If you claim you're "provably fair" and your response to "prove it" is to censor the thread and act like an asshole, you are probably not provably fair and you are probably a fucking fraud. This site should be listed as a scam site and so should you for advertising it.
Opinions are fine and all and perhaps you are correct but I prefer evidence instead of speculation and that I have not seen yet
Although I am admitting you have a point there
I put more trust in data than users Mircea has proven that may be a flaming raging troll at times but she has valid points and well trilema keeps a nice ledger of the activities
But I am observing as well
As an aside Ponzis
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5668240
John the Dong anyone
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4463576
Tomato Cage (I trust tomatos objective viewpoint more than yours not as a snide remark but because of his status and reputation)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5475757
Personally my Decision is not set in stone either but for now my sig will stay until proven verifiable information from a trusted community member clearly shows otherwise
That said I do take your opinion seriously and with a grain of salt since Mem's thread is fairly quiet on this sent a PM to B!Z requesting a review of the site and perhaps a thread on bitcoin reviewer
If you want to help out feel free to also send them a contact message to prove this with hard data one way or the other
http://bitcoinreviewer.com/
Edit In: B!Z got back to me and said he will review the site but if you don't trust that this happened feel free to do it yourself as well and not just take the face value of the message below ^_^
Hi Swords,
I'll take a look at the site and write what I find on Bitcoin Reviewer. Thanks for bringing it to my attention!
Cheers,
b!z