Topic: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX - page 49. (Read 60004 times)

I have 1063x12 rig, it does the 150,5 flawlessy.
Solutions: 1) check that your integrated graphics is turned on 2) or swap your gpu0 to the larger VRAM one.

Does 150,5 works on 1060 3gb?

when i try it looks like the memory is not enough but you have a results in first post for 150,5...

HiveOS  1.3n5 80 and 100 the same result



Any tips?

> In this case, you need to add --pers auto or --smart-pers:

That did the trick. --pers auto works like a charm. Thank you very much for your help!

Hi Zminer777,

Thanks for your remark.
You are right, for 96,5 the average number of solutions per iterations should be closer to 2.
We will investigate and fix this.
It is good to cross check with values given by the pool.
It seems not many people are mining MNX with miniZ... Good that you did and report back.

Cheers

just for testing/comparison purpose

Why would you use miniZ instead of your own miner?

Hi,

In equihash algorithms average number of solutions per iteration is 2.
However number of solutions per iteration in miniz log is always close to 2.3, I mine equihash 96,5, is it mistake in hash rate calculations?
Can you please comment it.

Best Regards.

Hi UselessGuru,
we see that your personalisation string does not look right.

In this case, you need to add --pers auto or --smart-pers:
Let us know how it goes.
Cheers

Hi Nairolf911
at the moment, we cannot say that there will be an improvement for 192,7 (in the next release).
We'll try to have a look. Which GPUs are you using?
Cheers

Hi MineOrDie,
We expect to support VDS in a future version. We will work on it after the next release.
Thank you for your preference!
Cheers

Ping: 3381ms to 14024ms, that's one serious latency issue.

MiniZ.exe --par=192,7 --telemetry 0.0.0.0:4001 --server mine.nlpool.nl --port 2144 --user ********************************** --pass Blackbox,c=BTC --intensity 50 --latency --cuda-devices 1 --show-shares --all-shares --show-pers
************ miniZ v1.3n5 ************
miniZ,192,7[0:0:50]: Selecting GPU#1[0] GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Algo:           EQ[192,7]
Pool#0:         user[**********************************]
                server[mine.nlpool.nl] port[2144] ssl[no] pers[BgoldPoW]
Telemetry:      [http://localhost:4001]
Intensity:      [50]
Temp. limit:    [90°C]
[ 0d 0h 0m09s] S:  0/0 0>GTX 1060 6GB ` 100% [62°C/28%]  6.27 I/s 11.0(11.0)Sol/s  50( 50.2)W clk=1936MHz mclk=4551MHz Sol/W=0.22 [BgoldPoW]- 47ms
[ 0d 0h 0m19s] S:  0/0 0>GTX 1060 6GB ` 100% [63°C/29%]  6.13 I/s 11.2(11.2)Sol/s  41( 41.2)W clk=1936MHz mclk=4551MHz Sol/W=0.27 [BgoldPoW]- 47ms
[ 0d 0h 0m29s] S:  0/0 0>GTX 1060 6GB ` 100% [64°C/29%]  6.03 I/s 11.4(11.4)Sol/s  93( 92.6)W clk=1936MHz mclk=4551MHz Sol/W=0.12 [BgoldPoW]- 14024ms
[ 0d 0h 0m39s] S:  0/0 0>GTX 1060 6GB ` 100% [64°C/29%]  6.13 I/s 12.6(12.6)Sol/s 108(107.4)W clk=1936MHz mclk=4551MHz Sol/W=0.12 [BgoldPoW]- 14024ms
[ 0d 0h 0m49s] S:  0/0 0>GTX 1060 6GB ` 100% [65°C/29%]  6.24 I/s 13.3(13.3)Sol/s  74( 81.2)W clk=1936MHz mclk=4551MHz Sol/W=0.16 [BgoldPoW]- 14024ms
[ 0d 0h 0m59s] S:  0/0 0>GTX 1060 6GB ` 100% [66°C/30%]  6.37 I/s 13.6(13.6)Sol/s  78( 81.4)W clk=1936MHz mclk=4551MHz Sol/W=0.17 [BgoldPoW]- 14024ms
[ 0d 0h 1m09s] S:  0/1 0>GTX 1060 6GB `0.00% [66°C/30%]* 6.37 I/s 13.0(13.0)Sol/s 102( 93.8)W clk=1936MHz mclk=4551MHz Sol/W=0.14 [BgoldPoW]- 9822ms
[ 0d 0h 1m20s] S:  0/1 0>GTX 1060 6GB `0.00% [66°C/30%]  6.44 I/s 12.8(12.8)Sol/s 112(100.7)W clk=1936MHz mclk=4551MHz Sol/W=0.13 [BgoldPoW]- 9822ms
[ 0d 0h 1m30s] S:  0/3 0>GTX 1060 6GB `0.00% [67°C/31%]* 6.45 I/s 12.9(12.9)Sol/s 116(105.2)W clk=1936MHz mclk=4551MHz Sol/W=0.12 [BgoldPoW]- 4822ms
[ 0d 0h 1m40s] S:  0/4 0>GTX 1060 6GB `0.00% [67°C/31%]* 6.46 I/s 12.6(12.6)Sol/s  80( 92.8)W clk=1936MHz mclk=4551MHz Sol/W=0.14 [BgoldPoW]- 3381ms
[ 0d 0h 1m50s] S:  0/4 0>GTX 1060 6GB `0.00% [67°C/31%]  6.47 I/s 12.7(12.7)Sol/s 106( 99.9)W clk=1936MHz mclk=4551MHz Sol/W=0.13 [BgoldPoW]- 3381ms

Miner fails at random and does not recover.... same issue with GTX1080ti

Also any plan for VDS algo support?
I would rather give you that 2% fee than to GMiner, but at the moment I'm forced to use GMiner.

Thanks for reply !

Do you expect improve for 192.7 algo ?
I'm mining genx and need to be more efficient

Hi Nairolf911, MineOrDie, and everyone

Thanks for your support!

No recent new releases/news, however we keep working on improvements.
We have been a bit silent but we keep giving support here and at our website.

There will be a few algo changes soon and we want to be able to support them.

To give you a glimpse of what we are working on:

- Zelcash algo change to 125,4
- Beam algo change
- Aion support! Yes it will be out there very soon!

Some of these will be availabe already in the next version. 

Hope this quick update is enough to keep you eager for the next miniZ release

Cheers

Hey developers,

Any progress on ZelHash 125,4?
GMiner added support today.

Hi !
Long time no version , are you still working on it ?
What % better do you expect ?

Thanks guys ! Miniz still better than gminer for me

Hi reoparker,
To mine Beam on Leafpool with automatic restart, you can create a bat file with this content (do not forget to customize your wallet address and desired worker name):
For further help with the command line for other pools check How to mine Beam? on our FAQ page.
Let us know it this helped.
Cheers

Better than gminer with --oc1 on 144_5 

Keep improving

For 150.5 for sure!

Is miniZ now faster than gminer on equihash algos ?