Sounds like bad news for investors to me. I could be wrong though, we'll see how it pans out.
I think people are forgetting how small a satoshi bet is. It quite literally something like x1000 times the EV to just process that bet in server/db costs. PocketRocketsCasino did a nice breakdown. Just today a (real) gambler was asking why the servers seem a bit laggy, and digging in I found a bot was spamming ~25-50 (i didn't count) satoshi-sized bets at once. At this point, it's really not gambling, it's just going for some vanity bets/second metric, and the end result is degraded service for everyone. I'm having a look now at building something like a priority queue, to give first priority to larger bets, and bets from unique ips, but it's getting a bit involved. So far the only real use-case I can see for support satoshi-level bets, is that it helps encourage some gamblers fallacy-type betting.
I know pokercoin.casino is going with a split-bankroll, so they can support dust bets (and get the money from it) and only forward us the larger bets. It's probably quite an elegant solution on this issue.
Yeah it costs us more space on the database as well to do these bets but really the dust bets come with the territory because dice is like that. Is there any other restrictions,changes to income, or other pertinent details we should be aware of on the horizon? If so let's just get it out now so we can make alternate preparations and not be caught off guard and put into a position where we need to make development changes to suit your decisions. Sorry to be blunt, but really I figured our input as a first casino of Moneypot would be taken into more consideration when it has direct effects on what we provide.
This is a good point... satoshis become btcs with things like martingale. Especially those doing 10x bets.