miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX - page 42.

2h4u

newbie

Activity: 55

Merit: 0

Quote

* Fixed slow start for some GPUs/rigs.

No, it didn't:

Code:

[ 0d 0h 1m38s|10:21:52 24/08/2019] S: 13/0 40(40.2)Sol/s 62( 62.5)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com,Beam-PoW]- 97ms (100.0%) (0.0%)
  0>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 9/0 [56°C/76%] 10.25 I/s 20.3(20.3)Sol/s 31( 31.4)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4353MHz Sol/W=0.65
  1>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 4/0 [59°C/63%]*11.19 I/s 22.8(22.8)Sol/s 31( 31.1)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4544MHz Sol/W=0.73
  2>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=10470402MHz mclk=3604486MHz Sol/W=-nan
  3>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [0°C/ 0%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=11MHz mclk=-1MHz Sol/W=-nan
  4>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [0°C/ 0%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=0MHz Sol/W=-nan
  5>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=2081792MHz mclk=23530508MHz Sol/W=-nan
  6>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=1885186MHz mclk=558301976MHz Sol/W=-nan
  7>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=2094112MHz mclk=13103122MHz Sol/W=-nan
  8>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=4162560MHz mclk=5701635MHz Sol/W=-nan
  9>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=1533281152MHz mclk=60227587MHz Sol/W=-nan
10>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=69190656MHz mclk=267845642MHz Sol/W=-nan
11>GTX 1060 3GB `S: 0/0 [0°C/ 0%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=0MHz Sol/W=-nan

2h4u

newbie

Activity: 55

Merit: 0

Looks like miniZ creates some strange trash files at segfault:

Code:

************ miniZ v1.5q ************
Number of CUDA[10.0] devices found: 8
miniZ<150,5,3>[4:1:00:5994]: Selecting GPU#0[0] P106-100
miniZ<150,5,3>[4:1:00:5994]: Selecting GPU#1[1] P106-100
miniZ<150,5,3>[4:1:00:5994]: Selecting GPU#2[2] P106-100
miniZ<150,5,3>[4:1:00:5994]: Selecting GPU#3[3] P106-100
/hive/miners/miniz/h-run.sh: line 20: 12793 Segmentation fault ./miniZ $(< ${MINER_NAME}.conf) --logfile $MINER_LOG_BASENAME.log --telemetry 127.0.0.1:${MINER_API_PORT} --gpu-line

miniz exited, waiting to cooldown a bit

Files:

Code:

root@c3:/# cd /hive/miners/miniz/1.5p-cuda100

root@c3:/hive/miners/miniz/1.5p-cuda100# ls -al
total 68664
drwxr-xr-x 2 user user 4096 Aug 23 16:03 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 user user 4096 Aug 15 16:13 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 user user 189 Aug 15 14:21 control
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 54 Aug 23 16:03 ??f??V
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 108 Aug 20 19:36 (l?Y-?
-rwxr-xr-x 1 user user 70276968 Aug 15 14:21 miniZ
lrwxrwxrwx 1 user user 33 Aug 15 14:21 miniz.conf -> /run/hive/miners/miniz/miniz.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 56 Aug 20 19:36 `????U
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 54 Aug 19 20:39 ??z?4V

root@c3:/hive/miners/miniz/1.5p-cuda100# cat /hive/miners/miniz/1.5p-cuda100/`.��U
[INFO ] Disconnecting from beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com

root@c3:/hive/miners/miniz/1.5p-cuda100#cat /hive/miners/miniz/1.5p-cuda100/(l�Y-.
[FATAL ] CUDA: failed to alloc 2801 MB for main data
[FATAL ] CUDA: failed to alloc 2801 MB for main data

2h4u

newbie

Activity: 55

Merit: 0

Quote from: miniZ on August 23, 2019, 07:14:07 PM

You can find new miniZ v1.5q here.

Something wrong with the new release, Linux version. All shares are invalid, no good shares at all. Looks like --pers=auto doesn't work.

Command line: --par=150,5,3 [email protected]:3378 --templimit=75 --latency --shares-detail --extra --pers=auto --show-pers --localtime=11 --oc2=0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7 --oc1=8,9

Code:

Number of CUDA[10.0] devices found: 10
miniZ<150,5,3>[1:1:00:7993]: Selecting GPU#0[0] GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
miniZ<150,5,3>[4:1:00:5994]: Selecting GPU#1[1] P106-100
miniZ<150,5,3>[4:1:00:5994]: Selecting GPU#2[2] P106-100
miniZ<150,5,3>[4:1:00:5994]: Selecting GPU#3[3] P106-100
miniZ<150,5,3>[4:1:00:5990]: Selecting GPU#4[4] GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
miniZ<150,5,3>[4:1:00:5990]: Selecting GPU#5[5] GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
miniZ<150,5,3>[4:1:00:5990]: Selecting GPU#6[6] GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
miniZ<150,5,3>[4:1:00:5990]: Selecting GPU#7[7] GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
miniZ<150,5,3>[7:1:00:3970]: Selecting GPU#8[8] GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ<150,5,3>[7:1:00:3970]: Selecting GPU#9[9] GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Algo: EQ[150,5,3]
Pool#0: user[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
   server[beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[auto]
Telemetry: [http://localhost:20000]
Logging:: file[/var/log/miner/miniz/miniz.log] period[10] delay[0]
Optimisation: oc1[8 9] oc2[0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7]
Temp. limit: [75°C]
[ 0d 0h 0m09s|09:29:20 24/08/2019] S: 0/1 44(43.6)Sol/s 76( 76.1)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com,auto]- 121ms (100.0%) (0.0%)
  0>GTX 1070 Ti `S: 0/1 [59°C/59%]*19.41 I/s 37.9(37.9)Sol/s 42( 41.6)W clk=1860MHz mclk=4536MHz Sol/W=0.91
  1>P106-100 `S: 0/0 [58°C/66%] 0.67 I/s 1.2( 1.2)Sol/s 34( 34.4)W clk=1771MHz mclk=4665MHz Sol/W=0.04
  2>P106-100 `S: 0/0 [0°C/ 0%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=5MHz mclk=-1MHz Sol/W=-nan
  3>P106-100 `S: 0/0 [0°C/ 0%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=0MHz Sol/W=-nan
  4>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=-280358912MHz mclk=88544533MHz Sol/W=-nan
  5>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=1544585216MHz mclk=1639390746MHz Sol/W=-nan
  6>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=2094080MHz mclk=17240592MHz Sol/W=-nan
  7>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=2068480MHz mclk=3669763MHz Sol/W=-nan
  8>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=2081793MHz mclk=2557701MHz Sol/W=-nan
  9>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=2065408MHz mclk=19335178MHz Sol/W=-nan
[ 0d 0h 0m19s|09:29:30 24/08/2019] S: 0/3 88(88.4)Sol/s 395(395.1)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com,auto]- 107ms (100.0%) (0.0%)
  0>GTX 1070 Ti `S: 0/1 [59°C/59%] 20.99 I/s 42.6(42.6)Sol/s 42( 41.6)W clk=1860MHz mclk=4536MHz Sol/W=1.02
  1>P106-100 `S: 0/0 [58°C/66%] 12.52 I/s 26.1(26.1)Sol/s 34( 34.4)W clk=1771MHz mclk=4665MHz Sol/W=0.76
  2>P106-100 `S: 0/0 [60°C/69%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 31( 31.1)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4738MHz Sol/W=0.00
  3>P106-100 `S: 0/1 [63°C/69%]* 0.19 I/s 0.1( 0.1)Sol/s 55( 55.1)W clk=1455MHz mclk=4437MHz Sol/W=0.00
  4>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/0 [54°C/64%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 28( 27.8)W clk=1544MHz mclk=4363MHz Sol/W=0.00
  5>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/1 [59°C/61%]* 0.14 I/s 0.1( 0.1)Sol/s 106(105.7)W clk=1974MHz mclk=4437MHz Sol/W=0.00
  6>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/0 [60°C/66%] 0.14 I/s 0.1( 0.1)Sol/s 99( 99.3)W clk=1822MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.00
  7>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=2068480MHz mclk=3669763MHz Sol/W=-nan
  8>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=2081793MHz mclk=2557701MHz Sol/W=-nan
  9>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=2065408MHz mclk=19335178MHz Sol/W=-nan
[ 0d 0h 0m29s|09:29:40 24/08/2019] S: 0/16 131(130.7)Sol/s 426(426.1)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com,auto]- 95ms (100.0%) (0.0%)
  0>GTX 1070 Ti `S: 0/2 [59°C/59%]*21.33 I/s 43.7(43.7)Sol/s 42( 41.6)W clk=1860MHz mclk=4536MHz Sol/W=1.05
  1>P106-100 `S: 0/2 [58°C/66%]*12.50 I/s 26.8(26.8)Sol/s 34( 34.4)W clk=1771MHz mclk=4665MHz Sol/W=0.78
  2>P106-100 `S: 0/6 [60°C/69%]* 0.10 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 31( 31.1)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4738MHz Sol/W=0.00
  3>P106-100 `S: 0/3 [63°C/69%]*10.27 I/s 20.0(20.0)Sol/s 55( 55.1)W clk=1455MHz mclk=4437MHz Sol/W=0.36
  4>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/0 [54°C/64%] 0.09 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 28( 27.8)W clk=1544MHz mclk=4363MHz Sol/W=0.00
  5>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/1 [59°C/61%] 13.29 I/s 26.6(26.6)Sol/s 106(105.7)W clk=1974MHz mclk=4437MHz Sol/W=0.25
  6>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/2 [60°C/66%]*12.67 I/s 21.3(21.3)Sol/s 99( 99.3)W clk=1822MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.21
  7>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/0 [57°C/65%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 31( 30.9)W clk=1835MHz mclk=4568MHz Sol/W=0.00
  8>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=2081793MHz mclk=2557701MHz Sol/W=-nan
  9>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 0/0 [NA°C/NA%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=2065408MHz mclk=19335178MHz Sol/W=-nan

fee.server the same, so it isn't Nicehash problem.

