miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX - page 46.

MineOrDie

jr. member

Activity: 75

Merit: 1

Hi,

I'm getting random rejected shares, like 60 at once in the console output (that's not normal, for sure) on Flypool mining YEC. Other miners work just fine, no rejected shares. GTX 1060 6GB, Windows 10, 431.60 drivers.

stzcze

jr. member

Activity: 109

Merit: 1

I'm blind sorry - "ANON vs AION" :-D

--mode=x - it works now

Now i will look for the best value.

Thank you for your answer and advice

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: stzcze on August 01, 2019, 04:20:31 AM

Hi,

other algo works normally....

Win 10, 4GB, pagefile 100GB, driver - 419-430 same solution

Thanks for reply

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Algo:      EQ[210,9]
Pool#0:    user[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxx]
      server[stratum.aionmine.org] port[2222] ssl[no] pers[AnonyPoW]
Telemetry:   [http://localhost:20000]
Logging::    file[miniZ.log] period[10] delay[0]
Temp. limit:   [90řC]
Number of CUDA devices found: 6
miniZ,210,9[8:1:00:9318]: Selecting GPU#0[0] GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
miniZ,210,9[8:1:00:9318]: Selecting GPU#1[1] GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
miniZ,210,9[2:1:00:6761]: Selecting GPU#2[2] GeForce GTX 1080
miniZ,210,9[8:1:00:9318]: Selecting GPU#3[3] GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
miniZ,210,9[8:1:00:9318]: Selecting GPU#4[4] GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
miniZ,210,9[8:1:00:9318]: Selecting GPU#5[5] GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GPU[0] has invalid mode 8.
GPU[1] has invalid mode 8.
GPU[3] has invalid mode 8.
GPU[4] has invalid mode 8.
GPU[5] has invalid mode 8.

Hi stzcze,
Sorry about this, and thank you for reporting.
For the moment, for your GTX 1080 Ti GPUs, you need to specify the mode manually. Also, your personalisation string does not look correct (do you want to mine AION?), maybe it is better to specify it manually. Could you paste here your command line?

You can add to your command line --mode=x --mode2=2 --pers=AION0PoW, where x=0,1,2,3,6,7,9. Try different x values to see which gives the best hashrate. (--mode2=2 makes your GPU#2 (GTX 1080) mining in mode 2)
Let us know if this worked. If you can please let us know which x value performed best.
Thanks!
Cheers

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: strideynet2 on August 01, 2019, 04:02:50 AM

Loving the miner, it's my favourite for Beam

With only two weeks left til the fork (https://www.hardforks.info/coins/beam/), do you know when you think you might have a test version of miniZ with BeamHashII support?

Hi strideynet2,
thank you for your preference

We expect it to be out in a week.
Cheers

stzcze

jr. member

Activity: 109

Merit: 1

Hi,

other algo works normally....

Win 10, 4GB, pagefile 100GB, driver - 419-430 same solution

Thanks for reply

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Algo:      EQ[210,9]
Pool#0:    user[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxx]
      server[stratum.aionmine.org] port[2222] ssl[no] pers[AnonyPoW]
Telemetry:   [http://localhost:20000]
Logging::    file[miniZ.log] period[10] delay[0]
Temp. limit:   [90řC]
Number of CUDA devices found: 6
miniZ,210,9[8:1:00:9318]: Selecting GPU#0[0] GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
miniZ,210,9[8:1:00:9318]: Selecting GPU#1[1] GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
miniZ,210,9[2:1:00:6761]: Selecting GPU#2[2] GeForce GTX 1080
miniZ,210,9[8:1:00:9318]: Selecting GPU#3[3] GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
miniZ,210,9[8:1:00:9318]: Selecting GPU#4[4] GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
miniZ,210,9[8:1:00:9318]: Selecting GPU#5[5] GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GPU[0] has invalid mode 8.
GPU[1] has invalid mode 8.
GPU[3] has invalid mode 8.
GPU[4] has invalid mode 8.
GPU[5] has invalid mode 8.

strideynet2

newbie

Activity: 7

Merit: 0

Loving the miner, it's my favourite for Beam

With only two weeks left til the fork (https://www.hardforks.info/coins/beam/), do you know when you think you might have a test version of miniZ with BeamHashII support?

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: tetan87 on July 28, 2019, 08:51:04 AM

Quote from: JFoxOne on July 28, 2019, 06:36:47 AM

Quote from: tetan87 on July 28, 2019, 06:31:22 AM

Thank you!
If the total number of shares in the address GPU1 was 1000, and GPU1 took 200, then I will see 20% efficiency, right?
Does such a low percentage affect the profitability of this GPU?

