Topic: Nanopool now has an Electroneum pool! - page 6. (Read 5913 times)

same problem i have had with other pools tons of rejects , pool down due to ddos etc ,nanopool might pay a bit leas but at least i get my actual hash rate due to stability

Agreed. Even 100 ETN would be appreciated.

It is up to the pool, not the mining app. At space pool you just add your desired diff level after your wallet: your_wallet.your_desired_diff

Mine on etn.nanopool since Friday early afternoon, and very stable, big enough to catch blocks, and have a good calculator...

So far its seems to be the most stable etn pool I have been on. All the others I have tried seem to start out doing good then I wake up to find that the pool is down and I have wasted 8hrs.  I am almost at 24hrs and the results are  pretty consistent with estimates from whattomine and the calculator on nanopool.

NsGpuCNMiner -xpool stratum+tcp://etn-us-west1.nanopool.org:13333 -xwal (wallet) -allpools 1 -xpsw z -r >30

Default payout is 1000 ETN and minimum payout is 500 ETN are too high !

Can you white down your Nanopool .bat file for Claymore pls.

Usually you put +diff at the end of your username, but not all pools allow custom diff.
Also when using custom diff. be careful not to have it too low, some pools might ban you for spamming too much shares.

How do you arrange diff in your miner?

is this pool more stable?

easyhash.io is constantly under DDOS attacks and going down.

electroneum.hashvault.pro i get massive amounts of rejected shares and thus way lower payout than expected (25%).

i wanted to mine this, but it's frustrating as hell right now.

i will give it 24 hours. interested as well in changing my difficulty.

After 24hrs my results are still lower than I expected, but acceptable I guess.
 Given the fact the network hashrate and difficulty has jumped last 24hrs too which may contribute as factor in comparison to past days results.

The high static difficulty 120000, PPLNS with 6 hrs for Nanopool and the very high min payout amount suggests they don't want hoppers and want steady miners who would continue to use their pool - i.e. Bringing more profit for them as well because of the high number of people who will stay.  

Pretty good profit strategy and pretty good timing (right after NH is gone).  I think it was not coincidence that Nanopool created the ETN pool 2 days ago.
They saw a big profit perspective.

Apart from all the above, overall the pool stability should be good. From which we would benefit as well. I like that they have nice API to which I can connect and get the mining details to put into my dashboards.
What I don't like is that Nanopool now has more than 50% of the network hashrate. I don't like monopoly, it always gives power for someone (if they want) to screw other people or implement 'hidden tactics'.  
Even with 2-3% 'hidden' profits, imagine the overall profit and usually not many people would notice.

 I will mine for 12-24 more hrs and do another comparison and analysis to see whether I would stay or go.

120k diff. should be no problem for 4k h/s.
In fact, you can mine at Nanopool with devices doing much less than that, it will just take longer for you to find a share.

I'm getting the right results on nano ETN, which i cant cay for some other pools that i've tried.

Looks like I've figured out what is the issue with Nanopool, it is their 120k diff. value. With my 4k hashes I've got 80 ETNs in 12 hrs, while using 80k diff. value on space pool I would have got around 120-150 ETNs. To complete an experiment I have tried to mine on space pool today with 120k diff. value and got pretty much the same results as on Nanopool. So looks like diff. rating that suits your rig is the key here.   

I like this pull, and the more coins in it the better. But it's strange that they chose this coin instead of bitcoin gold and the like

I am  not the one who cant see the stats

https://twitter.com/nanopool_org/status/939335720883367936

Seems I only read the last quote, and thought it meant exchange

Would be nice to see nanopools difficulty. Sup.rnova has had and still has very high hashrate, but also 200% luck, so not good

Cryptopia says, you should not mine directly to them, and ppl still do it   Current cmd wallet aint the most pretty, but it works like a charm.

Had the same issue mining with Cast XMR to nanopool with cryptopia address.  Got a response from nanopool pretty quick and they are looking into it.

5 hrs mining and very few ETNs. It is ridiculous.
Something is very very wrong with ETN and Nanopool.  I remembered now why I stopped using them back in the ETH/ZEC days.
For now my earnings seem half of what I usually get on other pools for the same hashrate.

Also noticed there are a lot of miners with huge hashrates which seem to dominate and may be get the better "share".