Currently top 10 average is +3.5%
MNX is -3.06%
Lets see better rates devs or lets see the bank step up the purchasing
Bank intervention is an emergency like option, please double check at WhitePaper how it works
I have read the whitepaper. And I am not intending on being complicated, but if the whitepaper says that the minexbank will take efforts to keep motion within 5% of the average of the top 10 currencies, and the purchasing is considered an emergency option, why haven't we seen rate increases?
If there is no action, I think consideration needs to be taken for changing the objective of the project, which is fine. There is plenty of success with Minexcoin, and the future is bright, but tying yourself to the top 10 currency motion and taking no action when a deviation of more than 5% occurs goes directly against the explanation as far as I understand it in the whitepaper. I believe a rate increase is in order to keep consistent with your whitepaper
Next revision of the MNX growth rate to USD will be effected on March 1, 2018.
After March 1, 2018, the average annual growth rate of MNX to USD would be revised upwards based on realities of cryptocurrency market development. This is characterized by the significant growth of joint market capitalization in 2017 as compared to 2016.
Ultimately we would like to see increases in Minexcoin adoption. If that were to happen, the price could go much higher. If the devs have the ability and our agreement that when the price rises too much too fast, that they should sell coins or lower interest rates in order to suppress the price, we should get the benefit of the coin moving upwards as well when the top 10 do. If it is in the whitepaper that the purpose of the coin is to react to the average of the top 10 coins, then that is what we should expect, am I incorrect in thinking this??? If I am incorrect, then we need to reestablish what the point of this coin is. There are many quality points to this coin, and I kind of wish that the price was not connected to the top 10 in order to allow huge growth for Minexcoin. It seems that we have foregone that ability however, so there should be a rise in the price of the coin when the top 10 rise, plain and simple, and if that floats more than 5% from that average, we should expect action from our devs.
How you did simple message from WP so hard for reading? Huge grow means huge falling as well, but if your coin is unstable you can't create payment system thru it. If you take calculator and you will count price to TOP 10 coins with formula in WP you will see current price +/-5% IF they did main rules for this coin they must keep them. If you don't like it you can create somekind voting, but it does not mean that someone listens you. Or you can leave MNX, because your opinions is useless like allways.
like i said before you are part of this project why you allways denny and say that you have no connection with minex team but thats a proof that you are one of them
Of course I'm part of this project. Like every one of us. Does I'm big fan of this project? Yes I'm. Every one cant text to supports and speak with them, so every one can have connection with the team. If I was once at Bitcoin conference and spoke with MNX team, does it making me for part of them?
I can tell you better. In next 1 or 2 months I'll visit Kiev again and probably I'll meet some of MNX devs for interview. Please, don't repeat about that again after interview
Temhuk, You are very lost. I like this project very much, and have a decent investment in it. But trying to understand it should not be hated on the way you do every single time I post.
IT IS IN THE WHITEPAPER, that the coin is to follow the top ten, and if it deviates more than 5% from that average, something IS supposed to be done. Expecting the coin to follow the top 10 should not be treated w such hostility. Firstly, if you want a stable payment system, following the moving average of the top 10 of the currencies in the most volatile currency market in existence makes little to NO sense. Cryptos are volatile, and NONE of the top 10 are stable enough to be a reliablepayment system, and they seem to move together, so there is NO reason to think you will gain a stable currency by following the weighted average of 10 volatile and connected currencies. So suggesting that they say "We want the coin to never move more than 5% from the previous close within a 24 hour perioud" would make a hell of a lot more sense than saying, "we want to make a stable currency by following the most volatile currencies in existence."
So when you respond in a negative manner to me, at least address what I am saying, bc it makes perfect sense, even though just because I wrote it you will look to demean me, and refute what I have said NO MATTER WHAT, bc honestly you are just kind of an Ahole, I am sure anyone who reads your posts knows that about you by now though