Correct.
Efficiency of 50% is bad. You should never go below ~98%.

Changed the server from "asia1-ycash.flypool.org server eu1-ycash.flypool.org". Anything with GPU did not. For a while, the efficiency of the two GPUs was low. Then rise. The screenshot on the link:

Thanks!

Hi tetan87,
it looks like you had one (or a few) invalid share on those cards. After a short run time there is not enough statistics and the efficiency is not very meaningful. So if it starts low but then converges to 100% it is fine. Like JFoxOne wrote before, if the efficiency values rise to >98% it should be OK. After a long run, you can also check if the hashrate reported by the pool is what you expect.
Cheers

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: 12miners on July 23, 2019, 12:28:53 PM

Dear dev,
I really look forward to the function of the failover pool in pools.txt file!

Hi 12miners,
you can add more pools to your command line.
Example for YEC:

Code:

./miniZ --par=192,7 [email protected]:5001 [email protected]:50152 --pers=ZcashPoW

You can also add failover pools to your config file. You can create a config file by adding --write-config filename to the end of your command line. Then run miniZ with this file by typing just miniZ.exe --read-config filename. Feel free to edit this file with your favorite text editor.

Let us know if this helped.
Cheers

tetan87

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Quote from: JFoxOne on July 28, 2019, 06:36:47 AM

Quote from: tetan87 on July 28, 2019, 06:31:22 AM

Thank you!
If the total number of shares in the address GPU1 was 1000, and GPU1 took 200, then I will see 20% efficiency, right?
Does such a low percentage affect the profitability of this GPU?

Correct.
Efficiency of 50% is bad. You should never go below ~98%.

Changed the server from "asia1-ycash.flypool.org server eu1-ycash.flypool.org". Anything with GPU did not. For a while, the efficiency of the two GPUs was low. Then rise. The screenshot on the link:

http://www.picshare.ru/view/10163300/

Thanks!

JFoxOne

member

Activity: 640

Merit: 56

minerstat

Quote from: tetan87 on July 28, 2019, 06:31:22 AM

Thank you!
If the total number of shares in the address GPU1 was 1000, and GPU1 took 200, then I will see 20% efficiency, right?
Does such a low percentage affect the profitability of this GPU?

Correct.
Efficiency of 50% is bad. You should never go below ~98%.

tetan87

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Quote from: JFoxOne on July 28, 2019, 06:15:16 AM

Quote from: tetan87 on July 28, 2019, 02:57:34 AM

Hello dears! Friends, could you tell me what these percentages mean? Why are three graphics cards less than 100%? Why are they highlighted in red? Sometimes two, sometimes three. The value sometimes changes. On the official website did not find a description of these values.

http://www.picshare.ru/view/10162421/

Thanks!

It shows efficiency ratio of accepted vs. rejected shares.

Thank you!
If the total number of shares in the address GPU1 was 1000, and GPU1 took 200, then I will see 20% efficiency, right?
Does such a low percentage affect the profitability of this GPU?

JFoxOne

member

Activity: 640

Merit: 56

minerstat

Quote from: tetan87 on July 28, 2019, 02:57:34 AM

Hello dears! Friends, could you tell me what these percentages mean? Why are three graphics cards less than 100%? Why are they highlighted in red? Sometimes two, sometimes three. The value sometimes changes. On the official website did not find a description of these values.

Thanks!

It shows efficiency ratio of accepted vs. rejected shares.

tetan87

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Hello dears! Friends, could you tell me what these percentages mean? Why are three graphics cards less than 100%? Why are they highlighted in red? Sometimes two, sometimes three. The value sometimes changes. On the official website did not find a description of these values.

http://www.picshare.ru/view/10162421/

Thanks!

12miners

newbie

Activity: 14

Merit: 0

Dear dev,
I really look forward to the function of the failover pool in pools.txt file!

caribbeanknight

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

Quote from: caribbeanknight on July 14, 2019, 03:41:06 AM

Quote from: miniZ on July 13, 2019, 08:26:35 PM

Quote from: caribbeanknight on July 13, 2019, 10:38:35 AM

Hi,

i have a weird problem mining ARW... I got one nvidia geforce GTX 970 with 4GB Vram and this is mining succesfull with miniz... now I also got a nvidia geforce GTX 1050 with 4GB Vram using the same miniz and bat file but that errors stating 'too little memory' or something.... Any idea on this issue...?

Hi caribbeanknight,
mining 192,7 with miniZ should work just fine with the 1050 Ti 4GB. If you are using both cards on the same computer, with Windows OS, be sure that your pagefile is big enough (at least the sum of the ram of all your cards).

You can see here how to check the pagefile size and how to manage it.
The required pagefile size depends on the type and number of GPUs. For example for 2×1050 (4GB) it should be at least 2x4GB=8GB. If you have enough space we recommend that you make it bigger.

Let us know if this helped.
Cheers

I have a 128GB pagefile so that should be enough for 4x8GB and 4x4GB of cards...?
gonna try with only 1 1050ti and post the error here in a while...

cheers!

Thanks for pointing me to the direction, the pagefile somehow reset itself to 'self managed' which of course is too little... now i reset the pagefile to a fixed 128GB the 1050ti's started working too without error!!

Thanks a lot!!

caribbeanknight

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

Quote from: miniZ on July 13, 2019, 08:26:35 PM

Quote from: caribbeanknight on July 13, 2019, 10:38:35 AM

Hi,

i have a weird problem mining ARW... I got one nvidia geforce GTX 970 with 4GB Vram and this is mining succesfull with miniz... now I also got a nvidia geforce GTX 1050 with 4GB Vram using the same miniz and bat file but that errors stating 'too little memory' or something.... Any idea on this issue...?

Hi caribbeanknight,
mining 192,7 with miniZ should work just fine with the 1050 Ti 4GB. If you are using both cards on the same computer, with Windows OS, be sure that your pagefile is big enough (at least the sum of the ram of all your cards).

You can see here how to check the pagefile size and how to manage it.
The required pagefile size depends on the type and number of GPUs. For example for 2×1050 (4GB) it should be at least 2x4GB=8GB. If you have enough space we recommend that you make it bigger.

Let us know if this helped.
Cheers

I have a 128GB pagefile so that should be enough for 4x8GB and 4x4GB of cards...?
gonna try with only 1 1050ti and post the error here in a while...

cheers!

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: caribbeanknight on July 13, 2019, 10:38:35 AM

Hi,

i have a weird problem mining ARW... I got one nvidia geforce GTX 970 with 4GB Vram and this is mining succesfull with miniz... now I also got a nvidia geforce GTX 1050 with 4GB Vram using the same miniz and bat file but that errors stating 'too little memory' or something.... Any idea on this issue...?

Hi caribbeanknight,
mining 192,7 with miniZ should work just fine with the 1050 Ti 4GB. If you are using both cards on the same computer, with Windows OS, be sure that your pagefile is big enough (at least the sum of the ram of all your cards).

You can see here how to check the pagefile size and how to manage it.
The required pagefile size depends on the type and number of GPUs. For example for 2×1050 (4GB) it should be at least 2x4GB=8GB. If you have enough space we recommend that you make it bigger.

Let us know if this helped.
Cheers

caribbeanknight

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

Hi,

i have a weird problem mining ARW... I got one nvidia geforce GTX 970 with 4GB Vram and this is mining succesfull with miniz... now I also got a nvidia geforce GTX 1050 with 4GB Vram using the same miniz and bat file but that errors stating 'too little memory' or something.... Any idea on this issue...?

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: Nairolf911 on July 07, 2019, 02:42:33 PM

Quote from: miniZ on July 07, 2019, 10:43:00 AM

Quote from: Nairolf911 on July 06, 2019, 06:33:31 AM

Quote from: miniZ on June 23, 2019, 08:11:41 AM

Quote from: Nairolf911 on June 21, 2019, 03:37:00 AM

Thanks for reply !

Do you expect improve for 192.7 algo ?
I'm mining genx and need to be more efficient

Hi Nairolf911
at the moment, we cannot say that there will be an improvement for 192,7 (in the next release).
We'll try to have a look. Which GPUs are you using?
Cheers

I'm mining with 970 and 1070ti !
In the last version, i have less hashrate than previous (better hashrate in 1.3n5 than 1.4o) : it's strange !

Thanks for listening your miner

Hi Nairolf911,
We will look into this and see if we can improve it.
Just confirm with us which OS are you using?
Cheers

Windows 7 64 bits

Cuda 10

Edit : i retry 1.4o and it's work as same as 1.3.5n

Hi Nairolf911,
this is more in line with what we expected.
Thank you for this information.
Cheers

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: MineOrDie on July 07, 2019, 11:55:15 AM

Really looking forward for your VDS algo implementation. Is there any ETA?

Hi MineOrDie,
right now it is a bit hard to give an ETA, but maybe the beginning of next month.
Thanks again for your interest!
Cheers

Topic: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX - page 46. (Read 59781 times)