Topic: [MOJO] MOJOv3 has been taken over by new devs - page 132. (Read 167315 times)

Why should be scam? it was freely distributed

Good work dev. previously, I had thought that Mojo Coin dev  is a cheater. But after seeing the development of this coin turns out he was responsible for what he had made and it has really worked to develop this coin and I think the dev is very trustworthy.

Oh i understand now. Thanks for the help

PM received and adresses for swap sent.

There is now sum yet. the 70 mio coins are going to the people that invest.
If you invest 1 Bitcoin and the overall investment is 70 Bitcoin, you would get 1 million coins.
If you invest 1 Bitcoin and the overall investment is 280 Bitcoin, you would get 250'000 coins.
So you know your IPO price at the very end.

how much is the ico price? i can't see in the topic.

Sounds interesting. So still 13 days time to invest I have to think about it.
Would like more features.
At the moment Lisk seems to be the more interesting IPO.

I will watch this thread and maybe invest a small amount.

i like your new logo & concept . i will watching with interest

thank you for pm

the new concept of mojo relaunch is much more better, will follow this thread for new update.. 
thanks for pm.

Thank you for the info Dev.

PM sent

Thank you for the PM dev.
I like the name and the plans for this coin.

My review for Mojo

CTransaction::FetchInputs          Good      shrmcoin            
ProcessMessage                     Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=10, codehash=7acf425f6f4df6d83c7b;   Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity     Good      blackcoin            
SendMessages                       Good      NEBUCHADNEZZAR      
CheckProofOfWork                   Good      arch                
GetNextTargetRequired              Most similar arch, diff=3, codehash=52923f0e242d7d094946;   Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::AcceptBlock                Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=6, codehash=9c814a1c75c451d83a2f;   Manually inspected, Good
CBlock::SignBlock                  Good      shrmcoin            
GetTransaction                     Good      shrmcoin            
ComputeMinStake                    Good      arch                
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs     Good      blackcoin arch      
ProcessBlock                       Good      shrmcoin            
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority       Good      dash blackcoin arch  
CTransaction::GetValueIn           Good      blackcoin arch      
ComputeMinWork                     Good      arch                
CTransaction::CheckTransaction     Good      blackcoin arch      
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good      blackcoin arch      
CTransaction::ConnectInputs        Good      arch                
CBlock::CheckBlock                 Most similar shrmcoin, diff=3, codehash=cf323af9996d167f6b3b;   Manually inspected, Good
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool      Good      shrmcoin            
CBlock::SetBestChainInner          Good      blackcoin arch      
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust         Good      blackcoin arch      
ProcessMessages                    Good      NEBUCHADNEZZAR      
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature        Good      arch                
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor  Good      blackcoin arch      
CBlock::ConnectBlock               Most similar shrmcoin, diff=5, codehash=68ee6fbed9c80a676a65;   Manually inspected, Good
Not found funcs ['AcceptToMemoryPool', 'GetProofOfStakeLimit']
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good

---

What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know, most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could potentialy damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this, people started to check the code both manually and automatically.  As I know ocminer automatically checks code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bugs. Earlz checks code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that it's safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock                Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e'  means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.

We will consider our options as we go along, it's too early to say how this will pan out...

I'm here, new mojocoin is good

Confirmed and for the sake of transparency I'll post the content of the PM

The best defense is a good offense

All code for this  type of coin has been cloned but the code has been customised is what I mean, it's a modified novacoin clone, so is Steps built from scratch or cloned? We are not trying to scam anyone, It's a clone of a previous coin as are most 'normal' coins out there.

ED: it's what you build on top of it that matters and how we will develop this. It has to start from somewhere.

this is not custom code, its cloned from minerals coin(quite old coin)

https://github.com/stormbitz/Mojocoin/blob/master/src/main.h#L54
https://github.com/AkiraTakizawa/Mineralscoin/blob/master/src/main.h#L55

Mojocoin is a custom code but using a cheap node to get the blockchain going so that it wasn't necessary to create a .conf file. To make it easier. We are getting some more nodes up now and will get some new wallets out with Linux as well and hardcode some permanent nodes in that will last.