Matthew, I wish to present you a gift. - page 5.

RandyFolds

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: teflone on November 11, 2011, 05:05:13 PM

Guys..

I've never had the feeling more than I do now after reading this thread..

Atlas is maybe a clever troll.. Props..

He has responded god knows how many times on this thread alone, and they all have been complete utter ridiculousness, one more wilder and bizzare than the next, complete lack of basic human compassion, common sense and moral center. Its hilarious!

They all have gotten a furry of responses (emotion) back from each new statement of craziness from us.

Its fascinates me this person Atlas could actually be and act as he describes himself. But it MUST be an act? it HAS to be an act..

We have been trolled.. this is one big long troll..

Cheesy

I think the same thing, but then I remember how stupid and cocksure I must have been at 17 and I start to doubt my doubts....

teflone

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 500

You're fat, because you dont have any pics on FB

Guys..

I've never had the feeling more than I do now after reading this thread..

Atlas is maybe a clever troll.. Props..

He has responded god knows how many times on this thread alone, and they all have been complete utter ridiculousness, one more wilder and bizzare than the next, complete lack of basic human compassion, common sense and moral center. Its hilarious!

They all have gotten a furry of responses (emotion) back from each new statement of craziness from us.

Its fascinates me this person Atlas could actually be and act as he describes himself. But it MUST be an act? it HAS to be an act..

We have been trolled.. this is one big long troll..

Cheesy

ALPHA.

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: greyhawk on November 11, 2011, 04:11:56 PM

Good. Send me the BTC you still owe me while you're at it.

I don't owe you any BTC.

greyhawk

hero member

Activity: 952

Merit: 1009

Good. Send me the BTC you still owe me while you're at it.

ALPHA.

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: repentance on November 11, 2011, 04:03:24 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:53:09 PM

I swear on my life that I haven't stolen anything of value.

You don't get to determine what is of value to others. Just because something may be of little material value of of no value at all to you doesn't mean that it's of no value to the person who possesses it.

And why would you steal something which is of no value to you? The act of stealing on its own implies that you want the thing you're stealing - that it has some value to you.

Look, you're taking my time right now. It might be small but to me that is worth over $100. I am going to have to bill you.

Anyways:

So what if it has value to me? Are you jealous, bro? You hate that I derive so much value my sub-Bitcoin fractions of a cent? Are you going to call mommy because I am having so much fun without you? Look, I'll help you out, man. I'll send you some Bit-fractions tonight. Heck, everyone can have some. There's enough for everyone! I am just awesome like that.

repentance

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:53:09 PM

I swear on my life that I haven't stolen anything of value.

You don't get to determine what is of value to others. Just because something may be of little material value of of no value at all to you doesn't mean that it's of no value to the person who possesses it.

And why would you steal something which is of no value to you? The act of stealing on its own implies that you want the thing you're stealing - that it has some value to you.

ALPHA.

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: RandyFolds on November 11, 2011, 03:58:49 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 03:54:32 PM

Quote from: RandyFolds on November 11, 2011, 03:53:00 PM

Quote from: deslok on November 11, 2011, 03:10:08 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 03:03:56 PM

Quote from: deslok on November 11, 2011, 03:02:13 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:53:09 PM

Quote from: greyhawk on November 11, 2011, 02:50:55 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:13:52 PM

Quote from: phillipsjk on November 11, 2011, 02:10:22 PM

You may have noticed the defintions of humility you quoted don't mention value.

Everybody has things they are better at than the average person, while conversely, everybody has things they are worse at than the average person. People humble enough to recongnize this can exchange goods and services to their mutual benefit. If you do not recognize your limits or the ablilites of others, any exchange you enter into will likely be inefficient and sub-optimal.

To force people to accept a sub-optimal exchange involves coersion.

So people who are not humble steal?

Considering your aversion to humility and the fact that you indeed stole, the answer seems self-evident.

I swear on my life that I haven't stolen anything of value.

Theft is theft regardless of value

I couldn't care less. I haven't revoked any significant value from anybody. If there is no victim, why should I care? I'll steal all I damn please if it doesn't cost anybody anything.

No victim, no problem.

Victimless crimes are only marks of tyranny.

Victimless? a crime has a victim by definition

You seem to be confused. Who is the victim if I walk out my back door and pop a couple rounds off into the tree trunk back there? Cause it's super-illegal...

http://gawker.com/5858759/100000-atlas-shrugged-dvds-recalled-for-perfectly-hilarious-reason

This is why I came back to this thread...

Laws aren't morality and I don't stand under them. I do what I prefer. It's not a matter of who is going to let me do something. It's a matter of who's going to stop me. Who's going to stop me from firing weapons on my own property? Probably nobody. My neighbors are very friendly and I can do it regularly despite the local ordinances.

You know who else does what they want...Cartman.

That's you! Did you ever see your life hitting such lows, where you were the cartman amongst a bunch of pasty computer dweebs that aren't getting laid? I mean...that's gotta suck.

Heh, I love how South Park is written by two Libertarians. Anyways, Cartman is awesome. Fuck you, man.

In an online forum (South Park Studios Chat, 10 May 2001),[4] Parker and Stone responded to a participant's question:

Q: Are you two guys liberal or conservative? Me and my friends have had debates about this.
TREY: We avoid extremes but we hate liberals more than conservatives and we hate them [conservatives].
MATT: I hate conservatives but I really fucking hate liberals.

RandyFolds

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 03:54:32 PM

Quote from: RandyFolds on November 11, 2011, 03:53:00 PM

Quote from: deslok on November 11, 2011, 03:10:08 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 03:03:56 PM

Quote from: deslok on November 11, 2011, 03:02:13 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:53:09 PM

Quote from: greyhawk on November 11, 2011, 02:50:55 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:13:52 PM

Quote from: phillipsjk on November 11, 2011, 02:10:22 PM

You may have noticed the defintions of humility you quoted don't mention value.

Everybody has things they are better at than the average person, while conversely, everybody has things they are worse at than the average person. People humble enough to recongnize this can exchange goods and services to their mutual benefit. If you do not recognize your limits or the ablilites of others, any exchange you enter into will likely be inefficient and sub-optimal.

To force people to accept a sub-optimal exchange involves coersion.

So people who are not humble steal?

Considering your aversion to humility and the fact that you indeed stole, the answer seems self-evident.

I swear on my life that I haven't stolen anything of value.

Theft is theft regardless of value

I couldn't care less. I haven't revoked any significant value from anybody. If there is no victim, why should I care? I'll steal all I damn please if it doesn't cost anybody anything.

No victim, no problem.

Victimless crimes are only marks of tyranny.

Victimless? a crime has a victim by definition

You seem to be confused. Who is the victim if I walk out my back door and pop a couple rounds off into the tree trunk back there? Cause it's super-illegal...

http://gawker.com/5858759/100000-atlas-shrugged-dvds-recalled-for-perfectly-hilarious-reason

This is why I came back to this thread...

Laws aren't morality and I don't stand under them. I do what I prefer. It's not a matter of who is going to let me do something. It's a matter of who's going to stop me. Who's going to stop me from firing weapons on my own property? Probably nobody. My neighbors are very friendly and I can do it regularly despite the local ordinances.

You know who else does what they want...Cartman.

That's you! Did you ever see your life hitting such lows, where you were the cartman amongst a bunch of pasty computer dweebs that aren't getting laid? I mean...that's gotta suck.

ALPHA.

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: RandyFolds on November 11, 2011, 03:53:00 PM

Quote from: deslok on November 11, 2011, 03:10:08 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 03:03:56 PM

Quote from: deslok on November 11, 2011, 03:02:13 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:53:09 PM

Quote from: greyhawk on November 11, 2011, 02:50:55 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:13:52 PM

Quote from: phillipsjk on November 11, 2011, 02:10:22 PM

You may have noticed the defintions of humility you quoted don't mention value.

Everybody has things they are better at than the average person, while conversely, everybody has things they are worse at than the average person. People humble enough to recongnize this can exchange goods and services to their mutual benefit. If you do not recognize your limits or the ablilites of others, any exchange you enter into will likely be inefficient and sub-optimal.

To force people to accept a sub-optimal exchange involves coersion.

So people who are not humble steal?

Considering your aversion to humility and the fact that you indeed stole, the answer seems self-evident.

I swear on my life that I haven't stolen anything of value.

Theft is theft regardless of value

I couldn't care less. I haven't revoked any significant value from anybody. If there is no victim, why should I care? I'll steal all I damn please if it doesn't cost anybody anything.

No victim, no problem.

Victimless crimes are only marks of tyranny.

Victimless? a crime has a victim by definition

You seem to be confused. Who is the victim if I walk out my back door and pop a couple rounds off into the tree trunk back there? Cause it's super-illegal...

http://gawker.com/5858759/100000-atlas-shrugged-dvds-recalled-for-perfectly-hilarious-reason

This is why I came back to this thread...

Laws aren't morality and I don't stand under them. I do what I prefer. It's not a matter of who is going to let me do something. It's a matter of who's going to stop me. Who's going to stop me from firing weapons on my own property? Probably nobody. My neighbors are very friendly and I can do it regularly despite the local ordinances.

Anyways, my preference dictates no aggression. As long as I don't aggress against anybodies person or property, I'll have no qualms acting as I please.

RandyFolds

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: deslok on November 11, 2011, 03:10:08 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 03:03:56 PM

Quote from: deslok on November 11, 2011, 03:02:13 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:53:09 PM

Quote from: greyhawk on November 11, 2011, 02:50:55 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:13:52 PM

Quote from: phillipsjk on November 11, 2011, 02:10:22 PM

You may have noticed the defintions of humility you quoted don't mention value.

Everybody has things they are better at than the average person, while conversely, everybody has things they are worse at than the average person. People humble enough to recongnize this can exchange goods and services to their mutual benefit. If you do not recognize your limits or the ablilites of others, any exchange you enter into will likely be inefficient and sub-optimal.

To force people to accept a sub-optimal exchange involves coersion.

So people who are not humble steal?

Considering your aversion to humility and the fact that you indeed stole, the answer seems self-evident.

I swear on my life that I haven't stolen anything of value.

Theft is theft regardless of value

I couldn't care less. I haven't revoked any significant value from anybody. If there is no victim, why should I care? I'll steal all I damn please if it doesn't cost anybody anything.

No victim, no problem.

Victimless crimes are only marks of tyranny.

Victimless? a crime has a victim by definition

You seem to be confused. Who is the victim if I walk out my back door and pop a couple rounds off into the tree trunk back there? Cause it's super-illegal...

http://gawker.com/5858759/100000-atlas-shrugged-dvds-recalled-for-perfectly-hilarious-reason

This is why I came back to this thread...

ALPHA.

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: Jalum on November 11, 2011, 03:18:55 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 03:17:07 PM

Well, they did give their sub-fractions of pennies in electricity voluntarily by accepting to run any software that was on my blog. Thank you for clearing this up.

And the hundreds of dollars in bitcoins you stole from the person who won your wager when you decided you didn't want to pay?

No such crime occurred.

Jalum

hero member

Activity: 774

Merit: 500

Look ARROUND!

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 03:17:07 PM

Well, they did give their sub-fractions of pennies in electricity voluntarily by accepting to run any software that was on my blog. Thank you for clearing this up.

And the hundreds of dollars in bitcoins you stole from the person who won your wager when you decided you didn't want to pay?

ALPHA.

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: deslok on November 11, 2011, 03:14:43 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 03:11:41 PM

Quote from: deslok on November 11, 2011, 03:10:08 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 03:03:56 PM

Quote from: deslok on November 11, 2011, 03:02:13 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:53:09 PM

Quote from: greyhawk on November 11, 2011, 02:50:55 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:13:52 PM

Quote from: phillipsjk on November 11, 2011, 02:10:22 PM

You may have noticed the defintions of humility you quoted don't mention value.

Everybody has things they are better at than the average person, while conversely, everybody has things they are worse at than the average person. People humble enough to recongnize this can exchange goods and services to their mutual benefit. If you do not recognize your limits or the ablilites of others, any exchange you enter into will likely be inefficient and sub-optimal.

To force people to accept a sub-optimal exchange involves coersion.

So people who are not humble steal?

Considering your aversion to humility and the fact that you indeed stole, the answer seems self-evident.

I swear on my life that I haven't stolen anything of value.

Theft is theft regardless of value

I couldn't care less. I haven't revoked any significant value from anybody. If there is no victim, why should I care? I'll steal all I damn please if it doesn't cost anybody anything.

No victim, no problem.

Victimless crimes are only marks of tyranny.

Victimless? a crime has a victim by definition

The crime of stealing something that has no objective value is victimless and hence not a crime.

The value of anything stolen is determined by the rightful owner not the thief, if the rightful owner did not contester it of any value it would be given freely and not something that could be stolen in the first place.

Well, they did give their sub-fractions of pennies in electricity voluntarily by accepting to run any software that was on my blog. Thank you for clearing this up: I haven't stolen from anybody.

deslok

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

It's all about the game, and how you play it

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 03:11:41 PM

Quote from: deslok on November 11, 2011, 03:10:08 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 03:03:56 PM

Quote from: deslok on November 11, 2011, 03:02:13 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:53:09 PM

Quote from: greyhawk on November 11, 2011, 02:50:55 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:13:52 PM

Quote from: phillipsjk on November 11, 2011, 02:10:22 PM

You may have noticed the defintions of humility you quoted don't mention value.

Everybody has things they are better at than the average person, while conversely, everybody has things they are worse at than the average person. People humble enough to recongnize this can exchange goods and services to their mutual benefit. If you do not recognize your limits or the ablilites of others, any exchange you enter into will likely be inefficient and sub-optimal.

To force people to accept a sub-optimal exchange involves coersion.

So people who are not humble steal?

Considering your aversion to humility and the fact that you indeed stole, the answer seems self-evident.

I swear on my life that I haven't stolen anything of value.

Theft is theft regardless of value

I couldn't care less. I haven't revoked any significant value from anybody. If there is no victim, why should I care? I'll steal all I damn please if it doesn't cost anybody anything.

No victim, no problem.

Victimless crimes are only marks of tyranny.

Victimless? a crime has a victim by definition

The crime of stealing something that has no objective value is victimless and hence not a crime.

The value of anything stolen is determined by the rightful owner not the thief, if the rightful owner did not contester it of any value it would be given freely and not something that could be stolen in the first place.

ALPHA.

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: deslok on November 11, 2011, 03:10:08 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 03:03:56 PM

Quote from: deslok on November 11, 2011, 03:02:13 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:53:09 PM

Quote from: greyhawk on November 11, 2011, 02:50:55 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:13:52 PM

Quote from: phillipsjk on November 11, 2011, 02:10:22 PM

You may have noticed the defintions of humility you quoted don't mention value.

Everybody has things they are better at than the average person, while conversely, everybody has things they are worse at than the average person. People humble enough to recongnize this can exchange goods and services to their mutual benefit. If you do not recognize your limits or the ablilites of others, any exchange you enter into will likely be inefficient and sub-optimal.

To force people to accept a sub-optimal exchange involves coersion.

So people who are not humble steal?

Considering your aversion to humility and the fact that you indeed stole, the answer seems self-evident.

I swear on my life that I haven't stolen anything of value.

Theft is theft regardless of value

I couldn't care less. I haven't revoked any significant value from anybody. If there is no victim, why should I care? I'll steal all I damn please if it doesn't cost anybody anything.

No victim, no problem.

Victimless crimes are only marks of tyranny.

Victimless? a crime has a victim by definition

The crime of stealing something that has no value is victimless and hence not a crime. The state and the sheep can whine about it insulting their sensibilities all they want but their claim has no merit.

deslok

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

It's all about the game, and how you play it

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 03:03:56 PM

Quote from: deslok on November 11, 2011, 03:02:13 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:53:09 PM

Quote from: greyhawk on November 11, 2011, 02:50:55 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:13:52 PM

Quote from: phillipsjk on November 11, 2011, 02:10:22 PM

You may have noticed the defintions of humility you quoted don't mention value.

Everybody has things they are better at than the average person, while conversely, everybody has things they are worse at than the average person. People humble enough to recongnize this can exchange goods and services to their mutual benefit. If you do not recognize your limits or the ablilites of others, any exchange you enter into will likely be inefficient and sub-optimal.

To force people to accept a sub-optimal exchange involves coersion.

So people who are not humble steal?

Considering your aversion to humility and the fact that you indeed stole, the answer seems self-evident.

I swear on my life that I haven't stolen anything of value.

Theft is theft regardless of value

I couldn't care less. I haven't revoked any significant value from anybody. If there is no victim, why should I care? I'll steal all I damn please if it doesn't cost anybody anything.

No victim, no problem.

Victimless crimes are only marks of tyranny.

Victimless? a crime has a victim by definition

ALPHA.

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: deslok on November 11, 2011, 03:02:13 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:53:09 PM

Quote from: greyhawk on November 11, 2011, 02:50:55 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:13:52 PM

Quote from: phillipsjk on November 11, 2011, 02:10:22 PM

You may have noticed the defintions of humility you quoted don't mention value.

Everybody has things they are better at than the average person, while conversely, everybody has things they are worse at than the average person. People humble enough to recongnize this can exchange goods and services to their mutual benefit. If you do not recognize your limits or the ablilites of others, any exchange you enter into will likely be inefficient and sub-optimal.

To force people to accept a sub-optimal exchange involves coersion.

So people who are not humble steal?

Considering your aversion to humility and the fact that you indeed stole, the answer seems self-evident.

I swear on my life that I haven't stolen anything of value.

Theft is theft regardless of value

I couldn't care less. I haven't revoked any significant value from anybody. If there is no victim, why should I care? I'll steal all I damn please if it doesn't cost anybody anything.

No victim, no problem.

Victimless crimes are only marks of tyranny.

deslok

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

It's all about the game, and how you play it

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:53:09 PM

Quote from: greyhawk on November 11, 2011, 02:50:55 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:13:52 PM

Quote from: phillipsjk on November 11, 2011, 02:10:22 PM

You may have noticed the defintions of humility you quoted don't mention value.

Everybody has things they are better at than the average person, while conversely, everybody has things they are worse at than the average person. People humble enough to recongnize this can exchange goods and services to their mutual benefit. If you do not recognize your limits or the ablilites of others, any exchange you enter into will likely be inefficient and sub-optimal.

To force people to accept a sub-optimal exchange involves coersion.

So people who are not humble steal?

Considering your aversion to humility and the fact that you indeed stole, the answer seems self-evident.

I swear on my life that I haven't stolen anything of value.

Theft is theft regardless of value

ALPHA.

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: greyhawk on November 11, 2011, 02:50:55 PM

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:13:52 PM

Quote from: phillipsjk on November 11, 2011, 02:10:22 PM

You may have noticed the defintions of humility you quoted don't mention value.

Everybody has things they are better at than the average person, while conversely, everybody has things they are worse at than the average person. People humble enough to recongnize this can exchange goods and services to their mutual benefit. If you do not recognize your limits or the ablilites of others, any exchange you enter into will likely be inefficient and sub-optimal.

To force people to accept a sub-optimal exchange involves coersion.

So people who are not humble steal?

Considering your aversion to humility and the fact that you indeed stole, the answer seems self-evident.

I swear on my life that I haven't stolen anything of value.

greyhawk

hero member

Activity: 952

Merit: 1009

Quote from: ALPHA. on November 11, 2011, 02:13:52 PM

Quote from: phillipsjk on November 11, 2011, 02:10:22 PM

You may have noticed the defintions of humility you quoted don't mention value.

Everybody has things they are better at than the average person, while conversely, everybody has things they are worse at than the average person. People humble enough to recongnize this can exchange goods and services to their mutual benefit. If you do not recognize your limits or the ablilites of others, any exchange you enter into will likely be inefficient and sub-optimal.

To force people to accept a sub-optimal exchange involves coersion.

So people who are not humble steal?

Considering your aversion to humility and the fact that you indeed stole, the answer seems self-evident.

Topic: Matthew, I wish to present you a gift. - page 5. (Read 7381 times)