Author

Topic: NA - page 373. (Read 893613 times)

full member
Activity: 486
Merit: 104
November 16, 2014, 07:39:17 AM

Thank you for the post. I looked into BleuTrade, CryptoRush and SwissCEx; these three exchanges all provide good, actionable html links in their email communication, with no evidence of third party meddling.

First Impressions:

I was particularly impressed with BleuTrade and SwissCEx.

  • SwissCEx's web site is very cleanly organised and responsive.
  • BleuTrade's web site is also well organised and and has that responsive feel. Additionally, they offer a way to participate in the exchange's profits via their BleuShare program.

~dbkeys~
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1002
HODL for life.
November 15, 2014, 11:52:07 PM
I want to buy some NLG, but Bittrex has a problem with the way they handle email, which makes it unsuitable for me; what is another exchange that trades NLG ? Thanks !

Exchanges are listed in the OP.  Just go to page 1 of this thread.

-Fuse
full member
Activity: 486
Merit: 104
November 15, 2014, 10:42:01 PM
I want to buy some NLG, but Bittrex has a problem with the way they handle email, which makes it unsuitable for me; what is another exchange that trades NLG ? Thanks !
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
@halofirebtc
November 15, 2014, 08:40:27 PM
THANK GOD!!!!!! KEEP GAW AWAY FROM NLG! PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  We will regret any partnership with them. Trust me on this. From all the crap GAW has done: with KNC, Zeus, the small time miners, the products, the falsifications, the moderations, the cover-ups, the list goes on.
wow, ok.

Don't take my mentioning GAW as an endorsement, although I haven't really followed their history.  I was talking about he hashlet type mining specifically.  But I will reiterate that I don't like buying something that I will never lay my hands on.

Which is why I seriously think if you are going to get mining into the hands of the people, it needs to be done with physical hardware that is as plug and play as possible, or a fiat to NLG cloud-mining solution.

But when it's all said and done, and we get the algo figured out and clever off the chain, you'll see the price go up and the miners come back.  It will happen.

-Fuse

All I ask is people do their research on this company before a decision is made about this. Google will not work unless you dig real deep or search specifics. They've cleaned it up and released so many articles and "reviews" to bury the stuff I'm refering to. There's a lot of threads in BCT about this company. Just bringing awareness. Make your own call. I shared my opinion. Smiley

Addition: Fuse, I think you're on the right track anyway with the algo change.
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1002
HODL for life.
November 15, 2014, 05:08:19 PM
THANK GOD!!!!!! KEEP GAW AWAY FROM NLG! PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  We will regret any partnership with them. Trust me on this. From all the crap GAW has done: with KNC, Zeus, the small time miners, the products, the falsifications, the moderations, the cover-ups, the list goes on.
wow, ok.

Don't take my mentioning GAW as an endorsement, although I haven't really followed their history.  I was talking about he hashlet type mining specifically.  But I will reiterate that I don't like buying something that I will never lay my hands on.

Which is why I seriously think if you are going to get mining into the hands of the people, it needs to be done with physical hardware that is as plug and play as possible, or a fiat to NLG cloud-mining solution.

But when it's all said and done, and we get the algo figured out and clever off the chain, you'll see the price go up and the miners come back.  It will happen.

-Fuse
full member
Activity: 192
Merit: 100
November 15, 2014, 04:56:58 PM
Understood.. definitely an interesting idea to discuss.  thanks for the clarification.  It's good of you to try and help those who are mining at a loss to keep the block gaps low.  My humble point of view:  Whether someone is adding a little more hashing power to keep the difficulty just above clever's mining threshold, or someone is selling a few pennies worth of NLG on bittrex to keep the price just below clever's mining threshold, it's essentially accomplishing the same thing.. keeping clever out, thus creating a fair playing field for the dedicated miners.  So do we call this difficulty manipulation and everyone gets upset? Smiley eventually the person renting the hashing power is going to be selling that newly acquired NLG anyway to cover the hashrate rental costs. 

A software program that will dynamically keep the balance of NLG price to hashrate ratio just above where clever would jump in by adding additional hashrate to the network is interesting.  I'm not sure how responsive and accurate these mining rental apis are.. Other potential factors:

- The amount of hashing clever has at it's disposal   This changes over time.
- The price to hashrate ratio of other alt-coins clever is jumping in and out of.
- The price of hashrate rentals

I'm on holiday with the family presently, but expect a 'clever watcher' tab at nlgstats over the next few weeks that will attempt to track exactly under which circumstances clevermining will jump in at..  Hope to have the info available by the time the simulator is released so this could help simulate a jump pool's behavior.  I'll try to record:

- difficulty of block clever solves
- highest buy on bittrex (let me know if this is best)
- network hashrate as reported on guldenpool.nl? (is there an api for this? I think so)
- clever's total hashrate (published hourly, may have to webscrape this one)
- a few litecoin profitability stats for comparison (anyone have a good source for this?)



Do you see how this is circular thinking.  Lets spend NLG to buy hashpower to make NLG to spend on the same hashpower for another period of time(rinse/repeat).  You might as well just buy mining equipment at that point.  Maybe a deal with GAW to get Hashlets for NLG?  Even then, I'm still leery of something I buy that I will never hold in my hands.

Why would we go through the effort of writing mining/price algorithms, essentially reverse-engineering clever like someone said, instead of putting that coding effort into the algorithm change?  I feel this is a distraction from the task at hand.

If you want to solve the mining problem, focus on the algorithm change.

-Fuse
I totally agree!, i already talked with gawminers, it isn't going to happen for the time being.


THANK GOD!!!!!! KEEP GAW AWAY FROM NLG! PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  We will regret any partnership with them. Trust me on this. From all the crap GAW has done: with KNC, Zeus, the small time miners, the products, the falsifications, the moderations, the cover-ups, the list goes on.
wow, ok.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
@halofirebtc
November 15, 2014, 04:09:21 PM
Understood.. definitely an interesting idea to discuss.  thanks for the clarification.  It's good of you to try and help those who are mining at a loss to keep the block gaps low.  My humble point of view:  Whether someone is adding a little more hashing power to keep the difficulty just above clever's mining threshold, or someone is selling a few pennies worth of NLG on bittrex to keep the price just below clever's mining threshold, it's essentially accomplishing the same thing.. keeping clever out, thus creating a fair playing field for the dedicated miners.  So do we call this difficulty manipulation and everyone gets upset? Smiley eventually the person renting the hashing power is going to be selling that newly acquired NLG anyway to cover the hashrate rental costs. 

A software program that will dynamically keep the balance of NLG price to hashrate ratio just above where clever would jump in by adding additional hashrate to the network is interesting.  I'm not sure how responsive and accurate these mining rental apis are.. Other potential factors:

- The amount of hashing clever has at it's disposal   This changes over time.
- The price to hashrate ratio of other alt-coins clever is jumping in and out of.
- The price of hashrate rentals

I'm on holiday with the family presently, but expect a 'clever watcher' tab at nlgstats over the next few weeks that will attempt to track exactly under which circumstances clevermining will jump in at..  Hope to have the info available by the time the simulator is released so this could help simulate a jump pool's behavior.  I'll try to record:

- difficulty of block clever solves
- highest buy on bittrex (let me know if this is best)
- network hashrate as reported on guldenpool.nl? (is there an api for this? I think so)
- clever's total hashrate (published hourly, may have to webscrape this one)
- a few litecoin profitability stats for comparison (anyone have a good source for this?)



Do you see how this is circular thinking.  Lets spend NLG to buy hashpower to make NLG to spend on the same hashpower for another period of time(rinse/repeat).  You might as well just buy mining equipment at that point.  Maybe a deal with GAW to get Hashlets for NLG?  Even then, I'm still leery of something I buy that I will never hold in my hands.

Why would we go through the effort of writing mining/price algorithms, essentially reverse-engineering clever like someone said, instead of putting that coding effort into the algorithm change?  I feel this is a distraction from the task at hand.

If you want to solve the mining problem, focus on the algorithm change.

-Fuse
I totally agree!, i already talked with gawminers, it isn't going to happen for the time being.


THANK GOD!!!!!! KEEP GAW AWAY FROM NLG! PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  We will regret any partnership with them. Trust me on this. From all the crap GAW has done: with KNC, Zeus, the small time miners, the products, the falsifications, the moderations, the cover-ups, the list goes on.
legendary
Activity: 1658
Merit: 1001
November 15, 2014, 03:39:18 PM
fuse is so right! The algorithms must solve the problem. We can't just rent 100 Giga Hash to stop clevermining, that is ridiculous.

