Pages:
Author

Topic: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX - page 46. (Read 60004 times)

member
Activity: 690
Merit: 17
Hi,
some news about date for the new release ?
Hi Nairolf911,
We will try to get it out next Sunday.
Cheers
jr. member
Activity: 75
Merit: 1
Thanks!

Really waiting for it. I prefer miniZ over any other miner as you know.
member
Activity: 690
Merit: 17
Hi,

I'm getting random rejected shares, like 60 at once in the console output (that's not normal, for sure) on Flypool mining YEC. Other miners work just fine, no rejected shares. GTX 1060 6GB, Windows 10, 431.60 drivers.
Hi MineOrDie,
It looks like the miner might be submiting some shares bellow target, on flypool.
This should not affect performance but we will check this further.
Thanks for reporting this.
Cheers
Yeah, I get rejecteds on pool side also. GMiner is fine, 0 rejected.
Also, is there something wrong with color output on Windows 8.1? GMiner works fine.
Hi MineOrDie,
this should be fixed in the next version.
Regarding the color output, Windows 8 console does not support miniZ colors. Check here for more information.
Cheers
newbie
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
Hi,
some news about date for the new release ?
jr. member
Activity: 75
Merit: 1
Hi,

I'm getting random rejected shares, like 60 at once in the console output (that's not normal, for sure) on Flypool mining YEC. Other miners work just fine, no rejected shares. GTX 1060 6GB, Windows 10, 431.60 drivers.
Hi MineOrDie,
It looks like the miner might be submiting some shares bellow target, on flypool.
This should not affect performance but we will check this further.
Thanks for reporting this.
Cheers
Yeah, I get rejecteds on pool side also. GMiner is fine, 0 rejected.
Also, is there something wrong with color output on Windows 8.1? GMiner works fine.
member
Activity: 690
Merit: 17
Hi,

I'm getting random rejected shares, like 60 at once in the console output (that's not normal, for sure) on Flypool mining YEC. Other miners work just fine, no rejected shares. GTX 1060 6GB, Windows 10, 431.60 drivers.
Hi MineOrDie,
It looks like the miner might be submiting some shares bellow target, on flypool.
This should not affect performance but we will check this further.
Thanks for reporting this.
Cheers
jr. member
Activity: 75
Merit: 1
Hi,

I'm getting random rejected shares, like 60 at once in the console output (that's not normal, for sure) on Flypool mining YEC. Other miners work just fine, no rejected shares. GTX 1060 6GB, Windows 10, 431.60 drivers.
jr. member
Activity: 109
Merit: 1
I'm blind sorry - "ANON vs AION" :-D

--mode=x  - it works now

Now i will look for the best value.

Thank you for your answer and advice
member
Activity: 690
Merit: 17
Hi,

other algo works normally....

Win 10, 4GB, pagefile 100GB, driver - 419-430 same solution

Thanks for reply

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Algo:      EQ[210,9]
Pool#0:    user[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxx]
      server[stratum.aionmine.org] port[2222] ssl[no] pers[AnonyPoW]
Telemetry:   [http://localhost:20000]
Logging::    file[miniZ.log] period[10] delay[0]
Temp. limit:   [90řC]
Number of CUDA devices found: 6
miniZ,210,9[8:1:00:9318]: Selecting GPU#0[0] GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
miniZ,210,9[8:1:00:9318]: Selecting GPU#1[1] GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
miniZ,210,9[2:1:00:6761]: Selecting GPU#2[2] GeForce GTX 1080
miniZ,210,9[8:1:00:9318]: Selecting GPU#3[3] GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
miniZ,210,9[8:1:00:9318]: Selecting GPU#4[4] GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
miniZ,210,9[8:1:00:9318]: Selecting GPU#5[5] GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GPU[0] has invalid mode 8.
GPU[1] has invalid mode 8.
GPU[3] has invalid mode 8.
GPU[4] has invalid mode 8.
GPU[5] has invalid mode 8.

Hi stzcze,
Sorry about this, and thank you for reporting.
For the moment, for your GTX 1080 Ti GPUs, you need to specify the mode manually. Also, your personalisation string does not look correct (do you want to mine AION?), maybe it is better to specify it manually. Could you paste here your command line?

You can add to your command line --mode=x --mode2=2 --pers=AION0PoW, where x=0,1,2,3,6,7,9. Try different x values to see which gives the best hashrate. (--mode2=2 makes your GPU#2 (GTX 1080) mining in mode 2)
Let us know if this worked. If you can please let us know which x value performed best.
Thanks!
Cheers
member
Activity: 690
Merit: 17
Loving the miner, it's my favourite for Beam Smiley

With only two weeks left til the fork (https://www.hardforks.info/coins/beam/), do you know when you think you might have a test version of miniZ with BeamHashII support?


Hi strideynet2,
thank you for your preference Smiley
We expect it to be out in a week.
Cheers
jr. member
Activity: 109
Merit: 1
Hi,

other algo works normally....

Win 10, 4GB, pagefile 100GB, driver - 419-430 same solution

Thanks for reply

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Algo:      EQ[210,9]
Pool#0:    user[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxx]
      server[stratum.aionmine.org] port[2222] ssl[no] pers[AnonyPoW]
Telemetry:   [http://localhost:20000]
Logging::    file[miniZ.log] period[10] delay[0]
Temp. limit:   [90řC]
Number of CUDA devices found: 6
miniZ,210,9[8:1:00:9318]: Selecting GPU#0[0] GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
miniZ,210,9[8:1:00:9318]: Selecting GPU#1[1] GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
miniZ,210,9[2:1:00:6761]: Selecting GPU#2[2] GeForce GTX 1080
miniZ,210,9[8:1:00:9318]: Selecting GPU#3[3] GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
miniZ,210,9[8:1:00:9318]: Selecting GPU#4[4] GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
miniZ,210,9[8:1:00:9318]: Selecting GPU#5[5] GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GPU[0] has invalid mode 8.
GPU[1] has invalid mode 8.
GPU[3] has invalid mode 8.
GPU[4] has invalid mode 8.
GPU[5] has invalid mode 8.


newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
Loving the miner, it's my favourite for Beam Smiley

With only two weeks left til the fork (https://www.hardforks.info/coins/beam/), do you know when you think you might have a test version of miniZ with BeamHashII support?

member
Activity: 690
Merit: 17
Thank you!
If the total number of shares in the address GPU1 was 1000, and GPU1 took 200, then I will see 20% efficiency, right?
Does such a low percentage affect the profitability of this GPU?

Correct.
Efficiency of 50% is bad. You should never go below ~98%.

Changed the server from "asia1-ycash.flypool.org server eu1-ycash.flypool.org". Anything with GPU did not. For a while, the efficiency of the two GPUs was low. Then rise. The screenshot on the link:



Thanks!
Hi tetan87,
it looks like you had one (or a few) invalid share on those cards. After a short run time there is not enough statistics and the efficiency is not very meaningful. So if it starts low but then converges to 100% it is fine. Like JFoxOne wrote before, if the efficiency values rise to >98% it should be OK. After a long run, you can also check if the hashrate reported by the pool is what you expect.
Cheers
member
Activity: 690
Merit: 17
Dear dev,
I really look forward to the function of the failover pool in pools.txt file!
Hi 12miners,
you can add more pools to your command line.
Example for YEC:
Code:
./miniZ --par=192,7 [email protected]:5001 [email protected]:50152 --pers=ZcashPoW

You can also add failover pools to your config file. You can create a config file by adding --write-config filename to the end of your command line. Then run miniZ with this file by typing just miniZ.exe --read-config filename. Feel free to edit this file with your favorite text editor.

Let us know if this helped.
Cheers
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
Thank you!
If the total number of shares in the address GPU1 was 1000, and GPU1 took 200, then I will see 20% efficiency, right?
Does such a low percentage affect the profitability of this GPU?

Correct.
Efficiency of 50% is bad. You should never go below ~98%.

Changed the server from "asia1-ycash.flypool.org server eu1-ycash.flypool.org". Anything with GPU did not. For a while, the efficiency of the two GPUs was low. Then rise. The screenshot on the link:

http://www.picshare.ru/view/10163300/

Thanks!
member
Activity: 640
Merit: 56
minerstat
Thank you!
If the total number of shares in the address GPU1 was 1000, and GPU1 took 200, then I will see 20% efficiency, right?
Does such a low percentage affect the profitability of this GPU?

Correct.
Efficiency of 50% is bad. You should never go below ~98%.
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
Hello dears! Friends, could you tell me what these percentages mean? Why are three graphics cards less than 100%? Why are they highlighted in red? Sometimes two, sometimes three. The value sometimes changes. On the official website did not find a description of these values.

http://www.picshare.ru/view/10162421/

Thanks!

It shows efficiency ratio of accepted vs. rejected shares.

Thank you!
If the total number of shares in the address GPU1 was 1000, and GPU1 took 200, then I will see 20% efficiency, right?
Does such a low percentage affect the profitability of this GPU?
member
Activity: 640
Merit: 56
minerstat
Hello dears! Friends, could you tell me what these percentages mean? Why are three graphics cards less than 100%? Why are they highlighted in red? Sometimes two, sometimes three. The value sometimes changes. On the official website did not find a description of these values.



Thanks!

It shows efficiency ratio of accepted vs. rejected shares.
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
Hello dears! Friends, could you tell me what these percentages mean? Why are three graphics cards less than 100%? Why are they highlighted in red? Sometimes two, sometimes three. The value sometimes changes. On the official website did not find a description of these values.

http://www.picshare.ru/view/10162421/

Thanks!
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Dear dev,
I really look forward to the function of the failover pool in pools.txt file!
Pages:
Jump to: