[NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner - page 224.

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

Quote from: mirny on February 24, 2017, 07:57:01 PM

Quote from: sp_ on February 24, 2017, 03:39:19 PM

Quote from: minerx117 on February 24, 2017, 03:26:06 PM

Yes your correct about ccminerlbr thanks ive removed it, saved another 13mb for 1.5.3 also im having trouble finding that faster KlausT version of ccminer you are using for neoscrypt?? ive tried both x86 and x64 from here: https://github.com/KlausT/ccminer/releases all tho last update was in december.. both are running slower neoscrpyt than my current ccminerneo i see he made a few updates to neoscrypt 10days ago in his ccminer source code: have you compiled that source and is that how your getting better speeds??

This release is pretty good for neoscrypt on the gtx 1070:

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.5.80

81 is broken..

So, you should remove that from your github then.
Or make a note, it's broken, or something.

mimmy you can post this to sp_ him self........................ https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ccminersp-mod-modded-nvidia-maxwell-pascal-kernels-826901

mirny

legendary

Activity: 1108

Merit: 1005

Quote from: sp_ on February 24, 2017, 03:39:19 PM

Quote from: minerx117 on February 24, 2017, 03:26:06 PM

Yes your correct about ccminerlbr thanks ive removed it, saved another 13mb for 1.5.3 also im having trouble finding that faster KlausT version of ccminer you are using for neoscrypt?? ive tried both x86 and x64 from here: https://github.com/KlausT/ccminer/releases all tho last update was in december.. both are running slower neoscrpyt than my current ccminerneo i see he made a few updates to neoscrypt 10days ago in his ccminer source code: have you compiled that source and is that how your getting better speeds??

This release is pretty good for neoscrypt on the gtx 1070:

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.5.80

81 is broken..

So, you should remove that from your github then.
Or make a note, it's broken, or something.

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

Quote from: sp_ on February 24, 2017, 03:39:19 PM

Quote from: minerx117 on February 24, 2017, 03:26:06 PM

Yes your correct about ccminerlbr thanks ive removed it, saved another 13mb for 1.5.3 also im having trouble finding that faster KlausT version of ccminer you are using for neoscrypt?? ive tried both x86 and x64 from here: https://github.com/KlausT/ccminer/releases all tho last update was in december.. both are running slower neoscrpyt than my current ccminerneo i see he made a few updates to neoscrypt 10days ago in his ccminer source code: have you compiled that source and is that how your getting better speeds??

This release is pretty good for neoscrypt on the gtx 1070:

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.5.80

81 is broken..

thankyou sp_

m1n1ngP4d4w4n

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

CryptoLearner

Yeah it's possible the 1070 like one version better than the other, dunno, i don't have sadly any other comparison because i own only 1070's.

For SP lbry, it may be good yeah. More testing on my side but it seems to yield +3% (so about 1.5% real gain minus fee)

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

Quote from: m1n1ngP4d4w4n on February 24, 2017, 03:39:35 PM

Quote from: minerx117 on February 24, 2017, 03:26:06 PM

Quote from: m1n1ngP4d4w4n on February 24, 2017, 12:56:46 PM

Quote from: minerx117 on February 24, 2017, 11:52:20 AM

i did replace neoscrypt with a faster version are you having better speeds with a different version??

I will try your version of neoscrypt against KlausT i'll get back to you in a few minutes !

feedback: yes the version you used is the DJM ccminer, it's the same i spoke about an earlier post i made to you about this. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17936088

here is my numbers

You version ccminerneo (djm) after 180 seconds

Code:

NAME=ccminer;VER=1.5.78-djm34-real-programming;API=1.3;ALGO=neoscrypt;GPUS=6;KHS=4274.34

KlausT version after 180 seconds

Code:

NAME=ccminer;VER=8.05-KlausT;API=1.3;ALGO=neoscrypt;GPUS=6;KHS=6784.77

Can you tell me what version you used for the ccminerlbr.exe ? i was under the impression Tpruvot version was the best for lbry, is it his ? or someone else ? Gonna try it to compare. Ok checked it seems they have the same CRC signature, it's actually tpruvot version, why not using ccminertp.exe then ? Huh

Yes your correct about ccminerlbr thanks ive removed it, saved another 13mb for 1.5.3 also im having trouble finding that faster KlausT version of ccminer you are using for neoscrypt?? ive tried both x86 and x64 from here: https://github.com/KlausT/ccminer/releases all tho last update was in december.. both are running slower neoscrpyt than my current ccminerneo i see he made a few updates to neoscrypt 10days ago in his ccminer source code: have you compiled that source and is that how your getting better speeds??

Nope as you can see i run the v8.05, so it's the one released in december (x64 version)

i thought so.. well ill test on my 1070 see if thats where you finding a improvement i test all my algos on the 1050ti, and v8.05 gets me 0.41 mhs and my current ccminerneo gets me 0.46.. tested both x86 and x64 v8.05.. not sure why your getting such better results 4.27mhs to 6.78mhs is a huge difference im just not seeing that on the 1050ti... retest now on the 1070 also have you tried sp-mod lbr with the 1.7fee for me i just tested it my current ccminerlbr= 106mhs 1050ti sp-modlbr=114mhs 1050ti worth adding to 1.5.3 Huh

m1n1ngP4d4w4n

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

CryptoLearner

Quote from: minerx117 on February 24, 2017, 03:26:06 PM

Quote from: m1n1ngP4d4w4n on February 24, 2017, 12:56:46 PM

Quote from: minerx117 on February 24, 2017, 11:52:20 AM

i did replace neoscrypt with a faster version are you having better speeds with a different version??

I will try your version of neoscrypt against KlausT i'll get back to you in a few minutes !

feedback: yes the version you used is the DJM ccminer, it's the same i spoke about an earlier post i made to you about this. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17936088

here is my numbers

You version ccminerneo (djm) after 180 seconds

Code:

NAME=ccminer;VER=1.5.78-djm34-real-programming;API=1.3;ALGO=neoscrypt;GPUS=6;KHS=4274.34

KlausT version after 180 seconds

Code:

NAME=ccminer;VER=8.05-KlausT;API=1.3;ALGO=neoscrypt;GPUS=6;KHS=6784.77

Can you tell me what version you used for the ccminerlbr.exe ? i was under the impression Tpruvot version was the best for lbry, is it his ? or someone else ? Gonna try it to compare. Ok checked it seems they have the same CRC signature, it's actually tpruvot version, why not using ccminertp.exe then ? Huh

Yes your correct about ccminerlbr thanks ive removed it, saved another 13mb for 1.5.3 also im having trouble finding that faster KlausT version of ccminer you are using for neoscrypt?? ive tried both x86 and x64 from here: https://github.com/KlausT/ccminer/releases all tho last update was in december.. both are running slower neoscrpyt than my current ccminerneo i see he made a few updates to neoscrypt 10days ago in his ccminer source code: have you compiled that source and is that how your getting better speeds??

Nope as you can see i run the v8.05 (look in the API line i pasted), so it's the one released in december (x64 version)

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: minerx117 on February 24, 2017, 03:26:06 PM

Yes your correct about ccminerlbr thanks ive removed it, saved another 13mb for 1.5.3 also im having trouble finding that faster KlausT version of ccminer you are using for neoscrypt?? ive tried both x86 and x64 from here: https://github.com/KlausT/ccminer/releases all tho last update was in december.. both are running slower neoscrpyt than my current ccminerneo i see he made a few updates to neoscrypt 10days ago in his ccminer source code: have you compiled that source and is that how your getting better speeds??

This release is pretty good for neoscrypt on the gtx 1070:

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.5.80

81 is broken..

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

Quote from: m1n1ngP4d4w4n on February 24, 2017, 12:56:46 PM

Quote from: minerx117 on February 24, 2017, 11:52:20 AM

i did replace neoscrypt with a faster version are you having better speeds with a different version??

I will try your version of neoscrypt against KlausT i'll get back to you in a few minutes !

feedback: yes the version you used is the DJM ccminer, it's the same i spoke about an earlier post i made to you about this. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17936088

here is my numbers

You version ccminerneo (djm) after 180 seconds

Code:

NAME=ccminer;VER=1.5.78-djm34-real-programming;API=1.3;ALGO=neoscrypt;GPUS=6;KHS=4274.34

KlausT version after 180 seconds

Code:

NAME=ccminer;VER=8.05-KlausT;API=1.3;ALGO=neoscrypt;GPUS=6;KHS=6784.77

Can you tell me what version you used for the ccminerlbr.exe ? i was under the impression Tpruvot version was the best for lbry, is it his ? or someone else ? Gonna try it to compare. Ok checked it seems they have the same CRC signature, it's actually tpruvot version, why not using ccminertp.exe then ? Huh

