[Merit] Hey Newbies! Can You Sign A Message? - page 19.

eR4

jr. member

Activity: 76

Merit: 2

----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am eR4. I can sign a message.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0)
Address: bc1qnrjqf5j2nwnu6atz09v5r3z02l95a7w0vrcgy8

IG66vK/llZNLZYihm6MDX/oxScbE1OK+z1P099PxmBLrD7XND3CxEDgWYx45SCCu/vxcfpgVapU7Z8ioB4Mn7U4=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Bitcoin577

member

Activity: 168

Merit: 11

Code:

Address: 19QpL3YidYZc8ULKYx21Z9z3y6Tf712417
Message: I am Bitcoin577 on Bitcointalk forum and today 5th October 2020 I can sign message
Signature: H4XYk/ecktX0d8+3OPF1rLP7oyKm9rkmx1OR06JGdwDwLNiw/J/WQofDcEwickV3xLDYyUstQMh30yIX+PpAMTc=

bitmover

legendary

Activity: 2352

Merit: 6089

bitcoindata.science

Quote from: 1miau on October 04, 2020, 07:24:04 PM

Quote from: achow101 on February 05, 2018, 11:38:12 AM

Quote from: bitmover on February 05, 2018, 11:33:49 AM

My doubt, regarding signing in segwit address is if this is a "bug" and will soon be corrected, or is it an abandoned feature?

It is neither a bug nor an abandoned feature. It is just that we are still working on creating a more generalized signing scheme that lets people sign with things like P2SH addresses (e.g. sign with a multisig address). There is simply no standard yet for signing with such scripts or with Segwit.

Hi, thanks for quoting that discussion. This was my first discussion here in bitcointalk, more than 2 years ago, and the problem is still not solved... i wish we had a solution for this, so we all could really stop using legacy addresses for good,.

While electrum did a nice solution, we still need a solution which is widely verified by any software.

Quote from: 1miau on October 04, 2020, 07:36:54 PM

Quote from: OgNasty on October 02, 2020, 11:46:27 PM

Quote from: Timelord2067 on September 30, 2020, 07:33:35 PM

I believe your good nature in this undertaking has been abused right from the start:

Indeed. That is what this community does and isn't limited to merit. If what you say is happening in this thread is true, then it is a very good example of how this forum is allowing scammers to make multiple accounts to abuse the system for their own benefit at the cost of generous members offering their time and resources to help others. If you think people are willing to go far to earn a merit, imagine the kind of nonsense occurring to get multiple accounts into the DT network to inflate their trust ratings and punish those who stand up against them.

How about increasing the level from now on? Cheesy

Set a requirement to use only vanity adresses with at least 4 digits. Most likely that will help to prevent *some* fraudulent practices if we add more requirements (at least x posts, at least x registration duration etc.).

That is really sad to see so many users trying to abuse this topic using newly created accounts just to spam.
I think setting a vanity address is going to be nice, however I think a minimum merit requirement would be interesting (like 2-3 merit)

Yuff1983

newbie

Activity: 8

Merit: 1

----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am Yuff1983. I can sign a message.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0)
Address: bc1qj0wpwgv3p92krr8ezunhe84n9v8uwg63sg7fdv
HxmChS/vdpeI09//qQyV8jPDVQNirVbyBowUbUifW/qQbZde89Nxgm6fRI+7e6dq3TudOlebCcehFz3EwD+Ks1Q=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

wtfguys

jr. member

Activity: 279

Merit: 2

----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am wtfguys. I can sign a message.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0)
Address: bc1qsfp8mf0s66fzak3h2t0qw5q8qvlkepfygd4p8l
IHryRanni6uex/zQ/cH5Fi009icvl/+zeJlhrJw7Q9cDPEoaqT6Qpfd67fTur6kpLBpWPMYSqqNGEl62PSiVcBQ=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Marfolone

jr. member

Activity: 76

Merit: 4

----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am Marfolone. I can sign a message.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0)
Address: 1AXj3AR4c9tsLXXGGjA9G314U73hkUCsbw
HwDVkeV+QxvCrK+fTXyBIaZsuiWbFtTYLiMHZ/URyTiBSUM8hdKkNQTt6ZwxKw7BHtsoGInfmvr1W7EHyjEx6tU=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

phreess

copper member

Activity: 268

Merit: 7

Phreess - A Self-Appreciating Token

Quote from: OgNasty on September 11, 2020, 02:04:23 AM

Hey Newbies (& Jr Members)! I want to give you the opportunity to earn some merit by using your Bitcoin client (or whatever you use). There is a great guide linked below showing you how to sign a message. If you can sign a message from your Bitcoin address with your bitcointalk username, post it here and I will send you merit. Enjoy!

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/how-to-sign-a-message-990345

Example:

Quote

Address: 1BitcoinAddressGoesHere
Message: I’m OgNasty and I can sign a message.
Signature: 1BitcoinSignedMessageSignatureGoesHere

Anyone wishing to comment about potential abuse of my generosity on this thread, please read my response here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.55305496

Address:

Code:

1Nqn4EfTfSTGqbcX34714MK6kxk6d93g1A

Message:

Code:

Hi im phreess from btctalk and i want to say thanks :)

Signature:

Code:

IAcOz2XF3dIEXxgqRq9CAsKDkGaWXC+4VsZWwaIM4HIkbxb/XZF0iNw9KyM3X76oLojbdgnaBYN3rgXsjNJA5mk=

Thanks, OgNasty! ^^

SquirrelJulietGarden

hero member

Activity: 1442

Merit: 775

Quote from: erikoy on October 04, 2020, 09:19:04 PM

Why is that other wallet btc address could not be verified? Isn't it connected to the bitcoin network? Or only it will be connected when wallet will be used for doing new transaction which is being broadcast to the network and node will going to accept and update it as the latest transaction for bitcoin. However, I am confused with bitcoin network and that include this one signing in message though I can sign in a message in my bitcoin wallet but it could not be verified just like what it shows in the other replies.

What could be the reason behind why electrum wallets could not be verified by other signing bitcoin verification message?

It depends on each wallet. Most of wallets use BIP 39 for their mnemonic seed but Electrum has its own code to create wallet seed (not BIP 39). The difference causes troubles when you verify signature by different wallets.

If you have ever imported other wallets that support BIP 39 into Electrum, you will see the option for BIP 39.

https://electrum.readthedocs.io/en/latest/seedphrase.html

Moreover, if a wallet does not support Segwit address type, it can not verify signature is signed from a Segwit address with another wallet.

erikoy

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 125

Quote from: 1miau on October 04, 2020, 07:24:04 PM

Why is that other wallet btc address could not be verified? Isn't it connected to the bitcoin network? Or only it will be connected when wallet will be used for doing new transaction which is being broadcast to the network and node will going to accept and update it as the latest transaction for bitcoin. However, I am confused with bitcoin network and that include this one signing in message though I can sign in a message in my bitcoin wallet but it could not be verified just like what it shows in the other replies.

What could be the reason behind why electrum wallets could not be verified by other signing bitcoin verification message?

1miau

legendary

Activity: 2226

Merit: 6947

Currently not much available - see my websitelink

Quote from: OgNasty on October 02, 2020, 11:46:27 PM

Quote from: Timelord2067 on September 30, 2020, 07:33:35 PM

I believe your good nature in this undertaking has been abused right from the start:

Indeed. That is what this community does and isn't limited to merit. If what you say is happening in this thread is true, then it is a very good example of how this forum is allowing scammers to make multiple accounts to abuse the system for their own benefit at the cost of generous members offering their time and resources to help others. If you think people are willing to go far to earn a merit, imagine the kind of nonsense occurring to get multiple accounts into the DT network to inflate their trust ratings and punish those who stand up against them.

How about increasing the level from now on? Cheesy

Set a requirement to use only vanity adresses with at least 4 digits. Most likely that will help to prevent *some* fraudulent practices if we add more requirements (at least x posts, at least x registration duration etc.).

1miau

legendary

Activity: 2226

Merit: 6947

Currently not much available - see my websitelink

Quote from: seParatrooper on October 04, 2020, 06:39:16 PM

Quote from: OgNasty on October 04, 2020, 05:44:26 PM

Quote from: seParatrooper on October 04, 2020, 05:02:59 PM

Code:

Address: bc1qgmu677807vnqrxp549vvw7x050czyw9jhstkgv

Message: I’m seParatrooper and I can sign a message.

Thank you OgNasty for such a great task. Before that, I didn't know that a bitcoin wallet can be used to sign a message.

Signature: HxXo6XzXKjVDsYlHMVBYm5tc/KwmNfxnKLOln3noLiOqHpvgLEIpulT43NGiQwggx00Ots7ffOc2jut4P1q5UZ0=

Wouldn't verify.

Next try.
...

It didn't verify because SegWit (bech32 is native SegWit) has no standard for signing messages yet:

Quote from: achow101 on February 05, 2018, 11:38:12 AM

Quote from: bitmover on February 05, 2018, 11:33:49 AM

My doubt, regarding signing in segwit address is if this is a "bug" and will soon be corrected, or is it an abandoned feature?

It is neither a bug nor an abandoned feature. It is just that we are still working on creating a more generalized signing scheme that lets people sign with things like P2SH addresses (e.g. sign with a multisig address). There is simply no standard yet for signing with such scripts or with Segwit.

However, if it's signed from Electrum, it can be verified from Electrum but only from Electrum because Electrum is using an own function to sign / verify here.
It verifies from Electrum:

And because of that it doesn't verify from Jochen Hoenicke website:

But for better compatibility it's always recommended to sign from legacy addresses (1....).

Quote from: MysteriousPackages on October 04, 2020, 06:52:23 PM

I think I did this correctly!

Code:


-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is MysteriousPackages from bitcointalk.org and today is 10/04/20
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
bc1qhydzaly3u4e38dp08v48vghjxxdhk5zn52fn8f
H2TszUg/0l7bJCpbzusH5akD++6Juf9P4t4aDob0sNaxGSbSDoKKgp+0KdGtiB8IspehKkIg/Z+27yfFjMWqVX4=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Same issue here, only verifies in Electrum:

MysteriousPackages

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 2

I think I did this correctly!

Code:


-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is MysteriousPackages from bitcointalk.org and today is 10/04/20
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
bc1qhydzaly3u4e38dp08v48vghjxxdhk5zn52fn8f
H2TszUg/0l7bJCpbzusH5akD++6Juf9P4t4aDob0sNaxGSbSDoKKgp+0KdGtiB8IspehKkIg/Z+27yfFjMWqVX4=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

seParatrooper

newbie

Activity: 23

Merit: 3

Quote from: OgNasty on October 04, 2020, 05:44:26 PM

Quote from: seParatrooper on October 04, 2020, 05:02:59 PM

Code:

Address: bc1qgmu677807vnqrxp549vvw7x050czyw9jhstkgv

Message: I’m seParatrooper and I can sign a message.

Thank you OgNasty for such a great task. Before that, I didn't know that a bitcoin wallet can be used to sign a message.

Signature: HxXo6XzXKjVDsYlHMVBYm5tc/KwmNfxnKLOln3noLiOqHpvgLEIpulT43NGiQwggx00Ots7ffOc2jut4P1q5UZ0=

Wouldn't verify.

Next try.

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I’m seParatrooper and I can sign a message.
Thank you OgNasty for such a great task. Before that, I didn't know that a bitcoin wallet can be used to sign a message.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1DzCzCTV9T2SnAPieK7Yt333cqNqLDYQq6
IPS68FpMBCF+KaO40HkTfOA8gW65Uzc0o7S8G0H0KFdMMR64mWy/ZhMvYd/15Su0l8vgqZnQ6FuK/XnulBrufqU=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

For some reason a message signed in Electrum 4.0.3 from a address starting with the BC characters does not pass verification using the service.

OgNasty

donator

Activity: 4760

Merit: 4323

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: seParatrooper on October 04, 2020, 05:02:59 PM

Code:

Address: bc1qgmu677807vnqrxp549vvw7x050czyw9jhstkgv

Message: I’m seParatrooper and I can sign a message.

Thank you OgNasty for such a great task. Before that, I didn't know that a bitcoin wallet can be used to sign a message.

Signature: HxXo6XzXKjVDsYlHMVBYm5tc/KwmNfxnKLOln3noLiOqHpvgLEIpulT43NGiQwggx00Ots7ffOc2jut4P1q5UZ0=

Wouldn't verify.

seParatrooper

newbie

Activity: 23

Merit: 3

Code:

Address: bc1qgmu677807vnqrxp549vvw7x050czyw9jhstkgv

Message: I’m seParatrooper and I can sign a message.

Thank you OgNasty for such a great task. Before that, I didn't know that a bitcoin wallet can be used to sign a message.

Signature: HxXo6XzXKjVDsYlHMVBYm5tc/KwmNfxnKLOln3noLiOqHpvgLEIpulT43NGiQwggx00Ots7ffOc2jut4P1q5UZ0=

AlexPr0

member

Activity: 94

Merit: 24

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am AlexPr0. I can sign a message.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0)
Address: 1NLDMyZJQCjppkUnV9FcdihyA8MUy7qsMF
IDfoVttROUmr7jIUoW5cvwDTVpHkKbINxESg2Hza6TXoS9N5pwiLr+QcqBofPOQBWR6u2gUclsWQgqIOPSPMRpM=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hope I got it right Grin

kasakola

jr. member

Activity: 148

Merit: 2

Sir i check it so done

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I'm kasakola i can sign a message
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0)
Address: 1Gu6F8pBbrjUwjWs4okxUmoyF1SrcyWLS8

IJSGn8J+6tmhKYkJm7Obh+AoQ3FZTk4mwbovOZqQGbSNWcKEj17jRSkgSU5dv8kxTSBCXVkqhVTKMhWn05uFgOE=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----

Tenoloc50

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 1

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am Tenaloc50 and I can sign a message.
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0)
Address: 19AKNG5fDGuA24n81eWYFFejmDBVTnYzFs

H42+pvsuCyLxzE/mBa5758ZLDZgyz3p6vi5q5JTrpc3FeZDKhu3XPQ4NDDuD7boJwUHZXtrGho4oc8Eyy78Amsg=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----

s0lidus

full member

Activity: 958

Merit: 120

CryptoGames: Revamped Games, Multiple Coins

Quote from: libert19 on September 11, 2020, 10:31:32 PM

Those who don't have/away from pc, you can also use Coinomi to sign the message.

Btw, @op don't you think your giveaway can be abused since you are giving merits to newbie rank for simple task?

I find it a very good initiative. I'm pretty sure a lot of users never even heard of signing a messages from Bitcoin addresses. Even I didn't know about it until around 3-4 years ago, when I needed to sign a message to recover an account somewhere. I was like, wtf? Something like this back then would have saved me a lot of time =P

What might seem like a simple task for "advanced" users, isn't for newbies. Besides that, new "bitcoiners" may avoid storing coins on third party wallets/services, as they'll notice they don't have full control over their funds when trying to sign a message from some shitty service calling themselves a wallet.

kokilpakhi

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 6

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

I am kokilpakhi. I can sign a message.

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----

Version: MultiBit HD (0.1.1)

Comment: https://multibit.org

Address: 12Pr9eqFS1rjsfeM3z5s6LpjfXym9DFdAe

IAp9TX200WlyxLQI/cfi37VNUk7y6whs1GdWVAZbz7ibNslQHoDW02NvEEZEnB8TNU+8MTUY+0wl/plnDIpamHE=

-----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----

Topic: [Merit] Hey Newbies! Can You Sign A Message? - page 19. (Read 77282 times)