Topic: Minimum Age to gamble - page 19. (Read 3734 times)

Or simply we cant really make out that kind of conclusion that on whatever things that we do see on parents, its not something that you could say that it would really be followed by your children.There are ones who would

really be trying out to oppose on what you have seen with your parents and go into the other side. About on age then this is would really be talking or speaking with 18-21 as which these are the casual government rules and laws on which it is really that something that would really be followed but in todays easy access or having the connection due to internet then it wont really be that so hard on finding yourself to be able to bypass these things for you to play on which it would really be that we cant really be able to stop to those people who are young to play gambling if they wanted to.They could always be having the bypass on which they would
neither be using up their parents ids and information or would be simply making use of VPN specially now that we do have crypto gambling space on which it do make things even more easier.
You could just simply tick those age verification and caution boxes then you're good to go.This is why its not something that we could completely be able to get rid of with if we do speak about
these young people to play on gambling places even if we dont want to.

This is not always true, parents can also become a negative example for their kids, so if the kids see that their father gets violent while he drinks they may develop an aversion against drinking alcohol and never taste it at all despite the example given by their father, unfortunately this also works with virtues, so if a parent is hardworking their kids may come to despise hard work and become lazy instead, despite the advantages that being hardworking can bring to their lives.

But, only if things are taken from a learning perspective. A lot of people would make the excuse that they will only do something so that they can learn about it, especially minors, but they will soon start abusing that right and will start using the thing for their pleasure or to get something out of it, which is the reason why there should always be some restrictions and regulations for certain things at certain ages in certain countries depending on the nature of the people.

That is why, though I do agree with you that there is nothing wrong in learning about things at an early age because that can be helpful in the future, there should still be some restrictions or at least the ones using those things so that they can learn about them should be under observation so that things don't go negative.

No parent wants their child to get along wrong and become a child who likes to gamble.
Education of children usually depends on the attitude of the parents themselves whether they have a firm and disciplined attitude or just give advice without any direction because some of the behavior of a child is really obedient and some are a little stubborn.
School education only teaches science and insight, while the character and habits of a child are the parents' job.

If only many parents were aware of the prevalence of online gambling to the extent that they could limit their children from playing with cellphones or PCs, maybe cases of gambling for underage children could be better resolved.

I follow the rule that parents should not teach and educate their children. Of course they gonna give some basics of what is good or bad and etc. But kids are the mirror of their parents. No matter how strict you are, no matter how much time you spend teaching them and etc, they would grow up like their parents anyway. Instead of teaching them, a parent imho better teach himself, and the kid will be a copy/paste of him.

That is why, if a person is dumb and spend all of his money in gambling, has addiction, not cold headed and impatient, no matter at what age his kid will be allowed to gamble, at 14, 18, 21 or 30, he will take reckless decisions as his parent.

In the family, raising children is the obligation of parents, and parents must educate their children so they don't do things that can make their lives not good in the future. It is not easy to educate their children, but by taking good care of them, they can find the right path to teaching their children until they grow up. And when they are grown up, they let their children decide what they want, but their parents will still accompany them because the parents' task of accompanying their children will be there until the parents die. This will be passed on to their children when they become parents. So, in this case, maybe the age for someone to play gambling can be changed to be over 25 years old with the assumption that someone over 25 years old is an adult who can think maturely and also has his own income. They have started to be responsible with their lives, but their parents still accompany them.

Yes, I think the parents of the children can teach the children properly. The parents have a big role to make a child a good human being. In the same way, the parents are there for the child to become bad. I think that if the parents of a child can teach the children right from an early age, the child will never be bad. Those parents who cannot teach their children the right education will be very bad. So we have to be very careful about these things so that we can give our children the right education.

Trying to make out some generalization when it comes to numbers then it would be playing around 18-21 years old on which this had been considered to be the legal age on which someone could be able to engage into
something or been allowed on doing so. This isnt only talking about gambling but also in other things like smoking or going to bar or with liquor on which this had been the legal age on which  you could really make
someone be allowed on doing so on which it is really just that right that there would really be prohibition something like this because we know that youngsters arent really that supposed to deal up with
something like this which would really be putting them in harm.

Being not on your good awareness and thinking would really be leading into bad decisions which is something that needs to be that to be on the right age for you to
engage on.

Talking about the minimum age for gambling,I think it depends on the location where the child grows up,if he grows up in a geographical entity where children around 14 are gambling,there is every tendency that the child will gamble,but if he grows up at a place where children are not allowed to gamble,then the children around that geographical entity have escaped it.In some places or betting centers,they paste on their notice wall that 18 is the minimum age for children,while some places might actually say 16,there is no minimum age to children gambling.What I see as the best thing to do is to make your child not to have access to any gambling site,or restricting him from the set of children that you see will lure them into gambling,because once addiction steps in,there is every tendency that you have lost that child. Therefore,training a child in a location where gambling is not rampant is ideal.

Parents are a child's guide. In a family where parents take care of their children at all times, their children are also obliged to them. It is the responsibility of parents to give proper education to their children because they do not understand what is right and what is wrong. Parents feel the need to take care of him till a certain age. When the child is able to understand his own good and bad, he is released. However, 18 years of age is considered to be the age of majority for a child. After that it is up to him how that child will lead his life.

At least if parents can educate their children well from childhood to adulthood, their children will have a solid foundation that will help them develop their own potential for the good of their lives. Parents will certainly try to make their children happy. Sometimes the method is not quite right because the average parent now only pays attention to material problems for their children without approaching them as parents and having a heart-to-heart talk with their children. Parents think if they can meet their child's needs, that's enough when it's not. Children also need love from their parents, which is not something related to the physical but spiritual. And when parents can do it, children can live well.

The point of my post was that it is better to let kids gamble from 14 instead of 18 or 21, because it makes no sense when you can but gun at 14, but can drink alcohol and gamble from 21 only. and you really think that a kid at 21 is much smarter than a 18 yo kid? Imho it is not about age. These 3 years dont make much difference in general. It is either you realise consequences or not. Sometimes kids are more forward-looking at the age when they sell lemonade at the yard, than guys at 40+ who take credits to buy crypto

I know many people do not believe in the Bible but I will have to use it for those who believe in it,
proverb said it all I don't know if I should use this Bible quots here, but it's just me given an advise.
If your child is been trained like how the Bible quoted it I don't think the child will go the other way round, in other case allowing the government to control your child for you in other for the child to be disciplined, that's a very wrong idea, because if the child have any little advantage of it's self he will do something the parents will regret thinking it's a good idea for him, if your child is well trained he/she will be very careful of what's he's doing and were he's going, although everyone has a life to live and if a child is above the age of 18+ he/she can do whatever he wants because he's matured enough to know what's good and what's bad and that is his/her life.

How come that it isn't better when I was talking about 18 years old and above when you are even pointing to 14 years old and about Guns ? this is gambling mate , and I don't know why you come to that part , and also we are talking about those states that has implementing 18to21 years old so let us consider it as brighter side .

Could take the other side on this subject, its never too early to learn.   Its better to learn all the rules and dynamics to any large subject before engaging personally with any possibly loss risking activity, we can apply that to guns, gambling, drugs anything.  Education isn't a bad thing, that perhaps should be the emphasis not a law just saying no.  I don't especially believe government does anything useful purely making a law to fine people and nothing else; we gained nothing but a tax from their oversight and regime so useless then
  People might be horrified at this idea but I learnt statistics at an early age, its invariably helped me quantify all kinds of statistics and risks in life as well gambling factors leading to a win rather just all or nothing hopes and dreams.  For sure its a positive to educate people not blindly ban imo.

Right and we cannot blame them if they are evading the licensing because that is quite expensive and besides, almost all of the casinos are after the same thing and that is to gather clients as much as possible to gain profits as much as possible. It's just these unlicensed casinos don't have to ask for some KYC because there is no need for them to filter the ages and it doesn't matter to them whether if their clients are still underage or not. The only thing that these licensed casinos are asking for KYC is for the sole reason that they have to enforce it legally.

but educating the young is just one of the many aspects to consider. I believe 18 years of old for a person would be viable. At that age, most teens are already mature enough to think. They can access IDs for KYC, credits, and debits. Legally, they are expected to be a responsible contributor to the society. So when they do things that are unruly to the law, then they are accountable to it because they are no longer a minor.

This will benefit both the participants and the business owners of the casino for a major loss.

It is necessary to be strict with children, but the average parent is too strict in supervising them. They can't tell the difference between being assertive and forbidding their children. The role of parents is very important in shaping their children's character to become a child who is responsible for themselves so that our children have better self-control than their friends. Moreover, the current situation is very different from a few years ago.

Yes, because they are our children that we must guide and look after properly and well. We help him to grow well without having to experience the bad things that other children have experienced. Apart from that, we can also give them an understanding that there are bad things around them so they have to be able to take good care of themselves. Their young age can make them lose self-control if we can't guide them properly and they might end up falling into bad things. And it will make us and our children will regret it.

In reality gambling sites are too many which is many of them don't have licensed which means they are not too strict and even minors can play with them they won't Ask KYC so that many minors can access their sites and play. Like what you said mate if the gambling industries want to lesser the minors got involved in gambling then all they can do is to ask KYC in their every player in order to know if that player is an adult or a kid.

Banyak orang tua yang sibuk bekerja dan mencari nafkah untuk keluarganya sehingga tidak bisa benar-benar memantau aktivitas anak namun tetap memperhatikan dan memberikan nasehat yang tepat sehingga tidak semua orang tua dapat memantau aktivitas anaknya.
Sebenarnya tidak perlu melakukan tracking aktivitas, namun dengan memperhatikan dan selalu membatasi penggunaan handphone dapat semakin meminimalisir aktivitas perjudian yang dilakukan oleh seorang anak itu sendiri.
Tapi ya itu semua tergantung bagaimana seorang ayah dan ibu mendidik dan memperhatikan anak-anaknya karena kesibukan tidak bisa dijadikan alasan untuk lalai dalam pengawasan.