Yes your correct about ccminerlbr thanks ive removed it, saved another 13mb for 1.5.3 also im having trouble finding that faster KlausT version of ccminer you are using for neoscrypt?? ive tried both x86 and x64 from here: https://github.com/KlausT/ccminer/releases all tho last update was in december.. both are running slower neoscrpyt than my current ccminerneo i see he made a few updates to neoscrypt 10days ago in his ccminer source code: have you compiled that source and is that how your getting better speeds??

m1n1ngP4d4w4n

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

CryptoLearner

Quote from: minerx117 on February 24, 2017, 11:52:20 AM

i did replace neoscrypt with a faster version are you having better speeds with a different version??

I will try your version of neoscrypt against KlausT i'll get back to you in a few minutes !

feedback: yes the version you used is the DJM ccminer, it's the same i spoke about an earlier post i made to you about this. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17936088

here is my numbers

You version ccminerneo (djm) after 180 seconds

Code:

NAME=ccminer;VER=1.5.78-djm34-real-programming;API=1.3;ALGO=neoscrypt;GPUS=6;KHS=4274.34

KlausT version after 180 seconds

Code:

NAME=ccminer;VER=8.05-KlausT;API=1.3;ALGO=neoscrypt;GPUS=6;KHS=6784.77

Can you tell me what version you used for the ccminerlbr.exe ? i was under the impression Tpruvot version was the best for lbry, is it his ? or someone else ? Gonna try it to compare. Ok checked it seems they have the same CRC signature, it's actually tpruvot version, why not using ccminertp.exe then ? Huh

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

i did replace neoscrypt with a faster version are you having better speeds with a different version??

m1n1ngP4d4w4n

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

CryptoLearner

Good work friend !

It seems your testing of nanashi's for lyra2rev2 was fruitfull, still not adopted KlausT for neoscrypt ?

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

1.5.2.2

Enabled: Lyra2z support thanks to : https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-msvc2015/releases/

Disabled: x13,x14,x15 (as they are now asic mined)

Replaced: Neoscrypt ccminer with faster more stable version
Replaced: Lyra2v2 ccminer with faster more stable version

nemosminerv1.5.2.2 now uses x86 and x64 compiled versions of ccminer (which improves speeds) i was having errors come up all the time to fix this i had to install MS Visual Studio:
https://www.visualstudio.com/post-download-vs/?sku=community&clcid=0x409&telem=ga#

after that nemosminerv1.5.2.2 runs perfect

i will leave 1.5.2.1 up for now as, MS Visual Studio is a big up date around 6gb.. so if you dont want to download a update that big, you can continue using 1.5.1.1 as its x64 bit only(slighty slower no lyra2z support)

Regards
#Nemo

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

Quote from: mirny on February 22, 2017, 08:47:27 PM

Quote

i could but why..

to compare, which payouts are better

i will look into it

mirny

legendary

Activity: 1108

Merit: 1005

Quote

i could but why..

to compare, which payouts are better

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

Quote from: mirny on February 22, 2017, 06:33:50 PM

Would you mind to make a version for miningpolhub.com ?

i could but why.. im just going to rock with this for a while its finally working well..

i did all this for free and have received 0 donations.. so not much incentive to make versions for other pools atm.. im looking at making a linux version of this exact miner atm.. as some algos run faster on linux over windows..

Regards
#Nemo

Alex.hdtv

newbie

Activity: 58

Merit: 0

Keep

mirny

legendary

Activity: 1108

Merit: 1005

Would you mind to make a version for miningpolhub.com ?

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

Quote from: fred1992 on February 18, 2017, 01:28:00 AM

Thx for miner.
Why not add Pasc and Zcash algos?

Zcash algo support added : )

Regards
#Nemo

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

Quote from: Kompik on February 22, 2017, 04:23:09 PM

I still dont get how it chooses the algo. At the moment lbry should be one of the most profitable, but it is very rarely chosen by the script. It chooses zDash whichs profitability is about half?

i think it may have something to do with 24Hours Actual as you can see on the zpool website lbr is at 0.00000 at the moment as its not finding many blocks at the moment... because hash rate is low

Kompik

sr. member

Activity: 463

Merit: 250

I still dont get how it chooses the algo. At the moment lbry should be one of the most profitable, but it is very rarely chosen by the script. It chooses zDash whichs profitability is about half?

Topic: [NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner - page 224. (Read 289464 times)