[NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner - page 87.

Zikkson

newbie

Activity: 70

Merit: 0

Quote from: car1999 on January 22, 2018, 06:33:10 PM

Quote from: Zikkson on January 22, 2018, 04:11:14 PM

Last version works great on my 6x1060 rig. Benchmark takes more time, especially palgin hsr, but getting 10% better results.

Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.

Results:
Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day
Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day
NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day

I used NiceHash Miner 2 for NiceHash to use that service as it is. Right now im running on MPH and getting the best results, also i will correct values to get clearer results if there will be difference.

what's your most runned algo in MPH?

I think its equihash, then neoscrypt and skein. But i will check it later today after i get back home

Mike011

full member

Activity: 312

Merit: 104

Quote from: Zybane on January 22, 2018, 07:55:56 PM

When CCminer says a line in blue like "skunk block 111222, diff 1877.231"

What does that mean? Is that an error?

Omg! If you get that message, your rig could explode any minute! I suggest that you stop mining immidiately! Sell all your gpu`s to me! Cheesy

Zybane

newbie

Activity: 7

Merit: 0

When CCminer says a line in blue like "skunk block 111222, diff 1877.231"

What does that mean? Is that an error?

car1999

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 100

@minerrx117,
v2.4.1, ahashpool24hr
It showed

Code:

Stats 'Phi' -> 202.51 MH/s after xxxxx sec

but the stats never changed in the list, it's always

Code:

Phi 194.25 MH/s 4.917 0.00492 52.548 .........

is it a bug?

Mike011

full member

Activity: 312

Merit: 104

Quote from: passteque on January 22, 2018, 12:04:38 PM

Quote from: Mike011 on January 22, 2018, 11:59:43 AM

"tribus" = " --cpu-priority=3 -d $SelGPUCC" #Tribus

This is working like a charm! Thanks!

What is it for?

Actually benchmarking for 4*1070 ti. Very nice job nemos your miner is great

Sometimes this solves "does not validate on cpu", or lowering intensity helps. However, i get the same message on i5 too sometimes, so duh...

car1999

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 100

Quote from: Zikkson on January 22, 2018, 04:11:14 PM

Last version works great on my 6x1060 rig. Benchmark takes more time, especially palgin hsr, but getting 10% better results.

Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.

Results:
Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day
Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day
NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day

I used NiceHash Miner 2 for NiceHash to use that service as it is. Right now im running on MPH and getting the best results, also i will correct values to get clearer results if there will be difference.

what's your most runned algo in MPH?

HardBlockMiner

jr. member

Activity: 224

Merit: 2

Quote from: blacklpk on January 22, 2018, 03:12:40 PM

Quote from: HardBlockMiner on January 22, 2018, 02:06:34 PM

Quote from: blacklpk on January 22, 2018, 01:55:08 PM

Hye,

I've a little problem when I launch the miner, the miner is open for 4/5sec like this: https://www.noelshack.com/2018-04-1-1516647201-mineur.png

It just close after and nothing happened after, what can i do to make it run?

Do you have your number of GPU configured properly?

Yes, I have only one GPU for the moment, my bat:

powershell -version 5.0 -noexit -executionpolicy bypass -windowstyle maximized -command "&.\NemosMiner-v2.4.1.ps1 -SelGPUDSTM '0' -SelGPUCC '0' -Currency USD -Passwordcurrency BTC -interval 30 -Username blacklpk -Workername lpk2 -Location US -ActiveMinerGainPct 3 -PoolName miningpoolhub -Type nvidia -Algorithm cryptonight,keccak,lyra2z,skein,equihash,groestl,MyriadGroestl,Lyra2RE2,neoscrypt -Donate 5

Which GPU are you using?

passteque

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: Zikkson on January 22, 2018, 04:42:35 PM

Quote from: Max3k on January 22, 2018, 04:26:50 PM

Quote from: Zikkson on January 22, 2018, 04:11:14 PM

Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.
Results:
Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day
Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day
NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day

Strange (low) values for weekly test, it was carried out simultaneousl (3 rigs of 6 cards)?

By the way, what EWBF replaced at DSTM? They have the same speed, the same load on the card, that's only for the first can be set --fee 0.

No i switched one rig over week between those pools. Tried to have equal time for all of them. Do you think it can be better per day value? I dont have set gpus for top performace, but for better effeciency, core +80, mem +400, power limit 80% (hynix memory). Getting 1620h/s equihash and 3900h/s neoscrypt for example.

you can't do that, run at the same time to compare; 2 gpu on each pool. payout move too much in a week to compare that way

Max3k

newbie

Activity: 79

Merit: 0

Quote from: minerx117 on January 22, 2018, 04:28:45 PM

i can add EWBF back alongside DSTM if you would like the choice

Nothing serious, i thought maybe I have something wrong and the speed is the same.

Skunk and ccminer-x86-2.2 - it would be possible to start using the new version (ccminer-x86-2.2.4-cuda9), speed should be more.
For Bitcore can use for example SP2, he is now lying around everywhere, in order to exclude CcminerTpruvot.ps1 =))

Quote from: Zikkson on January 22, 2018, 04:42:35 PM

No i switched one rig over week between those pools. Tried to have equal time for all of them. Do you think it can be better per day value?

No problem then, just good to compare in parallel and 2-3 weeks.

