- fastestFee: 5 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 5 sat/vB
- hourFee: 5 sat/vB
- economyFee: 4 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 2 sat/vB
Topic: Mempool Observer Topic (Read 20218 times)
- fastestFee: 5 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 5 sat/vB
- hourFee: 5 sat/vB
- economyFee: 4 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 2 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 13 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 12 sat/vB
- hourFee: 10 sat/vB
- economyFee: 4 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 2 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 4 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 4 sat/vB
- hourFee: 4 sat/vB
- economyFee: 4 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 2 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 7 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 6 sat/vB
- hourFee: 5 sat/vB
- economyFee: 4 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 2 sat/vB
@bitmover
You can check if it's the bot that needs some configuration or if I'm the one who has to whitelist Cloudflare.
Then he says something.
You can check if it's the bot that needs some configuration or if I'm the one who has to whitelist Cloudflare.
Then he says something.
I didn't change anything at the bot.
I will take a look later , but as you are changing a lot of stuff this is probably on your side
You may have to indicate the bot's IP. Then send it by PM.
@bitmover
You can check if it's the bot that needs some configuration or if I'm the one who has to whitelist Cloudflare.
Then he says something.
You can check if it's the bot that needs some configuration or if I'm the one who has to whitelist Cloudflare.
Then he says something.
I didn't change anything at the bot.
I will take a look later , but as you are changing a lot of stuff this is probably on your side
Either, a lighting should become more developed and adopted or block size should be increased. Lighting is a little complicated to use, people are afraid of increased block size because there is a chance that blocks won't be full but the fact is that fees need to go down.
Lightning is not the only layer-2 currently in development. There's also Ark for example, which is complicated to understand too (I have still to analyze it for incentives and tradeoffs) but as far as I know it is potentially more friendly to the non-technical user than Lightning because the onboarding process does not require an onchain transaction. Then there are a lot of sidechains in development, I think one of the most interesting is the Spiderchain project but it's still a testnet. The BitVM project will also allow the deployment of rollups like on Ethereum, but that may take some years still as it's a very new technology.I personally oppose big blocks currently, the size was already increased by Segwit to x4 and due to the developments in the L2 area I don't think we need another increase. Runes and similar stuff is much more convenient to deploy on altcoins like LTC.
@bitmover
You can check if it's the bot that needs some configuration or if I'm the one who has to whitelist Cloudflare.
Then he says something.
You can check if it's the bot that needs some configuration or if I'm the one who has to whitelist Cloudflare.
Then he says something.
- fastestFee: 15 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 14 sat/vB
- hourFee: 12 sat/vB
- economyFee: 4 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 2 sat/vB
Guys, you know what's funny? At the moment, transaction fees are low, 6-8 sat/vByte is nothing to complain but the price of Bitcoin is so high that that 8 sat/vByte is now a thing. It costs $1 to create an average native SegWit transaction of the size of 140 vBytes.
Long-term, the price of Bitcoin isn't going down, it will only surpass $100k and reach higher levels, I wouldn't be surprised if Bitcoin reaches 200K USD but I think that soon there will come time where we will be forced to change the fee system. Either, a lighting should become more developed and adopted or block size should be increased. Lighting is a little complicated to use, people are afraid of increased block size because there is a chance that blocks won't be full but the fact is that fees need to go down.
What do you think about it?
Long-term, the price of Bitcoin isn't going down, it will only surpass $100k and reach higher levels, I wouldn't be surprised if Bitcoin reaches 200K USD but I think that soon there will come time where we will be forced to change the fee system. Either, a lighting should become more developed and adopted or block size should be increased. Lighting is a little complicated to use, people are afraid of increased block size because there is a chance that blocks won't be full but the fact is that fees need to go down.
What do you think about it?
- fastestFee: 17 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 16 sat/vB
- hourFee: 15 sat/vB
- economyFee: 4 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 2 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 5 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 5 sat/vB
- hourFee: 5 sat/vB
- economyFee: 4 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 2 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 3 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 3 sat/vB
- hourFee: 3 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 4 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 4 sat/vB
- hourFee: 4 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 9 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 8 sat/vB
- hourFee: 6 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 3 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 3 sat/vB
- hourFee: 3 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 5 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 5 sat/vB
- hourFee: 5 sat/vB
- economyFee: 4 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 2 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 10 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 9 sat/vB
- hourFee: 7 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
Personally, I don't like high fees too, but technically what could we actually do but wait for demand for block space to go down?
--Snip--
I forgot that what we could do is also FUD, gaslight, and spread disinformation to convince everyone who would listen that the Core Developers are deliberately keeping the blocks small because "reasons".
What ALL users of BitcoinTalk should simply do is read your trust-rating. You tricked many plebs like me before, and you will never trick us again frankandbeans.
Jump to: