I predict that there is going to be an immense pressure on wallet developers to lower the fees with 0.9 out.
To me it seems that people want to do micropayments with bitcoin. Now they bump against the fees, but if the fees are lowered, they may well bump into the next obstacle—the block size limit.
If that gets raised too, miners will bump against excessive blockchain bulk, and everybody will bump against performance limits. Satoshi Nakamoto's original design was extremely well tuned. It cannot easily be stretched, at least not very far.
One could try to redesign bitcoin, like demanding a transaction for each wallet every 2 years, then deleting all blockchain content older than 2 years. But such a redesign would raise so severe problems that I am almost certain that it will not happen.
Perhaps one way out is to build a micropayment system on top of bitcoin. One possibility would be a system that moves small IOUs that are regularly consolidated and settled with real bitcoins, like once every 24 hours. Such a system might have to contain a trust network and would not be very simple. But to build it might well be a good way to earn a living and some fame.
Another way out that I can imagine would be to invent and change over to bitcoin 2, which would have to be so cleverly designed that it surmounts these problems. One system I could vaguely imagine would be to have hundreds or thousands of bitcoin-like blockchains that are basically separate from each other, but are kept in line by some kind of arbitrage between them that guarantees that prices will be very nearly equal.
Who knows? I gladly admit that my ideas are very vague and unripe.