miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX - page 56.

Nbdy

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Started with 1.3n2 today,will see how it will show trough time ...

The 1.3n+ worked for day and 7 hours,and then started crashing and showing false shares ...

I'm on sparkpool 2,but the eu part of it,should I change it be cause of ping Huh

The miner crushed again after 3 hours of mining ...

Must admit that there is a problem restarting miniZ even on sunpool ...

He has some overclocking error,and after 4 restarts,and 2 reboots he finaly got to work on sunpool ...

rgsnedds

member

Activity: 952

Merit: 17

raskul

Quote from: AltScope on April 29, 2019, 03:10:33 AM

Quote from: miniZ on April 28, 2019, 05:57:13 PM

Quote from: hogwash.89m on April 28, 2019, 12:44:18 PM

v1.3n+ and v1.3n++ (beta build, Apr 28 2019 12:28:20) CUDA 10 versions doesn't work on sparkpool, see picture above.
Sparkpool is displaying that there are too many rejected shares, but it's not reporting it back to miner, so in miner it looks good, but on poolside >95% of shares are rejected (or stales).

Then I left it to mine on leafpool and it keeps mining fine for more than 8 hours.
Only thing I noticed is that at some point it hits 100% CPU usage and stays like that, I need to investigate this more.

CPU: Celeron G3930 (@2.90 GHzm 2C/2T)
RAM: 4 GB
Virtual Mem.: 64 GB
GPUs: 1x 1080ti MSI Gaming
5x 1080 inno3d twin X2

OS: Windows Server 2016 (version 1607, OS Build 14393.2273)
Nvidia driver: 419.17 (CUDA 10.10)

MSI Afterburner (for OC): 4.6.0 -> noting this as it can be cause of 100% CPU usage, because on 1080ti fanspeed readings in miniZ console becomes 0%, maybe there are conflict between querying Nvidia-SMI stats from miner and Afterburner, idk.

Hi hogwash.89m,
Thank you for the detailed information.
We are looking to what is happening with sparkpool.

We have updated the testing file with few more small corrections.
miniZ.exe --version output: miniZ v1.3n++ @ cuda v10.0, Apr 28 2019 20:05:51

If you try it out let us know how it goes.
Cheers

also been mining BEAM on sparkpool, latest version (1.3n2?) stil has issues with rejects there, 186 accepted 0 rejects according to miner 5.57% invalid 1% stale on sparkpool with high invalid/delay notification.

rig of mixed cards 2*1080, 2*1080ti 1*1070ti win 10 8GB RAM 64GB Virtual Memory allocated running at 60% power through MSI afterburner no issues noticed at sunpool

Some pools run redirected servers from outbound locations - which in turn may show you a fast ping at terminal, but in reality the ping at pool is way higher.
If you are using the asia server of spark then your ping will be correct, otherwise consider mining at a server closer to your actual locality.

AltScope

sr. member

Activity: 714

Merit: 252

Quote from: miniZ on April 28, 2019, 05:57:13 PM

Quote from: hogwash.89m on April 28, 2019, 12:44:18 PM

v1.3n+ and v1.3n++ (beta build, Apr 28 2019 12:28:20) CUDA 10 versions doesn't work on sparkpool, see picture above.
Sparkpool is displaying that there are too many rejected shares, but it's not reporting it back to miner, so in miner it looks good, but on poolside >95% of shares are rejected (or stales).

Then I left it to mine on leafpool and it keeps mining fine for more than 8 hours.
Only thing I noticed is that at some point it hits 100% CPU usage and stays like that, I need to investigate this more.

CPU: Celeron G3930 (@2.90 GHzm 2C/2T)
RAM: 4 GB
Virtual Mem.: 64 GB
GPUs: 1x 1080ti MSI Gaming
5x 1080 inno3d twin X2

OS: Windows Server 2016 (version 1607, OS Build 14393.2273)
Nvidia driver: 419.17 (CUDA 10.10)

MSI Afterburner (for OC): 4.6.0 -> noting this as it can be cause of 100% CPU usage, because on 1080ti fanspeed readings in miniZ console becomes 0%, maybe there are conflict between querying Nvidia-SMI stats from miner and Afterburner, idk.

Hi hogwash.89m,
Thank you for the detailed information.
We are looking to what is happening with sparkpool.

We have updated the testing file with few more small corrections.
miniZ.exe --version output: miniZ v1.3n++ @ cuda v10.0, Apr 28 2019 20:05:51

If you try it out let us know how it goes.
Cheers

also been mining BEAM on sparkpool, latest version (1.3n2?) stil has issues with rejects there, 186 accepted 0 rejects according to miner 5.57% invalid 1% stale on sparkpool with high invalid/delay notification.

rig of mixed cards 2*1080, 2*1080ti 1*1070ti win 10 8GB RAM 64GB Virtual Memory allocated running at 60% power through MSI afterburner no issues noticed at sunpool

artful

newbie

Activity: 59

Merit: 0

8 minutes init all video card

Code:

[ 0d 0h 8m50s] 264(241.2)Sol/s 1714(1481.3)W
0>P106-100 ` 100% [59°C/96%] 7.46 I/s 15.1(15.1)Sol/s 21( 76.9)W clk=1708MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.20
1>P106-100 ` 100% [65°C/95%]* 7.65 I/s 15.3(15.2)Sol/s 94( 93.0)W clk=1771MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.16
2>P106-100 ` 100% [68°C/95%] 7.50 I/s 14.6(14.7)Sol/s 100( 92.9)W clk=1695MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.16
3>P106-100 ` 100% [61°C/95%] 7.42 I/s 15.1(15.0)Sol/s 89( 91.4)W clk=1721MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.16
4>P106-100 ` 100% [61°C/94%] 7.48 I/s 14.8(14.8)Sol/s 121( 76.3)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.19
5>P106-100 ` 100% [60°C/95%] 7.54 I/s 15.0(14.9)Sol/s 94( 87.8)W clk=1683MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.17
6>P106-100 ` 100% [62°C/95%]* 7.50 I/s 14.4(14.6)Sol/s 105( 94.1)W clk=1683MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.16
7>P106-100 ` 100% [66°C/94%] 7.51 I/s 14.8(15.0)Sol/s 94( 92.3)W clk=1695MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.16
8>P106-100 ` 100% [63°C/95%] 7.50 I/s 15.1(15.0)Sol/s 94( 92.7)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.16
9>P106-100 ` 100% [59°C/95%]* 7.62 I/s 15.3(15.3)Sol/s 98( 94.8)W clk=1721MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.16
10>P106-100 ` 100% [64°C/95%] 7.51 I/s 14.8(14.9)Sol/s 98( 90.0)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.17
11>P106-100 ` 100% [65°C/94%] 7.60 I/s 15.0(14.9)Sol/s 90( 83.7)W clk=1683MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.18
12>P106-100 ` 100% [63°C/94%] 7.58 I/s 15.6(15.3)Sol/s 94( 87.7)W clk=1683MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.17
13>P106-100 ` 100% [49°C/96%] 7.57 I/s 16.1(16.1)Sol/s 84( 20.8)W clk=1721MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.78
14>P106-100 ` 100% [61°C/95%] 7.56 I/s 15.3(15.2)Sol/s 86( 74.1)W clk=1695MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.20
15>P106-100 ` 100% [58°C/95%] 7.63 I/s 15.4(15.3)Sol/s 84( 75.4)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.20
16>P106-100 ` 100% [62°C/95%] 7.61 I/s 15.1(15.1)Sol/s 85( 65.7)W clk=1695MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.23
17>P106-100 ` 100% [60°C/95%]* 7.74 I/s 15.8(15.8)Sol/s 95( 38.3)W clk=1721MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.41
18>P106-100 ` 100% [66°C/58%]* 7.63 I/s 14.9(14.9)Sol/s 87( 53.1)W clk=1683MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.28

config my pc:
Motherboard ASUS B250 MINING EXPERT
CPU: i5-7500
16Gb DDR4

artful

newbie

Activity: 59

Merit: 0

hello
i have 19 GPU in one PC, me launch miniZ:

Code:

Videocards info:
0, 95 %, 51, P106-100, 31.64 W, 1898 MHz, 1911 MHz, 4404 MHz, GPU-a86737e1-a115-f9e5-026d-04e7f456e665, 86.06.58.00.24, 00000000:01:00.0
1, 96 %, 60, P106-100, 33.78 W, 1936 MHz, 1911 MHz, 4404 MHz, GPU-3349cf8d-11eb-385b-f6ce-cfbf9407a65e, 86.06.58.00.24, 00000000:02:00.0
2, 96 %, 62, P106-100, 34.45 W, 1885 MHz, 1911 MHz, 4404 MHz, GPU-b00ff0c8-6919-2670-d590-fadab363a118, 86.06.58.00.24, 00000000:03:00.0
3, 96 %, 58, P106-100, 32.37 W, 1898 MHz, 1911 MHz, 4201 MHz, GPU-e799cab5-5b26-ccb4-8272-1994e115b819, 86.06.58.00.24, 00000000:06:00.0
4, 96 %, 56, P106-100, 32.42 W, 1885 MHz, 1911 MHz, 4498 MHz, GPU-9e6ec457-dd8c-d93d-c7ce-47f5e4ae472c, 86.06.58.00.24, 00000000:07:00.0
5, 96 %, 55, P106-100, 36.78 W, 1999 MHz, 1911 MHz, 4498 MHz, GPU-0a13f69a-f943-f835-b059-23db978c2997, 86.06.58.00.24, 00000000:08:00.0
6, 96 %, 56, P106-100, 30.25 W, 1733 MHz, 1911 MHz, 4404 MHz, GPU-c964dba8-9970-50f0-7891-9af312a750d5, 86.06.58.00.24, 00000000:09:00.0
7, 97 %, 62, P106-100, 34.12 W, 1873 MHz, 1911 MHz, 4404 MHz, GPU-6a9dfd7f-db56-37df-9ca7-af9f15347de4, 86.06.58.00.24, 00000000:0A:00.0
8, 96 %, 57, P106-100, 37.33 W, 2012 MHz, 1911 MHz, 4404 MHz, GPU-3090a63d-fc31-2ca2-7702-cb13de7ad5eb, 86.06.58.00.24, 00000000:0B:00.0
9, 95 %, 53, P106-100, 35.01 W, 1974 MHz, 1911 MHz, 4404 MHz, GPU-4f3a2a71-4c52-a8a4-e6bb-d5db431e4a39, 86.06.58.00.24, 00000000:0C:00.0
10, 96 %, 60, P106-100, 35.03 W, 1949 MHz, 1911 MHz, 4404 MHz, GPU-a82b1918-9a7f-5813-0f18-40d92f04819e, 86.06.58.00.24, 00000000:0D:00.0
11, 96 %, 60, P106-100, 38.85 W, 2025 MHz, 1911 MHz, 4498 MHz, GPU-1e1ee750-565f-0a1a-4bbf-dc6b6d4562a6, 86.06.58.00.24, 00000000:0E:00.0
12, 96 %, 60, P106-100, 30.29 W, 1506 MHz, 1911 MHz, 4498 MHz, GPU-6ebd709b-0b79-aac2-8857-07211a88986a, 86.06.58.00.24, 00000000:0F:00.0
13, 95 %, 60, P106-100, 36.51 W, 1999 MHz, 1911 MHz, 4404 MHz, GPU-23db25c5-9adc-0177-1781-98df524aa91f, 86.06.58.00.24, 00000000:10:00.0
14, 96 %, 54, P106-100, 29.24 W, 1657 MHz, 1911 MHz, 4404 MHz, GPU-489e52f4-555b-745a-fead-268f06f1b4c1, 86.06.58.00.24, 00000000:11:00.0
15, 96 %, 50, P106-100, 36.88 W, 2012 MHz, 1911 MHz, 4498 MHz, GPU-1d0207ad-baec-c820-3f6f-fdd40359c18a, 86.06.58.00.24, 00000000:12:00.0
16, 96 %, 58, P106-100, 34.03 W, 1911 MHz, 1911 MHz, 4498 MHz, GPU-bb672c12-f935-daaa-f5c8-8735e78f1117, 86.06.58.00.24, 00000000:13:00.0
17, 95 %, 61, P106-100, 38.63 W, 2025 MHz, 1911 MHz, 4498 MHz, GPU-8d6203c2-33a8-c378-9764-6a8b877ccef2, 86.06.58.00.24, 00000000:14:00.0
18, 58 %, 64, P106-100, 36.47 W, 1987 MHz, 1911 MHz, 4498 MHz, GPU-c2d5cfc4-9ecf-0e2d-45f6-7183d4924411, 86.06.58.00.24, 00000000:15:00.0

Code:

[ 0d 0h 0m10s] 54(54.0)Sol/s 398(397.9)W
0>P106-100 ` 100% [44°C/95%] 7.45 I/s 13.5(13.5)Sol/s 100(100.0)W clk=1733MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.13
1>P106-100 ` 100% [48°C/95%] 6.95 I/s 13.0(13.0)Sol/s 36( 35.7)W clk=1582MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.37
2>P106-100 ` 100% [49°C/95%]* 2.18 I/s 3.6( 3.6)Sol/s 28( 27.9)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.13
3>P106-100 ` 100% [51°C/94%] 7.16 I/s 12.7(12.7)Sol/s 88( 88.3)W clk=1746MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.14
4>P106-100 ` 100% [45°C/94%] 6.06 I/s 10.5(10.5)Sol/s 90( 89.7)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.12
5>P106-100 ` 100% [42°C/95%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 29( 29.3)W clk=1708MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.00
6>P106-100 ` 100% [43°C/95%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 27( 27.1)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.00
7>P106-100 ` 100% [371197949°C/1082590729%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=-286195712MHz mclk=458767MHz Sol/W=-nan
8>P106-100 ` 100% [130487042°C/-31455248%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=673170432MHz mclk=10945561MHz Sol/W=-nan
9>P106-100 ` 100% [-23066639°C/24583177%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=1556088448MHz mclk=27727879MHz Sol/W=-nan
10>P106-100 ` 100% [7001°C/ 0%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=7059MHz Sol/W=-nan
11>P106-100 ` 100% [0°C/ 0%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=0MHz Sol/W=-nan
12>P106-100 ` 100% [101122564°C/-31453210%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=2086016MHz mclk=25631258MHz Sol/W=-nan
13>P106-100 ` 100% [30870540°C/-501086224%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=2081792MHz mclk=31918866MHz Sol/W=-nan
14>P106-100 ` 100% [0°C/ 0%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=0MHz Sol/W=-nan
15>P106-100 ` 100% [-58714142°C/7800839%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=1544552448MHz mclk=9899529MHz Sol/W=-nan
16>P106-100 ` 100% [7001°C/ 0%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=7059MHz Sol/W=-nan
17>P106-100 ` 100% [-31455242°C/267848455%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=1533281152MHz mclk=34078474MHz Sol/W=-nan
18>P106-100 ` 100% [-31455247°C/50528255%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=-279052288MHz mclk=67305471MHz Sol/W=-nan
[ 0d 0h 0m20s] 71(71.3)Sol/s 456(456.5)W
0>P106-100 ` 100% [44°C/95%]* 7.54 I/s 13.7(13.7)Sol/s 100(100.0)W clk=1733MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.14
1>P106-100 ` 100% [48°C/95%]* 7.51 I/s 14.9(14.9)Sol/s 36( 35.7)W clk=1582MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.42
2>P106-100 ` 100% [49°C/95%] 7.13 I/s 14.2(14.2)Sol/s 28( 27.9)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.51
3>P106-100 ` 100% [51°C/94%]* 7.43 I/s 13.1(13.1)Sol/s 88( 88.3)W clk=1746MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.15
4>P106-100 ` 100% [45°C/94%] 7.16 I/s 13.5(13.5)Sol/s 90( 89.7)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.15
5>P106-100 ` 100% [42°C/95%] 0.28 I/s 0.1( 0.1)Sol/s 29( 29.3)W clk=1708MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.00
6>P106-100 ` 100% [43°C/95%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 27( 27.1)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.00
7>P106-100 ` 100% [49°C/95%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 32( 31.6)W clk=1847MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.00
8>P106-100 ` 100% [40°C/95%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 27( 27.0)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.00
9>P106-100 ` 100% [-23066639°C/24583177%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=1556088448MHz mclk=27727879MHz Sol/W=-nan
10>P106-100 ` 100% [7001°C/ 0%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=7059MHz Sol/W=-nan
11>P106-100 ` 100% [0°C/ 0%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=0MHz Sol/W=-nan
12>P106-100 ` 100% [101122564°C/-31453210%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=2086016MHz mclk=25631258MHz Sol/W=-nan
13>P106-100 ` 100% [30870540°C/-501086224%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=2081792MHz mclk=31918866MHz Sol/W=-nan
14>P106-100 ` 100% [0°C/ 0%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=0MHz Sol/W=-nan
15>P106-100 ` 100% [-58714142°C/7800839%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=1544552448MHz mclk=9899529MHz Sol/W=-nan
16>P106-100 ` 100% [7001°C/ 0%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=7059MHz Sol/W=-nan
17>P106-100 ` 100% [-31455242°C/267848455%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=1533281152MHz mclk=34078474MHz Sol/W=-nan
18>P106-100 ` 100% [-31455247°C/50528255%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=-279052288MHz mclk=67305471MHz Sol/W=-nan
[ 0d 0h 0m30s] 84(83.9)Sol/s 511(511.1)W
0>P106-100 ` 100% [44°C/95%] 7.58 I/s 14.1(14.1)Sol/s 100(100.0)W clk=1733MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.14
1>P106-100 ` 100% [48°C/95%] 7.65 I/s 14.5(14.5)Sol/s 36( 35.7)W clk=1582MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.41
2>P106-100 ` 100% [49°C/95%] 7.47 I/s 14.5(14.5)Sol/s 28( 27.9)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.52
3>P106-100 ` 100% [51°C/94%] 7.49 I/s 14.8(14.8)Sol/s 88( 88.3)W clk=1746MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.17
4>P106-100 ` 100% [45°C/94%] 7.37 I/s 14.4(14.4)Sol/s 90( 89.7)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.16
5>P106-100 ` 100% [42°C/95%] 7.70 I/s 12.6(12.6)Sol/s 29( 29.3)W clk=1708MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.43
6>P106-100 ` 100% [43°C/95%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 27( 27.1)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.00
7>P106-100 ` 100% [49°C/95%] 0.17 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 32( 31.6)W clk=1847MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.00
8>P106-100 ` 100% [40°C/95%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 27( 27.0)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.00
9>P106-100 ` 100% [38°C/95%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 28( 28.1)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.00
10>P106-100 ` 100% [42°C/95%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 27( 26.5)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.00
11>P106-100 ` 100% [0°C/ 0%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=0MHz Sol/W=-nan
12>P106-100 ` 100% [101122564°C/-31453210%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=2086016MHz mclk=25631258MHz Sol/W=-nan
13>P106-100 ` 100% [30870540°C/-501086224%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=2081792MHz mclk=31918866MHz Sol/W=-nan
14>P106-100 ` 100% [0°C/ 0%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=0MHz Sol/W=-nan
15>P106-100 ` 100% [-58714142°C/7800839%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=1544552448MHz mclk=9899529MHz Sol/W=-nan
16>P106-100 ` 100% [7001°C/ 0%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=0MHz mclk=7059MHz Sol/W=-nan
17>P106-100 ` 100% [-31455242°C/267848455%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=1533281152MHz mclk=34078474MHz Sol/W=-nan
18>P106-100 ` 100% [-31455247°C/50528255%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 0( 0.0)W clk=-279052288MHz mclk=67305471MHz Sol/W=-nan

WTF??? Temp -31455247°C, FAN: 50528255%

after 3 min work me see log:

Code:

[ 0d 0h 3m50s] 182(180.5)Sol/s 1313(1188.9)W
0>P106-100 ` 100% [57°C/95%]* 7.49 I/s 14.7(14.7)Sol/s 88( 88.3)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.17
1>P106-100 ` 100% [64°C/95%] 7.67 I/s 15.2(15.2)Sol/s 93( 91.8)W clk=1759MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.17
2>P106-100 ` 100% [64°C/95%] 7.57 I/s 15.2(15.2)Sol/s 90( 89.3)W clk=1695MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.17
3>P106-100 ` 100% [59°C/95%] 7.45 I/s 14.9(14.9)Sol/s 97( 91.6)W clk=1746MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.16
4>P106-100 ` 100% [59°C/95%] 7.49 I/s 14.7(14.7)Sol/s 90( 91.5)W clk=1695MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.16
5>P106-100 ` 100% [58°C/95%] 7.57 I/s 14.7(14.8)Sol/s 90( 92.3)W clk=1708MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.16
6>P106-100 ` 100% [60°C/95%] 7.51 I/s 15.0(15.0)Sol/s 88( 91.2)W clk=1657MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.16
7>P106-100 ` 100% [62°C/95%]* 7.54 I/s 15.0(15.0)Sol/s 80( 88.4)W clk=1695MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.17
8>P106-100 ` 100% [60°C/95%] 7.52 I/s 14.7(14.7)Sol/s 94( 92.1)W clk=1708MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.16
9>P106-100 ` 100% [55°C/95%] 7.67 I/s 15.1(15.1)Sol/s 99( 93.6)W clk=1746MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.16
10>P106-100 ` 100% [58°C/95%] 7.58 I/s 15.2(15.2)Sol/s 102( 92.4)W clk=1695MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.16
11>P106-100 ` 100% [52°C/96%] 7.68 I/s 15.2(15.2)Sol/s 91( 44.1)W clk=1733MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.34
12>P106-100 ` 100% [55°C/96%] 7.64 I/s 14.6(14.6)Sol/s 88( 64.6)W clk=1670MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.23
13>P106-100 ` 100% [31°C/94%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 6( 7.9)W clk=139MHz mclk=405MHz Sol/W=0.00
14>P106-100 ` 100% [41°C/95%] 7.68 I/s 14.7(14.7)Sol/s 70( 25.2)W clk=1721MHz mclk=4404MHz Sol/W=0.58
15>P106-100 ` 100% [29°C/95%] 0.02 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 29( 14.6)W clk=1506MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.00
16>P106-100 ` 100% [28°C/95%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 7( 9.7)W clk=898MHz mclk=810MHz Sol/W=0.00
17>P106-100 ` 100% [33°C/96%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 7( 10.9)W clk=898MHz mclk=810MHz Sol/W=0.00
18>P106-100 ` 100% [31°C/58%] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0)Sol/s 4( 9.5)W clk=139MHz mclk=405MHz Sol/W=0.00

very long init miner

string launch:
miniZ --par=150,5 --server beam.eu.nicehash.com --port 3370 --user WALLET.CPz000000108 --telemetry=0

if you need access to my pc - no problem, linux + ssh + external ip

somaton

jr. member

Activity: 211

Merit: 6

Dunno if it helps, but n++ crashed same way like + version afer running for ~5 hours with 150.5. Now trying n2 and turned log on.

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Hi everyone!
Big thanks for you patience and cooperation!
The main issues with miniZ v1.3n are now solved, we encourage everyone to download
the latest build from our website. miniZ v1.3n2 @ https://miniz.ch/download/
For those who use Hive OS there is a new link for you:
http://miniz.ch/hiveos/miniZ-1.3n2.tar.gz
Cheers

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: DanGB on April 28, 2019, 09:02:20 PM

Quote from: miniZ on April 28, 2019, 06:08:17 PM

Hi DanGB,
OCs may need to be adjusted when changing miner.
We share some values on our website (https://miniz.ch/1505-2/). They are just a reference, you may need to adjusted for your configuration.
When limitig power, performance may benefit from using --oc1.
Cheers

miniZ,

I tried --oc1. My 1070 in that rig runs about 1.5 Sol/s better with it, but my 1070ti's run about 5 Sol/s less, so I took it back out. I'll try tweaking my settings if it continues to crash.

No issues with my other rigs. Running great for 11.5 hours now.

One question... would it be possible to give us the option to show both run time and local time? That way, it's easy to see how long it has been running, but also when looking at the logs, you can see when something happened.

Thanks

Hi DanGB,
Good to know that now it seems to be working OK.
We will add that option for the next version.

Thanks!
Cheers

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: impynick link=topic=4767892.msg50816147#msg50816147

I forgot to mention this is 144,5 not 150 it’s been stable for me running it on all my 1070s. Great work thank you
[/quote

Hi impynick,
Thanks for the information.
Thanks for letting us know.

Cheers

DanGB

newbie

Activity: 25

Merit: 0

Quote from: miniZ on April 28, 2019, 06:08:17 PM

Hi DanGB,
OCs may need to be adjusted when changing miner.
We share some values on our website (https://miniz.ch/1505-2/). They are just a reference, you may need to adjusted for your configuration.
When limitig power, performance may benefit from using --oc1.
Cheers

miniZ,

I tried --oc1. My 1070 in that rig runs about 1.5 Sol/s better with it, but my 1070ti's run about 5 Sol/s less, so I took it back out. I'll try tweaking my settings if it continues to crash.

No issues with my other rigs. Running great for 11.5 hours now.

One question... would it be possible to give us the option to show both run time and local time? That way, it's easy to see how long it has been running, but also when looking at the logs, you can see when something happened.

Thanks

impynick

jr. member

Activity: 77

Merit: 6

Quote from: miniZ on April 28, 2019, 05:44:01 PM

Quote from: impynick on April 28, 2019, 05:20:37 PM

Quote from: miniZ on April 28, 2019, 09:28:24 AM

Quote from: impynick on April 28, 2019, 06:45:05 AM

MiniZ is faster on my 1070s vs Gminer; however Gminer is faster on my 1080ti.

I noticed f11=1 (stock setting I think) is the best one with oc2. I’ve teied “2” and “3”3 and “0” for f11 values and it’s slower on these other values

Hi impynick,
Thanks for reporting this.
Could you share your hashrate and OC values for those GPUs?
Cheers

1070 and 1080ti on same settings = 100%PL ; +100 core +500 mem

1070s putting down 70 sols and 1080ti (FE) at 90-92

On Gminer I’m getting 65 sols on my 1070s and 97 sols on the 1080ti.

Hi impynick,
thank you for the information.
We will look into performance as soon as we manage to solve this stability issue.
Cheers

I forgot to mention this is 144,5 not 150 it’s been stable for me running it on all my 1070s. Great work thank you

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: DanGB on April 28, 2019, 05:52:35 PM

Quote from: miniZ on April 28, 2019, 05:43:22 PM

Quote from: DanGB on April 28, 2019, 05:17:56 PM

miniZ - The miner on my one rig crashed. It ran for 7.5 hours. This is the error in the log:

GPU[2]: CUDA error 'unspecified launch failure' in func 'eq_a[[[ac>5;:c_26dEbB, SM, PS2>::solve' line 957
GPU[0]: CUDA error 'unspecified launch failure' in func 'eq_a[[[ac>5;:c_26dEbB, SM, PS2>::solve' line 957

This rig has an i5 CPU and 4GB ram running Win10x64. NVIDIA driver version is 417.35.

Hi DanGB,
Thank you for the test.
That Cuda error is not related to the other issue.
This may be related to your GPUs OCs. Remind us which GPUs and OCs are you using.

Nevertheles, we have updated the testing file with few more small corrections.
miniZ v1.3n++ @ cuda v10.0, Apr 28 2019 20:05:51

Thanks.
Cheers

Those two specific cards are as follows (settings done with Afterburner):
GPU0 - PNY 1070 XLR8 Power 66%, temp limit 65deg, core +160, mem +0
GPU2 - EVGA 1070ti FTW2 Power 66%, temp limit 70deg, core +200, mem +0

These are the settings I had been using on gminer since January.

Thanks

Hi DanGB,
OCs may need to be adjusted when changing miner.
We share some values on our website (https://miniz.ch/1505-2/). They are just a reference, you may need to adjusted for your configuration.
When limitig power, performance may benefit from using --oc1.
Cheers

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: hogwash.89m on April 28, 2019, 12:44:18 PM

v1.3n+ and v1.3n++ (beta build, Apr 28 2019 12:28:20) CUDA 10 versions doesn't work on sparkpool, see picture above.
Sparkpool is displaying that there are too many rejected shares, but it's not reporting it back to miner, so in miner it looks good, but on poolside >95% of shares are rejected (or stales).

Then I left it to mine on leafpool and it keeps mining fine for more than 8 hours.
Only thing I noticed is that at some point it hits 100% CPU usage and stays like that, I need to investigate this more.

CPU: Celeron G3930 (@2.90 GHzm 2C/2T)
RAM: 4 GB
Virtual Mem.: 64 GB
GPUs: 1x 1080ti MSI Gaming
5x 1080 inno3d twin X2

OS: Windows Server 2016 (version 1607, OS Build 14393.2273)
Nvidia driver: 419.17 (CUDA 10.10)

MSI Afterburner (for OC): 4.6.0 -> noting this as it can be cause of 100% CPU usage, because on 1080ti fanspeed readings in miniZ console becomes 0%, maybe there are conflict between querying Nvidia-SMI stats from miner and Afterburner, idk.

Hi hogwash.89m,
Thank you for the detailed information.
We are looking to what is happening with sparkpool.

We have updated the testing file with few more small corrections.
miniZ.exe --version output: miniZ v1.3n++ @ cuda v10.0, Apr 28 2019 20:05:51

If you try it out let us know how it goes.
Cheers

DanGB

newbie

Activity: 25

Merit: 0

Quote from: miniZ on April 28, 2019, 05:43:22 PM

Quote from: DanGB on April 28, 2019, 05:17:56 PM

miniZ - The miner on my one rig crashed. It ran for 7.5 hours. This is the error in the log:

GPU[2]: CUDA error 'unspecified launch failure' in func 'eq_a[[[ac>5;:c_26dEbB, SM, PS2>::solve' line 957
GPU[0]: CUDA error 'unspecified launch failure' in func 'eq_a[[[ac>5;:c_26dEbB, SM, PS2>::solve' line 957

This rig has an i5 CPU and 4GB ram running Win10x64. NVIDIA driver version is 417.35.

Hi DanGB,
Thank you for the test.
That Cuda error is not related to the other issue.
This may be related to your GPUs OCs. Remind us which GPUs and OCs are you using.

Nevertheles, we have updated the testing file with few more small corrections.
miniZ v1.3n++ @ cuda v10.0, Apr 28 2019 20:05:51

Thanks.
Cheers

Those two specific cards are as follows (settings done with Afterburner):
GPU0 - PNY 1070 XLR8 Power 66%, temp limit 65deg, core +160, mem +0
GPU2 - EVGA 1070ti FTW2 Power 66%, temp limit 70deg, core +200, mem +0

These are the settings I had been using on gminer since January.

Thanks

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: impynick on April 28, 2019, 05:20:37 PM

Quote from: miniZ on April 28, 2019, 09:28:24 AM

Quote from: impynick on April 28, 2019, 06:45:05 AM

MiniZ is faster on my 1070s vs Gminer; however Gminer is faster on my 1080ti.

I noticed f11=1 (stock setting I think) is the best one with oc2. I’ve teied “2” and “3”3 and “0” for f11 values and it’s slower on these other values

Hi impynick,
Thanks for reporting this.
Could you share your hashrate and OC values for those GPUs?
Cheers

1070 and 1080ti on same settings = 100%PL ; +100 core +500 mem

1070s putting down 70 sols and 1080ti (FE) at 90-92

On Gminer I’m getting 65 sols on my 1070s and 97 sols on the 1080ti.

Hi impynick,
thank you for the information.
We will look into performance as soon as we manage to solve this stability issue.
Cheers

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: DanGB on April 28, 2019, 05:17:56 PM

miniZ - The miner on my one rig crashed. It ran for 7.5 hours. This is the error in the log:

GPU[2]: CUDA error 'unspecified launch failure' in func 'eq_a[[[ac>5;:c_26dEbB, SM, PS2>::solve' line 957
GPU[0]: CUDA error 'unspecified launch failure' in func 'eq_a[[[ac>5;:c_26dEbB, SM, PS2>::solve' line 957

This rig has an i5 CPU and 4GB ram running Win10x64. NVIDIA driver version is 417.35.

Hi DanGB,
Thank you for the test.
That Cuda error is not related to the other issue.
This may be related to your GPUs OCs. Remind us which GPUs and OCs are you using.

Nevertheles, we have updated the testing file with few more small corrections.
miniZ v1.3n++ @ cuda v10.0, Apr 28 2019 20:05:51

Thanks.
Cheers

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: $@X on April 28, 2019, 04:26:03 PM

Hi miniZ,

Thank you so much for the continued efforts to improve mining Beam. W

What version of Nvidia drivers is your team testing on?

Also, do you have a SHA256 checksum for the latest testing version?

Thanks!

Hi $@X,
Thank you for your message.
We test mostly on NVIDIA 390.48, in linux. But, on HiveOS 418.43.
(*edit*) On Windows 10, 418.91.

We added the miniZ.exe sha to the website.
We have updated the file with few more small corrections.
  miniZ v1.3n++ @ cuda v10.0, Apr 28 2019 20:05:51

Cheers

impynick

jr. member

Activity: 77

Merit: 6

Quote from: miniZ on April 28, 2019, 09:28:24 AM

Quote from: impynick on April 28, 2019, 06:45:05 AM

MiniZ is faster on my 1070s vs Gminer; however Gminer is faster on my 1080ti.

I noticed f11=1 (stock setting I think) is the best one with oc2. I’ve teied “2” and “3”3 and “0” for f11 values and it’s slower on these other values

Hi impynick,
Thanks for reporting this.
Could you share your hashrate and OC values for those GPUs?
Cheers

1070 and 1080ti on same settings = 100%PL ; +100 core +500 mem

1070s putting down 70 sols and 1080ti (FE) at 90-92

On Gminer I’m getting 65 sols on my 1070s and 97 sols on the 1080ti.

DanGB

newbie

Activity: 25

Merit: 0

miniZ - The miner on my one rig crashed. It ran for 7.5 hours. This is the error in the log:

GPU[2]: CUDA error 'unspecified launch failure' in func 'eq_a[[[ac>5;:c_26dEbB, SM, PS2>::solve' line 957
GPU[0]: CUDA error 'unspecified launch failure' in func 'eq_a[[[ac>5;:c_26dEbB, SM, PS2>::solve' line 957

This rig has an i5 CPU and 4GB ram running Win10x64. NVIDIA driver version is 417.35.

$@X

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 0

Hi miniZ,

Thank you so much for the continued efforts to improve mining Beam. W

What version of Nvidia drivers is your team testing on?

Also, do you have a SHA256 checksum for the latest testing version?

Thanks!

Topic: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX - page 56. (Read 59613 times)