Topic: -- Miner's Official Coin LAUNCH - NUGGETS (NUGS) -- - page 98. (Read 121547 times)

Oh no, no....please, at first I thought William hung was a compliment but now I looked him up and he's a regtard.  Please pick someone Estes.  At least someone good looking or like a smart or half smart since I'm half retarrd.

I had a modeling contract to go model in NY at 25 for Elite models but I needed $5.000 and my wealthy parents didn't even even wanna pitch in $100 for the road or for my picture book.

So at least pick like a regard who's good looking.

Vlad...
Have you ever seen a member of the forum who is constantly bashed by everybody and supported by literally nobody? No, you're the first and only one. Surely there's a reason, don't you think?
You have such a high opinion of yourself you can't even listen to others.

You really want a coin? Do what I told you, that's the only way to go.
No real developers here? There are some. I think I'm part of them but I know it you cost you much more than what you paid to r3 to hire me so I guess it's the same for others.
It's how it works you won't get what you want for a few bucks.
Not happy with that? Go to Cuba.

I don't see any mental breakdown, I just see the same-old same-old from Vlad2Vlad.   Nothing much has changed from when he was a huge DVC supporter, writing long rambling posts filled with illogical and plainly weird utterances.

Schadenfreude fans should have no fear, Vlad will be back posting soon. His particular mental "configuration" does not allow him to leave this forum.

obligatory meme:

I sincerely believe we are all witness to an actual mental breakdown. I think I need to stop posting to this guy before I get arrested for accessory to him going off and slaughtering a bunch of people and just mumbling gotspots gotspots gotspots

I locked the retard or not poll - I'm satisfied with the largely.(Very) negative outcome.  Well, it depends if one thinks being a full blown retard is a bad thing.  It's all subjective.


Thank you for your votes.  It served its purpose and it was a fun change in pace and not a poll any anal dev would ever have the guts to expose his flaws, up even his smallest flaw. 

The more I think about devs the more I realize they're a a lot like politicians and I'm the exact the opposite..  This poll is now locked. 

Thanks everyone and those who hate and try to kill other people's dreams and coins by fabricating lies and giving horrible self serving advice.  There's such little honesty and integrity on these forums it's sickening and here I am baring my soul and I'm labeled a retard, well, I do exhibit regard-like qualities but the Eastern Bloc a commits experiment end on me, can't blame me.  I have 5 brothers and they're wall normal.

That small part of my life story should have served as an example that clowns like you guys can do nothing to stop me.  Nothing.  I laugh at all your meritless attacks.   BRing it on, ya jealous wannabe programmers.

My destiny is in God's hands and so I have nothing to fear, I have to just try my best and not do anything stupid to sabotage myself.  Like maybe out up a poll asking people if I'm retarded.  Ok, maybe that as a bad idea, but when in doubt I always err on the side of honesty.  And it was and interesting story.

Maybe one day I'll tell you guys the story of coming to America via Italy and the knife fight my fad got into or the torture techniques commits used on Christian men in the gulags.  Hint:  razor sharp spinning fans, prostitutes stripping and Christian men who had not seen a women in years.   

Sadly, 9 out of 10 failed the test and it cost them their penis.  Oh there's so much more and these are real softies my dad lived through and his closest friends.  Back then you wanted a bible, you had to be ready to die for it, all books were burned and could not be found - only the commie approved propaganda books.  China communism is a walk in the park. 

So yeah, I was a child when I saw these things with my own eyes, threaten me, out me down, its a good laungh. 

What does it matter whether DeVCoin gets buried or not? To test merged mining it is useful to have a number of merged mined coins. Testing so far has seemed to indicate that adding UKB, CDN, MBC, GMC, GRF, NKL and UNS to the merge would only weaken all of those coins, which currently have retreated from blockchain form due to the insecurity of blockchains, even merged mined blockchains. If GRP, which was left as a blockchain, can eventually manage to be secured maybe those others will reconsider using a blockchain form of representation/implementation.


I count more than five, see above. Seven of them already moved away from using a blockchain because using a blockchain would be irresponsibly insecure.

-MarkM-

Thanks for for the info. 

Ok, thanks for the stats.

When the bankers come in the real developers with entire teams will come once. I stand by. 300 active coins next year and 3,000 the year after. 

Your mistake was your coin was fundamentally flawed.  It was flawed due to YOUR ignorance.  Getting a better programmer doesn't just magic away that ignorance.

a) having flat coin generation for 7 years and dropping to zero is asinine.
b) believing that a variable block rate helps small miners is equally asinine.
c) thinking someone with 51% of hash power can change the rules shows a fundamental lack of understanding in an area where you are trying to "invent" something new.
d) accepting a statement that variable block rewards can't work with POS protected chain shows how shallow your knowledge is.

These aren't programming mistakes they are flaws in the high level thinking required for designing a crypto-currency.  The worst part is your inability to accept responsibility and instead blame everyone around you.  Please launch equal dubious failures, get them out of system quickly.

I'm feeling worn out.  Too much stress even for me . I'm gonna check the "am I a retard or not" poll later on so I hope everyone voted .

It's a serious poll so I hope everyone took to it seriously.  Ok, seriously.

And Mark, trust me, devcoin will get buried and I don't know I'd it will have enough time to expand fast enough before the coming avalanche.

If the business plan I'm telling you makes sense to you then PM, me.  If not, then get used to seeing ever increasing crap coins on a daily basis and soon just by odds some will make it big and steal all nether attention from the more established and maybe even better cons.  These seer stocks - fist is about perception, not true value or features.  

If what I'm telling you, mark, makes sense write me back and we'll go from there cause you can optimize your talents and offerings across vsrupious platforms while optimizing your output and that of devcoin through partnerships, cross advertising, merge inning and synergies from sharing overhead and human resources.

Such a strategy would greatly expand your personal ad devcoins potential as there is no way to know the sheer number of crapCoins coming this way what anybody dies they cannot stop so why not use your standing, reputation and skill to take a cut of each one which (in part) would go to devcoin.


For coin, for example, help me get it off the ground and I will give you 25% personally and devcoin 25%. What have you go to lose.  If I'm crazy you're just the programmer behind the scenes.  I've never mentioned the name of the other programmer, so I respect people's respect.

Imagine if you did some work on like 5 coins and just one made it, it would be a huge boon for you and for devcoin.   That's the way to help yourself and Devcoin not trying to kill a Hydra with a plastic sword.

I put my faith in God so whatever happens,  happens. Good luck.


Oh yeah, I, Vlad2Vlad, hearby officially accept the full and complete resignation of r3 's partnership of 50% of the crypto-coin, nuggets and in turn, to be fair, have paid him for his 24 hours of work that he did on the coin. The 50% was returned free of charge as it was entrusted to him by me also free of charge on a faith trial basis.

Based on his personal and willful resignation due to irreconcilable differences and differences in opinions with me, the founder, Vlad2Vlad, r3, no longer has any interest, decision making, say or functions of Any type, now or in the future, in the alt coin, nuggets.


Now I think I'm gonna take off like 2 or 3 days.  This past week took a lot out of me.  I'm emotionally and physically worn out badly.  And my kids need me.  Take care guys and thanks for all your inputs and your criticism, even from the the asshole of the entire internets:  Gotspots.  When I just think of that guy I see spots, I think I need powerful antipsychotic meds to cope with this guy.

At any rate, if this planet still exists in a few days I look forward to coming back and I'm so curious to see if the coin is gonna be dead.  It will be a good test to see how resilient it is compared to how ixCoin survived.

When I do come back zi hope to have a plan and enough bounty coins to get the golden Blocks to work right although I think if you pay a programmer for a job and he says yeah I can do that and it doesn't work that he should fix it.  But I don't know the rules on these forums so I'll let you guys decode.

Nuggets has great potential but I'm obviously biased.  We'll - thanks to everyone and God bless!

There is no exponential growth.  The rate of new scamCoin releases is significantly down.  The number of releases is also irrelivent, what matters is the number of actively developed and mined coins and that is a flat line at best.

6 months ago Bitcoin had ~95% of cryptocurrency marketshare and Litecoin had ~4% with the other 1% spread among a couple dozen dead or dying coins.  Today Bitcoin has ~95% and Litecoin has ~4% and the final 1% is spread among a couple dozen dead or dying coins.  The scamCoins are parasitic to one another.  They are exact copies which produce no value so one gets hyped one weak and crashes the next weak.  A coin goes offline only to be replaced with another one.

The vast majority of the coins will be gone in a year and will never rise to any significant usage. Only five coins have ever broke through $1 mil USD in valuation and honestly even $1M is a negligible amount.  None of those have been released in the last three months.  Of the five only NVC was released this year. 

You didn't really read what I wrote, did you?

Just because you cannot stop a massive spree of bank-robberies or pick-pocketings or muggings or pyramid schemes or ponzi schemes or Enron schemes or gross fiduciary malfeasance on the part of banks or any other victimful crime is not a good reason to join the criminals nor to aid and abet the criminals.

The things cannot be secured. Until we solve the problem of securing such things, it is morally if not quite yet always clearly criminally wrong to encourage people to fall for them or to create more to suck people into.

Possibly one day maybe we might be able to show that PPC's proof of stake system can provide some security, but so far that is somewhat confounded by mixing in proof of work and by the automated centralised checkpoints. So even spawning more coins based on PPC is kind of irresponsible, and even PPC's author, Sunny, has long been accused of irresponsibly sucking people into his unproven proof of stake scheme because of things like purportedly trying to do some kind of coverup by obscurity or something where he was accused of claiming to have "fixed" a known problem with his system but has supposedly not actually offered any kind of explanation of what the "fix" was, how it would actually "fix" the problem and so on.

So the whole concept is on very shaky ground, about the only reasonably sure thing so far is that bitcoin's hashing power is so incredibly massive compared to all the supercomputing facilities in the world that it seemed quite likely, until this last year or so of ASIC shenanigans, that maybe the bitcoin chain might possibly be able to be secured.

You are basically suggesting "the huns are coming, the huns are coming, so take up a sword and swear aliegance to Attila and join his army! slaughter innocents! Rape and pillage!" Except if Attila like Genghis actually made an empire so safe a virgin carrying sacks of gold could walk across it unmolested then sorry bad example maybe its the Nazis that are coming thus that we should join cause with, which, by ancient usenet law, brings us to the end of the thread.

-MarkM-

So you're planning to pump and dump after 12-36 months? I fail to see how the timeframe changes it.


Do you even understand what makes Bitcoin different than Paypal? (Hint: It's not the fact that Paypal uses the dollar. It's much deeper than that.)


You've been repeating in this thread many times how your lack of knowledge doesn't matter and that you don't need to learn more.

Don't you understand that the vast majority of the coins will have been dead? There are limited resources, and people are going to flock primarily to the currency with the most resources behind it, Bitcoin. There might be niche markets for things like Litecoin and Namecoin (maybe Namecoin can become more than nice because of its DNS registration), but most of the other coins will die when there is nobody who bothers to secure their blockchains. Crapcoins come and go, they don't steal people from them like you think; the majority of them are fun toys people play with as a side project for a bit and then drop.


12 to 36 months is very much pump and dump or get rich quick. What gets people so riled up is your hubris and the fact that you are so transparent about the get rick quick scheme your ideas for coins are.

I'm not starting coins cause I'm broke p.  the real money won't come for snorter 12-36 months, I'm not a pump and dumper.

I'm starting a coin cause its the greatest thing since the Internet and its the most amazing thing.  Why would I stay out of this cause I can't program?  That's silly.

I am educated enough to know what I need to make it.  I'm honest enough (thank God) to know what qualities I lack.  A lack of knowledge is only bad when you lie to yourself and think you don't need help.

Programmers are for hire.  I made a mistake case I thought people here were hardcore programmers.

Thanks again for your advice, but I've list at least 6 different times around $60,000 on various business transactions in one felt swoop.  The few $K I'm losing here is dwarfed. Ybthe potential. I wish my wife would see it but women are inherently scared if things they can't touch, see and feel.


I will never whit until i feel the desire leaves me and that is up to God.  We shall see.

By your logic it was stupid for Pepsi v a Burger King or Nike to ever try.

You're part or the 99.99% that does that think for yourself.  Congrats.

All you need to know is that blockchains are INSANELY expensive to secure, so much so that even using merged mining alongside bitcoin so that the world-record, world-leading amount of hashing power directed at bitcoin can secure a chain while still also securing the bitcoin chain, STILL most of even the merged-mined coins have not been able to afford enough hashing power to come anywhere near being "secure".

Part of the reason for the coin freezing approach used for the Digitalis Open Transactions Server is the simple fact that most blockchains are far from secure. If any of those frozen coins moved, they would lose the security provided for them by the many hard-coded checkpoints that have been coded into coin clients since the coins were frozen to issue tokens on the Open Transactions server.

Even if someone managed to 51% attack a coin, reversing a transaction on a blockchain, the frozen coins the tokens on the Open Transactions server represent should not be affected, because they have not moved since many hard-coded checkpoints ago.

Even if we imagine bitcoin itself to be secure, which does not seem that bad a bet though what happens with ASICs could maybe change that prognosis, the second-most-secure merged mined chain, NaMeCoin, has vastly less hashing power securing it than bitcoin, and the next down even less, and the last few have pathetic amounts of hashing power securing them (and thus ridiculously low difficulty, making it easy for even small miners to collect nice stockpiles of them currently.)

So maybe possibly one chain in all the world might be secure, maybe if one is optimistic one might imagine two are, but in general blockchains are not secure and the more there are that cannot be merged mined the less secure most of them probably tend to become.

So it is pretty much gross negligence and dereliction of fiduciary duty to spawn more blockchain based currencies.

if you really do have a background in banking that ought to be understandable?

-MarkM-

EDIT: if/when a verdict comes in regarding proof of stake offering any actual security maybe proof of stake might help some a little, but then again might turn out not to.

Just find a problem to SOLVE - then you might profit from solving it. This is why Bitcoin was born, to solve very real problems we face every day when storing and transferring value - those problems related to fiduciary money have a very profound impact in our lives.

What problem is your crapcoin solving? It adds nothing of value to existing cryptos, your crapcoin's only purpose is to make profit, your crapcoin is a piece of malfunctioning sh*t, but still you keep going on with your delusions of grandeur, you don't stop repeating how generous, kind, transparent and intelligent you are, while you are just making a fool of yourself.

You look very mentally unbalanced and I bet that posting 16 hours per day in here is not helping at all.  

Be careful man, if what you wrote its true you have already burnt a few k's of $ your family could need. And you burnt them for good. Calm down and stop being delusional.