Topic: [NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner - page 94. (Read 289464 times)

i have 3rd rig when benchmark my rig crash and auto restart
my 1st and second rig ok no problems

I am assuming you are new to this. The estimated value you are seeing is actually quite correct. That is : if the pool luck, the miners on the pool hashrate on said algo, BTC values, and the value of the coin on various exchanges remain exactly the same for 24 hours.

Yeah - that doesn't happen.

You will see major fluctuations based on those variables.

OK, but the estimates could not be half that, since as I said the estimates are always between $ 32 to $ 42, I think at least I should give $ 25 to $ 27 do you agree? But it's giving 20 and sometimes less.

nothing is wrong...

that is because your using startahashpool.bat (uses current estimate and 24hr estimate API too request profit) ...

try the startahashpool24hr.bat (uses last 24hour Actual API too request profit) i made it for this exact reason i did not like the estimates that MuiltipoolMiner,Sniifdog etc use

P.S v2.4.1 is being tested at the moment has been through 6x10603gb rig is currently running/testing on the 6x1080ti rig if all goes well it will be released 2nite...

v2.4.1
update: ccminerAlexis78
faster hashrate for: lyra2v2,skein,blake2s,keccak,lbry,nist,phi,veltor

Best Regards
Nemo

Type: NVIDIA

Miner                Algorithm           Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
-----                ---------           ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ----
ccminerAlexis78      Blake2s        17,28 GH/s    4,129 0,00413  48,310    0,00024 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvot       Skunk         127,99 MH/s    2,519 0,00252  29,470    0,01968 ahashpool


There is something very wrong with this miner, since it always shows from 32 to 42 US $ day, but in fact what comes in is less than 20 US $ because it gets so low as it actually says there? I think there could be a difference but not so much. Please can anyone tell me why? 

What's happening with this in red, it seems that our colleague above has the same problem, the hashrate down.
3 GTX 1080ti

ccminerAlexis78      Blake2s        17,28 GH/s    3,418 0,00342  39,756    0,00020 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvot       Skunk         127,99 MH/s    2,525 0,00253  29,369    0,01973 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Lyra2RE2      170,94 MH/s    2,438 0,00244  28,350    0,01426 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Skein           2,32 GH/s    2,115 0,00212  24,600    0,00091 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9  Tribus        249,80 MH/s    1,993 0,00199  23,184    0,00798 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Hsr            48,31 MH/s    1,771 0,00177  20,602    0,03667 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      C11            67,65 MH/s    1,706 0,00171  19,842    0,02522 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Nist5         185,27 MH/s    1,543 0,00154  17,948    0,00833 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9  Phi            75,57 MH/s    1,538 0,00154  17,886    0,02035 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvot       Bitcore        61,86 MH/s    1,518 0,00152  17,656    0,02454 ahashpool-
CcminerKlaust        NeoScrypt       3,06 MH/s    1,402 0,00140  16,304    0,45782 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      X17            44,28 MH/s    1,232 0,00123  14,333    0,02783 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvot       Lbry            1,19 GH/s    0,370 0,00037   4,302    0,00031 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Sib            52,07 MH/s    0,356 0,00036   4,142    0,00684 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      MyriadGroestl 270,32 MH/s    0,173 0,00017   2,012    0,00064 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9  Timetravel    106,77 MH/s    0,00

Benchmark result sometimes not consistent....?

Should I benchmark 1 vga or all vga ?

would the result matter?

im having erratic figures....

latest : 5 gtx 1080ti
   Type: NVIDIA

Miner                Algorithm           Speed mBTC/Day BTC/Day USD/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
-----                ---------           ----- -------- ------- ------- ---------- ----
ccminerAlexis78      X17            81.29 MH/s    6.052 0.00605  70.152    0.07445 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9  Phi           161.70 MH/s    5.005 0.00500  58.007    0.03095 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Blake2s        34.03 GH/s    4.906 0.00491  56.870    0.00014 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      C11           142.98 MH/s    4.511 0.00451  52.286    0.03155 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Sib           107.69 MH/s    4.401 0.00440  51.016    0.04087 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Lyra2RE2      346.59 MH/s    4.176 0.00418  48.409    0.01205 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvot       Skunk         260.62 MH/s    3.816 0.00382  44.226    0.01464 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Nist5         404.51 MH/s    3.693 0.00369  42.808    0.00913 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Skein           4.57 GH/s    3.338 0.00334  38.688    0.00073 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvot       Bitcore       122.30 MH/s    3.159 0.00316  36.617    0.02583 ahashpool-
CcminerKlaust        NeoScrypt       7.11 MH/s    2.519 0.00252  29.197    0.35411 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      Hsr           101.39 MH/s    2.227 0.00223  25.819    0.02197 ahashpool-
CcminerAlexis78cuda9 Xevan          28.40 MH/s    2.062 0.00206  23.898    0.07260 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9  Tribus        508.45 MH/s    1.912 0.00191  22.159    0.00376 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvot       Lbry            2.33 GH/s    0.839 0.00084   9.727    0.00036 ahashpool-
ccminerAlexis78      MyriadGroestl 593.35 MH/s    0.255 0.00026   2.957    0.00043 ahashpool-
CcminerTpruvotcuda9  Timetravel    201.50 MH/s    0.000 0.00000   0.000            -



FROM AHASH site:

neoscrypt   4233   9   CRC   2098   2.9 Gh/s   1%   0.48062
blake2s   5766   3   XVG   361   5.9 Th/s   1%   0.11976
xevan   3739   1   BSD   33   330.2 Mh/s   1%   0.10442
m7m   6033   1   XMG   35   1.5 Mh/s   1%   0.06681

---


Should I go with what is highest on ahash site?

No worrys

you can change currency to your local currency i live in New Zealand and use -Currency NZD

i have tested GPB NZD AUD USD im sure more will work...

Best Regards
Nemo

Thanks guytechie,
That Question was from someone else, I'd always rebench if different miners were used or updated.

No my other Q was about currency and location - but meh just left it on usd and us

If everything is identical, I don't see why not.  Especially if you already know performance is exactly the same across the board.

For your earlier question of re-using the old version stats, probably not a good idea.  Different versions of miners, also some miners may have been dropped, maybe name was changed, etc.

It may get you out of the benchmarking hole quicker, but it may not be accurate.

Thanks paskevic.
And yes I was only using ahash

Is it Ok to copy over the hashrates/benchmarks to several identical machines, I'm assuming it will be.

active time is for yourself like for example i get up in the morning and i can see for how long which algo has been running talking about phi maybe it isn't working as supposed on hashrefinery only. i always benchmark using hashrefinery as it reaches peak hashrate much faster than ahashpool.

thanks i know about the "reported active" showing higher results... i will fix that doesn't effect profit or hashing...

im not getting that phi error at all on my rigs... phi is benching and running great..  what pool were you trying?

Best Regards
Nemo

new bench

Hi, guys! Newb question, but does Nemosminer support claymore or another ethash miner?

Active time is def wrong, is that used for anything though?
As for phi, it worked fine for me

https://i.imgur.com/MtWymd6.jpg

Any way to integrate XMR-Stak so I can mine using my Ryzen 1700 on Cryptonight?

Fantastic!! 

currently testing ver2.4 and can instantly see that reported active time of every algorithm is wrong. says 16s for each 240?sec benchmark. also "exited" time is wrong. edit: benchmarking stopped on phi as it did not have any stratum specified in it command line. sorry but this 2.4 ver should be labeled as alpha at best back to 2.3c beta.