Author

Topic: [NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner - page 117. (Read 289464 times)

legendary
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
trying it on 4*1060 since yesterday and I have some questions:

- Can someone explain the format of "benchmark" files and how are the speeds calculated ? I want to manually enter speed values
I read about increasing "interval for benchmarking"  - any hint where is this parameter?
- It seems Klaust 8.16 (which was downloaded) needs drivers later than 388.xx - readme.md claims 384.xx is enough
- Can I modify time between price check/switching ?

All in all it works just fine

PS: tried to add ccminer-palginmod11, but something went wrong. palginmod windows were not killed and when more than 1 were started machine went unresponsive
I added miner .ps1 with contents:
Code:
. .\Include.ps1

$Path = ".\Bin\NVIDIA-Palginmod11\ccminer64.exe"
$Uri = "https://github.com/nemosminer/ccminer-xevan/releases/download/ccminer-xevan/ccminer_x86.7z"
$Uri = ""

$Commands = [PSCustomObject]@{
    #"bitcore" = " -d $SelGPUCC" #Bitcore
    #"jha" = " -d $SelGPUCC" #Jha
    #"blake2s" = " -d $SelGPUCC" #Blake2s
    #"blakecoin" = " -d $SelGPUCC" #Blakecoin
    #"vanilla" = "" #BlakeVanilla
    #"cryptonight" = "" #Cryptonight
    #"decred" = "" #Decred
    #"equihash" = "" #Equihash
    #"ethash" = "" #Ethash
    #"xevan" = " -d $SelGPUCC" #Xevan
    #"groestl" = "" #Groestl
    #"hmq1725" = " -d $SelGPUCC" #hmq1725
    #"keccak" = " -d $SelGPUCC -m 2" #Keccak
    "lbry" = " -d $SelGPUCC" #Lbry
    "lyra2v2" = "" #Lyra2RE2
    #"lyra2z" = "" #Lyra2z
    #"myr-gr" = "" #MyriadGroestl
    #"neoscrypt" = " -d $SelGPUCC" #NeoScrypt
    #"nist5" = "" #Nist5
    #"pascal" = "" #Pascal
    #"qubit" = "" #Qubit
    #"scrypt" = "" #Scrypt
    #"sia" = "" #Sia
    #"sib" = "" #Sib
    #"skein" = "" #Skein
    "skunk" = " -d $SelGPUCC" #Skunk
    #"timetravel" = " -d $SelGPUCC" #Timetravel
    #"tribus" = " -d $SelGPUCC" #Tribus
    "x11" = "" #X11
    "veltor" = "" #Veltor
    #"x11evo" = " -d $SelGPUCC" #X11evo
    "x17" = " -d $SelGPUCC" #X17
    #"yescrypt" = "" #Yescrypt
}

$Name = (Get-Item $script:MyInvocation.MyCommand.Path).BaseName

$Commands | Get-Member -MemberType NoteProperty | Select -ExpandProperty Name | ForEach {
    [PSCustomObject]@{
        Type = "NVIDIA"
        Path = $Path
        Arguments = "-a $_ -o stratum+tcp://$($Pools.(Get-Algorithm($_)).Host):$($Pools.(Get-Algorithm($_)).Port) -u $($Pools.(Get-Algorithm($_)).User) -p $($Pools.(Get-Algorithm($_)).Pass)$($Commands.$_)"
        HashRates = [PSCustomObject]@{(Get-Algorithm($_)) = $Stats."$($Name)_$(Get-Algorithm($_))_HashRate".Week}
        API = "Ccminer"
        Port = 4068
        Wrap = $false
        URI = $Uri
    }
}
Someone who can help?
full member
Activity: 350
Merit: 100
Locacion JP doesn't work for nicehash

my bat:
Code:
powershell -version 5.0 -noexit -executionpolicy bypass -windowstyle maximized -command "&.\NemosMiner-v2.3.ps1 -SelGPUDSTM '0' -SelGPUCC '0' -Currency USD -Passwordcurrency BTC -interval 120 -Wallet xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -Location JP -PoolName nicehash -Type nvidia -Algorithm cryptonight,keccak,skunk,lbry,equihash,Nist5,Lyra2RE2,neoscrypt,blake2s -Donate 0

output:
Code:
Loading BTC rate from 'api.coinbase.com'..
Loading pool stats..
Error contacting pool, retrying..

Loading BTC rate from 'api.coinbase.com'..
Loading pool stats..
Error contacting pool, retrying..

If I change -Location to US, it works.

Latest version
jr. member
Activity: 58
Merit: 5
Yup, the idea of adding % profitability switch is great. When profit of two enabled algorithms is close, miner switch too often. It can be modified by increasing check time, but when a miner crashes it will stay offline longer.

Or you can explain how exactly profitability calculation works, so we can edit pour benchmark result files.
jr. member
Activity: 35
Merit: 1
Would it be possible to add a setting so the program doesn't switch algo unless is more than predefined percentage ?

