Topic: MONEYPOT alternative discussion thread! no posting will be deleted - page 2. (Read 1618 times)

so the solution is that you need to take over the discord support channel or/and to tell each user to contact you directly

cheers

In some of the more complicated support issues there is a drop off window as they require my assistance to do some of the stuff in the database that we do not have tools for. We are building more tools as we progress to help alleviate the issue.

If a user contacts me directly I will work the issue myself as I have a direct line with those who worth support channels.

hey CC

thx for the explanation of one problem

but the other very obvious problem is that their is no support for players and that was already before. support is most important but was never taken serious by moneypot. players sending mails or going to discord and dont get answers.

anyway good luck to you

.

We use one of the top cloud providers to host our services. Unfortunately, they are having a major issue in one of their regions with the way they handle traffic. Without getting too technical, in this particular scenario, we cannot restore a backup of the server since the wallets are technically still live. If we restore a wallet while the other said wallet is live, we risk corrupting the wallet.

We have been closely following the issue and have been manually processing deposits and withdrawals as they come through. If a user contacts us, we will credit their account as long as the transaction is provable on the blockchain.

a bit info about Moneypot support. taken from Moneypot discord channel

from general -

BlackSheep (MoneyPot) - 03/23/2018
Hi Kitty Mill
Were going to start being more active in our Discord channel here again.
Issues regarding Flash deposits have been resolved

steeeeev - Yesterday at 2:56 PM
any moneypot staff available?


Rulishix - Today at 5:10 AM
Hmmmm.
Any news about when BTC and LTC deposits will be working again?
I suppose this question belongs in support but this is my first time using Discord so my apologies.


Kitty Mill - Today at 5:20 AM
@MoneyPotSupport

from support

steeeeev - Today at 2:22 AM
any mods here?

steeeeev - Today at 6:47 AM
when will the moneypot wallet be back online?
why do you bother to have a chat room like this if you don't respond? I suppose that's a rhetorical question...

how can @moneypot aka Dogedigital answer your support questions? he is busy playing poker LOL


Weekly Race Rakes winners

Low Stakes

5 dogedigital 210

Mid Stakes

4 dogedigital 400

.

He did the same thing to me last month, and started the unsolicited message with

"*For personal viewing only*"

I informed him that that was worthless since I wasn't his doctor or lawyer. 

He said that he wrong that because he "thought this was a gentleman's conversation", which is pretty illogical since if you think it's a gentleman's conversation you wouldn't have to inform the other gentleman to not publicise what you're saying.

With Twitchyseal's permission, and to give a complete picture of the entire conversation,

This was the response to private messages:

« Sent to: TwitchySeal on: Today at 08:13:19 PM »

You were private messaged because you posted in the thread after numerous statements asking people not to speculate with the bitcointalk rule explicitly stating: if your posts have been deleted or you have been asked not to post, do not post again.  It felt like a better form of communication as we are trying to encourage users to withdraw if they still had a balance and make it as visible as possible.  Side issues that have already been addressed would detract from that.

There aren't any users with a balance of over 1 Bitcoin and once this issue is properly settled by the appropriate channels, we are able to post the proof of liabilities for all funds.

We understand that you're trying to do 'good' by the bitcointalk community and that's commendable, so wouldn't letting these events take place so that it can be done be the appropriate move on your part?

thats exactly what Dogedigital did with me he bombarded me with PMs and I told him I publish all his PMs so it is better to stop the PMs and lets discuss it in public.

why did RHavar delete many postings because Dogedigital PMed him and begged for it

user moneypot is Dogedigital. it is already a one man show

I was trying to let people know that they can withdraw their funds instead of thinking they aren't able to and not try or give up because of misinformation.   

I truly can not win posting.  Good bye again.

I can see both sides of the coin.  If there were a situation where people were stating inaccuracies, it would be infuriating to not be able to correct the record.

That said, it seems pretty cut and dry.  An investor asked to divest 100BTC, wasn't given his/her money, and then filed a lawsuit.  I don't see many ways of looking at that where MP had the investor money and tried to give it back to him/her.

Also it wouldn't violate an NDA or a lawsuit to say "Here's the tx id of us sending 100BTC".  It's on the blockchain and thus is public information.

Here's some speculation:  I am speculating that they never told Monster Bit about this outstanding debt/stolen money/whatever it is and MB found out about it at the zero hour and pulled their offer.

absolutely correct what you are saying and very strange argumentation from Moneypot.

he writes now that they risk losing their stance against pursuing an individual for criminal charges! huh? is Maidenvoyage a criminal who is trying to withdraw his coins and the promised 35 BTC? or are Moneypot owners the criminals who are trying to scam their investors? I am still waiting for my 4 BTC

^^pm from moneypot and my response

Really seems like they are trying to use the NDA argument for their own benefit.

If you sign an NDA, that means you've agreed not to disclose certain details.  It's not a good excuse to try and silence/censor others who have not signed the NDA.

I think this is a time for an exception to post here so people know that they CAN retrieve their balances:

All players and investors with available balances are able and encouraged to withdraw from withdraw.moneypot.com or transfer to the new Moneypot.  All funds transferred to the new Moneypot will be reflected in a proof of liabilities at the end of the month.

Another legit question deleted by Moneypot Scammers

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Quote
why is the thread subject

Moneypot: Powered by Monster Byte?

according to Monsterbyte there is no final deal done yet and they are waiting the outcome of the court decision

here the posting of Monsterbyte
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.29682581

Quote from: casinobitco on February 05, 2018, 10:09:07 PM
Quote from: Dogedigital on February 05, 2018, 09:25:48 PM
Quote from: fiscorcle on February 05, 2018, 09:16:53 PM
So, if MP Legacy only sold its assets MonsterByte, what happened to the payments MonsterByte made to MP? If the company has any liabilities, any proceeds from the sale of assets should go towards those liabilities rather than to the owners - that's just corporate law works, even in Costa Rica I'm pretty sure. In this case, especially, because the debt had been called prior to the asset sale, meaning MP has an obligation to direct any proceeds from the sale to the owner of their liabilities. Anything else is pretty much just embezzlement...

The merger deal is for equity swapped.  Moneypot legacy is using the income gained from the equity to pay for things such as debt tokens, support for R2B2 in the future, and increased development of Moneypot.  No direct payments were made to the owners.

To add to this, Keeth is correct - there hasn't been any transfer of money to MoneyPot, and it's important to note that we haven't closed the deal yet. The potential deal we have in place is development and marketing support to help MoneyPot realize their vision, as well as restricted equity in Monster Byte assuming certain conditions were made throughout 2018.

Contingent upon our deal was that the old MoneyPot team would make realistic arrangements to settle all their previous liabilities from future revenue of the MoneyPot platform, and solve the Rubies token situation. The proposal that Keeth put out there seemed realistic and in the best interests of anyone that had a vested interest in MoneyPot fixing this situation and moving on under the Monster Byte umbrella. The alternative is that they would fold operations and everyone is left with nothing.

However, there was a legal claim presented in the Canada courts that we need to see through before we move any further. It's unfortunate as I believe we were making some good progress on foundational items, but we (Monster Byte) will need to see how that case ends up before we officially close the deal with MoneyPot.

This thread isn't helping matters, and anything can (and most certainly will) be used in the court system - so this is the last I'm writing publicly on this matter until it's resolved.