God is all. God is the universe. God is oneness. God is light. God is love. God is consciousness.
Says you. So these assertions are meaningless twaddle meant to sound like they are all mystical and deep.
Ego is none. Ego is fear. Ego is death. Ego is doubt. Ego is random.
Jumbled nonsense intended to sound meaningful to impressionable idiots.
Everything is everything.
Light is light, dark is dark, repeat is repeat.
Wow, useful Dank.
Everything = ∞
Really, you got anything to back that up?
Nothing = 0
No. Nothing is the absence of any 'thing'. 0 is zero, a metaphysical numerical concept.
Multiply any form of logic times zero, what do you get?
Multiply any form of logic by green, no, red, no wait, yellow, yeah that'll do, multiply any form of logic by yellow and what do you get?!!!!1!!11!
Bullshit, Dank, that's what you get. You are talking utter garbage and trying to pass it off as meaningful substance. Guess what, you are a mix of delusional mental illness and narcissistic pomposity.
Try swallowing this red pill, "You are not special".
Why did you click on a thread called mathematical proof of god if you aren't open to finding proof?
Your disconnection from the post presented stems from your own perception. Calling something twaddle is much more meaningless than setting parameters for a logical equation.
Sometimes the deepest things are the simplest. What you see as jumbled nonsense is really your fear and doubt labeling it as so in an attempt to cling onto your ego, your past perception. The statements covey logic perfectly as each variable is an attribution to ego, all derivatives of negativity.
A lot of people do not realize that nothing is nothing, hence those who believe in nonexistence, so it must be said in a way that people understand.
Infinity is the only possible variable for everything. Thinking the universe is contained to our bubble is quite egocentric.
0 represents nothing in the equation. I think you're disputing just to dispute.
And the remainder of your post is your ego clinging to it's past perception by judging and attacking the new ideology presented.
Why did you seek mathematical proof of god if you were not open to changing your view on the universe?l