It doesn't sound like a good idea when we even haven't left beta stage, this tech will manage people's literal finances which affect their daily lives. Developers have to make sure it's extra secure and stable.
It will be ready when it will be ready and when that happens more exchanges/people/companies will pick up NEM.
"NEM is an enterprise class solution and therefore is not an experiment." - Lon Wong, Founding President, NEM.io Foundation
Guess that is now settled ;-)
Let's be realistic now kids.
And by the way, I'm an early hodlr of NEM so no fud here. Just don't like sensationalistic garbage, let NEM grow naturally and organically, not by using cheap marketing tactics
you do not like arrogance, but you still use statements which go very near to that...
Yes, no need to make needless sensations, but either there is no need to say a project "experimental" -
a project, which has bypassed these phases
- "it is a scam"
- "they never get the blockchain working"
- "the project will die in a year"
- "the value of NEM will be going down, down , until it is 0"
- "they wont get any apps"
- etc. etc.
How NEM is different from Bitcoin ?
1. The amount of users is smaller.
How the amount of NEM users is raised? By sensations ...?
2. The ... ?
What are you talking about? Stop using google translate
I am disappointed to you.
The number of your posts refers to better knowledge, but maybe the first post of yours reveals, what you are about ("ban...")
Now you are jumping away again, but let's grab that "joke" too:
- why are you taking Google into this discussion ? (I am not using it)
- you have not yet defined what do you mean by "NEM is experimental". (So, you are writing FUD, ... why?)