Megaminer implemented a similar feature, but I like your scripts better  Wink

https://github.com/tutulino/Megaminer/issues/178

legendary
Activity: 2294
Merit: 1182
Now the money is free, and so the people will be
Yeah you should manually edit your benchmark speeds to control how much it switches.  If you switch algos all the time you lose a lot because your ccminer is closing and opening, etc.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
any profit calculator?

want to compare before.
lets say i have 6 1060 6gbs, how much would i earn per day?


If you know your hashrates you can use my tool:

http://pools.you-stupid-woman.com


I'm noticing that all of my earnings projections show ahashpool as being higher than zpool. Do you have the same experience?

Ahashpool beats all the pools, they have the lowest fees and yield the most return, been that way for a long time, but so many people don't listen.
SEE IMAGE: https://imgur.com/a/b2fWw


member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
145 hours ago I setup two identical miners to compare the standard profit switching to the 24hr profit switching.  So far here is the outcome

MINER1 (ahashpool) = $42.52/day avg
MINER2 (ahashpool24hr) = $43.85/day avg

Rigs are running 6x1070ti, 85% power, +100GPU, +500MEM, NemosMiner 2.3, 900 interval - Values calculated off $15,000/BTC

newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0

I restarted benchmarking all algorithms.  When it got to the x11 benchmark and it initially showed 49 MH/s, then 30 minutes later it got up to 84.97 MH/s.
Then the benchmark ended, so I guess now I have to extend the benchmark for this algorithm to 1 hour since it never had the chance to get to the top speed.
That's kind of ridiculous.
Now Nemos miner shows the speed on top of the screen as 83.97 MH/s, but this is NOT the top speed since I am sure it would have kept going up even after 1/2 an hour.
Anyone else pay attention to this X-17 algorithm while benchmarking?



You can edit your benchmark file, the weekly average is what shows on the screen when calculating profitability. I had to manually bump up my x17 as well.. I'm also lengthening the duration it spends mining it.
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
112 hours ago I setup two identical miners to compare the standard profit switching to the 24hr profit switching.  So far here is the outcome

MINER1 (ahashpool) = 0.01337059 BTC = $180.31 in 112 hours or $38.64/day avg
MINER2 (ahashpool24hr) = 0.01399279 BTC = $188.70 in 112 hours or $40.43/day avg

Rigs are running 6x1070ti, 85% power, +100GPU, +500MEM, NemosMiner 2.3, 900 interval - Values calculated off $13,486/BTC


Millsys, your posts have been a huge help!

I saw in a previous post you made that you excluded Timetravel and My-gr from the ahashpool24hr bat.  Was there anything else?

I'm running 5x1070ti, 1x1080, and 1x1080ti.  I've set the intensity on my 1070tis to match yours, and set my other cards intensities to the common intensity based on yiimp.eu benchmarks.  I'm running 100% power, +150/+500 on my 1070tis without problem.

With all that, I've still only made $44 over the last 24 hrs (@13,486) compared to your $40.43.  I'm trying to figure out why our profits are so close given the difference in hashpower.  Over the last 24h I've mined on Bitcore, Skein, and X17.

Note: I'm also using 900 interval.

You can't really compare, his is an average of over four days and yours is just the last 24 hrs.  The rate of return will vary from day to day and unless you measure over the exact time period you can't compare exact numbers.  For example with my 6 x 1070ti through part of Dec I was averaging $38 (@13,486) but now I am $39-40.

Cheers!
jr. member
Activity: 224
Merit: 2
Hi,
is there a way to rerun a benchmark for a particular algorithm without having to rerun through them all?
I noticed for x17 it takes a long time for it to come up to full speed ( over 5 minutes ) so the default 120 seconds is not enough and the benchmark result is not accurate.
The same for NIST.  My single GPU 1080 scores 58.18 MH/s and my 8 x 1070 only scored 97.43 MH/s ( the benchmarking time was too short so it did not have time to ram p to full speed )

The last option is just change the number to 1800 but then it will run each benchmark for 1/2 an hour.....

regards
How do you extend the benchmark time?
I didn't realize it was as easy as changing the interval time.  I poured a ton of time going through the powershell scripts trying to find it.  Embarrassed
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
112 hours ago I setup two identical miners to compare the standard profit switching to the 24hr profit switching.  So far here is the outcome

MINER1 (ahashpool) = 0.01337059 BTC = $180.31 in 112 hours or $38.64/day avg
MINER2 (ahashpool24hr) = 0.01399279 BTC = $188.70 in 112 hours or $40.43/day avg

Rigs are running 6x1070ti, 85% power, +100GPU, +500MEM, NemosMiner 2.3, 900 interval - Values calculated off $13,486/BTC


Millsys, your posts have been a huge help!

I saw in a previous post you made that you excluded Timetravel and My-gr from the ahashpool24hr bat.  Was there anything else?

I'm running 5x1070ti, 1x1080, and 1x1080ti.  I've set the intensity on my 1070tis to match yours, and set my other cards intensities to the common intensity based on yiimp.eu benchmarks.  I'm running 100% power, +150/+500 on my 1070tis without problem.

With all that, I've still only made $44 over the last 24 hrs (@13,486) compared to your $40.43.  I'm trying to figure out why our profits are so close given the difference in hashpower.  Over the last 24h I've mined on Bitcore, Skein, and X17.

Note: I'm also using 900 interval.
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
Big thanks for all the hard work you've done, Nemo.
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
This thread is great. Very useful, i learned so much from this thread. Thank you and happy New Year!
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 256
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
So many complaints by,  what feels like,  a bunch of 12 year olds that i wanted to chime in and let you know that your program has been working flawlessly for me and my 1080 ti's.  Was on 2.2.2 and now on 2.3c... no issues with either for over a month.

Thank you and Happy New Year!

Much Appreciated Happy New Year
Best Regards
Nemo

Yea I feel bad not sending you a Christmas Gift, I think many of us owe you one

its algud i didn't make this for gifts or donations i made this to try and help people


Donate 5 isn't enough, 12 rig setup I'm building now, Donate 5 minutes/day would only give you $50/month.

: ) im not greedy thats why i have a very low default fee... i will not be increasing it anytime soon... its algud.. you can increase it but i do not expect you or anyone else to... i have plenty of my own rigs running NemosMiner so im doing fine...

(There is alot more to life than MONEY)

Best Regards
Nemo
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
So many complaints by,  what feels like,  a bunch of 12 year olds that i wanted to chime in and let you know that your program has been working flawlessly for me and my 1080 ti's.  Was on 2.2.2 and now on 2.3c... no issues with either for over a month.

Thank you and Happy New Year!

Much Appreciated Happy New Year
Best Regards
Nemo

Yea I feel bad not sending you a Christmas Gift, I think many of us owe you one

its algud i didn't make this for gifts or donations i made this to try and help people


Donate 5 isn't enough, 12 rig setup I'm building now, Donate 5 minutes/day would only give you $50/month.
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 256
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
So many complaints by,  what feels like,  a bunch of 12 year olds that i wanted to chime in and let you know that your program has been working flawlessly for me and my 1080 ti's.  Was on 2.2.2 and now on 2.3c... no issues with either for over a month.

Thank you and Happy New Year!

Much Appreciated Happy New Year
Best Regards
Nemo

Yea I feel bad not sending you a Christmas Gift, I think many of us owe you one

its algud i didn't make this for gifts or donations i made this to try and help people

this is a free project feel free to donate be much appreciated: (the default donation of 5 mins per day works out to be 0.3472%) theirs 1440 mins in a day 5 for me 1335 for you..

Best Regards
Nemo

sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 256
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
hi guys.

New miner here. Just finished building my rig over the weekend, and get everything setup using this miner. I have been enjoying it so far. Lots of valuable information in this thread as well - thanks to everyone who has contributed!



Thank you Much Appreciated
Best Regards
Nemo
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
So many complaints by,  what feels like,  a bunch of 12 year olds that i wanted to chime in and let you know that your program has been working flawlessly for me and my 1080 ti's.  Was on 2.2.2 and now on 2.3c... no issues with either for over a month.

Thank you and Happy New Year!

Much Appreciated Happy New Year
Best Regards
Nemo

Yea I feel bad not sending you a Christmas Gift, I think many of us owe you one
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 256
NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3
So many complaints by,  what feels like,  a bunch of 12 year olds that i wanted to chime in and let you know that your program has been working flawlessly for me and my 1080 ti's.  Was on 2.2.2 and now on 2.3c... no issues with either for over a month.

Thank you and Happy New Year!

Much Appreciated Happy New Year
Best Regards
Nemo
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
hi guys.

New miner here. Just finished building my rig over the weekend, and get everything setup using this miner. I have been enjoying it so far. Lots of valuable information in this thread as well - thanks to everyone who has contributed!

Had 2 quick questions though (more related to my setup). I'm running two 1070ti cards: 0 GPU, +650 MEM

1) I'm seeing a hash rate of out 12.5 Mh/s per card, mining X-17. Does that sound about right? Playing with GPU/MEM clock settings seems to have no impact on this number.


2) Is it normal to see the hashrate bouncing around like this (ahashpool wallet page)?




12.5 is great, I get 73 out of 6 cards (but each card shows 13MH/s in ccminer-alexis) using 80% limit/+100gpu/+500mem
Be sure to adjust interval to 900, it can take a few minutes for x17 algo to show 13MH/s for each GPU.  This is why 120 is not ideal

That is normal, NO POOL can accurately measure hashrate for your individual miner, only the miner itself will have the accurate calculation.
Jump to: