Nice comparison. Wonder how that works out
Looks like it's heading for around 10-15% of the total blocks found after 24hrs.
You mean the 500 MHs is heading towards 10-15% of total blocks, or your rental of 340 MHs?
The 500 in total on the pool, yesterday the pool was running at around 560 and today around 430 MH, so other hash dropped off but it will average out to 500MH overall. It hasn't really had that much positive effect on total daily block count but it did have a positive effect on the amount that was discovered by hardcore miners which was to be expected.
It would require around 1.5 - 2 GH/s constant hash on the network to increase block counts and to normalize the frequency of block intervals. I am 89% through the rental at this stage.
After the reward change I expect 500 MH to have a large impact on block counts and intervals unless profit switching pools are running on desperation.
Shouldn't your percentage be higher then?
If I take the charts from http://guldencointrader.nl/hashrate.php , it averages above 2 Ghs. So shouldn't 500 MHs of that be accountable for roughly like around 20% of total blocks?
Regarding the wishfull constant hash on the network, you know what I have in store for that. Should the community be able to come together to kickstart that one off, we could be well on it's way laying the first pillar in achieving that goal
Hi George,
I have to agree, the reset gives the community a chance to get into mining after the reset and build up while value builds up. I mean to get into the same situation we have now with Multi pools the price would need to be around 2500 and it will be awhile before that happens. When it does, if we have 2 GH/s constant hash for the long term it will be really good. It will force miners who want NLG to mine directly on our community pools and everyone wins.