I agree with this. There is Bitcointalk and then the real world. Andreas Antonopoulos had met senators in America, Australia and Canada and none of them had heard of Litecoin let alone your *insert alternate*. We will get nobody if we trying to be educators. Nobody even knows what cryptocurrency or alternatives mean: they only understand this brand of Bitcoin (like personal water craft = Jet Ski, Jet Ski is a branded name).
http://www.coindesk.com/cardinalcommerce-bitcoin-mass-adoption/
If this man is correct then the only thing which is prohibiting Bitcoin from mass adoption is perception of security.
I agree with Ciappa that you have to drive the point home. "Bitcoin 2.0 NEM anti-theft platform". Say it again: "Bitcoin 2.0 NEM anti-theft platform". Say it again: "Bitcoin 2.0 NEM anti-theft platform"
right! Who can create that for copy and paste?
very good point, maybe so: "Bitcoin 2.0 NEM anti-theft platform by multisig"
or so ; "Bitcoin 2.0 NEM anti-theft platform by multisig - trading without contract and hidden charges " - check it out with only a few dollars
with something like this we must attract new people, never heard about bitcoin... Believe me, there are many people ready to invest, but that it is too cumbersome to sign long contracts for shares etc... that is our target group
Multisignature = Cosigning
Multisignature is really this bitcoin liturgy term and it is something people will not understand (while Cosigning is something understood and frequently done).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co-signing