Topic: Martingale for win, my own experience - page 5. (Read 1115 times)

Quote from: CryptoProphet on March 13, 2018, 04:45:01 AM

If you have 0.05BTC and you go broke in 3 straight losses you are doing the martingale wrong Cheesy

.. You need to at least have a bankroll that covers 10-15 losses in a row to even consider trying it out. It works, but most casinos have limits in place which means you can't continue forever if there's a streak of 30-40 losses.

10-15 losses or 30-40 losses is impossible because winning chance 50% (1/2) like head/tail.

It is possible and 10-15 loses are common in gambling. we think the Martingale is an advantage for us and we can make a profit but actually, this is an advantage for casinos. did you ever heard after 20+ loses any gambler beat casino while using this method I think no one. Because 99% casino only wins this long run.

I never catched 10-15 loses with 50% winning chance.
I playing the game with provably fair system only

I have faced more than 10 continuous losses with a setting of 50.8%. This game runs on a probably fair system so you may get first many wins and fewer losses but if you continue to play for more time then you may get continuous more losses. Still, gambling house is not cheating you but just you're unlucky to get so many continuous losses.

The real problem with this strategy is that a big amount of money is required to get profit. The more you play, the more are the chances of winning. But how many shots one can really give? In order to make 10 shots, a person must not only have a good amount of money but some persistency and guts too. Else, it even sounds painful to face 10 losses in a row. However, nothing can be better than recovering the loss and winning extra but again, such a risky and difficult strategy it is.

chris200x9

legendary

Activity: 1316

Merit: 1011

Quote from: flower1024 on March 09, 2018, 12:03:55 PM

Quote from: CryptoProphet on March 09, 2018, 01:41:28 AM

Quote from: crwth on March 13, 2018, 10:37:09 PM

If you have 0.05BTC and you go broke in 3 straight losses you are doing the martingale wrong Cheesy

.. You need to at least have a bankroll that covers 10-15 losses in a row to even consider trying it out. It works, but most casinos have limits in place which means you can't continue forever if there's a streak of 30-40 losses.

10-15 losses or 30-40 losses is impossible because winning chance 50% (1/2) like head/tail.

It is possible and 10-15 loses are common in gambling. we think the Martingale is an advantage for us and we can make a profit but actually, this is an advantage for casinos. did you ever heard after 20+ loses any gambler beat casino while using this method I think no one. Because 99% casino only wins this long run.

I never catched 10-15 loses with 50% winning chance.
I playing the game with provably fair system only

I have faced more than 10 continuous losses with a setting of 50.8%. This game runs on a probably fair system so you may get first many wins and fewer losses but if you continue to play for more time then you may get continuous more losses. Still, gambling house is not cheating you but just you're unlucky to get so many continuous losses.

Caladonian

hero member

Activity: 1302

Merit: 540

Quote from: CryptoProphet on March 13, 2018, 04:45:01 AM

Quote from: flower1024 on March 09, 2018, 12:03:55 PM

Quote from: CryptoProphet on March 09, 2018, 01:41:28 AM

Quote from: CryptoProphet on March 13, 2018, 04:45:01 AM

If you have 0.05BTC and you go broke in 3 straight losses you are doing the martingale wrong Cheesy

.. You need to at least have a bankroll that covers 10-15 losses in a row to even consider trying it out. It works, but most casinos have limits in place which means you can't continue forever if there's a streak of 30-40 losses.

10-15 losses or 30-40 losses is impossible because winning chance 50% (1/2) like head/tail.

It is possible and 10-15 loses are common in gambling. we think the Martingale is an advantage for us and we can make a profit but actually, this is an advantage for casinos. did you ever heard after 20+ loses any gambler beat casino while using this method I think no one. Because 99% casino only wins this long run.

I never catched 10-15 loses with 50% winning chance.
I playing the game with provably fair system only

You should definitely be playing in a provably fair system only and the thing is, there is still a possibility of facing that continuous loss and it could definitely occur when the time is unlucky. There's a high chance of it when you play for a long time.

Personally we can speak according to what we experienced before, 20 loses in the road is always possible when you are playing for much longer time, might be possible that you are not too greedy and if you achieved what you are aiming you already quit and enjoy, but keep in mind that it's
not always a lucky day for you, time will come that you will then suffer and losing streak will show to the point that you are not expecting it to happen.

crwth

copper member

Activity: 2800

Merit: 1268

Try Gunbot for a month go to -> https://gunbot.ph

Quote from: flower1024 on March 09, 2018, 12:03:55 PM

Quote from: CryptoProphet on March 09, 2018, 01:41:28 AM

If you have 0.05BTC and you go broke in 3 straight losses you are doing the martingale wrong Cheesy

.. You need to at least have a bankroll that covers 10-15 losses in a row to even consider trying it out. It works, but most casinos have limits in place which means you can't continue forever if there's a streak of 30-40 losses.

10-15 losses or 30-40 losses is impossible because winning chance 50% (1/2) like head/tail.

It is possible and 10-15 loses are common in gambling. we think the Martingale is an advantage for us and we can make a profit but actually, this is an advantage for casinos. did you ever heard after 20+ loses any gambler beat casino while using this method I think no one. Because 99% casino only wins this long run.

I never catched 10-15 loses with 50% winning chance.
I playing the game with provably fair system only

You should definitely be playing in a provably fair system only and the thing is, there is still a possibility of facing that continuous loss and it could definitely occur when the time is unlucky. There's a high chance of it when you play for a long time.

marlboroza

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 2270

Quote from: serjent05 on March 02, 2018, 02:37:54 AM

Martingle strategy works in a long time and the most important is the money you have it needs to be more money not huge but its enough as long as you can sustain your strategy. Its an effective way to get a profit after all your bets.

No it doesn't and it is not effective way to get profit, stop spamming gambling section with nonsense.

True, and martingale had been proven to be a good method for a short span betting but it will eat up all your fund in a long run session. We can do it again and again but in just limited set of time. I have done this strategy and observed that the longer we play using this method, the longer losing streak we will experience thus, emptying our bankroll.

Long bad streak can occur in first 50 rolls. It is not proven by anyone that martingale is good method, even in short run.

Quote from: CryptoProphet on March 13, 2018, 04:45:01 AM

I never catched 10-15 loses with 50% winning chance.
I playing the game with provably fair system only

Don't worry, you will Wink

smoothenough

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 0

Lucky you crypto, probably doing it in long run won't work as well as for you in short.

CryptoProphet

full member

Activity: 258

Merit: 100

Quote from: flower1024 on March 09, 2018, 12:03:55 PM

Quote from: CryptoProphet on March 09, 2018, 01:41:28 AM

Quote from: CryptoProphet on March 09, 2018, 01:41:28 AM

If you have 0.05BTC and you go broke in 3 straight losses you are doing the martingale wrong Cheesy

.. You need to at least have a bankroll that covers 10-15 losses in a row to even consider trying it out. It works, but most casinos have limits in place which means you can't continue forever if there's a streak of 30-40 losses.

10-15 losses or 30-40 losses is impossible because winning chance 50% (1/2) like head/tail.

It is possible and 10-15 loses are common in gambling. we think the Martingale is an advantage for us and we can make a profit but actually, this is an advantage for casinos. did you ever heard after 20+ loses any gambler beat casino while using this method I think no one. Because 99% casino only wins this long run.

I never catched 10-15 loses with 50% winning chance.
I playing the game with provably fair system only

flower1024

legendary

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1000

If you have 0.05BTC and you go broke in 3 straight losses you are doing the martingale wrong Cheesy

.. You need to at least have a bankroll that covers 10-15 losses in a row to even consider trying it out. It works, but most casinos have limits in place which means you can't continue forever if there's a streak of 30-40 losses.

10-15 losses or 30-40 losses is impossible because winning chance 50% (1/2) like head/tail.

It is possible and 10-15 loses are common in gambling. we think the Martingale is an advantage for us and we can make a profit but actually, this is an advantage for casinos. did you ever heard after 20+ loses any gambler beat casino while using this method I think no one. Because 99% casino only wins this long run.

Pan Troglodytes

member

Activity: 392

Merit: 39

You martingale for a short period of time and few bets try more and Lets see if you'll get the same result as positive profit. But if you do that you must have a big amount of balance to cover your continous losses during martingale.

Martingle strategy works in a long time and the most important is the money you have it needs to be more money not huge but its enough as long as you can sustain your strategy. Its an effective way to get a profit after all your bets.

No mate, martingale strategy will not work and especially not in a long time. I've made a post about it like 5 minutes ago, there is really no point repeating that, please have a read if you'd like to know why:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.31928147

CryptoProphet

full member

Activity: 258

Merit: 100

Quote from: serjent05 on March 07, 2018, 11:34:45 AM

If you have 0.05BTC and you go broke in 3 straight losses you are doing the martingale wrong Cheesy

.. You need to at least have a bankroll that covers 10-15 losses in a row to even consider trying it out. It works, but most casinos have limits in place which means you can't continue forever if there's a streak of 30-40 losses.

10-15 losses or 30-40 losses is impossible because winning chance 50% (1/2) like head/tail.

CryptoProphet

full member

Activity: 258

Merit: 100

You martingale for a short period of time and few bets try more and Lets see if you'll get the same result as positive profit. But if you do that you must have a big amount of balance to cover your continous losses during martingale.

Martingle strategy works in a long time and the most important is the money you have it needs to be more money not huge but its enough as long as you can sustain your strategy. Its an effective way to get a profit after all your bets.

I disagree, martingale is good for a limited time session. if you use it for a long run, you will be surprised that your bankroll is already depleted. I have experience on this kind of method. I can say, it is good at the beginning but the longer you play , the longer the losing streak occurs. Aside from that, a controlled martingale is good but an automatic long run martingale is very risky.

Yes, this is really good for limited time session.
Do you use it too?

serjent05

legendary

Activity: 2884

Merit: 1258

Quote from: gabmen on March 05, 2018, 10:39:55 AM

You martingale for a short period of time and few bets try more and Lets see if you'll get the same result as positive profit. But if you do that you must have a big amount of balance to cover your continous losses during martingale.

Martingle strategy works in a long time and the most important is the money you have it needs to be more money not huge but its enough as long as you can sustain your strategy. Its an effective way to get a profit after all your bets.

I disagree, martingale is good for a limited time session. if you use it for a long run, you will be surprised that your bankroll is already depleted. I have experience on this kind of method. I can say, it is good at the beginning but the longer you play , the longer the losing streak occurs. Aside from that, a controlled martingale is good but an automatic long run martingale is very risky.

Hhampuz

legendary

Activity: 2828

Merit: 5894

Meh.

Quote from: serjent05 on March 02, 2018, 02:37:54 AM

Quote from: ethereumhunter on March 02, 2018, 12:05:13 AM

Quote from: serjent05 on March 02, 2018, 02:37:54 AM

You martingale for a short period of time and few bets try more and Lets see if you'll get the same result as positive profit. But if you do that you must have a big amount of balance to cover your continous losses during martingale.

Martingle strategy works in a long time and the most important is the money you have it needs to be more money not huge but its enough as long as you can sustain your strategy. Its an effective way to get a profit after all your bets.

although I don't know too much about martingale strategy, I can say that the strategy will not work if you don't have a luck. but if there is one person can win the games for short or long time, then I can say that person have his luck so he can win the money too. soon you will lost your money with any of strategy and I hope that you realize before you lost all of your money.

True, and martingale had been proven to be a good method for a short span betting but it will eat up all your fund in a long run session. We can do it again and again but in just limited set of time. I have done this strategy and observed that the longer we play using this method, the longer losing streak we will experience thus, emptying our bankroll.

Well i've tried it. It sometimes makes you think that the gambling site doesn't want you to win. I mean, seriously, .05 got lost in under 4 rolls. A three roll losing streak did it for me. You would have to have a serious amount of capital for this to work and it isn't a guarantee at all.

If you have 0.05BTC and you go broke in 3 straight losses you are doing the martingale wrong Cheesy

.. You need to at least have a bankroll that covers 10-15 losses in a row to even consider trying it out. It works, but most casinos have limits in place which means you can't continue forever if there's a streak of 30-40 losses.

gabmen

hero member

Activity: 1246

Merit: 529

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: ethereumhunter on March 02, 2018, 12:05:13 AM

Quote from: ethereumhunter on March 02, 2018, 12:05:13 AM

You martingale for a short period of time and few bets try more and Lets see if you'll get the same result as positive profit. But if you do that you must have a big amount of balance to cover your continous losses during martingale.

Martingle strategy works in a long time and the most important is the money you have it needs to be more money not huge but its enough as long as you can sustain your strategy. Its an effective way to get a profit after all your bets.

although I don't know too much about martingale strategy, I can say that the strategy will not work if you don't have a luck. but if there is one person can win the games for short or long time, then I can say that person have his luck so he can win the money too. soon you will lost your money with any of strategy and I hope that you realize before you lost all of your money.

True, and martingale had been proven to be a good method for a short span betting but it will eat up all your fund in a long run session. We can do it again and again but in just limited set of time. I have done this strategy and observed that the longer we play using this method, the longer losing streak we will experience thus, emptying our bankroll.

Well i've tried it. It sometimes makes you think that the gambling site doesn't want you to win. I mean, seriously, .05 got lost in under 4 rolls. A three roll losing streak did it for me. You would have to have a serious amount of capital for this to work and it isn't a guarantee at all.

serjent05

legendary

Activity: 2884

Merit: 1258