Topic: [NEM] NEM -New Economy Movement - No Envy Movement - Updates+Discussion thread - page 172. (Read 661498 times)

looks like I should of READ the FINE PRINT I donated and posted my Transaction ID of two different transactions on the same BITCOIN TALK ACCOUNT I still see my name twice on the contributor list but I think the second was counted as a Donation. I would really appreciate if somebody could PM me to see if we can sort this out.

You think it would be 5+ BTC for all 120?

true

I was referring to the coin.  If these guys need money then they should be selling equity (especially at the prices they're asking) not coins.

Maidsafe has been in development for over 8 years, they have presented in universities and even a google developer talk which can be seen here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLA77zxk-vA

Their code is open source and can be seen here:

https://github.com/maidsafe


Stop looking at technology in terms of its IPO, That's ignorant closed minded and emotionally driven.

Do not forget, that pool be effective for NEM and mined coins exchanged to NEM only then NEM will be in exchanges. I don't think that with alpha release NEM will be in exchanges.

NEM final stakeholder list：3055   yweetot   Y   2e41eaaf5c330fa6f836386e7b2028e993a2cf3392592bce22c51bbf95fda46f

Maidsafe had almost no presence on the net a few months ago, it was some obscure vaporeware project.  Suddenly, out of nowhere, they annouced some coin and received millions in hours until it was partially closed.  

Someone invested 900 BTC ($450K) in one transaction alone.  Based on what?  No photos and stuff copied from freenet?  No escrow?  No marketing?

NEM final stakeholder list can not see

Off topic.

Stolen MTGOX BTCs going to maidsafe ipo?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=579797.280

hmmmm, just a thought.  would it be a good idea to hold the auction until an alpha is out on a test net?  then the auction could go live.  the profits from the auction could be used to by miners for the miner pool.  that way the profits from the auction would indirectly be going back to all the share holders as the profits from the miners would go towards propping up NEM.  is it an okay idea?  as far as I am concerned, I would be okay with an auction at testnet phase and then even another one at launch, maybe even lots of shares.  If a lot of money could be generated to buy miners, that would be really awesome.    

that would kickstart the mining pool with A LOT of hashing power.  that is what these mining pools need.  once it was big enough, lots of other people would join in it and make it bigger.  NXT's problem was reaching a tipping point with their mining pools where they had enough power to really mine some of the more serious coins.   

+1000 agree

Bump.

Imho this auction should be set up as to proceed in the best interest of the community.

So for the impressive hard work, innovation, great community, brilliant dev team and promising plans, a starting pre-auction valuation should be agreed upon and the price should be allowed to go from there up, but not down. Meaning the market should determine which should be the right price starting from lets say at least 5 btc per stake but not below that.  This is how an auction is really helping the community and project, otherwise the downside would defeat the purpose of the auction. If the price payed is not set by an agreed serious valuation then this auction will only serve the purpose of a big dump.

If we can agree that this project is comparable to etherium, etc, is very promising, long term aimed and here to stay, then I think we should act as such and value all this movement has achieved up until now. After all, look around, we have made some good progress, things are starting to clear out, the alpha is almost ready and a lot of other projects are set to launch.

Update: In addition, a valuation with a reasonable price payed for a stake during the auction will serve as some sort of bottom price solidification. With this step, this project would gain more interest and credibility and will also be transitioning from an interesting idea of sorts to real project in progress. Presumably, this would make even dumpers think twice before dumping their stakes right after the free market phase arrives. It could also raise a lot of attention from the media if we market the auction accordingly.

Nem vs BlackCoin

NEM becoming a success is going to be much better for the environment than Bitcoin.

If we are doing the multi-pool idea, we need to do it right and mine the most profitable coins

Excepts some dev. stakes for administrative tasks, the basis for allocating dev. stakes in promotion category is the project's capacity to attract new users (user acquisition), of course we will try to use some kind of plausible projection instead of actual numbers. The basis of allocating dev. stakes in ecosystem category is the project's capacity to add useful functionality into NEM ecosystem. Multipools may qualify in promotion category depending on how efficient they are.  Maybe a part of the ecosystem as well.

I think auction starting price should be not less than last price for stake in IPO. It can be bigger a little.

I consider that one share of Nem has to suffice the person on all his life. I don't speak about over wealth and about over consumption, but I mean that having one share, it would be possible to live, not to live in misery all life, and not to need anything. Therefore think before for cheap to dump that, on what it would be possible to live then all life.

What is 3000 people in planet scales which having the shares of Nem will never need more money? Therefore, it would be worth talking about initial capitalization in 5 billion dollars for Nem that 3000 people who have shares, more never needed anything.

Shouldn't the price be determined by the market ?