In my opinion, rather yes, 1 vote per 1 person, no matter how many MOON he owns (on the other hand, if it's an extremely low amount, a person really might not care too much about whether his decision affects MOON or not, it depends on the general responsibility of a person though, however an user with a lot of MOON anyway will be more careful in his decisions),
also an important question is how can we be sure that there are no fake accounts?
At least here I know old members, I know their accounts are not fake and they almost ALL (who posted) didn't support a new logo proposal for MOON.
It was a good initiative to organize the contest, and now we have a winning logo proposal, but may be it should be improved?
People will agree with a variant which is really great, if they don't support it now, something is wrong.
Of course, democracy is great, but in my opinion there should be also some respect from newcomers to people who had been supporting MOON for years,
and at least newcomers should take into account their opinion, these people saw things and never will recommend or support something bad for Mooncoin.
I agree with you here on the most part. However both nico and vegasmoon barely post. I can't find much of their history apart from a lot of involvement in other coins.
You and I know who really did a lot of the hard work for mooncoin, and I respect the way you are dealing with things, quite wise words. I will happily discuss with yourself, agswinner, coinflow about changes and positive ways to make them happen.
I will not deal with nico and vegasmoon due to their complete disinterest in interacting with the community much in the past (unless they identify old accounts that did play a part in mooncoin).
Is there a way forward from this you see possible? The discord community is very attached to the new logo and the ANN community is very attached to nico's logo. Can we theoretically use them both?
Also in regards to nico's childish insults and emoticons about people's work. Grow up. Discuss things like an adult, and don't stoop to ad hom. and strawman arguments.