Pages:
Author

Topic: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 move to a new thread - page 57. (Read 317805 times)

newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0

Where is the collaboration?


Hello everyone 🖖🏻

In my humble opinion all the news heard in this week are great news but now Mark Barry is right: we need more collaboration!
In the past few days we tweeted and re-tweeted posts about a new team with 14 people and two devs and now here I am reading about a new dev (welcome on board 😊!) but the telegram group is completely unaware of him.

I agree that things are simple and easy and we can start collaborate right now between each other but my feeling is that first of all there is a LACK of COMMUNICATION.

So please, I invite all of you to make an effort and try to cooperate all together, in order to see our beloved coin grow and grow in the next future.

Have a nice day

Luigi
newbie
Activity: 117
Merit: 0
How about this:

what is the motivation of the team(s)

  ie: get the code cleaned up.
then what?

and so on.   (also which area is everyone from?)
when i say transparency... does that mean i want to know anyones real name? no.
i want discussions put up.  Transcripts would be fine, about what to do, how to do it...

    and not just 1 person working on code and releasing it.   would rather have someone Checking code...
errors, etc.

 Smiley



what you are calling for is exactly how the team was built.

I could go into the why it was built in the way it was but maybe that's not for now.

The fact of the matter is ANN is used very sparingly by the community but Telegram is an easy method of gaining followers, having one pinned post that everyone can see and read easily and post or PM with one click.  This makes it the channel of choice for most Cryptos looking to build numbers quickly.

I agree with your sentiments re Discord but that doesn't stop me from checking in to see what, if anything, is being discussed.

Given the lack of anyone willing to do something, one person cannot go across all channels, especially when that one person is fully engaged in many discussions with many different people in different time zones around the world. Quite a few of these discussions were carried out through the night (my time zone) and for hours on end, sometimes ending with nothing coming out of it (you can't get there till you get there).

So, giantin, this one time, go to Telegram, see how the team is made up in the pinned post and base your view on that.

Once you do that I'm more than happy to discuss any aspect of it. As I have been, day in and day out for the last 2 months.

btw, i ordinarily use Android to access the different channels, ANN is murder on a smart device. So many typos to correct.

https://t.me/joinchat/HasmPkLxNo3riOE7u5PLBA
hero member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 501
How about this:

what is the motivation of the team(s)

  ie: get the code cleaned up.
then what?

and so on.   (also which area is everyone from?)
when i say transparency... does that mean i want to know anyones real name? no.
i want discussions put up.  Transcripts would be fine, about what to do, how to do it...

    and not just 1 person working on code and releasing it.   would rather have someone Checking code...
errors, etc.

 Smiley

hero member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 501
perhaps.

    but i dont have a telegram.

  i got a twiiter, and regret it.

This channel is the easiest for me.    If your going to announce on all channels..including this one...
but dont do it on this one..its kinda lacking! lol


-----------------------------
i have discord, its ok.  used it from the start of it.  (now its a bit...crazy to me)

i dont have time to wade thru all the good/bad posts about whatever topic im on.  tried on a coin.
  click, read 200 posts...    goto another room, read a few posts, have a discussion, go back to first room... 250 new msg's geez.

    (learned quick that that room is the crazypublic room lol)

have skype.   something like 15yrs now. (goodlord)

   i dont use skype much anymore...no time.  (and i like it better for the 1on1 discussions)

so many diff ways to comm.    i still like the forum setups best.
 you can go back, and read what was posted last month super easy. (like we did)

ah well. im digressing when i should be working.
g


newbie
Activity: 117
Merit: 0
also...why was he asked to join would be nice to know.

curious about motivations.   i guess i could have waited for responses via pm...
but tarranis posts got the questions started.

   (is it wierd i am questioning BOTH sides?) Smiley




Nothing wrong in questioning both sides. Objectivity....
newbie
Activity: 117
Merit: 0
i went back to the 7th of March. read thru til the 10th...  i see no announcement.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1733963.5240
  (that link might not go back hm)

maybe a link to the announcement.

oh good, link worked.

Posts 5249, 5258

5249 is not an annoucement.  thats an invite.

5258 ....is another invite.

 im looking for an announcement.   like you said, it was announced here.

those 2 posts are just hoping someone shows up.
cmon.    your wanting to setup as a full on show...

    An announcement would be alot more info than that.

  and SAYING its an announcement.
  Hell from those statements, i thought nothing came of it, and it was dead.

Hopefully something moves forward.  but you coming back here all mad that someone else is
working on the coin too is kinda ridiculous.

(where is the direction? it wasnt here.)

(im all for dev stuff.... but it bothers me that you really think you did what you say you were going to do??)

(im not mad etc.  just smh)

now this other post was an announcement:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.34059638
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.33839056

this one, is a pre announcement: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.33823168

see the difference.

2 announcements  and one pre that doesnt really announce.

the ones you mentioned are nothing.
  
hope im being clear. tough when your not hearing me.
g

Maybe you thought it was dead because you didn't bother going to the channel and thought that this channel was the only one that mattered.

A post telling some to go to Telegram to see what was being done doesn't say anything to you? It wouldn't make you actually go there to find out?

A post asking one of the most prominent contributors in this channel to "support the effort in Telegram to build a team for all the tasks we now need to undertake (devs, programmers, marketing etc.)" wouldn't make you think something IS actually happening?

Agswinner was in full knowledge of the effort to recruit. He even asked questions on it to me.
We spoke to each other enough that I asked him to copy ANN in on the statement of the dev team announcement.

Maybe sticking to just one channel to the detriment of your knowledge of what's going on elsewhere is something worth looking at. And i say that respectfully.

I posted an (pre)"announcement" on 30th March of the Telegram announcement, and included a link to the channel.
hero member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 501
also...why was he asked to join would be nice to know.

curious about motivations.   i guess i could have waited for responses via pm...
but tarranis posts got the questions started.

   (is it wierd i am questioning BOTH sides?) Smiley


hero member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 501
also... i have no clue who Trevdev is either.

   my first msg was to Mc F  to see if he really asked someone to join as Dev.

if so, i was excited.

    we need more Transparency here. its a mess otherwise.
hero member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 501
i went back to the 7th of March. read thru til the 10th...  i see no announcement.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1733963.5240
  (that link might not go back hm)

maybe a link to the announcement.

oh good, link worked.

Posts 5249, 5258

5249 is not an annoucement.  thats an invite.

5258 ....is another invite.

 im looking for an announcement.   like you said, it was announced here.

those 2 posts are just hoping someone shows up.
cmon.    your wanting to setup as a full on show...

    An announcement would be alot more info than that.

  and SAYING its an announcement.
  Hell from those statements, i thought nothing came of it, and it was dead.

Hopefully something moves forward.  but you coming back here all mad that someone else is
working on the coin too is kinda ridiculous.

(where is the direction? it wasnt here.)

(im all for dev stuff.... but it bothers me that you really think you did what you say you were going to do??)

(im not mad etc.  just smh)

now this other post was an announcement:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.34059638
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.33839056

this one, is a pre announcement: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.33823168

see the difference.

2 announcements  and one pre that doesnt really announce.

the ones you mentioned are nothing.
 
hope im being clear. tough when your not hearing me.
g
newbie
Activity: 117
Merit: 0
i went back to the 7th of March. read thru til the 10th...  i see no announcement.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1733963.5240
  (that link might not go back hm)

maybe a link to the announcement.

oh good, link worked.

Posts 5249, 5258
hero member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 501
i went back to the 7th of March. read thru til the 10th...  i see no announcement.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1733963.5240
  (that link might not go back hm)

maybe a link to the announcement.

oh good, link worked.
newbie
Activity: 117
Merit: 0
taranis.  are you part of one of the new teams?

 I read here often... pre notification?

   theres a few ppl i skim over...  as their posts are    how to say

crazy.  maybe it was in one of those posts. i guess ill have to look.


 Smiley




8th March.
hero member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 501
taranis.  are you part of one of the new teams?

 I read here often... pre notification?

   theres a few ppl i skim over...  as their posts are    how to say

crazy.  maybe it was in one of those posts. i guess ill have to look.


 Smiley


member
Activity: 138
Merit: 10
i think we should let the new teams go in what ever direction they feel best to do   i have very much confidence in their  abilities and dedication to moon coin   and if anyone feels any different i am sure they would be able to volunteer their services and join the new team    i am very excited about the announcement and the the new teams that have been put together   moon coin has a new positive future and positive community and to leave the past in the past now moon coin can move forward lets see what the future brings
newbie
Activity: 117
Merit: 0
wow.  and you wonder why ppl dont want to be a dev.

   soon as one walks in the room, he gets attacked.  great job.

Actually, I don't wonder why people don't want to become dev.

We have spent 2 months bringing together a large group of people, with a wide range of skills, to work on all aspects of Moon.

The search, and the pre notification was announced in all Moon channels, including here. The whole community knew about it.

Just as they are getting started, one person announces himself as dev to just one Moon channel with no notification nor involvement with the community.
Yes, very decentralised.

Where is the collaboration? Where is the direction?
hero member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 501
wow.  and you wonder why ppl dont want to be a dev.

   soon as one walks in the room, he gets attacked.  great job.



The code needs to work. first.  if it doesnt work.  why would anyone use it.

    clean up the code.  (i like more than one team, they can check each others work)

if they both want to add x, they would post here, and we discuss and vote on direction/implementation etc.

    that team works on it.  presents it, and other team dbl checks it.  (errors and what not)

  sounds great to me.

i have to kill the old wallet i have.   im on paper atm anyhow.
thats my next step. (well, that and redirect my auto mining sends, whoops)

g
newbie
Activity: 117
Merit: 0
Hi,

While compiling on Linux, get this:

using:
./configure --with-incompatible-bdb
make

mooncoind: malloc.c:2374: sysmalloc: Assertion `(old_top == (((mbinptr) (((char *) &((av)->bins[((1) - 1) * 2])) - __builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd)))) && old_size ==                                                0) || ((unsigned long) (old_size) >= (unsigned long)((((__builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd_nextsize))+((2 *(sizeof(size_t))) - 1)) & ~((2 *(sizeof(size_t))) - 1))) &&                                                ((old_top)->size & 0x1) && ((unsigned long) old_end & pagemask) == 0)' failed.

I have never seen this before when compiling other wallet, will focus on getting the root cause of this error. It seems a serious error whereby memory has been deallocated and so is not available and so the application stops working.

@Taranis67, is it ok for you?

I'm unsure of the urgency to looking at/changing code when that is not the main issue for Moon.
Why are you doing this alone?

Exchanges, wallet services etc ask us Daemon and Linux wallet to compile faster.... why not? Grin

Moon can't be spent...On anything.
Any issues with code is a symptom, not the problem..

But that's the same with most cryptos, only the biggest ones can be spend.

If you are unaware, respectfully, that is on the verge of changing.

Moon's problems aren't in the code. It's lack of transparency, stolen coins, mistrust in the community, virtually no awareness outside of the community, dormant projects, dormant social media channels (websites, FB page etc)
Those things are in need of development.
And if we don't develop those, we get left behind. For good.

There is a reason why $MOON is at 1 Sat.
hero member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 506
Hi,

While compiling on Linux, get this:

using:
./configure --with-incompatible-bdb
make

mooncoind: malloc.c:2374: sysmalloc: Assertion `(old_top == (((mbinptr) (((char *) &((av)->bins[((1) - 1) * 2])) - __builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd)))) && old_size ==                                                0) || ((unsigned long) (old_size) >= (unsigned long)((((__builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd_nextsize))+((2 *(sizeof(size_t))) - 1)) & ~((2 *(sizeof(size_t))) - 1))) &&                                                ((old_top)->size & 0x1) && ((unsigned long) old_end & pagemask) == 0)' failed.

I have never seen this before when compiling other wallet, will focus on getting the root cause of this error. It seems a serious error whereby memory has been deallocated and so is not available and so the application stops working.

@Taranis67, is it ok for you?

I'm unsure of the urgency to looking at/changing code when that is not the main issue for Moon.
Why are you doing this alone?

Exchanges, wallet services etc ask us Daemon and Linux wallet to compile faster.... why not? Grin

Moon can't be spent...On anything.
Any issues with code is a symptom, not the problem..

But that's the same with most cryptos, only the biggest ones can be spend.
newbie
Activity: 117
Merit: 0
Hi,

While compiling on Linux, get this:

using:
./configure --with-incompatible-bdb
make

mooncoind: malloc.c:2374: sysmalloc: Assertion `(old_top == (((mbinptr) (((char *) &((av)->bins[((1) - 1) * 2])) - __builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd)))) && old_size ==                                                0) || ((unsigned long) (old_size) >= (unsigned long)((((__builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd_nextsize))+((2 *(sizeof(size_t))) - 1)) & ~((2 *(sizeof(size_t))) - 1))) &&                                                ((old_top)->size & 0x1) && ((unsigned long) old_end & pagemask) == 0)' failed.

I have never seen this before when compiling other wallet, will focus on getting the root cause of this error. It seems a serious error whereby memory has been deallocated and so is not available and so the application stops working.

@Taranis67, is it ok for you?

I'm unsure of the urgency to looking at/changing code when that is not the main issue for Moon.
Why are you doing this alone?

Exchanges, wallet services etc ask us Daemon and Linux wallet to compile faster.... why not? Grin

Moon can't be spent...On anything.
Any issues with code is a symptom, not the problem..
legendary
Activity: 1375
Merit: 1010
Hi,

While compiling on Linux, get this:

using:
./configure --with-incompatible-bdb
make

mooncoind: malloc.c:2374: sysmalloc: Assertion `(old_top == (((mbinptr) (((char *) &((av)->bins[((1) - 1) * 2])) - __builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd)))) && old_size ==                                                0) || ((unsigned long) (old_size) >= (unsigned long)((((__builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd_nextsize))+((2 *(sizeof(size_t))) - 1)) & ~((2 *(sizeof(size_t))) - 1))) &&                                                ((old_top)->size & 0x1) && ((unsigned long) old_end & pagemask) == 0)' failed.

I have never seen this before when compiling other wallet, will focus on getting the root cause of this error. It seems a serious error whereby memory has been deallocated and so is not available and so the application stops working.

@Taranis67, is it ok for you?

I'm unsure of the urgency to looking at/changing code when that is not the main issue for Moon.
Why are you doing this alone?

Exchanges, wallet services etc ask us Daemon and Linux wallet to compile faster.... why not? Grin
Pages:
Jump to: