to the wallet!

You are just an idiot. People need technical support, solve issues with a pool of wallets, you have come and flood. Do not like it - go to hell do not stop people from working - deer.

stas

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Quote from: witalikf on August 08, 2019, 04:56:16 PM

This team initially positions itself as a fork from BEAM, but this is fundamentally wrong ... and they themselves talk about it! + BEAM developers did not talk about fork ... do not be fooled!Let's get it shit back, where it got out!

In this case fork - means they just took source code from beam gitHub repository and used it for their project.
Not the fork in context of block chain splitting.

I do agree that the launch was not a clean one:) only big rigs could get blocks until pool was added.
And now when pool is available the difficulty is too high

witalikf

jr. member

Activity: 75

Merit: 1

It’s not so easy for you to wash yourself!

witalikf

jr. member

Activity: 75

Merit: 1

This team initially positions itself as a fork from BEAM, but this is fundamentally wrong ... and they themselves talk about it! + BEAM developers did not talk about fork ... do not be fooled!Let's get it shit back, where it got out!

witalikf

jr. member

Activity: 75

Merit: 1

Quote from: mrquackquack on August 08, 2019, 04:33:22 PM

exchanges?

no whitepaper,no exchanges and don`t talk about it!

mrquackquack

member

Activity: 1204

Merit: 10

exchanges?

witalikf

jr. member

Activity: 75

Merit: 1

These guys threw me out of telegrams. They do not want to answer questions that are inconvenient for them. Does such a coin have a future? It is impossible to buy or sell it! Well, the last developers are Russian-speaking! Tell me the projects that had a future with such developers Sorry for Google translation, but it's too late for me and it's time to sleep...moreover ... 50 coins simply disappeared from the pool when withdrawing to the wallet!

bur1x

newbie

Activity: 10

Merit: 0

We've created a Grimm Community Discord Server
Join here: https://discord.gg/XKgPPW2

joeykolb

newbie

Activity: 81

Merit: 0

how to set up the peers on the wallet? somebody knows some peers?

sava0123

sr. member

Activity: 393

Merit: 250

Telegram OTC group:

https://t.me/grimm_otc

Topic: [MAINNET]"MimbleWimble", we cast this spell so mote it be. GRIMM was born. - page 12. (Read 12635 times)