Zikkson

newbie

Activity: 70

Merit: 0

Quote from: Max3k on January 22, 2018, 04:26:50 PM

Quote from: Zikkson on January 22, 2018, 04:11:14 PM

Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.
Results:
Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day
Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day
NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day

Strange (low) values for weekly test, it was carried out simultaneousl (3 rigs of 6 cards)?

By the way, what EWBF replaced at DSTM? They have the same speed, the same load on the card, that's only for the first can be set --fee 0.

No i switched one rig over week between those pools. Tried to have equal time for all of them. Do you think it can be better per day value? I dont have set gpus for top performace, but for better effeciency, core +80, mem +400, power limit 80% (hynix memory). Getting 1620h/s equihash and 3900h/s neoscrypt for example.

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

Quote from: Max3k on January 22, 2018, 04:26:50 PM

Quote from: Zikkson on January 22, 2018, 04:11:14 PM

Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.
Results:
Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day
Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day
NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day

Strange (low) values for weekly test, it was carried out simultaneousl (3 rigs of 6 cards)?

By the way, what EWBF replaced at DSTM? They have the same speed, the same load on the card, that's only for the first can be set --fee 0.

i can add EWBF back alongside DSTM if you would like the choice

Max3k

newbie

Activity: 79

Merit: 0

Quote from: Zikkson on January 22, 2018, 04:11:14 PM

Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.
Results:
Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day
Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day
NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day

Strange (low) values for weekly test, it was carried out simultaneousl (3 rigs of 6 cards)?

By the way, what EWBF replaced at DSTM? They have the same speed, the same load on the card, that's only for the first can be set --fee 0.

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

Quote from: millsys on January 22, 2018, 05:03:32 AM

minerx117

Honestly I'm not seeing any improvement with this new phi client..

NemosMiner 2.4 - using ccminer 2.2.4
[2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU #1: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.31 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU #2: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.23 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU #0: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.12 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU #5: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.00 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU #3: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 21.85 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:47] GPU #4: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 21.80 MH/s
[2018-01-22 02:00:00] phi block 157319, diff 21635.913
[2018-01-22 02:00:02] GPU #2: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.29 MH/s
[2018-01-22 02:00:03] accepted: 280/280 (diff 0.549), 132.14 MH/s yes!
[2018-01-22 02:00:10] GPU #0: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.01 MH/s
[2018-01-22 02:00:10] accepted: 281/281 (diff 2.054), 132.13 MH/s yes!

NemosMiner 2.4.1 - using phi-1.0 (which has some built in donation system)
[2018-01-22 01:58:27] [YES] [S/A/T]: 0/23/23, diff: 1.765, 130.51 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:58:33] GPU#0: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.26 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:58:40] GPU#1: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.33 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:14] phi block 157318, diff 21635.913
[2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU#3: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.46 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU#2: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.31 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU#0: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.22 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU#4: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.21 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:46] GPU#5: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.19 MH/s
[2018-01-22 01:59:56] [YES] [S/A/T]: 0/24/24, diff: 1.871, 131.11 MH/s
[2018-01-22 02:00:00] phi block 157319, diff 21635.913
[2018-01-22 02:00:32] GPU#1: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.32 MH/s
[2018-01-22 02:00:57] phi block 157320, diff 21044.053
[2018-01-22 02:01:12] phi block 157321, diff 21044.053
[2018-01-22 02:01:25] GPU#5: MSI GTX 1070 Ti, 22.12 MH/s
[2018-01-22 02:01:25] [YES] [S/A/T]: 0/25/25, diff: 0.563, 131.35 MH/s

These are identical rigs, identical cards, identical overclock settings, identical power settings

thanks i'll double check today and confirm are you running lower tdp? i have two 6x1070ti rigs with 69%tdp (124watt) +125core +505mem and i got a slightly better hashrate with Alexis-Phi over Tpruvot 2.2.4

"which has some built in donation system" Does it? i did not know that (can you elaborate more on that please millsys) i may remove it very soon...

Seems clean to me i checked through source code
Source Code: https://github.com/216k155/ccminer-phi-anxmod

Zikkson

newbie

Activity: 70

Merit: 0

Its worth that extra hash speed Wink

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3

Quote from: Zikkson on January 22, 2018, 04:11:14 PM

Last version works great on my 6x1060 rig. Benchmark takes more time, especially palgin hsr, but getting 10% better results.

Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.

Results:
Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day
Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day
NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day

I used NiceHash Miner 2 for NiceHash to use that service as it is. Right now im running on MPH and getting the best results, also i will correct values to get clearer results if there will be difference.

yeh benchmark time is 8min per Algo apart from PalginHSR which is 10-18mins

Zikkson

newbie

Activity: 70

Merit: 0

Last version works great on my 6x1060 rig. Benchmark takes more time, especially palgin hsr, but getting 10% better results.

Anyway today i have some results of one week test between miningpoolhub, ahashpool and nicehash for you who want to know which one has better profit. Whole test runs on 6x GTX1060 6GB rig.

Results:
Nemosminer - miningpoolhub -> 0.00158208BTC/day
Nemosminer - ahashpool -> 0.00147477BTC/day
NiceHash Miner 2 - NiceHash -> 0.00135381BTC/day

I used NiceHash Miner 2 for NiceHash to use that service as it is. Right now im running on MPH and getting the best results, also i will correct values to get clearer results if there will be difference.

minerx117

sr. member

Activity: 728

Merit: 256

NemosMiner-v3.8.1.3