@EBK1000, I think your future credibility rests on whether you are actually in hospital, and many obviously think you're not being truthful, and are trying to cover your deceit with a sympathy story. Can you verify your story, take a photo of your current location with some evidence it is 'EBK1000'.
Why don't you write 'EBK1000' on a piece of paper, stick it to the machine that goes ping, then post a photo of it?
My current opinion is you aren't in hospital, but if you are, you could easily verify you are actually in a hospital bed with a photo.
Personal photos of his life are not your business. Shit happens man. How bout you post your shit all over the internet for all to see? He pays the bounty to fuzzbawls is proof enough for me that he is legit. Let's leave his personal life outta this as I am sure you wouldn't want yours posted all over BCT either. Damn man give the man a break. At least he is posting, eh?
fuck dude relax.
we can agree to disagree! a photo of his name forum name written on a piece of paper in an obvious hospital setting is NOT exactly asking him to post personal details, but it would show his story is genuine, as long as it happens soon. He did get paid +100 bitcoins in the ICO, and his behavior has been highly suspicious.
IMO EBK1000 had a high level of credibility, but lost most of it when he went missing. It's entirely up to him, but I think the hospital story is a cover, he was going to disappear after the swap went pear shaped with a dud wallet, and then realised his identity was known, and people would cause him some grief, so now he needs 'in hospital' time to think of a new exit strategy, or hopefully, how to get MOJO back on track.
I think it is fair to require showing more evidence. Fairly speaking, this sudden disappear was not acceptable. He could ask his friends to post here earlier even he couldn't access internet himself. Re-appearing after someone threatened to hurt him could also be suspicious.
Paying bounty can't fully earn back his credibility. It just shows how incompetence he may be, because compiling a Windows client obviously doesn't need 1 BTC.
Well, the good thing is the current situation still looks better than a few days ago..
