Of course, I still need to address your comments about extinction.
Yea, I actually read that. I was looking for more info about the effects of dansgaard-oeschger events on biodiversity but did not find anything easily. That link is just saying the current warming is not best explained as a D-O event. Nothing about the effect on biodiversity, which I would be interested in with regards to Punk-eek.
It's also stating that Fred Singer likes to push it. Recall Frederick Seitz? And Richard Lindzen? Those two, plus Singer are all sellouts to Big Oil. And the tobacco industry. Are they experts on climate change or are they experts on the dangers of tobacco smoke? The answer, of course, is it doesn't matter, because they obviously have other agendas.
That's a point against you, not for you. You see, I said earlier that you need to read the scientific literature. I said that twice. And you just now admitted that the only thing you read is the 2007 IPCC document. Is that the one that Richard Lindzen was a participant in, before he became disassociated with it?
I'm telling you (for about the fourth time) - stop trotting out material that is associated with paid charlatans aligned with the oil and tobacco industries, and start reading the scientific periodicals.
Well this was from the 2007 report, Lindzen was an author for the "clouds" chapter in 2001.
So you think the IPCC is not a good starting point? I only consider it a useful summary, but one must start somewhere.
Apparently you know more about this stuff than me... are the IPCC reports untrustworthy because some of the info in there is associated with paid charlatans?
I don't read the IPCC reports. And for all I know, the reference to the Dansgaard-Oeschger events was just background material, in an effort to be thorough.
Please, read the reputable scientific periodicals, either peer reviewed, or more mainstream ones like Scientific American. Do that for two years, or read back issues. For lack of a better way of putting it, you'll just feel that AGW makes sense. And conversely, every time you come across something that sounds like it is smugly pointing out that AGW must not be happening, dig a little deeper, and I can assure you - every single time - you'll discover it has ties to Big Oil, and even more strangely, the same people will have also been paid off by the tobacco companies years ago.