I can't code the solution (I don't write C) or host rigs at my place (not such a big house), but I can rent mining equipment... or not, which in that case Clever takes >90% until the algorithm is developed (my guess, it will take 3 weeks at least). Guess what that does to pools, markets and businesses when confirmations take >5 hours, that is also not good.

Buying hashing power and dumping coins on the market is just a temporarily way of buying time until the algorithm is finished.
full member
Activity: 170
Merit: 100
November 15, 2014, 12:38:19 PM
Very true  Grin

But I like to be able to convince my friends to download the guldencoin wallet as well. And they mainly have iPhones.
When they pay my bear at a pub in Euros, I would like to instantly pay them back in Guldens  Cheesy. How more people have Guldens in there wallets, how better the gulden is distributed, how better the future for the Gulden. Therefor, it is important that the App is accepted by Apple.

You can ask them to download it through the Guldenwallet website now so more people have the app, and use it. The more users sign-up through Testflight, the better case we can present to Apple. My girlfriend has the app on her iPhone as well, helped her a little with the Testflight route though, but it's easy enough.
Thanx!
But when it is not directly downloadable, only real believers will do the effort to install the test version of the wallet. But at least it is a start Cheesy

For new users, it would be a lot easier when they can install it instantaneous in the pub and use it directly.
full member
Activity: 170
Merit: 100
November 15, 2014, 12:27:16 PM
fuse is so right! The algorithms must solve the problem. We can't just rent 100 Giga Hash to stop clevermining, that is ridiculous.
full member
Activity: 192
Merit: 100
November 15, 2014, 11:39:06 AM
That's why i still think that noob mining hardware, or cloud mining is the way to go to solve this, but after the algo change.
full member
Activity: 192
Merit: 100
November 15, 2014, 11:35:59 AM
Understood.. definitely an interesting idea to discuss.  thanks for the clarification.  It's good of you to try and help those who are mining at a loss to keep the block gaps low.  My humble point of view:  Whether someone is adding a little more hashing power to keep the difficulty just above clever's mining threshold, or someone is selling a few pennies worth of NLG on bittrex to keep the price just below clever's mining threshold, it's essentially accomplishing the same thing.. keeping clever out, thus creating a fair playing field for the dedicated miners.  So do we call this difficulty manipulation and everyone gets upset? Smiley eventually the person renting the hashing power is going to be selling that newly acquired NLG anyway to cover the hashrate rental costs. 

A software program that will dynamically keep the balance of NLG price to hashrate ratio just above where clever would jump in by adding additional hashrate to the network is interesting.  I'm not sure how responsive and accurate these mining rental apis are.. Other potential factors:

- The amount of hashing clever has at it's disposal   This changes over time.
- The price to hashrate ratio of other alt-coins clever is jumping in and out of.
- The price of hashrate rentals

I'm on holiday with the family presently, but expect a 'clever watcher' tab at nlgstats over the next few weeks that will attempt to track exactly under which circumstances clevermining will jump in at..  Hope to have the info available by the time the simulator is released so this could help simulate a jump pool's behavior.  I'll try to record:

- difficulty of block clever solves
- highest buy on bittrex (let me know if this is best)
- network hashrate as reported on guldenpool.nl? (is there an api for this? I think so)
- clever's total hashrate (published hourly, may have to webscrape this one)
- a few litecoin profitability stats for comparison (anyone have a good source for this?)



Do you see how this is circular thinking.  Lets spend NLG to buy hashpower to make NLG to spend on the same hashpower for another period of time(rinse/repeat).  You might as well just buy mining equipment at that point.  Maybe a deal with GAW to get Hashlets for NLG?  Even then, I'm still leery of something I buy that I will never hold in my hands.

Why would we go through the effort of writing mining/price algorithms, essentially reverse-engineering clever like someone said, instead of putting that coding effort into the algorithm change?  I feel this is a distraction from the task at hand.

If you want to solve the mining problem, focus on the algorithm change.

-Fuse
I totally agree!, i already talked with gawminers, it isn't going to happen for the time being.
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1002
HODL for life.
November 15, 2014, 11:10:04 AM
Understood.. definitely an interesting idea to discuss.  thanks for the clarification.  It's good of you to try and help those who are mining at a loss to keep the block gaps low.  My humble point of view:  Whether someone is adding a little more hashing power to keep the difficulty just above clever's mining threshold, or someone is selling a few pennies worth of NLG on bittrex to keep the price just below clever's mining threshold, it's essentially accomplishing the same thing.. keeping clever out, thus creating a fair playing field for the dedicated miners.  So do we call this difficulty manipulation and everyone gets upset? Smiley eventually the person renting the hashing power is going to be selling that newly acquired NLG anyway to cover the hashrate rental costs. 

A software program that will dynamically keep the balance of NLG price to hashrate ratio just above where clever would jump in by adding additional hashrate to the network is interesting.  I'm not sure how responsive and accurate these mining rental apis are.. Other potential factors:

- The amount of hashing clever has at it's disposal   This changes over time.
- The price to hashrate ratio of other alt-coins clever is jumping in and out of.
- The price of hashrate rentals

I'm on holiday with the family presently, but expect a 'clever watcher' tab at nlgstats over the next few weeks that will attempt to track exactly under which circumstances clevermining will jump in at..  Hope to have the info available by the time the simulator is released so this could help simulate a jump pool's behavior.  I'll try to record:

- difficulty of block clever solves
- highest buy on bittrex (let me know if this is best)
- network hashrate as reported on guldenpool.nl? (is there an api for this? I think so)
- clever's total hashrate (published hourly, may have to webscrape this one)
- a few litecoin profitability stats for comparison (anyone have a good source for this?)



Do you see how this is circular thinking.  Lets spend NLG to buy hashpower to make NLG to spend on the same hashpower for another period of time(rinse/repeat).  You might as well just buy mining equipment at that point.  Maybe a deal with GAW to get Hashlets for NLG?  Even then, I'm still leery of something I buy that I will never hold in my hands.

Why would we go through the effort of writing mining/price algorithms, essentially reverse-engineering clever like someone said, instead of putting that coding effort into the algorithm change?  I feel this is a distraction from the task at hand.

If you want to solve the mining problem, focus on the algorithm change.

-Fuse
legendary
Activity: 1658
Merit: 1001
November 15, 2014, 11:06:47 AM
- network hashrate as reported on guldenpool.nl? (is there an api for this? I think so)

I already looked this up:
http://guldenpool.nl:27100/global_stats
hero member
Activity: 638
Merit: 500
November 15, 2014, 09:27:14 AM
Just to let everyone know, I am working with Buerra on these projects... coming up with the ideas and getting 3rd party developers doing the work, all Dutch and we get them invested in NLG in the process. Service updates, new projects and fun stuff coming in the near future.

What a great job you are doing guys!

This sounds very great! I feel somewhere 2015 will be the year of Guldencoin.
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
November 15, 2014, 09:25:40 AM
Very true  Grin

But I like to be able to convince my friends to download the guldencoin wallet as well. And they mainly have iPhones.
When they pay my bear at a pub in Euros, I would like to instantly pay them back in Guldens  Cheesy. How more people have Guldens in there wallets, how better the gulden is distributed, how better the future for the Gulden. Therefor, it is important that the App is accepted by Apple.

You can ask them to download it through the Guldenwallet website now so more people have the app, and use it. The more users sign-up through Testflight, the better case we can present to Apple. My girlfriend has the app on her iPhone as well, helped her a little with the Testflight route though, but it's easy enough.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
November 15, 2014, 08:10:44 AM
Just to let everyone know, I am working with Buerra on these projects... coming up with the ideas and getting 3rd party developers doing the work, all Dutch and we get them invested in NLG in the process. Service updates, new projects and fun stuff coming in the near future.

What a great job you are doing guys!
full member
Activity: 170
Merit: 100
November 15, 2014, 08:10:33 AM
Still waiting for the final iPhone app.  Tongue

The current test version v0.6 works fine, but this week I got a problem with the indicated value in Euros. value '<0,01 euro' was displayed while the wallet has a lot of NLG. Does any one know what the reason and/or solution is for this problem? Can it be fixed  Huh

The NLG iPhone app 'Guldenwallet' should be accepted by Apple because there is also a wallet called 'bread wallet' (that works for the bitcoins) and looks exactly like the NLG wallet and is free to download from the app store as a bitcoin wallet.

Let the devs know in this topic https://forum.guldencoin.com/index.php?topic=508.0 about your iOS-issue please. ANN stuff might get lost along the way.

Your logic of it should be accepted by Apple due to the fact they've accepted Breadwallet is one I can understand, unfortunately it does not work that way. Chances of Apple accepting Guldenwallet straight into the App Store are slim, even if the app is 100% solid and up to their standards they can deny access because it is not a Bitcoin, Litecoin or Dogecoin app (yes, they can be that illogical). Be prepared for a big fat no, if it's a yes then we have all the more joy and less disappointment Wink
Thanx Buerra, I placed the message at the other forum.

It would be very sad when the app is not excepted. It is the only way to do the payments at subway or other commercial businesses.  

People who have the Guldenwallet on their iPhones now can use it though. So you should be good if the issues you raised are fixed Wink
Very true  Grin

But I like to be able to convince my friends to download the guldencoin wallet as well. And they mainly have iPhones.
When they pay my bear at a pub in Euros, I would like to instantly pay them back in Guldens  Cheesy. How more people have Guldens in there wallets, how better the gulden is distributed, how better the future for the Gulden. Therefor, it is important that the App is accepted by Apple.
full member
Activity: 138
Merit: 100
November 15, 2014, 08:08:05 AM

CIG - Can you expand on what you're thinking? There are lots of possibilities to keep clevermining out of mining NLG, problem is none of them are profitable. Although some techniques could help minimize an NLG miner's losses. Are you thinking about a trading bot that would monitor NLG difficulty and sell NLG when necessary to keep the bittrex price just below clevermining's profitability threshold to mine NLG?   that would be pretty ambitious considering how quickly the difficulty swings.

If you want a place where you can see for each block solved by clevermining, the difficulty of that block along with the highest bittrex NLG buy rate and quantity at the time the block was solved, that's probably easy enough to host at nlgstats.  let me know how you'd want it presented I can whip something up.  It would be interesting to try and figure out if clever compares NLG profitability strictly to LTC profitability when making a decision to mine NLG, or also the other alt-coins they are targeting.  I assume the latter.  The better we reverse engineer clevermining the better we can design an approach to minimize their impact to the coin.


You 're right. Mining isn't profitable. And still it's very important we keep mining. I see possibilities to get close to break-even. All well known hashrentals are offering API's. It's a matter of smart hiring hashpower: at the right time for the lowest price. The right time is when the diff trends to drop below the point where Clever jumps in. The lowest hiring price doesn't need explanation. If we succeed in preventing the diff dropping to low, then we got a double-edged sword. A drop in the diff is always followed by a spike. Thus if we level out the drops, we level out the spikes. Since the dedicated miners are mining the spikes, it is easier (meaning with less power) to mine the spikes. Because Clever is mining only when it's profitable and if we mine just above that point, we can get close to break-even.

The price on Bittrex is an important variable. It determines at what diff Clever jumps in. I don't believe in price manipulation on Bittrex. Although it helps if the marketprice is low, in the long run the market trend always wins.

I'm not a programmer. Thus I need help on automating the smart hashpower buying. I figured out some game rules. I can explain that to the developer of the bot. An important variable is the difficulty level at which Clever jumps in. Fantastic if you can work on that Markanth.

Understood.. definitely an interesting idea to discuss.  thanks for the clarification.  It's good of you to try and help those who are mining at a loss to keep the block gaps low.  My humble point of view:  Whether someone is adding a little more hashing power to keep the difficulty just above clever's mining threshold, or someone is selling a few pennies worth of NLG on bittrex to keep the price just below clever's mining threshold, it's essentially accomplishing the same thing.. keeping clever out, thus creating a fair playing field for the dedicated miners.  So do we call this difficulty manipulation and everyone gets upset? Smiley eventually the person renting the hashing power is going to be selling that newly acquired NLG anyway to cover the hashrate rental costs. 

A software program that will dynamically keep the balance of NLG price to hashrate ratio just above where clever would jump in by adding additional hashrate to the network is interesting.  I'm not sure how responsive and accurate these mining rental apis are.. Other potential factors:

- The amount of hashing clever has at it's disposal   This changes over time.
- The price to hashrate ratio of other alt-coins clever is jumping in and out of.
- The price of hashrate rentals

I'm on holiday with the family presently, but expect a 'clever watcher' tab at nlgstats over the next few weeks that will attempt to track exactly under which circumstances clevermining will jump in at..  Hope to have the info available by the time the simulator is released so this could help simulate a jump pool's behavior.  I'll try to record:

- difficulty of block clever solves
- highest buy on bittrex (let me know if this is best)
- network hashrate as reported on guldenpool.nl? (is there an api for this? I think so)
- clever's total hashrate (published hourly, may have to webscrape this one)
- a few litecoin profitability stats for comparison (anyone have a good source for this?)

Jump to: