- fastestFee: 4 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 4 sat/vB
- hourFee: 4 sat/vB
- economyFee: 4 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 2 sat/vB
Topic: Mempool Observer Topic - page 32. (Read 22910 times)
- fastestFee: 19 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 19 sat/vB
- hourFee: 12 sat/vB
- economyFee: 4 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 2 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 5 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 5 sat/vB
- hourFee: 5 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 4 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 4 sat/vB
- hourFee: 4 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 4 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 4 sat/vB
- hourFee: 4 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 5 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 5 sat/vB
- hourFee: 5 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 5 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 5 sat/vB
- hourFee: 5 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 7 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 6 sat/vB
- hourFee: 5 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 6 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 5 sat/vB
- hourFee: 5 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 7 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 6 sat/vB
- hourFee: 6 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 9 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 8 sat/vB
- hourFee: 7 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 5 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 5 sat/vB
- hourFee: 5 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 6 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 6 sat/vB
- hourFee: 6 sat/vB
- economyFee: 4 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 2 sat/vB
How comes transactions with 5 vbyte fees do not make into the first block?
Maybe it has to do with the absolute size of the transaction?
Maybe it has to do with the absolute size of the transaction?
Very likely.
Or else, it's a question of rounding. In other words, the 5 indicated may not actually be 5, it may be 4.6.
How comes that the highest fee for the second block is higher than the lowest fee of the first block?
Shouldn’t fees non augmenting going down the queue?
Is it a bug in mempool.space?
Shouldn’t fees non augmenting going down the queue?
Is it a bug in mempool.space?
I didn't understand what you mean.
The first block had an average rate of 7 and the second 5. Everything was normal.
Furthermore, the rates are dynamic, now I can have a very low rate, and in the next block the rate will be very high.
Something happened when I took the picture. Actually everything is good in that picture.
Check this one I just took:
The first block has 402-4 fees range
The second block has 5-4 fees range.
How comes transactions with 5 vbyte fees do not make into the first block?
Maybe it has to do with the absolute size of the transaction?
- fastestFee: 5 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 5 sat/vB
- hourFee: 5 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
How comes that the highest fee for the second block is higher than the lowest fee of the first block?
Shouldn’t fees non augmenting going down the queue?
Is it a bug in mempool.space?
Shouldn’t fees non augmenting going down the queue?
Is it a bug in mempool.space?
I didn't understand what you mean.
The first block had an average rate of 7 and the second 5. Everything was normal.
Furthermore, the rates are dynamic, now I can have a very low rate, and in the next block the rate will be very high.
This morning I woke up and decided to observe the mempool.
I saw something weird in mempool.space:
How comes that the highest fee for the second block is higher than the lowest fee of the first block?
Shouldn’t fees non augmenting going down the queue?
Is it a bug in mempool.space?
I saw something weird in mempool.space:
How comes that the highest fee for the second block is higher than the lowest fee of the first block?
Shouldn’t fees non augmenting going down the queue?
Is it a bug in mempool.space?
- fastestFee: 9 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 7 sat/vB
- hourFee: 6 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
- fastestFee: 6 sat/vB
- halfHourFee: 6 sat/vB
- hourFee: 6 sat/vB
- economyFee: 2 sat/vB
- minimumFee: 1 sat/vB
Jump to: