Update: Well that did not take long, lol I am back in and rollin the dice! Thanks for the quick work Dogedigital!!!!!
Topic: 🌟🎲🌟 MoneyPot.com - page 3. (Read 119068 times)
Good to hear... I am new to all of this and got worried it was just another scam since i cannot get into my account
Update: Well that did not take long, lol I am back in and rollin the dice! Thanks for the quick work Dogedigital!!!!!
Update: Well that did not take long, lol I am back in and rollin the dice! Thanks for the quick work Dogedigital!!!!!
Thanks for the info
Happy New Years all!
We will be closing this thread and setting up a new thread shortly, designed to make viewing important information much easier.
We will be closing this thread and setting up a new thread shortly, designed to make viewing important information much easier.
My deposit is not credited after 10+ confirmations 
Resolved.
I know that 2017 will be Moneypot's year. I am waiting for v2 API..
My deposit is not credited after 10+ confirmations
How's Moneypot going? I only read up until the argument with Alex 
Anything new other than that? Can't wait for API v2
Happy New Year btw!
Anything new other than that? Can't wait for API v2
Happy New Year btw!
There will be a lot of good news coming in to the beginning of the new year,
. And happy new year to you as well! 
How's Moneypot going? I only read up until the argument with Alex
Anything new other than that? Can't wait for API v2
Happy New Year btw!
Anything new other than that? Can't wait for API v2
Happy New Year btw!
New App Rules:
No luring players to or from other apps
No luring players to or from other apps
I thought I will report this because he didnt ask us if he can promote his site in our chat
btw I like his HE
Dec 31 16:55 SlimxaQ: 0.001% House Edge Bits Fast Betting site: http://youboost.me/
Dec 31 16:55 SlimxaQ: 0.001% House Edge Bits Fast Betting site: http://youboost.me/
Dec 31 16:55 SlimxaQ: 0.001% House Edge Bits Fast Betting site: http://youboost.me/
Please ban the user from your site as well.
We do not at all condone this type of behaviour.
New App Rules:
No luring players to or from other apps
No luring players to or from other apps
I thought I will report this because he didnt ask us if he can promote his site in our chat
btw I like his HE
Dec 31 16:55 SlimxaQ: 0.001% House Edge Bits Fast Betting site: http://youboost.me/
Dec 31 16:55 SlimxaQ: 0.001% House Edge Bits Fast Betting site: http://youboost.me/
Dec 31 16:55 SlimxaQ: 0.001% House Edge Bits Fast Betting site: http://youboost.me/
Please ban the user from your site as well.
We did.We do not at all condone this type of behaviour.
We know. 
New App Rules:
No luring players to or from other apps
I thought I will report this because he didnt ask us if he can promote his site in our chat
btw I like his HE
Dec 31 16:55 SlimxaQ: 0.001% House Edge Bits Fast Betting site: http://youboost.me/
Dec 31 16:55 SlimxaQ: 0.001% House Edge Bits Fast Betting site: http://youboost.me/
Dec 31 16:55 SlimxaQ: 0.001% House Edge Bits Fast Betting site: http://youboost.me/
moneypot was good idea but now its running odd.
nobody check sites coming and such.
nobody check sites coming and such.
Even if they check it when they are released (what they actually do I believe), the code can still be changed after that. And to watch a couple thousand apps for changes is a bit much to ask.
moneypot was good idea but now its running odd.
nobody check sites coming and such.
nobody check sites coming and such.
All site owners should know how stressful this job is. I feel ours is a bit more stressful because we deal with app owners, players, and investors.
Hehe, yeah. You'll never be able to win that fight. I remember once I put the commissions to 0%, and had both app owners and investors complaining to me at the same time they were getting the short end of the stick. I guess you know when you've struck a good compromise is when both sides are equally unhappy
As we power several other websites, it is important that we have a stable platform. Here is a breakdown of our infrastructure. Note that this has absolutely nothing to do with optimizing code, but rather providing a redundant environment for our architecture.
3x Load Balancers
2x Web Servers
2x API servers
2x Socketpot Servers
2x Database Servers (Master / Slave configuration for redundancy)
2x Coin Servers (one active, one maintaining chainstate in the event that it needs to be promoted)
1x Dev environment
1x Staging environment
We also have to account for cloudflare, backups, bandwidth, and other related expenses.
Im not going to go further into the specifics of our infrastructure configuration, but you can see that we take our infrastructure seriously. This has nothing to do with optimizing code.
3x Load Balancers
2x Web Servers
2x API servers
2x Socketpot Servers
2x Database Servers (Master / Slave configuration for redundancy)
2x Coin Servers (one active, one maintaining chainstate in the event that it needs to be promoted)
1x Dev environment
1x Staging environment
We also have to account for cloudflare, backups, bandwidth, and other related expenses.
Im not going to go further into the specifics of our infrastructure configuration, but you can see that we take our infrastructure seriously. This has nothing to do with optimizing code.
Thanks for the detailed answer, that's pretty cool that you have such infrastructure and explains the running costs. Wish we could start from it. I'm sorry for messing in your thread.
Regards,
Alex.
Alex, you are incorrect. The difference is that the big wins on BitDice and BetKing came from players risking a significant amount of Bitcoin, whereas the big wins on MoneyPot primarily occurred from users betting what is essentially dust. One of our largest investors pulled out specifically citing this has his biggest beef.
I understand you are also salty that a large portion of your userbase switched to MoneyPot (primarily Bit-exo.com), but you need to refrain from trolling.
I understand you are also salty that a large portion of your userbase switched to MoneyPot (primarily Bit-exo.com), but you need to refrain from trolling.
Actually, I've never trolled anyone on the forum. Even with BitExo situation, which I think you are aware of, I decided not to start a storm in a teacup, and I have all the rights to do it. You do agree that for business owners only wager counts, not people being online? Let's forget it, I really do not care about it.
I've left my comment with another reason. I rarely participate in discussions as unfortunately, I do not have time to be on the forum. But when I strongly disagree - I think I have a right to left such comment. People are free to accept or deny it or discuss. The least I wanted with it is a brag like we or someone else is better. Based on MP's stats I really do not understand why parties who risks the most earns the less. In economic terms risks always pays out. And if that investor would be paid based on his risk, I think he wouldn't divest, but again HE of 0.1 and even 0.5% is too low for all participants.
Regards,
Alex.
If you're not trolling, you are stating on a public forum under your public company's image bold facts that you are writing and believe to be true. We would like to challenge you on this.
We are not bragging or using any statistics to take a shot at you. You claimed that our costs are almost non existent and we are explaining to you why.
For business income, yes, wagering/volume is the most important factor, but we have explained (even in the post that you quoted) that our high number of bets is a big reason for our high costs.
I honestly believe and could make a great argument for why out of all the parties, Moneypot takes the most risk.
It's probably best that you don't participate in discussions often. I think it's quite foolish as the head of an official company to write damaging statements in public that you are not well informed of.
I was thinking that my comment was a part of a discussion on your business model, and even suggestion to optimize it. Never thought it was "damaging". Seems you over-reacting and rather than explain and discuss you attack.
Regards,
Alex.
I'd consider attacking posting damaging bold statements that you haven't researched into. I have made no mention of your site other than giving you an idea of scale of our bets.
Other than that, I am trying to contact your 'public' company that seems to only be an e-mail. There is no actual gaming license, and you're flat out refusing to disclose any information other than what your e-mail is. I'm not really understanding what your 'public' company is if there doesn't seem to be anything behind it.
In a hypothetical situation, if you run away with the funds, one might believe that our only course of action would be to contact your e-mail from what I currently understand.
Taking into account this: http://prntscr.com/dok6np, you do not need to be a genius to see that's something isn't right. I've got that you database is big, and you have staff, this explains your commission. However you could simply tell it, and not attacking me.
You are asking details, which of course we do not provide upon request. If you do really want to play that game, first, you need to be a legal entity to even start something, as private person with a site can not start a defamation case. Second, you need to ask your legal team to at least qualify my words to actual or assumed damages and third prove that I'm wrong or otherwise it can back-hit you in court.
Regarding your adds, we have to disclose to the official government authorities to prevent tax evasion ( and you can not incorporate otherwise ), not to a private person.
Now, can we chill out, as I'm not going into it anymore?
Regards,
Alex.
We have several thousand dollars of infrastructure with cost ever increasing
Then you need to optimize code, as it's way over normal price, even if you use whole AWS stack and not dedicated servers which are like x10 lower in running costs.
Regards,
Alex.
As we power several other websites, it is important that we have a stable platform. Here is a breakdown of our infrastructure. Note that this has absolutely nothing to do with optimizing code, but rather providing a redundant environment for our architecture.
3x Load Balancers
2x Web Servers
2x API servers
2x Socketpot Servers
2x Database Servers (Master / Slave configuration for redundancy)
2x Coin Servers (one active, one maintaining chainstate in the event that it needs to be promoted)
1x Dev environment
1x Staging environment
We also have to account for cloudflare, backups, bandwidth, and other related expenses.
Im not going to go further into the specifics of our infrastructure configuration, but you can see that we take our infrastructure seriously.
but again HE of 0.1 and even 0.5% is too low for all participants.
Regards,
Alex.
Regards,
Alex.
I 100% agree with you and I stated this long ago to force a min of 1% HE
Alex, you are incorrect. The difference is that the big wins on BitDice and BetKing came from players risking a significant amount of Bitcoin, whereas the big wins on MoneyPot primarily occurred from users betting what is essentially dust. One of our largest investors pulled out specifically citing this has his biggest beef.
I understand you are also salty that a large portion of your userbase switched to MoneyPot (primarily Bit-exo.com), but you need to refrain from trolling.
I understand you are also salty that a large portion of your userbase switched to MoneyPot (primarily Bit-exo.com), but you need to refrain from trolling.
Actually, I've never trolled anyone on the forum. Even with BitExo situation, which I think you are aware of, I decided not to start a storm in a teacup, and I have all the rights to do it. You do agree that for business owners only wager counts, not people being online? Let's forget it, I really do not care about it.
I've left my comment with another reason. I rarely participate in discussions as unfortunately, I do not have time to be on the forum. But when I strongly disagree - I think I have a right to left such comment. People are free to accept or deny it or discuss. The least I wanted with it is a brag like we or someone else is better. Based on MP's stats I really do not understand why parties who risks the most earns the less. In economic terms risks always pays out. And if that investor would be paid based on his risk, I think he wouldn't divest, but again HE of 0.1 and even 0.5% is too low for all participants.
Regards,
Alex.
If you're not trolling, you are stating on a public forum under your public company's image bold facts that you are writing and believe to be true. We would like to challenge you on this.
We are not bragging or using any statistics to take a shot at you. You claimed that our costs are almost non existent and we are explaining to you why.
For business income, yes, wagering/volume is the most important factor, but we have explained (even in the post that you quoted) that our high number of bets is a big reason for our high costs.
I honestly believe and could make a great argument for why out of all the parties, Moneypot takes the most risk.
It's probably best that you don't participate in discussions often. I think it's quite foolish as the head of an official company to write damaging statements in public that you are not well informed of.
I was thinking that my comment was a part of a discussion on your business model, and even suggestion to optimize it. Never thought it was "damaging". Seems you over-reacting and rather than explain and discuss you attack.
Regards,
Alex.
Jump to: