the only thing you are referring to is his public blog and he can only go so far and reveal so much there.
Do yourself a favor and read the private blog posts starting from 2016 going into at least 2017/2018 and all will be revealed regarding the metals and the indices. Have a look and see what reversals were given and see for yourself whether they worked or not. Its right there a record of everything Armstrong posted on his private blog. You will have to discover the truth on your own I cannot do it for you...
And of course AnonymousCoder has never gone through the private blog and is still stuck on the gold play that ended in early 2016 for him, that is a real sad state of affairs how many calls Armstrong has made after the fact on his private blog and he is hung up on one trade from the hundreds of trades given on his private blog he clings to one as proof of his assertion.
I cannot continue to post because this forum has been taken over by the mob that is AnonymousCoder and he is doing everything in his power to silence me, it clearly has become personal.
Private Blogs: I have all private blogs and these do NOT contain anything contradicting our message. You did have the chance to quote any relevant private blog messages but you failed to do so.
update* you almost sound upset to see me go AnonymousCoder You never wanted to talk about anything other than the gold report in 2015 and early 2016 March that is the time period and the blog posts you were fixated on and there was no way to move ahead to other trades. And you have not read a single private blog post from 2017 going into 2019 because you have been fixated on one trade where the only conclusion is to believe Armstrong lied or failed to let clients know in time. I am done with trying to explain anything to you I do not care what you believe or have to say about Armstrong or Socrates, who are you at the end of the day? just a disgruntled owner of the 2015 gold report who lost out on one trade, ultimately your opinion means nothing.
Good luck guys hope you find success with your trading with or without Socrates.
Gumbi, sorry but much of what you're saying here just flat isn't true at all. Armstrong completely blew the turn in commodities in late 2015 and for whatever reason he continually called for new lows the entire time. This wasn't just one trade, this went on for most of 2016 and into 2017. The 2015 WEC forum was just full of chatter about it. Coming out of the 2015 WEC I will say he did get it right to short Deutsche Bank but just about everyone saw the EU as a dirt torpedo so not a particularly hard call IMHO. I was on Socrates when it first came out in early 2016 and nobody seemed to understand how to make it work, not the GMW (public or private), not the arrays, reversals, energy indicators , etc. Everyone took a crack at it and offered their explanations, they all took tries to trade from it and often you'd hear of some 3rd party that knew how to use it and make serious money in futures/stocks/etc but not a single person I ever came across was able to back this up at all. Slowly we started to notice the arrays on Socrates we were using and the arrays MA posted were quite different. Then after a few months of trying to use the system we were told don't trade on it because the coding still had bugs that needed to be worked out. Seriously?! I have absolutely no bias for or against Armstrong but I do deal in facts and I'm sorry but the reality is that he continually called for a bottom on PM's right through that entire rally. Why are people so pissed off about that? Well maybe it's because PM stocks went up 3-10X during that time! That's a huge missed call and if the computer didn't show you that move then how the heck can you trust it on more subtle market moves? He also said governments would move to ban crypto currencies (we'll see how that one plays out too, but nothing yet). Honestly I should be thanking him for what happened because without it I would not have created my own system which does work remarkably well for me. Now I'm not prepared to say all of MA's stuff is fraudulent or garbage but to sell the idea that the computer is never wrong is certainly misleading even under the best circumstances.