Topic: [NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner - page 57. (Read 289464 times)

I take it you are referring to the account that receives donated hashpower?

"Account suspended" is from http://mytestenv.alwaysdata.net/servefiles/Donation.json

Admins have account suspended

Under what circumstances does this script - that is, 2.4.2 - decide to redo all its benchmarks (besides there not being any *profit.txt files in the Stats folder)?

I've been alternating between 2.4.2 and the MrPlus fork to see if they both chose the same algo as most profitable and now my 2.4.2 install decided it needed to redo all the benchmarks!?!

Oh, one other thing to consider in future releases is that both Lyra2v2 and Neoscrypt require considerable time to get up to speed on multi-GPU rigs. I am manually running ccminer-polytimos - the same one used by NemosMiner - on my 6x 1060 rig right now and it took about 20 minutes to get up to its max speed of 150 MH/s, after starting out at 100 MH/s.

EDIT - and I found a MAJOR bug - if an algo/port which is normally available on a pool has been disabled and NemosMiner attempts to benchmark it the command output for the stratum connection is blank and the miner hangs or exits back to the powershell prompt. Might want to do a cursory check of port availability before attempting to benchmark. For example, Phi is not available right now on Zpool and benchmarking just failed. I believe this is what happened to me with the Timetravel algo a few days ago.

EDIT2 - and it just crashed with a weird entry in the miner.log file: "Account Suspended". Since I don't know if this is an issue with Zpool or NemosMiner I posted about it in the Zpool thread first: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.30623787

I didn't disable ANY algorithms in NiceHash.  The 3 listed are the only algorithms NiceHash decided were the most profitable, 90% of the time it mined Equihash.

Updating any neoscrypt miner would have been useless since 90% of the time it mined Equihash.  It mined very little Neoscrypt.  The fact remains that the profitability of the algorithms NiceHash offers are 15-20% lower than the profitability of the algorithms on AHashPool at this point in time.

Tell me please, why in NiceHash you have disabled most of the algorithms? They are not a pool, and pay for what is beneficial to buyers, you have deprived yourself of a part of the possible income. Also,  2.0.1.10 more convenient because it does not waste time in switching customers has the best speed.

Available here: https://github.com/MrPlusGH/NPlusMiner/releases
Feddback here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.30467058

Thanks for the testing once again. I'm assuming you didn't load HSRminer or the newest revision of Excavator onto NHML? If you used the default miner (Klaust 8.18 I believe) without any intensity changes, it might be significantly slower than the two I mentioned. Also I believe Lyra2REv2's prone to price manipulation unfortunately.

AHP pumped out some solid numbers; I wonder if the gains were mostly due to the skyrocket in Verge's pricing.

No, NHM2 is just a front end wrapper, its not any faster or more profitable than their 1.8.1.8

but isn't nhm2 faster / more profitable?

Hi Nemo,

Have you considered switching the NeoScrypt miner to Justaminer's Hsrminer fork which has a 0% devfee and a working api?

link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/hsrminer-neoscrypt-fork-by-justaminer-high-hashrate-api-all-gpus-supported-2765610

Legacy is more customizeable.  NHM2 is for total novice no customization...  Legacy allows you to customize.

Thank you, MagicSmoker. I still find it extremely tedious that simple things like these feel like painful childbirth for some. No, I do not think that posting a quick changelog in the first post is a difficult thing to do, and no, I do not feel like having to search for one post about a version update several pages back is something that I should be doing. Especially since I haven't followed the thread for a couple of days.

why are you using NiceHashMiner Legacy 1.8.1.8 and not the nhm2?

Plus algo has been dropped by MrPlus at this time because of server load.  He is coding to place the algorithm into NemosMiner so it doesn't depend on an external server brain (ie his server).   Test was conducted using standard ahashpool but I use a 60 second interval with ActiveMinerGainPct 5 and 6 top algos

Finally one of these multi-algo pools beat NiceHash! Were you using the regular batch file, or the plus one? I've gone back to the regular batch files in NemosMiner 2.4.2 because the other forks and the plus version don't seem to be working right. In fact, I suspect the best approach to managing brief spikes to poll the API more frequently (not good news for the pool operators) and then do a 3 - 9 sample moving average of the profitability figures.

72 Hour NICEHASH vs AHASHPOOL
Identical 6x1070ti rigs - 2/15/2018 4pm to 2/18/2018


NiceHash  : 0.00435638 BTC using NiceHashMiner Legacy 1.8.1.8 hashing Equihash, neoscrypt, Lyra2REv2
AHashPool: 0.005000578465575 BTC using NemosMiner 2.4.2 hashing phi,skein,x17,Nist5,neoscrypt,blake2s

NiceHash Pro: Great responsive interface, updates extremely frequently and keeps you up to date on where you are with maturity of profits
NiceHash Con: Doesn't support the more profitable algorithms that AHashPool supports (X17, Phi, Blake2S, etc)

Depends on where you are located - ahashpool is in Asia somewhere, so ping times will be long from the US - and how much hashrate you have - their 0.01 BTC minimum payout takes way too long to reach with my 6x 1060 rig.

When I started mining in beginning of januari I started with Zpool. But found that ahashpool was providing way better profit so switched. Dont think I'm going back to zpool any time soon. Rather hope that zergpool or blazepool get more workers and will check those out again in future.

NemosMiner Whatsapp Group
https://chat.whatsapp.com/A9jrZSkJ0aW0Qbl0NAIOWY

are you tested zpool?