Code:

[ 0d 0h 2m59s|09:32:10 24/08/2019] S: 0/177 231(230.8)Sol/s 908(888.9)W [fee.server]- 94ms (95.5%) (4.5%)
  0>GTX 1070 Ti `S: 0/28 [64°C/55%] 21.63 I/s 43.8(43.8)Sol/s 143(139.5)W clk=1784MHz mclk=4536MHz Sol/W=0.31
  1>P106-100 `S: 0/21 [65°C/62%] 12.48 I/s 25.5(25.5)Sol/s 104(100.6)W clk=1797MHz mclk=4665MHz Sol/W=0.25
  2>P106-100 `S: 0/28 [64°C/67%] 10.50 I/s 20.4(20.4)Sol/s 72( 70.0)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4738MHz Sol/W=0.29
  3>P106-100 `S: 0/20 [66°C/68%] 10.24 I/s 20.5(20.5)Sol/s 64( 60.7)W clk=1430MHz mclk=4437MHz Sol/W=0.34
  4>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/21 [64°C/62%]*12.86 I/s 25.2(25.2)Sol/s 111(103.4)W clk=1873MHz mclk=4363MHz Sol/W=0.24
  5>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/21 [64°C/62%] 13.21 I/s 26.5(26.5)Sol/s 102(105.2)W clk=1949MHz mclk=4437MHz Sol/W=0.25
  6>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/12 [64°C/63%] 12.60 I/s 25.8(25.8)Sol/s 102( 98.4)W clk=1822MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.26
  7>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/15 [64°C/66%] 11.06 I/s 21.5(21.5)Sol/s 72( 73.0)W clk=1594MHz mclk=4568MHz Sol/W=0.29
  8>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 0/3 [58°C/35%] 6.18 I/s 12.7(12.7)Sol/s 69( 69.0)W clk=1860MHz mclk=4058MHz Sol/W=0.18
  9>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 0/8 [57°C/35%] 6.61 I/s 13.1(13.1)Sol/s 69( 69.0)W clk=1822MHz mclk=4380MHz Sol/W=0.19
[ 0d 0h 3m09s|09:32:20 24/08/2019] S: 0/177 231(230.7)Sol/s 891(887.3)W [fee.server]- 94ms (90.4%) (9.6%)
  0>GTX 1070 Ti `S: 0/28 [64°C/55%] 21.63 I/s 43.7(43.7)Sol/s 142(139.7)W clk=1759MHz mclk=4536MHz Sol/W=0.31
  1>P106-100 `S: 0/21 [65°C/62%] 12.48 I/s 25.4(25.4)Sol/s 97( 99.6)W clk=1784MHz mclk=4665MHz Sol/W=0.25
  2>P106-100 `S: 0/28 [64°C/67%] 10.50 I/s 20.5(20.5)Sol/s 73( 70.5)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4738MHz Sol/W=0.29
  3>P106-100 `S: 0/20 [66°C/68%] 10.24 I/s 20.4(20.4)Sol/s 66( 61.4)W clk=1480MHz mclk=4437MHz Sol/W=0.33
  4>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/21 [64°C/62%] 12.86 I/s 25.1(25.1)Sol/s 107(103.4)W clk=1873MHz mclk=4363MHz Sol/W=0.24
  5>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/21 [65°C/62%] 13.21 I/s 26.3(26.3)Sol/s 101(104.6)W clk=1949MHz mclk=4437MHz Sol/W=0.25
  6>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/12 [65°C/63%] 12.59 I/s 25.4(25.4)Sol/s 97( 97.8)W clk=1822MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.26
  7>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/15 [64°C/66%] 11.06 I/s 21.7(21.7)Sol/s 70( 72.4)W clk=1594MHz mclk=4568MHz Sol/W=0.30
  8>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 0/3 [58°C/35%] 6.19 I/s 12.7(12.7)Sol/s 69( 69.0)W clk=1898MHz mclk=4058MHz Sol/W=0.18
  9>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 0/8 [56°C/35%] 6.61 I/s 13.1(13.1)Sol/s 69( 69.0)W clk=1822MHz mclk=4380MHz Sol/W=0.19

Reverted it back to v1.5p and voila:

Code:

Number of CUDA[10.0] devices found: 10
miniZ<150,5,3>[1:1:00:7993]: Selecting GPU#0[0] GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
miniZ<150,5,3>[4:1:00:5994]: Selecting GPU#3[3] P106-100
miniZ<150,5,3>[4:1:00:5994]: Selecting GPU#1[1] P106-100
miniZ<150,5,3>[4:1:00:5994]: Selecting GPU#2[2] P106-100
miniZ<150,5,3>[4:1:00:5990]: Selecting GPU#4[4] GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
miniZ<150,5,3>[4:1:00:5990]: Selecting GPU#5[5] GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
miniZ<150,5,3>[7:1:00:3970]: Selecting GPU#8[8] GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ<150,5,3>[7:1:00:3970]: Selecting GPU#9[9] GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ<150,5,3>[4:1:00:5990]: Selecting GPU#7[7] GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
miniZ<150,5,3>[4:1:00:5990]: Selecting GPU#6[6] GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Algo: EQ[150,5,3]
Pool#0: user[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
   server[beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com] port[3378] ssl[no] pers[Beam-PoW]
Telemetry: [http://localhost:20000]
Logging:: file[/var/log/miner/miniz/miniz.log] period[10] delay[0]
Optimisation: oc1[8 9] oc2[0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7]
Temp. limit: [75°C]
[ 0d 0h 0m07s|09:33:32 24/08/2019] S: 3/0 98(97.9)Sol/s 587(586.5)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com,Beam-PoW]- 108ms (100.0%) (0.0%)
  0>GTX 1070 Ti `S: 0/0 [60°C/55%] 15.03 I/s 28.9(28.9)Sol/s 149(149.1)W clk=1822MHz mclk=4536MHz Sol/W=0.19
  1>P106-100 `S: 0/0 [59°C/62%] 3.53 I/s 7.1( 7.1)Sol/s 32( 32.0)W clk=1582MHz mclk=4665MHz Sol/W=0.22
  2>P106-100 `S: 2/0 [61°C/67%]* 5.76 I/s 12.1(12.1)Sol/s 31( 31.2)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4738MHz Sol/W=0.39
  3>P106-100 `S: 1/0 [63°C/67%]* 7.04 I/s 12.2(12.2)Sol/s 66( 66.4)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4437MHz Sol/W=0.18
  4>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/0 [58°C/62%] 7.05 I/s 15.6(15.6)Sol/s 28( 28.1)W clk=1544MHz mclk=4363MHz Sol/W=0.56
  5>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/0 [56°C/62%] 3.74 I/s 7.0( 7.0)Sol/s 28( 28.5)W clk=1594MHz mclk=4437MHz Sol/W=0.25
  6>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/0 [59°C/63%] 1.55 I/s 2.8( 2.8)Sol/s 43( 42.9)W clk=1721MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.06
  7>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 0/0 [62°C/64%] 3.27 I/s 8.5( 8.5)Sol/s 70( 70.4)W clk=1594MHz mclk=4568MHz Sol/W=0.12
  8>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 0/0 [53°C/36%] 0.88 I/s 1.7( 1.7)Sol/s 69( 69.0)W clk=1430MHz mclk=4058MHz Sol/W=0.03
  9>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 0/0 [51°C/36%] 0.88 I/s 1.5( 1.5)Sol/s 69( 69.0)W clk=1290MHz mclk=4380MHz Sol/W=0.02
[ 0d 0h 0m17s|09:33:42 24/08/2019] S: 16/0 204(204.3)Sol/s 851(851.2)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com,Beam-PoW]- 76ms (100.0%) (0.0%)
  0>GTX 1070 Ti `S: 1/0 [63°C/55%]*19.98 I/s 39.4(39.4)Sol/s 132(131.5)W clk=1759MHz mclk=4536MHz Sol/W=0.30
  1>P106-100 `S: 1/0 [62°C/62%]*11.18 I/s 22.4(22.4)Sol/s 95( 95.4)W clk=1797MHz mclk=4665MHz Sol/W=0.23
  2>P106-100 `S: 2/0 [63°C/67%] 9.47 I/s 20.4(20.4)Sol/s 68( 68.1)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4738MHz Sol/W=0.30
  3>P106-100 `S: 2/0 [64°C/68%]* 9.44 I/s 19.3(19.3)Sol/s 68( 67.6)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4437MHz Sol/W=0.29
  4>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 2/0 [63°C/61%]*11.58 I/s 22.0(22.0)Sol/s 92( 92.4)W clk=1873MHz mclk=4363MHz Sol/W=0.24
  5>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 4/0 [62°C/61%]*11.88 I/s 24.6(24.6)Sol/s 96( 96.2)W clk=1949MHz mclk=4437MHz Sol/W=0.26
  6>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 1/0 [62°C/63%]*12.04 I/s 24.6(24.6)Sol/s 86( 85.8)W clk=1822MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.29
  7>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 3/0 [63°C/65%]* 9.95 I/s 20.9(20.9)Sol/s 76( 76.1)W clk=1594MHz mclk=4568MHz Sol/W=0.28
  8>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 0/0 [57°C/36%] 5.91 I/s 10.6(10.6)Sol/s 69( 69.0)W clk=1873MHz mclk=4058MHz Sol/W=0.15
  9>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 0/0 [55°C/36%] 6.32 I/s 14.6(14.6)Sol/s 69( 69.0)W clk=1847MHz mclk=4380MHz Sol/W=0.21

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: MineOrDie on August 23, 2019, 07:39:49 PM

Quote from: miniZ on August 23, 2019, 07:36:22 PM

Quote from: MineOrDie on August 23, 2019, 07:22:04 PM

Still the same thing on Windows 10 and 125,4 algo.

Your solver still wants to allocate 2524MB, and my cards only got 2480 memory free.
Nothing changed from the last version.

Hi MineOrDie,
thanks for the feedback.
Could you check what happens if you try to force mode 10 with --mode=10?
Cheers

I tried with that command already. Using it from the start. It's the same as with not mode 10.
You need to shrink your solver just a tiny bit more. Even if that means loss of performance.

Hi MineOrDie,
thanks.
It is weird because the 2524MB message should refer to mode=3. On mode=10 we have 2409 MB.
Could you paste here the beginning of miniZ output? And command line.
Cheers

MineOrDie

jr. member

Activity: 75

Merit: 1

Quote from: miniZ on August 23, 2019, 07:36:22 PM

Quote from: MineOrDie on August 23, 2019, 07:22:04 PM

Still the same thing on Windows 10 and 125,4 algo.

Your solver still wants to allocate 2524MB, and my cards only got 2480 memory free.
Nothing changed from the last version.

Hi MineOrDie,
thanks for the feedback.
Could you check what happens if you try to force mode 10 with --mode=10?
Cheers

I tried with that command already. Using it from the start. It's the same as with not mode 10.
You need to shrink your solver just a tiny bit more. Even if that means loss of performance.

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: MineOrDie on August 23, 2019, 07:22:04 PM

Still the same thing on Windows 10 and 125,4 algo.

Your solver still wants to allocate 2524MB, and my cards only got 2480 memory free.
Nothing changed from the last version.

Hi MineOrDie,
thanks for the feedback.
Could you check what happens if you try to force mode 10 with --mode=10?
Cheers

MineOrDie

jr. member

Activity: 75

Merit: 1

Still the same thing on Windows 10 and 125,4 algo.

Your solver still wants to allocate 2524MB, and my cards only got 2480 memory free.
Nothing changed from the last version.

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Hi everyone,
Thanks a lot for your feedback and support!

You can find new miniZ v1.5q here.

In brief:
* Adjusted oc modes for ZelHash - 125,4. Major improvements for 1080Ti (>7%).
* Adjusted oc modes for BeamHashII - 150,5,3 with improvements.
* Improvements for ZHash - 144,5, for RTX cards.
* Further attempts to support ZEL mining on 3GB GPU, on Windows 10.
* Fixed support for 144,5 for 1050 2GB, on Windows 10.
* Fixed slow start for some GPUs/rigs.
* Added --csv option for log stats in csv format.
* Added busID to -ci output.
* Fixed issue connection to sparkpool.
* Fixed invalid shares on flypool.
* Other minor bug fixes.

Check performances here. Or performances page for each algorithm.

For additional information check our Usage or FAQ pages.

Happy mining!

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: 2h4u on August 23, 2019, 03:11:53 AM

@miniz, what is window size for calculating averages?

I need to figure out minimal amount of time to wait before I can use your average hashrate as real average hashrate, give or take. Let's say I gonna benchmark some algo against every power level to find out a sweet spot. If that averaging window is like past 5 mins, I don't have to run miner for 10 minutes, right?

Hi 2h4u,
the Sol/s averages you read in the console output are a short 3min average, and a long 3h average (in brackets).
However, for benchmarking purposes the I/s are much more suitable than the Sol/s (we show 3min average).
I/s stabilize much faster ~3-4min, and the Sol/s ~3-4h.

We are about to make a release later in the day.

Cheers

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: Valter84 on August 22, 2019, 06:19:43 AM

Thank you for your work.
We hope you can do it.
Would be glad to start mining ZEL again on my win 10 rigs.
Thank you.

Hi Valter84,
we are about to make a new release today where we further attempt to make it work.
You should be aware that if it works in Windows 10, the performance is a bit worse than in other OS.
Cheers

2h4u

newbie

Activity: 55

Merit: 0

@miniz, what is window size for calculating averages?

I need to figure out minimal amount of time to wait before I can use your average hashrate as real average hashrate, give or take. Let's say I gonna benchmark some algo against every power level to find out a sweet spot. If that averaging window is like past 5 mins, I don't have to run miner for 10 minutes, right?

Valter84

newbie

Activity: 26

Merit: 0

Quote from: miniZ on August 15, 2019, 11:45:24 AM

Quote from: RelaxedCrypto on August 15, 2019, 08:47:31 AM

Quote from: MineOrDie on August 15, 2019, 06:40:41 AM

Mode=10 do nothing for me.

Same here

Hi RelaxedCrypto, MineOrDie,
Apparently our solver has not shrink enough to fit in your cards. Sad

We keep trying to improve this for the next version.
Cheers

Thank you for your work.
We hope you can do it.
Would be glad to start mining ZEL again on my win 10 rigs.
Thank you.

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: 2h4u on August 19, 2019, 11:12:25 PM

Looks like I have found the cause. This situation happens only when an additional CPU miner is working. I put it on hold, restarted miniZ and woa--there's no problem at all. Must say that gminer and cryptodredge not that touchy at all.

Hi 2h4u,
Thanks for the extra information.
We managed to understand the cause.
We fixed this and it will be OK in the next version.
Cheers

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: MineOrDie on August 19, 2019, 06:20:21 PM

Well, the problem with Flypool invalid shares still exists.

Hi MineOrDie,
we think we may have spot the issue.
It will be fixed in the next release.
Thanks.
Cheers

2h4u

newbie

Activity: 55

Merit: 0

Looks like I have found the cause. This situation happens only when an additional CPU miner is working. I put it on hold, restarted miniZ and woa--there's no problem at all. Must say that gminer and cryptodredge not that touchy at all.

2h4u

newbie

Activity: 55

Merit: 0

Quote from: miniZ on August 18, 2019, 06:28:41 PM

thank you for all the information. We're looking into it.

More logs. No hashes and no nvml info for 5 mins. HiveOS.

Code:

[ 0d 0h 5m17s|10:45:28 20/08/2019] S:150/0 188(187.6)Sol/s  35( 34.9)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com,Beam-PoW]- 101ms (93.1%) (6.9%)                                                                         
  0>GTX 1070 Ti `S: 40/0 [47°C/35%] 21.64 I/s 43.2(43.1)Sol/s  35( 34.9)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4536MHz Sol/W=1.23                                                                                              
  1>P106-100    `S:  0/0 [0°C/ 0%]  0.00 I/s  0.0( 0.0)Sol/s   0(  0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=0MHz Sol/W=-nan                                                                                                     
  2>P106-100    `S: 19/0 [0°C/ 0%]*10.54 I/s 20.8(20.9)Sol/s   0(  0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=0MHz Sol/W=inf                                                                                                      
  3>P106-100    `S:  0/0 [0°C/ 0%]  0.00 I/s  0.0( 0.0)Sol/s   0(  0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=0MHz Sol/W=-nan                                                                                                     
  4>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 30/0 [0°C/ 0%]*12.84 I/s 26.0(25.9)Sol/s   0(  0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=0MHz Sol/W=inf                                                                                                     
  5>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 12/0 [0°C/ 0%] 13.20 I/s 25.7(25.7)Sol/s   0(  0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=0MHz Sol/W=inf                                                                                                     
  6>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 16/0 [0°C/ 0%] 12.56 I/s 24.8(24.7)Sol/s   0(  0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=0MHz Sol/W=inf                                                                                                     
  7>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 13/0 [0°C/ 0%]*11.07 I/s 21.9(21.9)Sol/s   0(  0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=0MHz Sol/W=inf                                                                                                     
  8>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 10/0 [0°C/ 0%]  6.19 I/s 12.2(12.2)Sol/s   0(  0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=0MHz Sol/W=inf                                                                                                      
  9>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 10/0 [0°C/ 0%]  6.62 I/s 13.4(13.3)Sol/s   0(  0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=0MHz Sol/W=inf                                                                                                      
[ 0d 0h 5m27s|10:45:38 20/08/2019] S:151/0 188(187.8)Sol/s 725(725.4)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com,Beam-PoW]- 100ms (93.3%) (6.7%)                                                                         
  0>GTX 1070 Ti `S: 40/0 [47°C/35%] 21.63 I/s 43.2(43.0)Sol/s  35( 34.9)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4536MHz Sol/W=1.23                                                                                              
  1>P106-100    `S:  0/0 [44°C/37%]  0.01 I/s  0.0( 0.0)Sol/s  29( 29.3)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4665MHz Sol/W=0.00                                                                                              
  2>P106-100    `S: 19/0 [67°C/46%] 10.54 I/s 20.9(20.9)Sol/s  73( 72.5)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4738MHz Sol/W=0.29                                                                                              
  3>P106-100    `S:  0/0 [55°C/35%]  0.01 I/s  0.0( 0.0)Sol/s  67( 67.4)W clk=1480MHz mclk=4437MHz Sol/W=0.00                                                                                              
  4>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 30/0 [67°C/55%] 12.84 I/s 26.3(26.1)Sol/s  90( 89.9)W clk=1873MHz mclk=4363MHz Sol/W=0.29                                                                                             
  5>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 12/0 [66°C/62%] 13.20 I/s 25.8(25.8)Sol/s 104(103.5)W clk=1949MHz mclk=4437MHz Sol/W=0.25                                                                                             
  6>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 17/0 [66°C/64%]*12.56 I/s 24.7(24.7)Sol/s 103(102.7)W clk=1835MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.24                                                                                             
  7>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 13/0 [67°C/56%] 11.07 I/s 21.7(21.8)Sol/s  75( 75.0)W clk=1645MHz mclk=4568MHz Sol/W=0.29                                                                                             
  8>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 10/0 [62°C/36%]  6.20 I/s 12.4(12.3)Sol/s  75( 75.0)W clk=1835MHz mclk=4058MHz Sol/W=0.16                                                                                              
  9>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 10/0 [55°C/35%]  6.62 I/s 13.4(13.3)Sol/s  75( 75.0)W clk=1822MHz mclk=4380MHz Sol/W=0.18                                                                                              
[ 0d 0h 5m37s|10:45:48 20/08/2019] S:154/0 192(190.1)Sol/s 918(825.3)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com,Beam-PoW]- 107ms (93.5%) (6.5%)                                                                         
  0>GTX 1070 Ti `S: 41/0 [67°C/43%]*21.62 I/s 43.2(43.1)Sol/s 217(133.6)W clk=1759MHz mclk=4536MHz Sol/W=0.32                                                                                              
  1>P106-100    `S:  0/0 [51°C/36%] 12.64 I/s 23.0(23.0)Sol/s  60( 32.8)W clk=1822MHz mclk=4665MHz Sol/W=0.70                                                                                              
  2>P106-100    `S: 19/0 [68°C/47%] 10.54 I/s 20.7(20.9)Sol/s  74( 72.7)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4738MHz Sol/W=0.29                                                                                              
  3>P106-100    `S:  0/0 [59°C/35%] 10.38 I/s 24.4(24.4)Sol/s  64( 67.0)W clk=1455MHz mclk=4437MHz Sol/W=0.36                                                                                              
  4>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 31/0 [67°C/55%]*12.83 I/s 26.4(26.2)Sol/s  82( 89.0)W clk=1873MHz mclk=4363MHz Sol/W=0.29                                                                                             
  5>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 12/0 [66°C/62%] 13.20 I/s 25.9(25.8)Sol/s 110(104.3)W clk=1949MHz mclk=4437MHz Sol/W=0.25                                                                                             
  6>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 17/0 [66°C/64%] 12.55 I/s 25.0(24.8)Sol/s 102(102.6)W clk=1822MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.24                                                                                             
  7>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 14/0 [67°C/57%]*11.06 I/s 21.8(21.8)Sol/s  61( 73.4)W clk=1594MHz mclk=4568MHz Sol/W=0.30                                                                                             
  8>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 10/0 [63°C/35%]  6.19 I/s 12.4(12.3)Sol/s  75( 75.0)W clk=1835MHz mclk=4058MHz Sol/W=0.16                                                                                              
  9>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 10/0 [55°C/35%]  6.62 I/s 13.3(13.3)Sol/s  75( 75.0)W clk=1835MHz mclk=4380MHz Sol/W=0.18                                                                                              
[ 0d 0h 5m47s|10:45:58 20/08/2019] S:158/0 197(192.8)Sol/s 886(827.0)W [beamv2.eu-new.nicehash.com,Beam-PoW]- 252ms (93.7%) (6.3%)                                                                         
  0>GTX 1070 Ti `S: 42/0 [67°C/44%]*21.61 I/s 43.2(43.1)Sol/s 180(134.2)W clk=1746MHz mclk=4536MHz Sol/W=0.32                                                                                              
  1>P106-100    `S:  0/0 [54°C/38%] 12.64 I/s 25.8(25.8)Sol/s  77( 36.3)W clk=1822MHz mclk=4665MHz Sol/W=0.71                                                                                              
  2>P106-100    `S: 19/0 [68°C/47%] 10.54 I/s 20.9(20.9)Sol/s  70( 72.4)W clk=1493MHz mclk=4738MHz Sol/W=0.29                                                                                              
  3>P106-100    `S:  0/0 [61°C/38%] 10.39 I/s 22.4(22.4)Sol/s  60( 66.4)W clk=1442MHz mclk=4437MHz Sol/W=0.34                                                                                              
  4>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 32/0 [67°C/56%]*12.83 I/s 26.5(26.2)Sol/s  96( 90.2)W clk=1860MHz mclk=4363MHz Sol/W=0.29                                                                                             
  5>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 12/0 [66°C/62%] 13.20 I/s 25.7(25.8)Sol/s 112(104.8)W clk=1949MHz mclk=4437MHz Sol/W=0.25                                                                                             
  6>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 17/0 [66°C/64%] 12.55 I/s 24.9(24.8)Sol/s  85(100.6)W clk=1822MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.25                                                                                             
  7>GTX 1060 6GB `S: 14/0 [67°C/57%] 11.06 I/s 22.1(22.0)Sol/s  55( 72.1)W clk=1594MHz mclk=4568MHz Sol/W=0.30                                                                                             
  8>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 11/0 [62°C/37%]* 6.19 I/s 12.5(12.4)Sol/s  75( 75.0)W clk=1847MHz mclk=4058MHz Sol/W=0.16                                                                                              
  9>GTX 1050 Ti `S: 11/0 [55°C/35%]* 6.62 I/s 13.6(13.4)Sol/s  75( 75.0)W clk=1822MHz mclk=4380MHz Sol/W=0.18

MineOrDie

jr. member

Activity: 75

Merit: 1

Well, the problem with Flypool invalid shares still exists.

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: 91to on August 19, 2019, 01:41:30 PM

--localtime=[11,14] - I meant --localtime=11 and --localtime=14 and its not working. I tried localtime with 11~14 everyone number from this diapason and its not working

Hi 91to,
could you paste here your command line?

We tried and see no problem:

Code:

./miniZ  --url 0xa074dd01441a2618296590e0d5fb69603624e8aa0251decec9f81c9f050a84c3.rig@aion-eu.luxor.tech:3366   --extra  --localtime=14
************ miniZ v1.5p ************
Number of CUDA[8.0] devices found: 1
miniZ,210,9[3:1:00:1939]: Selecting GPU#1[0] GeForce GTX 1050
Algo:           EQ[210,9] 
Pool#0:         user[0xa074dd01441a2618296590e0d5fb69603624e8aa0251decec9f81c9f050a84c3.rig1]
                server[aion-eu.luxor.tech] port[3366] ssl[no] pers[AION0PoW]
Telemetry:      [http://localhost:20000]
Temp. limit:    [90°C]
[ 0d 0h 0m10s|Aug 20 00:40:53] S:  0/0 0>GTX 1050 ` 100% [48°C/38%] 37.57 I/s 73.3(73.3)Sol/s  75( 75.0)W clk=1746MHz mclk=3504MHz Sol/W=0.98 [aion-eu.luxor.tech] (100.0%) (0.0%)
[ 0d 0h 0m20s|Aug 20 00:41:03] S:  0/0 0>GTX 1050 ` 100% [56°C/41%] 38.26 I/s 72.9(72.9)Sol/s  75( 75.0)W clk=1746MHz mclk=3504MHz Sol/W=0.97 [aion-eu.luxor.tech] (100.0%) (0.0%)
[ 0d 0h 0m30s|Aug 20 00:41:13] S:  0/0 0>GTX 1050 ` 100% [59°C/43%] 38.45 I/s 74.4(74.4)Sol/s  75( 75.0)W clk=1733MHz mclk=3504MHz Sol/W=0.99 [aion-eu.luxor.tech] (100.0%) (0.0%)
[ 0d 0h 0m40s|Aug 20 00:41:23] S:  0/0 0>GTX 1050 ` 100% [60°C/45%] 38.52 I/s 73.1(73.1)Sol/s  75( 75.0)W clk=1733MHz mclk=3504MHz Sol/W=0.98 [aion-eu.luxor.tech] (100.0%) (0.0%)

Let us know if you managed to get it work.
Cheers

91to

newbie

Activity: 26

Merit: 0

--localtime=[11,14] - I meant --localtime=11 and --localtime=14 and its not working. I tried localtime with 11~14 everyone number from this diapason and its not working

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: 91to on August 19, 2019, 07:56:40 AM

hello! How to make to show local time in miner window? --localtime=[11,14] is not working

Hi 91to,
you need to specify a number, from 11 to 14, not [11,14].

Ex. if --localtime=13 you get the following format:
[ 0d 0h 0m10s|15:44:03]
Cheers

Topic: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX - page 42. (Read 60004 times)