http://www.bitdice.me added to pending (testing yay).
realized I need a new category: Odds - added.
added new status category: offline (sad to hear some of the good sites have gone).
I'll keep smashing away but its nearly time for me to call it a night, shall resume tomorrow.
I think my list is out of date enough that I really do need to keep adding sites and games manually (via webforms) until Im all caught up.
Thanks for the helpful feedback.
mem.
Topic: ★★★ MEMs LIST of GAMBLING SITES ★★★ - page 13. (Read 134926 times)
Yeah. BitVegas is gone. Sadly.
Also I'm pretty sure dabs doesn't do his lotto anymore, and bitvegas is no more.
Also, you still have Coin Chat listed. Lol.
Unfriendly_Admin
For sites run by dicks (eg mpoe-r)
You're letting him off far too lightly...I could think of a much more appropriate description than that.
oh I agree, but to be taken seriously I need to reduce (eliminate) my use of foul language as it detracts from the message.
Plus if I added "admin_is_racist_cunt" I can think of only 1 sites admin that would be worthy of the badge so it would be a wasted effort
Unfriendly_Admin
For sites run by dicks (eg mpoe-r)
You're letting him off far too lightly...I could think of a much more appropriate description than that.
OH BABY BABY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
paste a btc/ ltc address mate that is tip worthy
I wonder if I can use this as my avatar......
Hahaha, glad you like it. My tip/donation address is in my signature (115TJLNHbc4opemg4k22Liu4qjFjS1UpiY). paste a btc/ ltc address mate that is tip worthy
I wonder if I can use this as my avatar......
Avatars are still disabled (sadly), so I don't think so
regarding the list, idiots like Slick ^ have made it painfully aware that I need a few more badges for the sites in the list.
the first that comes to mind is
"provable results" which is not the same as "provably fair".
"Not Provably Fair" for sites like https://www.bitroulette.se/ that make the claim of being provably fair without any proof.
Have you by any chance met RitzGrandCasino? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5866709the first that comes to mind is
"provable results" which is not the same as "provably fair".
"Not Provably Fair" for sites like https://www.bitroulette.se/ that make the claim of being provably fair without any proof.
Hi RGBKey, I'll read that thread now - in between tweaking code.
Really want to test bb code templates tonight if all goes smoothly.
regarding the list, idiots like Slick ^ have made it painfully aware that I need a few more badges for the sites in the list.
the first that comes to mind is
"provable results" which is not the same as "provably fair".
"Not Provably Fair" for sites like https://www.bitroulette.se/ that make the claim of being provably fair without any proof.
Have you by any chance met RitzGrandCasino? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5866709 the first that comes to mind is
"provable results" which is not the same as "provably fair".
"Not Provably Fair" for sites like https://www.bitroulette.se/ that make the claim of being provably fair without any proof.
can anyone overlay this text on this gif for me:
I think we should start building up some scam meme's for posting to threads run by shitheads like multiponzi
I think we should start building up some scam meme's for posting to threads run by shitheads like multiponzi
The red looked ugly as hell, so I went for white
If you want, I could put the text on the whole GIF. However, this looks better if you ask me.OH BABY BABY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
paste a btc/ ltc address mate that is tip worthy
I wonder if I can use this as my avatar......
Just wondering, do you dislike Ponzi's or do you dislike some of the guys who run Ponzi's?
I dislike ponzi's - they are simple scams that most people are unable to see through.
I was here calling bullshit on pirate@40's scam while the rest of the forum was onto him hook line and sinker.
There is nothing useful about a ponzi, they are purposefully deceptive by nature and cannot exist in a currency/ commodity with a finite resource.
I liken all ponzi operators to the good old fashioned con artists &/ grifters.
Do you like the GIF by the way?
Just wondering, do you dislike Ponzi's or do you dislike some of the guys who run Ponzi's?
I dislike ponzi's - they are simple scams that most people are unable to see through.
I was here calling bullshit on pirate@40's scam while the rest of the forum was onto him hook line and sinker.
There is nothing useful about a ponzi, they are purposefully deceptive by nature and cannot exist in a currency/ commodity with a finite resource.
I liken all ponzi operators to the good old fashioned con artists &/ grifters.
Just wondering, do you dislike Ponzi's or do you dislike some of the guys who run Ponzi's?
can anyone overlay this text on this gif for me:
I think we should start building up some scam meme's for posting to threads run by shitheads like multiponzi
I think we should start building up some scam meme's for posting to threads run by shitheads like multiponzi
The red looked ugly as hell, so I went for white
If you want, I could put the text on the whole GIF. However, this looks better if you ask me.
This is the true gambling list!!!!
I have to be fair and admit my own fault - so I'll do it here as well for all to see:
Well, It appears I may need to eat some humble pie.
Please, excuse my terrible approach to these concerns I have raised.
May we start again and address some key concerns:
1) You claim "The First And Only True Random Online Roulette", casino.bit (think thats the one) uses a real roulette table which I would argue is true random.
At this point it is hair splitting but I would argue you are not the first "true random".
2) I see in your reply you do have plans to provide a method for players to verify their roles, this is ideal.
3) Will players be able to set their own client seed ?
In my defense, its pretty hard to believe you would build a bitcoin casino without ensuring results are provably fair but a mistake is mistake and I ripped into the admin unfairly.
Props to him for continuing to represent his site despite my poor approach to the concerns I have.
There is inconsistency in your posts and defamation.
1. We do not claim the term Provably Fair - "This does not make us a scam"
2. We have not opened for monetary betting - "This does not make us a scam"
3. We never denied that we would prove random results. - "This does not make us a scam"
How about instead of "swinging your balls in the wind" you tell us what you would like to see and we will provide it. It is called constructive criticism...I can take it.
1. We do not claim the term Provably Fair - "This does not make us a scam"
2. We have not opened for monetary betting - "This does not make us a scam"
3. We never denied that we would prove random results. - "This does not make us a scam"
How about instead of "swinging your balls in the wind" you tell us what you would like to see and we will provide it. It is called constructive criticism...I can take it.
Well, It appears I may need to eat some humble pie.
Please, excuse my terrible approach to these concerns I have raised.
May we start again and address some key concerns:
1) You claim "The First And Only True Random Online Roulette", casino.bit (think thats the one) uses a real roulette table which I would argue is true random.
At this point it is hair splitting but I would argue you are not the first "true random".
2) I see in your reply you do have plans to provide a method for players to verify their roles, this is ideal.
3) Will players be able to set their own client seed ?
In my defense, its pretty hard to believe you would build a bitcoin casino without ensuring results are provably fair but a mistake is mistake and I ripped into the admin unfairly.
Props to him for continuing to represent his site despite my poor approach to the concerns I have.
What about adding a note/symbol for those that offer games with jackpots?
Ahhh, so nice to talk to an actual gambler and not a scam operator desperately defending their scam.
Yes, yes, 100 times yes.
I love a good jackpot, definitely adding it.
Cheers, keep up with the good suggestions all.
What about adding a note/symbol for those that offer games with progressive jackpots?
BTW, keep up the good work mem!
We appreciate it. We really do!
Cheers!
BTW, keep up the good work mem!
We appreciate it. We really do!
Cheers!
Additional list categories:
Any other badges a site might need ?
I thought of these today after arguing with several twerps about theirscam casinos.
| Badge | Description |
| Progressive_Jackpot | Thanks to Financisto for the suggestion . |
| Provable_Results | Which is not the same as "provably fair" . |
| Provably_Fair_Gold | Fair & Provable results. Not only is it provable, players can set their own seeds/ seed is from a player controlled input (eg txid) . |
| Unfriendly_Admin | For sites run by dicks (eg mpoe-r) . |
| False Advetiser | For sites that advertise with false claims, eg https://www.bitroulette.se/ claiming to be the first provably fair bitcoin roulette table. . |
| Not_Provably_Fair | for sites like https://www.bitroulette.se/ that make the claim of being provably fair without any proof. for sites that dont offer anyway to verify bets. . |
Any other badges a site might need ?
I thought of these today after arguing with several twerps about their
Jump to: