Mother Forcing Chemical Castration & Gender Reassignment of 6 Year Old Boy In TX

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2898

Merit: 1386

Quote from: TECSHARE on October 22, 2019, 02:04:24 PM

"Texas Jury Rules To Chemically Castrate 7yo Boy"

https://redoubtnews.com/2019/10/texas-jury-rules-to-chemically-castrate-7yo-boy/

I heard today Rep. Chip Roy is going to put a stop to this nonsense (or already has).

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 1958

First Exclusion Ever

"Texas Jury Rules To Chemically Castrate 7yo Boy"

https://redoubtnews.com/2019/10/texas-jury-rules-to-chemically-castrate-7yo-boy/

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 1958

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: topshelfcrypto on October 05, 2019, 09:21:04 PM

There's a little known researcher who is trying to expose evidence in support of a theory that in all likelihood most cases of actual intersex and transgender have been caused by the administration of heavy doses of synthetic hormones during pregnancy.

Here's a petition he started that explains his findings pretty well:
https://www.change.org/p/the-us-food-and-drug-administration-fda-acknowledge-that-hormone-treatment-during-pregnancy-can-cause-intersex-and-transgender

Quote

Based on what I've seen of the effects of DES, I think it's quite likely that the whole transgender phenomenon of recent times is largely being driven by people who were exposed to DES or other female hormone derivatives before birth.

Although DES was withdrawn from use 40 years ago, other treatments involving high doses of other female hormone derivatives are still in use. One example is "Proluton Depot", an injectible progestin (the same type of synthetic hormone as is used to chemically castrate sex offenders!). The standard dose for prevention of miscarriage or premature birth is either 250mg or 500mg a week, which if you know anything about hormones, looks like a very high dose indeed.

He's posted further research and articles about it on the site HormoneMatters:
https://www.hormonesmatter.com/author/hugh-easton/

More people need to know about this so it will lead to awareness and stopping the administration of such hormones during pregnancy.

This is an interesting angle to this situation that I had not really considered. It is also a valid point to examine the prevalence of endocrine disruptors that are increasingly finding their way into human food and water supplies.

topshelfcrypto

member

Activity: 79

Merit: 27

There's a little known researcher who is trying to expose evidence in support of a theory that in all likelihood most cases of actual intersex and transgender have been caused by the administration of heavy doses of synthetic hormones during pregnancy.

Here's a petition he started that explains his findings pretty well:
https://www.change.org/p/the-us-food-and-drug-administration-fda-acknowledge-that-hormone-treatment-during-pregnancy-can-cause-intersex-and-transgender

Quote

Based on what I've seen of the effects of DES, I think it's quite likely that the whole transgender phenomenon of recent times is largely being driven by people who were exposed to DES or other female hormone derivatives before birth.

Although DES was withdrawn from use 40 years ago, other treatments involving high doses of other female hormone derivatives are still in use. One example is "Proluton Depot", an injectible progestin (the same type of synthetic hormone as is used to chemically castrate sex offenders!). The standard dose for prevention of miscarriage or premature birth is either 250mg or 500mg a week, which if you know anything about hormones, looks like a very high dose indeed.

He's posted further research and articles about it on the site HormoneMatters:
https://www.hormonesmatter.com/author/hugh-easton/

More people need to know about this so it will lead to awareness and stopping the administration of such hormones during pregnancy.

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 1958

First Exclusion Ever

"Hundreds Come Forward Seeking To "Detransition" After Gender Reassignment"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIAumOcIh1c

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 1958

First Exclusion Ever

"Johns Hopkins professor on child transgender trend: ‘Many will regret this’"

https://www.thecollegefix.com/johns-hopkins-professor-on-child-transgender-trend-many-will-regret-this/

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 1958

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: mOgliE on August 27, 2019, 10:53:29 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on August 27, 2019, 10:36:10 AM

Quote from: mOgliE on August 27, 2019, 10:17:37 AM

I'm fucking quoting your own article right in my post xD
If you don't want to answer just don't you know

Too bad you aren't intelligent enough to quote correctly. Also reading the article first helps, I still doubt you have, because if you did you would see your point contradicted several times. Also, the statement you made that I was referring to was referring to your original post, which was not a quote. You can't even manage to figure out how to read these short forum posts let alone an article.

ahahahah xD
It's insane, you took so much energy explaining me how dumb/lazy/stupid I am and still haven't explained how the child can be considered emancipated and not emancipated at the same time. I guess it's a difference between authorithy level but I won't know as you just want to insult inferior beings like myself rather than explain your shit.

Sorry I bothered you xD

Actually that is the very first thing I did was make clear they did not do due process. Again, this is why I have zero respect for you as you accuse me of exactly what you do.

Quote from: TECSHARE on August 26, 2019, 04:23:23 PM

Quote from: mOgliE on August 26, 2019, 10:00:47 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on August 26, 2019, 06:09:08 AM

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/mom-sues-county-for-giving-her-minor-son-sex-change-without-her-consent

The "child" was 17 years old and was granted the emancipated status. I get that the mother didn't like that but that's the case of most parents whose child are granted emancipation status.

If someone is granted emancipation it means he's free to do whatever he wants without referring to his parents no? Unless emancipation is a different legal status in US of course, I don't know anything about this status in other country!

No. Learn to read. The required due process through the court was not completed. The school just unilaterally declared it so.

mOgliE

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1251

Quote from: TECSHARE on August 27, 2019, 10:36:10 AM

Quote from: mOgliE on August 27, 2019, 10:17:37 AM

I'm fucking quoting your own article right in my post xD
If you don't want to answer just don't you know

Too bad you aren't intelligent enough to quote correctly. Also reading the article first helps, I still doubt you have, because if you did you would see your point contradicted several times. Also, the statement you made that I was referring to was referring to your original post, which was not a quote. You can't even manage to figure out how to read these short forum posts let alone an article.

ahahahah xD
It's insane, you took so much energy explaining me how dumb/lazy/stupid I am and still haven't explained how the child can be considered emancipated and not emancipated at the same time. I guess it's a difference between authorithy level but I won't know as you just want to insult inferior beings like myself rather than explain your shit.

Sorry I bothered you xD

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 1958

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: mOgliE on August 27, 2019, 10:17:37 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on August 27, 2019, 10:13:47 AM

You didn't just ask a question. You made a statement as if it were fact. This is a statement you would not have made if you even bothered reading the article, which you didn't. If you don't like me being "a dick", maybe don't be so fucking lazy and self assured. Emancipation requires a court process, it can not just be unilaterally declared.

I'm fucking quoting your own article right in my post xD
If you don't want to answer just don't you know

Too bad you aren't intelligent enough to quote correctly. Also reading the article first helps, I still doubt you have, because if you did you would see your point contradicted several times. Also, the statement you made that I was referring to was referring to your original post, which was not a quote. You can't even manage to figure out how to read these short forum posts let alone an article.

mOgliE

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1251

Quote from: TECSHARE on August 27, 2019, 10:13:47 AM

You didn't just ask a question. You made a statement as if it were fact. This is a statement you would not have made if you even bothered reading the article, which you didn't. If you don't like me being "a dick", maybe don't be so fucking lazy and self assured. Emancipation requires a court process, it can not just be unilaterally declared.

I'm fucking quoting your own article right in my post xD
If you don't want to answer just don't you know

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 1958

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: mOgliE on August 27, 2019, 02:36:15 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on August 26, 2019, 04:23:23 PM

Quote from: mOgliE on August 26, 2019, 10:00:47 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on August 26, 2019, 06:09:08 AM

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/mom-sues-county-for-giving-her-minor-son-sex-change-without-her-consent

The "child" was 17 years old and was granted the emancipated status. I get that the mother didn't like that but that's the case of most parents whose child are granted emancipation status.

If someone is granted emancipation it means he's free to do whatever he wants without referring to his parents no? Unless emancipation is a different legal status in US of course, I don't know anything about this status in other country!

No. Learn to read. The required due process through the court was not completed. The school just unilaterally declared it so.

Of course even when someone is politely asking you something stating they don't know much about the official process you have to be a dickhead don't you?

"“Unbelievably, Minnesota statutes authorize a county to deem a minor ‘emancipated’ to receive welfare payments to live on their own and allow medical providers to void parental input if it determines the minor is living apart from the parents and is managing personal financial affairs,” said Kaardal."

Doesn't it mean that they had the right to do so? That's how I understand the sentence.

You didn't just ask a question. You made a statement as if it were fact. This is a statement you would not have made if you even bothered reading the article, which you didn't. If you don't like me being "a dick", maybe don't be so fucking lazy and self assured. Emancipation requires a court process, it can not just be unilaterally declared.

mOgliE

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1251

Quote from: TECSHARE on August 26, 2019, 04:23:23 PM

Quote from: mOgliE on August 26, 2019, 10:00:47 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on August 26, 2019, 06:09:08 AM

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/mom-sues-county-for-giving-her-minor-son-sex-change-without-her-consent

The "child" was 17 years old and was granted the emancipated status. I get that the mother didn't like that but that's the case of most parents whose child are granted emancipation status.

If someone is granted emancipation it means he's free to do whatever he wants without referring to his parents no? Unless emancipation is a different legal status in US of course, I don't know anything about this status in other country!

No. Learn to read. The required due process through the court was not completed. The school just unilaterally declared it so.

Of course even when someone is politely asking you something stating they don't know much about the official process you have to be a dickhead don't you?

"“Unbelievably, Minnesota statutes authorize a county to deem a minor ‘emancipated’ to receive welfare payments to live on their own and allow medical providers to void parental input if it determines the minor is living apart from the parents and is managing personal financial affairs,” said Kaardal."

Doesn't it mean that they had the right to do so? That's how I understand the sentence.

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 1958

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: mOgliE on August 26, 2019, 10:00:47 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on August 26, 2019, 06:09:08 AM

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/mom-sues-county-for-giving-her-minor-son-sex-change-without-her-consent

The "child" was 17 years old and was granted the emancipated status. I get that the mother didn't like that but that's the case of most parents whose child are granted emancipation status.

If someone is granted emancipation it means he's free to do whatever he wants without referring to his parents no? Unless emancipation is a different legal status in US of course, I don't know anything about this status in other country!

No. Learn to read. The required due process through the court was not completed. The school just unilaterally declared it so.

mOgliE

legendary

Activity: 1344

Merit: 1251

Quote from: TECSHARE on August 26, 2019, 06:09:08 AM

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/mom-sues-county-for-giving-her-minor-son-sex-change-without-her-consent

The "child" was 17 years old and was granted the emancipated status. I get that the mother didn't like that but that's the case of most parents whose child are granted emancipation status.

If someone is granted emancipation it means he's free to do whatever he wants without referring to his parents no? Unless emancipation is a different legal status in US of course, I don't know anything about this status in other country!

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 1958

First Exclusion Ever

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/mom-sues-county-for-giving-her-minor-son-sex-change-without-her-consent

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 1958

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: Oxstone on August 02, 2019, 05:01:07 AM

You know, thanks a lot TECSHARE.

Before knowing you, I was only pro free speech and against censorship. I mainly discussed with intelligent people, and even if they were from various political views I saw no reason to censor anyone.

BUT now I understand the point.
Some people are not able to discuss, they are only talking to hear themselves and will continue to yell and yell there nonsense, pushing arbitrary points and deciding that such subject is out topic or such thing isn't in the definition, refuse facts based on their own criterias etc...

And such people kill discussion.
People like you are trully killing debates, because there is absolutely ZERO point in talking with you.

Have you ever admitted to be wrong on anything even once in your life?

There is a reason you've been nominated as the fourth troll of the forum.

If EVERYONE is telling you you're an asshole, maybe it is because you are one

Might want to thing about it you know.

Hey mOgliE. Could you be any more obvious of a sock puppet? Don't have the nuts to post under your main account eh? Did you think I was gonna be like "OH NOES EVERYONE HATES ME! I BETTER GO HOME!"? Have fun with your transformation into a totalitarian because you can't back up your beliefs with a logical argument.

Oxstone

full member

Activity: 392

Merit: 115

You know, thanks a lot TECSHARE.

Before knowing you, I was only pro free speech and against censorship. I mainly discussed with intelligent people, and even if they were from various political views I saw no reason to censor anyone.

BUT now I understand the point.
Some people are not able to discuss, they are only talking to hear themselves and will continue to yell and yell there nonsense, pushing arbitrary points and deciding that such subject is out topic or such thing isn't in the definition, refuse facts based on their own criterias etc...

And such people kill discussion.
People like you are trully killing debates, because there is absolutely ZERO point in talking with you.

Have you ever admitted to be wrong on anything even once in your life?

There is a reason you've been nominated as the fourth troll of the forum.

If EVERYONE is telling you you're an asshole, maybe it is because you are one

Might want to thing about it you know.

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 1958

First Exclusion Ever

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-08-01/berkeley-couple-support-their-children-aged-4-8-transition

TECSHARE

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 1958

First Exclusion Ever

Quote from: coins4commies on July 13, 2019, 05:48:02 AM

Catholic schools are all private and are examples of non state schools. NAIS is the national association of independent schools. Conference topics anecdotes as they represent high demand topics from a large sample size of independent schools coming together at a national level. In the absence of statsitical data, anecdotal evidence can be useful. Just because anecdotal evidence isn't as strong as statistical evidence, doesn't mean it must always be completely discredited.

Quote

You claim state schools are the pinnacle of science and are less bias, but here you are demonstrating you clearly work your own political ideologies and dogmas into your "teaching", things which have nothing whatsoever to do with science, and consist of Marxism masquerading as science.

Thats kind of the point. I wasn't able to do as much of that at a state school as I am at a private school that has institutional support for my "dogmas".

The point was that state schools provide much more balance while private schools and homeschools provide a specialized, and often extreme bias that caters to the mission/affiliation of the school. My school was founded to promote social justice while Catholic schools have a mission to teach in accordance with the catechism. People generally instill their own values in home-schooling. Those are all inherently biased sources of education.

And apples and pears are kinds of fruits. What the fuck is your point? I said home schooling and you bring up other forms of schooling then attack that claiming they are the same thing. You are a walking inherently biased "source of education".

"Texas Court Orders Father to Raise His Son As A Transsexual"
www.informationliberation.com/?id=60480

coins4commies

full member

Activity: 952

Merit: 175

@cryptocommies

Catholic schools are all private and are examples of non state schools. NAIS is the national association of independent schools. Conference topics anecdotes as they represent high demand topics from a large sample size of independent schools coming together at a national level. In the absence of statsitical data, anecdotal evidence can be useful. Just because anecdotal evidence isn't as strong as statistical evidence, doesn't mean it must always be completely discredited.

Quote

You claim state schools are the pinnacle of science and are less bias, but here you are demonstrating you clearly work your own political ideologies and dogmas into your "teaching", things which have nothing whatsoever to do with science, and consist of Marxism masquerading as science.

Thats kind of the point. I wasn't able to do as much of that at a state school as I am at a private school that has institutional support for my "dogmas".

The point was that state schools provide much more balance while private schools and homeschools provide a specialized, and often extreme bias that caters to the mission/affiliation of the school. My school was founded to promote social justice while Catholic schools have a mission to teach in accordance with the catechism. People generally instill their own values in home-schooling. Those are all inherently biased sources of education.

Topic: Mother Forcing Chemical Castration & Gender Reassignment of 6 Year Old Boy In TX (Read 1332 times)